A comparison of apical root resorption after orthodontic treatment with surgical exposure and traction of maxillary impacted canines versus that without impactions.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Orthodontic management of maxillary canine impaction (MCI), including forced eruption, may result in significant root resorption; however, the association between MCI and orthodontically induced root resorption (OIRR) is not yet sufficiently established. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to comparatively evaluate the severity of OIRR of maxillary incisors in orthodontically treated patients with MCI. Additionally, impaction characteristics were associated with OIRR severity. SUBJECTS AND METHODS The sample comprised 48 patients undergoing fixed-appliance treatment-24 with unilateral/bilateral MCI and 24 matched controls without impaction. OIRR was calculated using pre- and post-operative panoramic tomograms. The orientation of eruption path, height, sector location, and follicle/tooth ratio of the impacted canine were also recorded. Mann-Whitney U-test and univariate and multivariate linear mixed models were used to test for the associations of interest. RESULTS Maxillary central left incisor underwent more OIRR in the impaction group (mean difference = 0.58mm, P = 0.04). Overall, the impaction group had 0.38mm more OIRR compared to the control (95% confidence interval, CI: 0.03, 0.74; P = 0.04). However, multivariate analysis demonstrated no difference in the amount of OIRR between impaction and non-impaction groups overall. A positive association between OIRR and initial root length was observed (95% CI: 0.08, 0.27; P < 0.001). The severity of canine impaction was not found to be a significant predictor of OIRR. LIMITATIONS This study was a retrospective study and used panoramic tomograms for OIRR measurements. CONCLUSIONS This study indicates that MCI is a weak OIRR predictor. Interpretation of the results needs caution due to the observational nature of the present study.

Surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment

BACKGROUND A range of surgical and non-surgical techniques have received increasing attention in recent years in an effort to reduce the duration of a course of orthodontic treatment. Various surgical techniques have been used; however, uncertainty exists in relation to the effectiveness of these procedures and the possible adverse effects related to them. OBJECTIVES To assess the effects of surgically assisted orthodontics on the duration and outcome of orthodontic treatment. SEARCH METHODS We searched the following electronic databases: the Cochrane Oral Health Group's Trials Register (to 10 September 2014), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library 2014, Issue 8), MEDLINE via OVID (1946 to 10 September 2014), EMBASE via OVID (1980 to 10 September 2014), LILACS via BIREME (1980 to 10 September 2014), metaRegister of Controlled Trials (to 10 September 2014), ClinicalTrials.gov (to 10 September 2014), and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (to 10 September 2014). We checked the reference lists of all trials identified for further studies. There were no restrictions regarding language or date of publication in the electronic searches. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the effect of surgical adjunctive procedures for accelerating tooth movement compared with conventional treatment (no surgical adjunctive procedure). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS At least two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias in the trials and extracted data. We used the fixed-effect model and expressed results as mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We investigated heterogeneity with reference to both clinical and methodological factors. MAIN RESULTS We included four RCTs involving a total of 57 participants ranging in age from 11 to 33 years. The interventions evaluated were corticotomies to facilitate orthodontic space closure or alignment of an ectopic maxillary canine, with the effect of repeated surgical procedures assessed in one of these studies. The studies did not report directly on the primary outcome as prespecified in our protocol: duration of orthodontic treatment, number of visits during active treatment (scheduled and unscheduled) and duration of visits. The main outcome assessed within the trials was the rate of tooth movement, with periodontal effects assessed in one trial and pain assessed in one trial. A maximum of just three trials with small sample sizes were available for each comparison and outcome. We assessed all of the studies as being at unclear risk of bias.Tooth movement was found to be slightly quicker with surgically assisted orthodontics in comparison with conventional treatment over periods of one month (MD 0.61 mm; 95% CI 0.49 to 0.72; P value < 0.001) and three months (MD 2.03 mm, 95% CI 1.52 to 2.54; P value < 0.001). Our results and conclusions should be interpreted with caution given the small number of included studies. Information on adverse events was sought; however, no data were reported in the included studies. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS This review found that there is limited research concerning the effectiveness of surgical interventions to accelerate orthodontic treatment, with no studies directly assessing our prespecified primary outcome. The available evidence is of low quality, which indicates that further research is likely to change the estimate of the effect. Based on measured outcomes in the short-term, these procedures do appear to show promise as a means of accelerating tooth movement. It is therefore possible that these procedures may prove useful; however, further prospective research comprising assessment of the entirety of treatment with longer follow-up is required to confirm any possible benefit.

