Distribuição espaço-temporal e dieta de Lontra longicaudis (Carnivora: mustelidae) em região costeira do sul do RS

A lontra-neotropical (Lontra longicaudis) é um carnívoro semi-aquático, com adaptações morfológicas para viver nos mais diversos habitats aquáticos, como rios, lagos, mangues e estuários. Além disso, também é encontrada em ambientes marinhos, onde se alimenta, ou apenas transita. São carnívoros que se alimentam principalmente de peixes e crustáceos. O objetivo desde trabalho foi verificar a utilização de ambientes de influência do mar, por L. longicaudis, no litoral sul do RS. A área de estudo foi a Praia do Cassino, onde foram percorridos seis cursos d’água (sangradouros), por cerca de 1 km em cada, à procura de fezes de lontras, entre dezembro de 2009 e novembro de 2010. As fezes foram analisadas para determinar a distribuição espaço-temporal e a dieta das lontras. Foram encontradas 75 fezes de lontras, sendo a maior quantidade no inverno e outono, diminuindo na primavera e verão. As maiores quantidades de fezes foram encontradas nos sangradouros R7 e R9, por estes serem mais extensos e profundos. As menores quantidades de fezes nos sangradouros R4, R8 e R10 se deve ao fato de estes serem menores e menos profundos. Os peixes foram as principais presas das lontras, seguidos pelos crustáceos, anfíbios, moluscos, insetos, aves e mamíferos. Os peixes foram mais predados na maior parte das estações, exceto no outono, quando os crustáceos predominaram. No inverno, os anfíbios predominaram sobre os crustáceos, sendo o segundo grupo mais predado. Os peixes mais consumidos foram Perciformes e Siluriformes. Foi verificado que as lontras utilizam os sangradouros da Praia do Cassino, mesmo estes não possuindo vegetação e substrato mais favoráveis à espécie. A maior utilização dos ambientes durante o inverno provavelmente se deve ao fato de neste período os sangradouros estarem mais profundos. A dieta das lontras variou ao longo do ano, possivelmente conforme a disponibilidade das presas.

Sea otter predation and the distribution of bivalve prey in the Elkhorn Slough National Estuarine Research Reserve

The California sea otter population is gradually expanding in size and geographic range and is consequently invading new feeding grounds, including bays and estuaries that are home to extensive populations of bivalve prey. One such area is the Elkhorn Slough, where otters have apparently established a spring and summer communal feeding and resting area. In anticipation of future otter foraging in the slough, an extensive baseline database on bivalve densities, size distributions, biomasses, and burrow depths has been established for three potential bivalve prey species, Saxidomus nuttalli, Tresus nutallii, and Zirphaea pilsbryi. In 1986, the Elkhorn Slough otters were foraging predominately at two areas immediately east and west of the Highway 1 bridge (Skipper's and the PG&E Outfall). Extensive subtidal populations of Saxidomus nuttalli and Tresus nuttallii occur in these areas. Shell records collected at these study areas indicated that sea otters were foraging selectively on Saxidomus over Tresus. The reason for this apparent preference was not clear. At the Skipper's study site, 51% of the shell record was composed of Saxidomus, yet this species accounted for only 16% of the in situ biomass, and only 39% of the available clams. Tresus represented 49% of the shell record at Skipper's, yet this species accounted for 84% of the in situ biomass and 61% of the available clams. There was no difference in mean burrow depth between the two species at this site so availability does not explain the disparity in consumption. At the PG&E Outfall, Saxidomus represents 66% of the in situ biomass and 81% of the available clams, while Tresus accounts for 34% of the in situ biomass and 19% of the available clams. Saxidomus accounts for 96% of the shell record at this site vs. 4% for Tresus, again indicating that the otters were preying on Saxidomus out of proportion to their density or biomass. High densities and biomasses of a third species, Zirphaea pilsbryi, occur in areas where sea otters were observed to be foraging, yet no cast-off Zirphaea shells were found. Although it is possible this species was not represented in the shell record because the otters were simply chewing up the shells, it is more likely this species is avoided by sea otters. There were relatively few sea otters in the Elkhorn Slough in 1986 compared to the previous two years. This, coupled with high bivalve densities, precluded any quantitative comparison of bivalve densities before and after the 1986 sea otter occupation. Qualitative observations made during the course of this study, and quantitative observations from previous studies indicate that, after 3 years, sea otters are not yet significantly affecting bivalve densities in the Elkhorn Slough.

Spatial, environmental and human influences on the distribution of otter (Lutra lutra) in the Spanish provinces

In a previous survey of otters ( Lutra lutra L. 1758) in Spain, different causes were invoked to explain the frequency of the species in each province. To find common causes of the distribution of the otter in Spain, we recorded a number of spatial, environmental and human variables in each Spanish province. We then performed a stepwise linear multiple regression of the proportion of positive sites of otter in the Spanish provinces separately on each of the three groups of variables. Geographic longitude, January air humidity, soil permeability and highway density were the variables selected. A linear regression of the proportion of otter presence on these variables explained 62.4% of the variance. We then used the selected variables in a partial regression analysis to specify which proportions of the variation are explained exclusively by spatial, environmental and human factors, and which proportions are attributable to interactions between these components. Pure environmental effects accounted for only 5.5% of the variation, while pure spatial and pure human effects explained 18% and 9.7%, respectively. Shared variation among the components totalled 29.2%, of which 10.9% was explained by the interaction between environmental and spatial factors. Human factors explained globally less variance than spatial and environmental ones, but the pure human influence was higher than the pure environmental one. We concluded that most of the variation in the proportion of occurrences of otter in Spanish provinces is spatially structured, and that environmental factors have more influence on otter presence than human ones; however, the human influence on otter distribution is less structured in space, and thus can be more disruptive. This effect of large infrastructures on wild populations must be taken into account when planning large-scale conservation policies