Assessing the validity of impact pathways for child labour and well-being in social life cycle assessment

Background, aim and scope: Assuming that the goal of social life cycle assessment (SLCA) is to assess damage and benefits on its ‘area of protection’ (AoP) as accurately as possible, it follows that the impact pathways, describing the cause effect relationship between indicator and the AoP, should have a consistent theoretical foundation so the inventory results can be associated with a predictable damage or benefit to the AoP. This article uses two concrete examples from the work on SLCA to analyse to what extent this is the case in current practice. One considers whether indicators included in SLCA approaches can validly assess impacts on the well-being of the stakeholder, whereas the other example addresses whether the ‘incidence of child labour’ is a valid measure for impacts on the AoPs.

Materials and methods: The theoretical basis for the impact pathway between the relevant indicators and the AoPs is analysed drawing on research from relevant scientific fields.

Results:   The examples show a lack of valid impact pathways in both examples. The first example shows that depending on the definition of ‘well-being’, the assessment of impacts on well-being of the stakeholder cannot be performed exclusively with the type of indicators which are presently used in SLCA approaches. The second example shows that the mere fact that a child is working tells little about how this may damage or benefit the AoPs, implying that the normally used indicator; ‘incidence of child labour’ lacks validity in relation to predicting damage or benefit on the AoPs of SLCA.

Discussion: New indicators are proposed to mitigate the problem of invalid impact pathways. However, several problems arise relating to difficulties in getting data, the usability of the new indicators in management situations, and, in relation to example one, boundary setting issues.

Conclusions: The article shows that it is possible to assess the validity of the impact pathways in SLCA. It thereby point to the possibility of utilising the same framework that underpins the environmental LCA in this regard. It also shows that in relation to both of the specific examples investigated, the validity of the impact pathways may be improved by adopting other indicators, which does, however, come with a considerable ‘price’.

Recommendations and perspectives: It is argued that there is a need for analysing impact pathways of other impact categories often included in SLCA in order to establish indicators that better reflect actual damage or benefit to the AoPs.

Sustainability evaluation, life cycle assessment and facilities management for Geelong Retail Development

Value management is a technique used during the design stage to justify cost and worth of a proposal. Designer must never center only to save capital expenditure but consider holistically the whole building life which will be sustainable. Therefore, sustainability evaluation must adopt a long term view and will properly include three crucial elements: economic, social and environmental. Lack of awareness of value management during the design stage of a building project will adversely impact on the life cycle assessment (LCA) and facilities management (FM). This paper provides a review of the sustainable elements that must be considered when designing and costing a new retail development in the Geelong region of Australia and how these factors influence the whole building life. The result of this research helps to create a greater understanding of the different attributes that will affect the LCA and FM decisions made on sustainable development in this and other regional Australian cities that are undergoing major population growth.

Comparative study of the life cycle assessment of particleboards made of residues from sugarcane bagasse (Saccharum spp.) and pine wood shavings (Pinus elliottii)

This paper presents a research on the environmental impacts of particleboards produced from wastes, based on a comparative Life Cycle Assessment study. The particleboards were manufactured in laboratorial scale from the following residues: sugarcane bagasse (Saccharum spp.) and pine wood shavings (Pinus elliottii). The study was developed following the methodological guidelines of ISO 14040. The functional unit adopted was the m2 of the particleboards produced and the impacts were evaluated by the Environmental Development of Industrial Products method. The results indicated that pine particleboard present the highest environmental impact potential. Our findings suggested that the factors that mostly aggravated the environmental impacts were: the distance between the raw materials and the production site, and formaldehyde emissions (FE). The first is related to the combustion of fossil fuel during the acquisition of raw material, which achieved the values of 2185.94 g/m2 for consumption of non-renewable resources for pine particleboard and 893.53 g/m2 for bagasse particleboard. The second is related to the use of urea-formaldehyde resin, responsible for the FE into the air during production. The FE is accountable for the contamination of approximately 7,800,000.00 m3 of air per m2 of particleboard produced, and was the factor with the greatest impact in human toxicity potential. © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Life quality assessment of patients after phacoemulsification or extracapsular cataract extraction

