Off-label utilization of antidepressants

Rapport de synthèse : De nombreuses études sont effectuées sur les antidépresseurs avant leur mise sur le marché, puis des règles précises sont établies pour leur prescription dans des indications délimitées. Leur utilisation dans des indications «off-label » (hors indication officiellement admise) manque souvent de validation par des bases de données scientifiques et leur prescription se base le plus souvent sur un consensus proposé par des experts. Le but du présent travail a été d'étudier les habitudes de prescription de psychiatres d'hôpitaux en ce qui concerne les antidépresseurs, en comparant des patients traités pour une dépression et des troubles anxieux avec des patients recevant un traitement «off-label ». Pour cette étude, les données d'utilisation de médicaments sont celles recueillies lors de 6 jours de référence, entre avril 1999 et novembre 2001, à l'hôpital psychiatrique de Lausanne (Suisse) comprenant 98 lits. La prescription de médicaments chez 174 patients a été prise en compte. Tandis que le diagnostic n'influençait pas le choix entre des nouveaux et anciens antidépresseurs, les patients présentant un trouble anxieux avaient un risque 4.5 fois (p < 0.05) plus élevé et les patients présentant un autre diagnostic 8 fois plus élevé de recevoir une comédication antipsychotique, en comparaison avec des patients dont le diagnostic primaire était un trouble dépressif. De plus, les patients recevant comme comédication un hypnotique non-benzodiazépine avaient moins de risque que l'on prescrive un ancien antidépresseur (p < 0.05). Alors que les patients avec un trouble anxieux et ceux souffrant d'une dépression majeure recevaient un antidépresseur à des doses comparables, les patients répondant à une indication off-label étaient de préférence traités avec des doses plus faibles. Les résultats de cette étude suggèrent que les psychiatres d'hôpitaux développent des préférences en ce qui concerne le choix de la classe d'antidépresseurs, et qu'ils les utilisent alors aussi bien dans des indications reconnues que non-reconnues. Puis ils semblent adapter la dose et la comédication en tenant compte du diagnostic, ce qui confirme l'hypothèse initiale de l'étude,

Use of linezolid in neonatal and pediatric inpatient facilities-results of a retrospective multicenter survey

The purpose of this investigation was to describe the use of linezolid in pediatric inpatient facilities. A retrospective multicenter survey including data from nine participating tertiary care pediatric inpatient facilities in Germany and Austria was undertaken. Data on 126 off-label linezolid treatment courses administered to 108 patients were documented. The survey comprises linezolid treatment in a broad spectrum of clinical indications to children of all age groups; the median age was 6.8 years (interquartile range 0.6-15.5 years; range 0.1-21.2 years; ten patients were older than 18 years of age but were treated in pediatric inpatient units). Of the 126 treatment courses, 27 (21%) were administered to preterm infants, 64 (51%) to pediatric oncology patients, and 5% to patients soon after liver transplantation. In 25%, the infection was related to a medical device. Linezolid iv treatment was started after intensive pre-treatment (up to 11 other antibiotics for a median duration of 14 days) and changed to enteral administration in only 4% of all iv courses. In 39 (53%) of 74 courses administered to children older than 1 week and younger than 12 years of age, the dose was not adjusted to age-related pharmacokinetic parameters. In only 17 courses (13%) was a pediatric infectious disease consultant involved in the clinical decision algorithm. Linezolid seemed to have contributed to a favorable outcome in 70% of all treatment courses in this survey. Although retrospective, this survey generates interesting data on the off-label use of linezolid and highlights several important clinical aspects in which the use of this rescue antibiotic in children might be improved.

Perceptions and attitudes of Jordanian paediatricians towards off-label paediatric prescribing

Objective To assess current experiences and attitudes of hospital based paediatricians towards off-label medicine prescribing. Setting Paediatric hospital wards and out-patient clinics. Design A prospective, questionnaire based study. Results A 30 item questionnaire was sent to 300 hospital based paediatricians and 250 (83%) were returned completed. Over 69% of responders were familiar with the term off-label medicines. However, only 28% were knowingly prescribing off-label medicines to children. The majority of respondents (90%) expressed concerns about the safety and efficacy of off-label medicines. Only 15% had observed Adverse Drug Reactions, and 31% a treatment failure. The vast majority of respondents (83%) did not obtain informed consent or tell parents they were prescribing off label medicines to their children. Conclusions Off-label prescribing of medicines to children is a familiar concept to the majority of paediatricians in Jordan although only a smaller number are aware that it is common in their practice. Respondents showed concern about off label prescribing, although the majority do not consider it necessary to inform parents. More comprehensive research is needed in this area in Jordan and other Middle Eastern countries.

Prescripción off-label inducida: responsabilidad ¿compartida?