Computerized Interactive Orthodontic Treatment Planning

Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Certificate in Orthodontics, Dept. of Orthodontics, University of Connecticut Health Center, 1975.

Alcohol, tobacco, and other drug use by women in the Illinois child welfare system : prevalence - treatment need - impact on children.

"This report represents a joint effort between the Illinois Department of Alcoholism and Substance Abuse (DASA) and Department of Children and Family Services (DCFS). The study examined alcohol, tobaccco, and other drug abuse (ATODA) and need for treatment among adults involved with the child welfare system in Illinois. The purpose of the study was to provide data on the relationships between ATODA and child abuse and neglect"--P. iii.

The influence of gender on perceived treatment need among a community sample of substance users

Purpose: Most individuals do not perceive a need for substance use treatment despite meeting diagnostic criteria for substance use disorders and they are least likely to pursue treatment voluntarily. There are also those who perceive a need for treatment and yet do not pursue it. This study aimed to understand which factors increase the likelihood of perceiving a need for treatment for individuals who meet diagnostic criteria for substance use disorders in the hopes to better assist with more targeted efforts for gender-specific treatment recruitment and retention. Using Andersen and Newman's (1973/2005) model of individual determinants of healthcare utilization, the central hypothesis of the study was that gender moderates the relationship between substance use problem severity and perceived treatment need, so that women with increasing problems due to their use of substances are more likely than men to perceive a need for treatment. Additional predisposing and enabling factors from Andersen and Newman's (1973/2005) model were included in the study to understand their impact on perceived need. Method: The study was a secondary data analysis of the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) using logistic regression. The weighted sample consisted of a total 20,077,235 American household residents (The unweighted sample was 5,484 participants). Results of the logistic regression were verified using Relogit software for rare events logistic regression due to the rare event of perceived treatment need (King & Zeng, 2001a; 2001b). Results: The moderating effect of female gender was not found. Conversely, men were significantly more likely than women to perceive a need for treatment as substance use problem severity increased. The study also found that a number of factors such as race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, age, marital status, education, co-occurring mental health disorders, and prior treatment history differently impacted the likelihood of perceiving a need for treatment among men and women. Conclusion: Perceived treatment need among individuals who meet criteria for substance use disorders is rare, but identifying factors associated with an increased likelihood of perceiving need for treatment can help the development of gender-appropriate outreach and recruitment for social work treatment, and public health messages.

The medico-legal importance of establishing human identity by palatal rugoscopy: evaluation of the immutability and individuality of palatal rugae under the influence of ante mortem orthodontic treatment

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

The Influence of Gender on Perceived Treatment Need among a Community Sample of Substance Users

