About the Multi Criteria Ranging Problem in the Fuzzy Environment

Decision making and technical decision analysis demand computer-aided techniques and therefore more and more support by formal techniques. In recent years fuzzy decision analysis and related techniques gained importance as an efficient method for planning and optimization applications in fields like production planning, financial and economical modeling and forecasting or classification. It is also known, that the hierarchical modeling of the situation is one of the most popular modeling method. It is shown, how to use the fuzzy hierarchical model in complex with other methods of Multiple Criteria Decision Making. We propose a novel approach to overcome the inherent limitations of Hierarchical Methods by exploiting multiple criteria decision making.

Optimizing preventative maintenance strategies for linear assets

Linear assets are engineering infrastructure, such as pipelines, railway lines, and electricity cables, which span long distances and can be divided into different segments. Optimal management of such assets is critical for asset owners as they normally involve significant capital investment. Currently, Time Based Preventive Maintenance (TBPM) strategies are commonly used in industry to improve the reliability of such assets, as they are easy to implement compared with reliability or risk-based preventive maintenance strategies. Linear assets are normally of large scale and thus their preventive maintenance is costly. Their owners and maintainers are always seeking to optimize their TBPM outcomes in terms of minimizing total expected costs over a long term involving multiple maintenance cycles. These costs include repair costs, preventive maintenance costs, and production losses. A TBPM strategy defines when Preventive Maintenance (PM) starts, how frequently the PM is conducted and which segments of a linear asset are operated on in each PM action. A number of factors such as required minimal mission time, customer satisfaction, human resources, and acceptable risk levels need to be considered when planning such a strategy. However, in current practice, TBPM decisions are often made based on decision makers’ expertise or industrial historical practice, and lack a systematic analysis of the effects of these factors. To address this issue, here we investigate the characteristics of TBPM of linear assets, and develop an effective multiple criteria decision making approach for determining an optimal TBPM strategy. We develop a recursive optimization equation which makes it possible to evaluate the effect of different maintenance options for linear assets, such as the best partitioning of the asset into segments and the maintenance cost per segment.

Análise dos modos de falha e seus efeitos (FMEA) aplicada a um secador industrial

Trabalho Final de Mestrado para obtenção do grau de Mestre em Engenharia Mecânica

Modelo de Gerenciamento da Logística Reversa

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Measuring the efficiency of outsourcing: An illustrative case study from the aerospace industry

Outsourcing is related to the action which an organization deals with its suppliers through a kind of business contract where a specific activity or service has been hired to be made. The outsourcing of some activities has become a common practice in the industry, nowadays. It reduces costs, significantly, in the production process and, at the same time, adds some values to the business organization. However it is necessary to measure the performance of these activities. Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) is a non-parametric method useful to measure comparative performance. It has a wide range of applications measuring comparative efficiency. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) is a multiple criteria decision-making method that uses hierarchic structures to represent a decision problem and then develops priorities for the alternatives based on the decision-maker's judgments. This paper presents an integrated application based on DEA and AHP to evaluate the efficiency of subcontracted companies in a Brazilian aerospace factory. © 2007 Springer-Verlag London Limited.

Modelo de gerenciamento da logística reversa integrado às questões estratégicas das organizações

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES)

Seleção de fornecedores em uma indústria de transformadores utilizando o método de análise hierárquica

The optimal supply chain management (SCM) is considered by the companies a new frontier in order to gain efficiently competitive advantage. Through the SCM companies must define their competitive strategies by positioning inside the supply chain wich belongs both as suppliers and as consumers. The main objectives of SCM is integrate multiple suppliers to satisfy the market demand and make possible the synergies between the parts of the supply chain in order to better serve the consumer Meanwhile, selection, evaluation and development of suppliers play important roles in establishing an efficient supply chain. Thus, the SCM covers elements such as manufacturing, assembly, raw materials, and distribution to the final consumer. Due to the factors described, the focus of this paper is to present the Analytic Hierarchical Process (AHP) application as an appropriate and structured method for the supplier selection of a strategic line of low voltage transformers of a transformers industry and compare it with the selection process currently used by this industry, showing the advantages of applying a multiple criteria decision making method. In this study, the research methodology used was modeling and simulation