Métodos: O trabalho foi realizado no Serviço de Oftalmologia do Hospital Universitário Bettina Ferro de Souza, Belém, Pará, Brasil. O desenho experimental consistiu em séries de casos comparados. O estudo incluiu 60 indivíduos com catarata. Metade dos pacientes foi submetida à extração de catarata extracapsular convencional (ECEE) e a outra metade à extração de catarata por facoemulsificação (PHACO). Os pacientes foram entrevistados usando-se o questionário Visual Function 14 (VF-14) para determinar a qualidade de vida antes e 30 dias depois da cirurgia. Os resultados do exame oftalmológico foram registrados no arquivo de cada paciente e disponibilizados ao longo do trabalho. Foram usados análise de variância simples e comparação post-hoc com teste de Tukey e teste dos sinais para a análise estatística dos resultados. Resultados: O índice de satisfação médio VF-14 foi 38,0 e 89,4 antes e após a cirurgia, respectivamente, para o grupo ECEE, sendo 47,0 e 94,1 para o grupo PHACO. A melhora na qualidade de vida após a cirurgia foi significativa em ambos os grupos de pacientes (p<0,0001), tendo sido semelhante em ambos os grupos. Conclusão: A melhora observada na qualidade de vida avaliada foi significativa e diretamente relacionada à satisfação dos pacientes com os resultados da cirurgia, a qual também foi significativa (p<0,0001). A satisfação e a qualidade de vida são fatores individuais. Consequentemente, as respostas dos pacientes relativas à melhoria em cada atividade são subjetivas e dependem unicamente da percepção individual.

Life cycle assessment applied to municipal solid waste management: a case study

This study analyzes the environmental performance of the Municipal Solid Waste Management System (MSWMS) of Piedade, São Paulo, from a systemic perspective. A life cycle assessment (LCA) technique was applied according to an attributional approach to evaluate both the current operational situation and different prospective scenarios, which were devised based on the application of targets for recycling dry and wet waste suggested by the pre-draft version of the Brazilian Plan for Solid Waste. The life cycle impact assessment method EcoIndicator 99, in association with normalization and weighting procedures, was used to conduct the analysis. It was observed that the adoption of goals of 30%, 50% and 70% for recovering of the recyclable dry waste, resulted in improvement of the environmental performance of the waste management system under analysis, respectively of 10%, 15% and 20%. It was also possible to detect an evolution in the order of 54% in reducing impacts resulting from the adoption of targets for composting. LCA proved to be effective for the evaluation of the environmental performance of MSWMS-Piedade. However, for future evaluations, the attributional approach should be replaced by the methodological practice of substitution to enable the avoided burdens to be considered in estimations of the environmental performance municipal solid waste management systems.

Life cycle assessment of sugarcane ethanol and palm oil biodiesel joint production

Sugarcane (Saccharum spp.) and palm tree (Elaeis guianeensis) are crops with high biofuel yields, 7.6 m(3) ha (1) y(-)1 of ethanol and 4 Mg ha(-1) y(-1) of oil, respectively. The joint production of these crops enhances the sustainability of ethanol. The objective of this work was comparing a traditional sugarcane ethanol production system (TSES) with a joint production system (JSEB), in which ethanol and biodiesel are produced at the same biorefinery but only ethanol is traded. The comparison is based on ISO 14.040:2006 and ISO 14044:2006, and appropriate indicators. Production systems in Cerrado (typical savannah), Cerradao (woody savannah) and pastureland ecosystems were considered. Energy and carbon balances, and land use change impacts were evaluated. The joint system includes 100% substitution of biodiesel for diesel, which is all consumed in different cropping stages. Data were collected by direct field observation methods, and questionnaires applied to Brazilian facilities. Three sugarcane mills situated in Sao Paulo State and one palm oil refinery located in Para State were surveyed. The information was supplemented by secondary sources. Results demonstrated that fossil fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions decreased, whereas energy efficiency increased when JSEB was compared to TSES. In comparison with TSES, the energy balance of JSEB was 1.7 greater. In addition, JSEB released 23% fewer GHG emissions than TSES. The ecosystem carbon payback time for Cerrado, Cerradao, and Degraded Grassland of JSEB was respectively 4, 7.7 and -7.6 years. These are typical land use types of the Brazilian Cerrado region for which JSEB was conceived. (C) 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Analisi del fine vita degli pneumatici attraverso una metodologia Life Cycle Assessment (LCA)

