974 resultados para Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Prepared by Daniel L. Turner, consulting engineer, and John P. Hallihan, engineer in charge.
Resumo:
Some numbers have special subtitles, as follows: no. 5, sect. 8/11, "proposal for installation of cable feed pipes..." no. 16/18/36/37 [combined] "proposal for construction of signal towers..." no. 18 (180th street and 239th street yards)" proposal for furnishing and erecting structural steel for inspection sheds..." no. 19/22, sect. 2. "proposal for erection of structural steel..." no. 49, sect. 1/2, "proposal for construction of concrete track floors and platforms ..." no. 49, sect. 3, "proposal for the supply of structural steel ..."
Resumo:
No. 36/37 & 50, sect. 1-3. Queensboro subway.--No. 39, sect. 2. Broadway - Fourth avenue (New Utrecht avenue) - No. 43, 4/38, see no. 4/38, 43.--No. 48, sect. 1-2. Seventh avenue - Lexington avenue.--No. 50. Queensboro subway (Hunters Point avenue station
Resumo:
On covers: Contract for the supply of ... [materials] Order [s] ...
Resumo:
The map is pasted on the front lining paper.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Issued Dec. 1977.
Resumo:
Cover title.
Resumo:
Report no. DOT-TPI-10-77-29.
Resumo:
On cover: Advance copy, subject to minor revisions when printed.
Resumo:
Description based on: 1898; title from cover.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Choosing between Light Rail Transit (LRT) and Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) systems is often controversial and not an easy task for transportation planners who are contemplating the upgrade of their public transportation services. These two transit systems provide comparable services for medium-sized cities from the suburban neighborhood to the Central Business District (CBD) and utilize similar right-of-way (ROW) categories. The research is aimed at developing a method to assist transportation planners and decision makers in determining the most feasible system between LRT and BRT. ^ Cost estimation is a major factor when evaluating a transit system. Typically, LRT is more expensive to build and implement than BRT, but has significantly lower Operating and Maintenance (OM) costs than BRT. This dissertation examines the factors impacting capacity and costs, and develops cost models, which are a capacity-based cost estimate for the LRT and BRT systems. Various ROW categories and alignment configurations of the systems are also considered in the developed cost models. Kikuchi's fleet size model (1985) and cost allocation method are used to develop the cost models to estimate the capacity and costs. ^ The comparison between LRT and BRT are complicated due to many possible transportation planning and operation scenarios. In the end, a user-friendly computer interface integrated with the established capacity-based cost models, the LRT and BRT Cost Estimator (LBCostor), was developed by using Microsoft Visual Basic language to facilitate the process and will guide the users throughout the comparison operations. The cost models and the LBCostor can be used to analyze transit volumes, alignments, ROW configurations, number of stops and stations, headway, size of vehicle, and traffic signal timing at the intersections. The planners can make the necessary changes and adjustments depending on their operating practices. ^
Resumo:
Covers Manhattan, South Bronx, and small adjacent parts of Queens, Brooklyn, and Jersey City.