A Recommendation Framework Based on the Analytic Network Process and its Application in the Semantic Technology Domain

When users face a certain problem needing a product, service, or action to solve it, selecting the best alternative among them can be a dicult task due to the uncertainty of their quality. This is especially the case in the domains where users do not have an expertise, like for example in Software Engineering. Multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods are methods that help making better decisions when facing the complex problem of selecting the best solution among a group of alternatives that can be compared according to different conflicting criteria. In MCDM problems, alternatives represent concrete products, services or actions that will help in achieving a goal, while criteria represent the characteristics of these alternatives that are important for making a decision.

Selección de una cartera de acciones bajo criterios de sostenibilidad medioambiental empleando técnicas de decisión multicriterio

La apertura de los mercados internacionales de capital como consecuencia del proceso de globalización ha motivado un aumento significativo de la labor investigadora en el campo de la economía y, concretamente, en la teoría de la inversión. Los trabajos en este área tuvieron como punto de partida el artículo publicado por Harry Markowitz en 1952 en el Journal of Finance bajo el título “Portfolio Selection”. En él se pretende hacer una modelización del proceso inversionista principalmente a través de dos criterios: riesgo y retorno. Markowitz no da indicaciones en cuanto a cómo elegir la composición de una cartera optimizando simultáneamente riesgo y retorno. En su lugar, fija una de las dos variables (según la aversión al riesgo del inversor y su preferencia por las ganancias) y optimiza la otra. Sin embargo, este análisis resulta ser bastante simplista si tenemos en cuenta que los inversores, como cualquier ser humano, son decisores multicriterio: no sólo maximizarán el beneficio para un riesgo dado, sino que intentarán también minimizar el riesgo, diversificar el tipo de acciones que poseen para inmunizarse frente a crisis financieras, emplear nuevos criterios de inversión que incorporen la sostenibilidad medioambiental y el impacto que la actividad productiva tiene en la sociedad, destinar un mayor porcentaje del presupuesto a compañías poco endeudadas, que alcancen un buen rating o unos buenos índices de responsabilidad social corporativa, etc. La inclusión de estas nuevas variables en el modelo tradicional es ahora posible gracias a la teoría de la decisión multicriterio (MCDM: Multiple Criteria Decision Making). Desde los años setenta se viene desarrollando y aplicando este nuevo paradigma en áreas tan dispares como la planificación de redes de telecomunicación, la optimización de listas de espera en hospitales o la planificación logística de las grandes distribuidoras y compañías de mensajería. En el presente trabajo se pretende aplicar el paradigma MCDM a la construcción de una cartera de acciones siguiendo criterios tanto puramente financieros como de sostenibilidad medioambiental y responsabilidad social corporativa. Para ello, en esta primera parte se estudiará la teoría clásica de selección de carteras de Markowitz, explicando los parámetros que permiten caracterizar un instrumento financiero individual (retorno, riesgo, covarianza) y una cartera de instrumentos (diversificación, frontera eficiente). En la segunda parte se analizará en profundidad el concepto de desarrollo sostenible, tan extendido en la actualidad, y su transposición al plano corporativo y de gestión de carteras. Se realizará una revisión histórica del término y su encaje en el esquema de decisión de una compañía privada, así como un estudio de las herramientas para medir el cumplimiento de ciertos principios de sostenibilidad por parte de las compañías y hacer, de esta forma, cuantificables dichos conceptos con vistas a su incorporación al esquema decisional del inversor. Con posterioridad, en la tercera parte se estudiará la programación por metas como técnica de decisión multicriterio para aplicar al problema de la composición de carteras. El potencial de esta metodología radica en que permite hacer resoluble un problema, en principio, sin solución. Y es que, como no se pueden optimizar todos y cada uno de los criterios simultáneamente, la programación por metas minimizará las desviaciones respecto a determinados niveles de aspiración para ofrecer una solución lo más cercana posible a la ideal. Finalmente, se construirá un caso de estudio a partir de datos reales tanto financieros como de sostenibilidad para, posteriormente, resolver el modelo matemático construido empleando LINGO. A través de esta herramienta software se podrá simular el proceso de optimización y obtener una cartera-solución que refleje las preferencias del agente decisor.