This study aims to show the scope of environment impact due to tyre treatments. The study scrutinises a firm’s case, Marangoni S.p.A, which is one of the first pneumatics treatments firm with emphasis on disposed and recostructed exhausted pneumatics. In particular those pneumatic’s treatments are two: reconstruction (30% of the whole amount of the pneumatics given) and incineration (70% of the whole amount of the pneumatics given). With LCA methods (EcoIndicator 99, EPS 2000, EDIP 97, IMPACT 2002) it has been possible to value the impact on the environments in terms of human health, ecosystem quality and resources. In addition, comparison with the principal process and subsidiary processes within the main one has brought to highlight how some results could be understood in different way. This interpretation should bring politics and socials network to take decision in order to save our planet.

Valutazione di impatto ambientale di un gruppo elettrogeno mediante Life Cycle Assessment: il caso COGEM.

Il presente lavoro ha come oggetto l’analisi di impatto ambientale, svolta mediante la metodologia Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) di un gruppo elettrogeno prodotto da COGEM s.r.l., azienda italiana situata a Castel d’Argile, nel bolognese, con l’obiettivo di supportare eventuali scelte di riprogettazione del prodotto anche in termini di Design for Disassembly. Dopo una prima analisi del contesto attuale in cui si colloca, la metodologia LCA è stata studiata nel dettaglio per poterla poi applicare al prodotto in oggetto. Esso è stato individuato mediante un’analisi delle vendite di COGEM, in seguito si è svolta una fase di raccolta dati e si sviluppata l’analisi LCA usando il software SimaPro 7.1. I risultati ottenuti hanno consentito di individuare le possibili aree di miglioramento dell’impatto ambientale dell’intero ciclo di vita del gruppo elettrogeno. In particolare si sono valutate due soluzioni innovative: un gruppo elettrogeno alimentato a olio vegetale e uno progettato in ottica DFD per consentire un corretto smaltimento dei rifiuti.

Life Cycle Assessment comparativo tra il processo di co-digestione della frazione organica dei rifiuti solidi urbani e dei fanghi di depurazione disidratati e il sistema di gestione attuale. Il caso di Bagnacavallo (RA)

Waste management is becoming, year after year, always more important both for the costs associated with it and for the ever increasing volumes of waste generated. The discussion on the fate of organic fraction of municipal solid waste (OFMSW) leads everyday to new solutions. Many alternatives are proposed, ranging from incineration to composting passing through anaerobic digestion. “For Biogas” is a collaborative effort, between C.I.R.S.A. and R.E.S. cooperative, whose main goal is to generate “green” energy from both biowaste and sludge anaerobic co-digestion. Specifically, the project include a pilot plant receiving dewatered sludge from both urban and agro-industrial sewage (DS) and the organic fraction of MSW (in 2/1 ratio) which is digested in absence of oxygen to produce biogas and digestate. Biogas is piped to a co-generation system producing power and heat reused in the digestion process itself, making it independent from the national grid. Digestate undergoes a process of mechanical separation giving a liquid fraction, introduced in the treatment plant, and a solid fraction disposed in landfill (in future it will be further processed to obtain compost). This work analyzed and estimated the impacts generated by the pilot plant in its operative phase. Once the model was been characterized, on the basis of the CML2001 methodology, a comparison is made with the present scenario assumed for OFMSW and DS. Actual scenario treats separately the two fractions: the organic one is sent to a composting plant, while sludge is sent to landfill. Results show that the most significant difference between the two scenarios is in the GWP category as the project "For Biogas" is able to generate “zero emission” power and heat. It also generates a smaller volume of waste for disposal. In conclusion, the analysis evaluated the performance of two alternative methods of management of OFMSW and DS, highlighting that "For Biogas" project is to be preferred to the actual scenario.