La prescripción off-label es una práctica tan frecuente como incorrectamente manejada por los pediatras. Solo dos de cada diez pediatras completan todos los pasos necesarios para el registro correcto del uso off-label de medicamentos para niños. Es necesario conocer conceptos básicos relacionados con esta práctica, especialmente cuando se trata de una prescripción inducida, por sus connotaciones éticas y legales.

Medicamentos para Crianças A realidade actual na União Europeia

Muitos medicamentos são ainda actualmente utilizados em crianças sem terem sido suficientemente estudados nesta população. Este facto tem como consequência a utilização de medicamentos não autorizados e em regime de “off-label” (para outras indicações terapêuticas, dose ou posologia que não as aprovadas durante a avaliação que antecede a entrada do medicamento no mercado). A utilização de medicamentos não aprovados em pediatria, embora legítima, é uma preocupação grave e real. A proposta de Regulamentação Europeia recentemente aprovada pelo Parlamento Europeu tem como objectivo a resolução desta problemática.

Safety and efficacy of fenproporex for obesity treatment: a systematic review

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE To evaluate clinical evidence on the safety and efficacy of fenproporex for treating obesity. METHODS MEDLINE, LILACS and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register were searched as well as references cited by articles and relevant documents. Two authors independently assessed the studies for inclusion and regarding risk of bias, collected data, and accuracy. Eligible studies were all those placebo-controlled that provided data on the efficacy and safety of Fenproporex to treat obesity. RESULTS Only four controlled studies met the inclusion criteria. One randomized, placebo-controlled trial on Fenproporex was found on electronic databases. Three placebo-controlled studies (in non-indexed journals) were identified by hand-searching. Patients with cardiovascular and other comorbidities were excluded in all studies. Trials lasted from 40 to 364 days and doses ranged from 20 to 33.6 mg/d. All controlled studies found that weight loss among Fenproporex-treated patients was greater than that produced by the placebo, but drug effect was modest. Fenproporex produced additional weight reductions of 4.7 kg (one year), 3.8 kg (six months) and 1.55 kg (two months) in average, in relation to diet and exercise only (three trials). Insomnia, irritability, and anxiety were the most frequently reported side effects in the four studies. CONCLUSIONS There is a paucity of randomized, placebo-controlled trials on Fenproporex and those identified here present major methodological flaws. These studies suggest that Fenproporex is modestly effective in promoting weight loss. Nonetheless, they failed to provide evidence that it reduces obesity-associated morbidity and mortality. Data from these studies are insufficient to determine the risk-benefit profile of Fenproporex. Abuse potential and amphetamine-like adverse effects are causes for concern.

2015 Update on Acute Adverse Reactions to Gadolinium based Contrast Agents in Cardiovascular MR. Large Multi-National and Multi-Ethnical Population Experience With 37788 Patients From the EuroCMR Registry.

OBJECTIVES: Specifically we aim to demonstrate that the results of our earlier safety data hold true in this much larger multi-national and multi-ethnical population. BACKGROUND: We sought to re-evaluate the frequency, manifestations, and severity of acute adverse reactions associated with administration of several gadolinium- based contrast agents during routine CMR on a European level. METHODS: Multi-centre, multi-national, and multi-ethnical registry with consecutive enrolment of patients in 57 European centres. RESULTS: During the current observation 37,788 doses of Gadolinium based contrast agent were administered to 37,788 patients. The mean dose was 24.7 ml (range 5-80 ml), which is equivalent to 0.123 mmol/kg (range 0.01 - 0.3 mmol/kg). Forty-five acute adverse reactions due to contrast administration occurred (0.12%). Most reactions were classified as mild (43 of 45) according to the American College of Radiology definition. The most frequent complaints following contrast administration were rashes and hives (15 of 45), followed by nausea (10 of 45) and flushes (10 of 45). The event rate ranged from 0.05% (linear non-ionic agent gadodiamide) to 0.42% (linear ionic agent gadobenate dimeglumine). Interestingly, we also found different event rates between the three main indications for CMR ranging from 0.05% (risk stratification in suspected CAD) to 0.22% (viability in known CAD). CONCLUSIONS: The current data indicate that the results of the earlier safety data hold true in this much larger multi-national and multi-ethnical population. Thus, the "off-label" use of Gadolinium based contrast in cardiovascular MR should be regarded as safe concerning the frequency, manifestation and severity of acute events.

Resultados de la terapia antiangiogenica con Ranibizumab en retinopatia del prematuro: revisión sistemática.