Desarrollo de un algoritmo de decisión multicriterio para la gestión de listas de espera en la solicitud de Holter

Las listas de espera son un problema para la mayor parte de los países que cuentan con un Sistema Nacional de Salud. El presente trabajo propone analizar el problema de las listas de espera desde una perspectiva de Decisión Multicriterio. Tras un análisis de las diferentes metodologías existentes, hemos elaborado un modelo de decisión basado en el método AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) para la gestión de listas de espera y lo hemos aplicado a un Hospital de la Comunidad de Madrid. La decisión multicriterio MCDM (Multiple Criteria Decision Making) es la teoría que estudia y analiza los problemas de decisión que involucran diferentes criterios. La MCDM enmarca con precisión problemas reales de toma de decisiones, planteados usualmente haciendo uso de varios criterios en conflicto; en los cuales, no será posible obtener en general una solución que asigne a todos los criterios su mejor valor sino que el decisor, aplicando distintas técnicas, deberá decidir la mejor solución a escoger del conjunto de soluciones factibles. El fundamento del AHP radica en descomponer problemas complejos en otros más sencillos y agregar las soluciones de los mismos. Según la propuesta de Saaty, el primer paso para la aplicación de este método es estructurar jerárquicamente el problema en niveles con distintos nodos interconectados. El primer nivel de la jerarquía corresponde al propósito del problema, el nivel/niveles intermedios a los criterios/subcriterios en base a los cuales se forma la decisión y el último corresponde a las alternativas o soluciones factibles del problema. La aplicación del método AHP requiere: -Realizar comparaciones por pares entre los entes de cada nivel jerárquico, en base a la importancia que presentan para el nodo del nivel superior de la jerarquía al que están ligados. Los resultados de estas comparaciones se recogen en forma de matrices de comparación por pares. -Obtener los vectores de prioridad correspondientes a cada una de las matrices de comparación por pares. -Calcular la contribución de cada alternativa al propósito del problema, mediante una agregación multiplicativa entre los niveles jerárquicos y en función de estos valores, ordenar las alternativas y seleccionar lo más conveniente como solución del problema. Como último paso en la metodología AHP debemos señalar que, cualquiera que sea el método empleado para sintetizar la información de dichas matrices para determinar los vectores de prioridad de los entes que se comparan, es posible realizar un análisis de sensibilidad del resultado alcanzado, visualizando y analizando otras posibles soluciones a obtener haciendo cambios en los juicios de valor emitidos por la unidad decisora al construir dichas matrices. El software Expert-Choice permite realizar el análisis de sensibilidad de 5 formas diferentes. En estos análisis se realizan variaciones en el valor de un peso o prioridad y se observa numérica y gráficamente como este cambio afecta a la puntuación de las alternativas.

Proposta de modelo multicritérios para análise de investimentos em refinarias de petróleo no Brasil.