Applicazione della metodologia Life Cycle Assessment al Passito di Pantelleria

Il presente studio riguarda l’applicazione della metodologia Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) ad una bottiglia di Passito di Pantelleria, prodotta dall’Azienda vitivinicola “Donnafugata” localizzata nel comune di Marsala in Sicilia. L’obiettivo di tale studio consiste nel quantificare e valutare le prestazioni energetico-ambientali derivanti dall’intero ciclo di vita del processo produttivo, nonché le fasi di produzione che presentano il maggiore impatto. Lo studio è stato ulteriormente approfondito effettuando una comparazione tra la produzione della singola bottiglia di Passito nei diversi anni 2007, 2008 e 2009 con lo scopo di determinare quali tra questi risulta avere il maggiore impatto ambientale. Gli impatti ambientali di un’Azienda vitivinicola risultano avere la loro particolare importanza in quanto la produzione di vino è un processo di natura complessa. Di conseguenza tali impatti possono compromettere le componenti fondamentali del processo produttivo, a partire dalle uve coltivate in vigna fino ad arrivare in cantina, dove avviene la trasformazione dell’uva in mosto e la successiva fase di vinificazione che determina il prodotto finale messo in commercio. Proprio attraverso il fluire delle seguenti fasi di trasformazione, in che misura queste consumano energia e producono emissioni? È importante sottolineare che lo studio del ciclo di vita di un prodotto può essere considerato come un supporto fondamentale allo sviluppo di schemi di etichettatura ambientale attraverso i quali è possibile indirizzare il consumatore finale verso beni più rispettosi dell’ambiente e fornire informazioni chiare e trasparenti sulle prestazioni ambientali del prodotto stesso. Allo stesso tempo tale strumento può essere adoperato dall’azienda per fornire garanzia delle credenziali ambientali del prodotto acquisendo così un vantaggio competitivo rispetto alle aziende concorrenti. Infatti, nell’ambito delle politiche comunitarie di prodotto, una delle applicazioni più significative della valutazione del ciclo di vita si ha nella dichiarazione ambientale di prodotto o EPD (Environmental Product Declaration). L’EPD è uno schema di certificazione volontaria che rappresenta un marchio di qualità ecologica per i prodotti, permettendo di comunicare informazioni oggettive, confrontabili e credibili relative alla prestazione ambientale degli stessi. Per essere convalidabili, le prestazioni ambientali presenti nelle EPD devono rispettare i requisiti stabiliti dal PCR- Product Category Rules, un documento nel quale sono presenti le regole per lo studio di una certa categoria di prodotto. Il presente lavoro può essere suddiviso in cinque step successivi. Il primo prevede la descrizione della metodologia LCA, adottata per la quantificazione dell’impatto ambientale, analizzandone singolarmente le quattro fasi principali che la caratterizzano; il secondo presenta la descrizione dell’Azienda vitivinicola e del Passito di Pantelleria, oggetto della valutazione, mettendo in evidenza anche le particolarità ambientali del territorio Pantesco in cui il prodotto prende vita; il terzo fornisce una descrizione delle caratteristiche principali dello strumento applicativo utilizzato per l’analisi, SimaPro nella versione 7.3; il quarto descrive le diverse attività di lavorazione svolte nel complesso processo di produzione della bottiglia di Passito, focalizzando l’attenzione sui componenti primari dell’oggetto di valutazione ed il quinto riguarda la descrizione dell’analisi LCA applicata alla singola bottiglia di Passito.