Introducción: La retinopatía del prematuro (ROP) se presenta hasta en el 73% de los neonatos pretérmino por debajo de la semana 27, los agentes antiangiogénicos se presentan como una herramienta para su tratamiento con resultados prometedores. En el presente estudio se pretendió evaluar los resultados de la terapia antiangiogénica con ranibizumab en pacientes con retinopatía del prematuro según la evidencia descrita hasta la fecha. Metodología: se realizó una revisión sistemática de literatura con componente meta-analítico de los datos sociodemográficos y clínicos, incluyendo todos los artículos sobre el tema sin límite de fecha de publicación. Se usó una estrategia de búsqueda en diferentes bases de datos, todos los estudios relacionados con el pronóstico de la enfermedad fueron elegibles. Resultados: Se encontraron un total de 13 artículos que cumplieron criterios de elegibilidad para su inclusión, que incluyeron 75 pacientes en total (133 ojos evaluados). La edad promedio al nacimiento fue 23.6 semanas, la edad al momento de aplicación de tratamiento fue 36.3 semanas. 11/13 artículos reportaron que el tratamiento con ranibizumab fue satisfactorio en términos de resolución completa de la enfermedad sin efectos secundarios (64 pacientes) Discusión: Los resultados de la terapia con ranibizumab para retinopatía del prematuro según la evidencia hasta la fecha permiten recomendar el uso de terapia antiangiogénica con el fin de mejorar la salud visual a mediano y largo plazo y por ende disminución en la prevalencia de ceguera por esta causa.

Avaliação do uso profilático de omeprazol em pacientes internados no hospital estadual Américo Brasiliense

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)

Low-dose recombinant factor VIIa for massive bleeding: A single centre observational cohort study with 73 patients

recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) is used off-label for massive bleeding. There is no convincing evidence of the benefits of this practice and the minimal effective dose is unknown. The aim of the study was to evaluate our in-house guideline recommending a low dose of 60 μg/kg for off-label use of rFVIIa.

[Thrombolysis of the middle cerebral artery]

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is the evidence-based treatment of acute ischemic stroke in the first 3 h after symptom onset (IVT 3-4.5 h: off-label use with informed consent of the patient). However, intra-arterial thrombolysis (IAT) results in higher recanalization rates of the middle cerebral artery compared to IVT. Therefore it seems reasonable to apply IAT in addition or instead of IVT up to 6 h after symptom onset.

Rotational atherectomy followed by drug-eluting stent implantation (Rota-DES): a rational approach for complex calcified coronary lesions

Rotational atherectomy has been regaining interest over the last couple of years after it almost has disappeared from most interventional catheterization laboratories for several years due to failure to prove its original concept of improving long term results of percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) as was repeatedly shown in studies in the 1990s. Its revival coupled the introduction of drug-eluting stents (DES); these devices have led to treating much more complex lesions and high-risk patients by PCI. However, real-world experience suggested that off-label use of DES is associated with a higher rate of early and late stent thrombosis. Therefore, more attention is now being paid to the initial implantation technique of DES including aggressive lesion preparation to facilitate stent delivery and expansion. The limited studies with rot-ablation and DES showed promising results with no long term safety concerns. In these studies, a subtle observation was made suggesting that rot-ablation prior to DES implantation in such lesions may have an add-on effect on long term outcome compared to DES alone. An ongoing multicenter study is investigating such effect among complex calcified coronary lesions. Even if this additive benefit does not prove true, rot-ablation remains an efficient tool for preparing certain lesions to facilitate effective and safe DES implantation. Therefore, interventional training programs should focus on this difficult technique to bridge the gap of experience which resulted from neglecting it for several years. In this regard, dedicated courses at experienced sites as well as medical simulation may be appropriate.

Diagnosis and treatment of peripartum bleeding

Severe peripartum hemorrhage (PPH) contributes to maternal morbidity and mortality and is one of the most frequent emergencies in obstetrics, occurring at a prevalence of 0.5-5.0%. Detection of antepartum risk factors is essential in order to implement preventive measures. Proper training of obstetric staff and publication of recommendations and guidelines can effectively reduce the frequency of PPH and its resulting morbidity and mortality. Therefore, an interdisciplinary expert committee was formed, with members from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland, to summarize recent scientific findings. An up-to-date presentation of the importance of embolization and of the diagnosis of coagulopathy in PPH is provided. Furthermore, the committee recommends changes in the management of PPH including new surgical options and the off-label use of recombinant factor VIIa.

[Safety of treatment with tacrolimus ointment for anterior segment inflammatory diseases]

BACKGROUND: The off-label use of topical tacrolimus (Protopic) for inflammatory external eye diseases is gaining popularity. However, there are no reports on the safety profile of this new treatment option. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We treated six patients with different inflammatory eye diseases with topical tacrolimus (Protopic 0.03 %) as off-label use in addition to the conventional anti-inflammatory treatment. Patients were interviewed for side effects and serum drug concentrations were measured under steady state conditions one hour after topical application of tacrolimus ointment. RESULTS: Two patients reported a slight burning sensation immediately after application, in one patient we found a slight worsening of the dry eye problems. No patient abandoned the treatment due to side effects. Serum drug concentrations remained below the analytical threshold in all cases (< 1.5 ng/ml). CONCLUSIONS: Tacrolimus for the topical treatment of anterior segment inflammatory eye diseases is well tolerated without detectable systemic drug resorption.