O processo de tomada de decisão que envolve a priorização e a seleção de projetos de investimentos na indústria do petróleo está longe de ser uma tarefa trivial. Ao mesmo tempo em que a empresa deve buscar relações favoráveis entre risco e retorno econômico-financeiro também deve se alinhar cada vez mais aos princípios do desenvolvimento sustentável em seus negócios. Em se tratando do caso da indústria petrolífera brasileira, formada essencialmente por um monopólio estatal, esta tarefa se torna ainda mais difícil, já que uma série de interesses públicos relacionados ao investimento também devem ser considerados. Sendo assim, o objetivo principal desta pesquisa foi o desenvolvimento e a aplicação de um modelo original de análise usando múltiplos critérios que auxiliasse na priorização e na seleção de projetos de investimentos nas refinarias de petróleo brasileiras. Utilizou-se uma metodologia de pesquisa quantitativa com o uso de diversos artefatos de matemática aplicada capazes de lidar adequadamente com as avaliações muitas vezes incompletas e subjetivas que caracterizam o problema da análise de investimentos em refinarias de petróleo. Ao final do trabalho, conseguiu-se obter um modelo suficientemente simples, ao ponto de ser facilmente implementado em uma planilha eletrônica, robusto, ao ser capaz de lidar de maneira bastante adequada com as principais peculiaridades que envolvem o setor do refino de petróleo no Brasil e flexível, de maneira que os critérios de análise e as alternativas de decisão pudessem ser facilmente adicionados, removidos ou alterados de acordo com as necessidades específicas exigidas para cada caso.

Measuring performance of virtual learning environment system in higher education

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to measure the performance of commercial virtual learning environment (VLE) systems, which helps the decision makers to select the appropriate system for their institutions. Design/methodology/approach – This paper develops an integrated multiple criteria decision making approach, which combines the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and quality function deployment (QFD), to evaluate and select the best system. The evaluating criteria are derived from the requirements of those who use the system. A case study is provided to demonstrate how the integrated approach works. Findings – The major advantage of the integrated approach is that the evaluating criteria are of interest to the stakeholders. This ensures that the selected system will achieve the requirements and satisfy the stakeholders most. Another advantage is that the approach can guarantee the benchmarking to be consistent and reliable. From the case study, it is proved that the performance of a VLE system being used at the university is the best. Therefore, the university should continue to run the system in order to support and facilitate both teaching and learning. Originality/value – It is believed that there is no study that measures the performance of VLE systems, and thus decision makers may have difficulties in system evaluation and selection for their institutions.

Risk-based maintenance model for offshore oil and gas pipelines:a case study

Offshore oil and gas pipelines are vulnerable to environment as any leak and burst in pipelines cause oil/gas spill resulting in huge negative Impacts on marine lives. Breakdown maintenance of these pipelines is also cost-intensive and time-consuming resulting in huge tangible and intangible loss to the pipeline operators. Pipelines health monitoring and integrity analysis have been researched a lot for successful pipeline operations and risk-based maintenance model is one of the outcomes of those researches. This study develops a risk-based maintenance model using a combined multiple-criteria decision-making and weight method for offshore oil and gas pipelines in Thailand with the active participation of experienced executives. The model's effectiveness has been demonstrated through real life application on oil and gas pipelines in the Gulf of Thailand. Practical implications. Risk-based inspection and maintenance methodology is particularly important for oil pipelines system, as any failure in the system will not only affect productivity negatively but also has tremendous negative environmental impact. The proposed model helps the pipelines operators to analyze the health of pipelines dynamically, to select specific inspection and maintenance method for specific section in line with its probability and severity of failure.

Risk management in oil and gas construction projects in Vietnam

Purpose - The purpose of the paper is to the identify risk factors, which affect oil and gas construction projects in Vietnam and derive risk responses. Design/methodology/approach - Questionnaire survey was conducted with the involvement of project executives of PetroVietnam and statistical analysis was carried out in order to identify the major project risks. Subsequently, mitigating measures were derived using informal interviews with the various levels of management of PetroVietnam. Findings - Bureaucratic government system and long project approval procedures, poor design, incompetence of project team, inadequate tendering practices, and late internal approval processes from the owner were identified as major risks. The executives suggested various strategies to mitigate the identified risks. Reforming the government system, effective partnership with foreign collaborators, training project executives, implementing contractor evaluation using multiple criteria decision-making technique, and enhancing authorities of project people were suggested as viable approaches. Practical implications - The improvement measures as derived in this study would improve chances of project success in the oil and gas industry in Vietnam. Originality/value - There are several risk management studies on managing projects in developing countries. However, as risk factors vary considerably across industry and countries, the study of risk management for successful projects in the oil and gas industry in Vietnam is unique and has tremendous importance for effective project management.