810 resultados para Government financial institutions
Resumo:
In this EuropEos Commentary, Stefano Micossi reviews recent efforts to build a stronger and more coherent regulatory system for financial markets and finds the idea of a resolution fund at best a distraction, and at worst a harbinger of renewed financial instability.
Resumo:
In the aftermath of the Great Financial Crisis both the EU and the US have implemented resolution procedures for their largest and most systemic financial institutions. This Commentary examines the main differences between the two frameworks. The EU framework allows, inter alia, action to prevent the failure of a credit institution, while the US regulatory framework requires that all systemic banks subject to resolution must be closed and resolved. The greater flexibility under the EU resolution framework allows action to be taken to preserve a credit institution without putting it through an insolvency process, which makes limiting moral hazard less obvious. Moreover, the scope of the EU framework is still narrow, since it does not allow the recovery of non-bank financial institutions, whereas the US framework does.
Resumo:
Item 1013
Resumo:
Item 1013-A, 1013-B (microfiche)
Resumo:
Reuse of record except for individual research requires license from Congressional Information Service, Inc.
Resumo:
"Serial 96-27."
Resumo:
Cover title.
Resumo:
"Serial 96-40."
Resumo:
CIS Microfiche Accession Numbers: CIS 88 S321-59
Resumo:
At head of title: 1641--1892.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Reports for 1933/34, 1943/1944 reprinted from 1934, 1944 year books.
Resumo:
Item 1013-A, 1013-B (microfiche)
Resumo:
Item 1013-A, 1013-B (microfiche)