Purpose: Most individuals do not perceive a need for substance use treatment despite meeting diagnostic criteria for substance use disorders and they are least likely to pursue treatment voluntarily. There are also those who perceive a need for treatment and yet do not pursue it. This study aimed to understand which factors increase the likelihood of perceiving a need for treatment for individuals who meet diagnostic criteria for substance use disorders in the hopes to better assist with more targeted efforts for gender-specific treatment recruitment and retention. Using Andersen and Newman’s (1973/2005) model of individual determinants of healthcare utilization, the central hypothesis of the study was that gender moderates the relationship between substance use problem severity and perceived treatment need, so that women with increasing problems due to their use of substances are more likely than men to perceive a need for treatment. Additional predisposing and enabling factors from Andersen and Newman’s (1973/2005) model were included in the study to understand their impact on perceived need. Method: The study was a secondary data analysis of the 2010 National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH) using logistic regression. The weighted sample consisted of a total 20,077,235 American household residents (The unweighted sample was 5,484 participants). Results of the logistic regression were verified using Relogit software for rare events logistic regression due to the rare event of perceived treatment need (King & Zeng, 2001a; 2001b). Results: The moderating effect of female gender was not found. Conversely, men were significantly more likely than women to perceive a need for treatment as substance use problem severity increased. The study also found that a number of factors such as race, ethnicity, socioeconomic status, age, marital status, education, co-occurring mental health disorders, and prior treatment history differently impacted the likelihood of perceiving a need for treatment among men and women. Conclusion: Perceived treatment need among individuals who meet criteria for substance use disorders is rare, but identifying factors associated with an increased likelihood of perceiving need for treatment can help the development of gender-appropriate outreach and recruitment for social work treatment, and public health messages.

Impacto das etapas do tratamento orto-cirúrgico na qualidade de vida de pacientes portadores de deformidades dentofaciais

Pacientes portadores de deformidades dentofaciais podem relatar dificuldades de mastigação e fala, desordens temporomandibulares, preocupação com a imagem corporal e baixa autoestima. Frequentemente, buscam tratamento orto-cirúrgico pela motivação de obter melhora notável nos aspectos estético, funcional e psicossocial. A evidência atualmente disponível sobre os benefícios na qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde bucal desta modalidade terapêutica ainda não é conclusiva, devido à diversidade de metodologias adotadas entre os estudos existentes, majoritariamente realizados na América do Norte, Europa, Oriente Médio e Ásia. Logo, é essencial utilizar instrumentos específicos para avaliar os efeitos desta modalidade de tratamento também na vida diária dos pacientes brasileiros. O propósito do presente estudo transversal foi determinar o impacto que o tratamento orto-cirúrgico exerce sobre a percepção de qualidade de vida dos pacientes portadores de deformidades dentofaciais, bem como a influência exercida pelo gênero, idade, renda, escolaridade e características da má oclusão, nas quatro etapas inerentes a esta modalidade de tratamento: (1) Inicial; (2) Preparo ortodôntico para a cirurgia; (3) Pós-cirúrgico; e (4) Contenção (pós-tratamento). Duzentos e cinquenta e quatro pacientes foram entrevistados em três importantes centros de atendimento na cidade do Rio de Janeiro. A qualidade de vida foi avaliada pelos questionários OHIP-14 (Oral Health Impact Profile - Short Version) e pelo OQLQ (Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire) em suas versões traduzidas e validadas para o português. A gravidade da má oclusão e autopercepção estética foram avaliadas com base no Índice de Necessidade de Tratamento Ortodôntico (IOTN) e pelo Índice de Estética Dental (DAI). A análise dos dados foi efetuada pelos testes qui-quadrado, Kruskal-Wallis e modelos de regressão binomial negativa múltipla. Os pacientes dos quatro grupos foram semelhantes em relação ao gênero (p = 0,463), escolaridade (p = 0,276) e renda familiar (p = 0,100). Entre os entrevistados houve o predomínio de mulheres, com ensino médio completo e renda familiar entre 2 e 3 salários mínimos, portadores de má oclusão de Classe III de Angle grave. No modelo de regressão binomial negativa ajustado para os fatores gênero, idade, renda familiar e escolaridade, a qualidade de vida aferida pelo OHIP-14 demonstrou que o grupo Inicial sofreu impactos mais negativos do que os grupos Pós-cirúrgico, Preparo e Contenção; o OQLQ indicou que o grupo Inicial sofreu impactos mais negativos do que os grupos Preparo, Pós-cirúrgico e Contenção, nesta sequência. Não foi detectada influência da idade, renda e escolaridade nestes resultados. Foi observado que o gênero feminino sofreu mais impacto negativo na qualidade de vida, principalmente nas dimensões relativas à função e a aspectos sociais. Concluiu-se que os pacientes que finalizaram o tratamento orto-cirúrgico apresentaram como benefícios menores impactos na qualidade de vida específica e relacionada à saúde bucal, melhor autopercepção estética e menor gravidade da má oclusão, em comparação aos pacientes nas etapas pré e pós-cirúrgica e aos pacientes portadores de deformidades dentofaciais em busca de tratamento.

Qualidade de vida em pacientes com más oclusões de Classe III tratados com o protocolo do benefício antecipado

O protocolo do benefício antecipado é uma modalidade de tratamento ortocirúrgico que não envolve o preparo ortodôntico prévio. De acordo com os preceitos da Odontologia baseada em evidências, é essencial que se conheça o impacto dessa modalidade de tratamento na vida diária dos pacientes, uma vez que, para ser considerada viável, deve-se comprovar que ela oferece benefícios significativos para a qualidade de vida. Esse estudo objetivou conhecer os efeitos do tratamento ortocirúrgico com o protocolo do benefício antecipado na qualidade de vida e na autopercepção estética dos pacientes, durante dois anos de acompanhamento, e compará-los com os percebidos pelos pacientes tratados pela técnica tradicional. A amostra foi constituída por dezesseis pacientes, sendo oito no grupo tratado com o benefício antecipado (GBA) e oito no grupo tratado com a técnica ortocirúrgica tradicional. A qualidade de vida dos pacientes foi avaliada com três questionários: o OQLQ (Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaire), o OHIP-14 (Oral Health Impact Profile Short Version) e o SF-36 (Medical Outcomes Study 36 Item Short-Form Health Survey), em suas versões traduzidas e validadas para o português, e a autopercepção estética e a gravidade da má oclusão foram avaliadas com o Índice de Necessidade de Tratamento Ortodôntico (IOTN). Os exames foram repetidos em sete momentos de avaliação dos participantes: no exame inicial (T0), um mês depois do início do tratamento (T1), três meses depois do início do tratamento (T2), seis meses depois do início do tratamento (T3), um ano depois do início do tratamento e dois anos após o início do tratamento ou no término do tratamento ortocirúrgico (T5). Para ambos os grupos, houve um tempo pós-operatório (TPO) que foi realizado entre duas e três semanas após a cirurgia ortognática. A análise dos dados foi realizada com os testes de Mann-Whitney e de Friedman. Os pacientes do grupo GBA tiveram uma redução significativa no OQLQ (p<0,001) e no OHIP-14 (p<0,001) após dois anos de avaliação. Essa melhora foi progressiva e iniciada após a realização da cirurgia ortognática. O SF-36 apresentou melhoras significativas nas dimensões de capacidade funcional, limitação por aspectos físicos e aspectos sociais (p<0,001). A autopercepção estética comportou-se de maneira similar, com uma melhora progressiva e significativa (p<0,001), acompanhada de uma melhora significativa na gravidade da má oclusão (p<0,001). Porém os indivíduos que removeram o aparelho tiveram OHRQoL e autopercepção estética melhores em relação aos pacientes que não finalizaram o tratamento no período de dois anos no grupo GBA (N=4). No grupo GTT nenhum paciente foi operado após os dois anos de acompanhamento, e pioras significativas foram observadas no OQLQ (p<0,001) e no OHIP-14 (p<0,001) e na autopercepção estética (p<0,001). O CPO-D não teve alteração significativa para nenhum dos dois grupos. Concluiu-se que o tratamento ortocirúrgico com o protocolo do benefício antecipado gerou efeitos mais positivos na qualidade de vida, na autopercepção estética e na gravidade da má oclusão do que o tratamento ortocirúrgico tradicional após dois anos.