The Four Different Types of Internal Hernia Occurring After Laparascopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Performed for Morbid Obesity: Are There Any Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) Features Permitting Their Distinction?

BACKGROUND: Four different types of internal hernias (IH) are known to occur after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGBP) performed for morbid obesity. We evaluate multidetector row helical computed tomography (MDCT) features for their differentiation. METHODS: From a prospectively collected database including 349 patients with LRYGBP, 34 acutely symptomatic patients (28 women, mean age 32.6), operated on for IH immediately after undergoing MDCT, were selected. Surgery confirmed 4 (11.6%) patients with transmesocolic, 10 (29.4%) with Petersen's, 15 (44.2%) with mesojejunal, and 5 (14.8%) with jejunojejunal IH. In consensus, 2 radiologists analyzed 13 MDCT features to distinguish the four types of IH. Statistical significance was calculated (p < 0.05, Fisher's exact test, chi-square test). RESULTS: MDCT features of small bowel obstruction (SBO) (n = 25, 73.5%), volvulus (n = 22, 64.7%), or a cluster of small bowel loops (SBL) (n = 27, 79.4%) were inconsistently present and overlapped between the four IH. The following features allowed for IH differentiation: left upper quadrant clustered small bowel loops (p < 0.0001) and a mesocolic hernial orifice (p = 0.0003) suggested transmesocolic IH. SBL abutting onto the left abdominal wall (p = 0.0021) and left abdominal shift of the superior mesenteric vessels (SMV) (p = 0.0045) suggested Petersen's hernia. The SMV predominantly shifted towards the right anterior abdominal wall in mesojejunal hernia (p = 0.0033). Location of the hernial orifice near the distal anastomosis (p = 0.0431) and jejunojejunal suture widening (p = 0.0005) indicated jejunojejunal hernia. CONCLUSIONS: None of the four IH seems associated with a higher risk of SBO. Certain MDCT features, such as the position of clustered SBL and hernial orifice, help distinguish between the four IH and may permit straightforward surgery.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass vs gastric banding for morbid obesity: a case-matched study of 442 patients.

HYPOTHESIS: Gastric banding (GB) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) are used in the treatment of morbidly obese patients. We hypothesized that RYGBP provides superior results. DESIGN: Matched-pair study in patients with a body mass index (BMI) less than 50. SETTING: University hospital and regional community hospital with a common bariatric surgeon. PATIENTS: Four hundred forty-two patients were matched according to sex, age, and BMI. INTERVENTIONS: Laparoscopic GB or RYGBP. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Operative morbidity, weight loss, residual BMI, quality of life, food tolerance, lipid profile, and long-term morbidity. RESULTS: Follow-up was 92.3% at the end of the study period (6 years postoperatively). Early morbidity was higher after RYGBP than after GB (17.2% vs 5.4%; P<.001), but major morbidity was similar. Weight loss was quicker, maximal weight loss was greater, and weight loss remained significantly better after RYGBP until the sixth postoperative year. At 6 years, there were more failures (BMI>35 or reversal of the procedure/conversion) after GB (48.3% vs 12.3%; P<.001). There were more long-term complications (41.6% vs 19%; P.001) and more reoperations (26.7% vs 12.7%; P<.001) after GB. Comorbidities improved more after RYGBP. CONCLUSIONS: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass is associated with better weight loss, resulting in a better correction of some comorbidities than GB, at the price of a higher early complication rate. This difference, however, is largely compensated by the much higher long-term complication and reoperation rates seen after GB.

A new type of internal hernia after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.

Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is currently the most common bariatric procedure. One of its late complications is the development of internal hernia, which can lead to acute intestinal obstruction or recurrent colicky abdominal pain. The aim of this paper is to present a new, unusual, and so far not reported type of internal hernia. A common computerized database is maintained for all patients undergoing bariatric surgery in our departments. The charts of patients with the diagnosis of internal hernia were reviewed. Three patients were identified who developed acute intestinal obstruction due to an internal hernia located between the jejunojejunostomy and the end of the biliopancreatic limb, directly between two jejunal limbs with no mesentery involved. Another seven patients with intermittent colicky abdominal pain, re-explored for the suspicion of internal hernia, were found to also have an open window of the same location apart from a hernia at one of the typical hernia sites. Since this gap is systematically closed during RYGBP, no other patient has been observed with this problem. Even very small defects can lead to the development of internal hernias after RYGBP. Patients with suggestive symptoms must be explored. Closure of the jejunojejunal defect with nonabsorbable sutures prevents the development of an internal hernia between the jejunal loops at the jejunojejunostomy.

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass After Failed Vertical Banded Gastroplasty: a Multicenter Experience with 203 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Vertical banded gastroplasty (VBG) has long been the main restrictive procedure for morbid obesity but has many long-term complications for which conversion to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is often considered the best option. METHODS: This series regroups patients operated on by three different surgeons in four different centers. All data were collected prospectively, then pooled and analyzed retrospectively. RESULTS: Out of 2,522 RYGBP performed between 1998 and 2010, 538 were reoperations, including 203 laparoscopic RYGBP after VBG. There were 175 women and 28 men. The mean BMI before VBG was 43.2 ± 6.3, and the mean BMI before reoperation was 37.4 ± 8.3. Most patients had more than one indication for reoperation and/or had regained significant weight. There was no conversion to open surgery. A total of 24 patients (11.8 %) developed complications, including nine (4.5 %) who required reoperation and one death. With a follow-up of 88.9 % after 8 years, the mean BMI after 1, 3, 5, 7, and 9 years was 29.1, 28.8, 28.7, 29.9, and 28.8, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this experience, the largest with laparoscopic reoperative RYGBP after failed VBG, we conclude that this procedure can safely be performed in experienced hands, with weight loss results similar to those observed after primary RYGBP. In patients with too difficult an anatomy below the cardia, dividing the esophagus just above the esophago-gastric junction and performing an esophagojejunostomy may be a safe alternative to converting to a Scopinaro-type BPD, obviating the additional long-term risks associated with malabsorption.

Almost routine prophylactic cholecystectomy during laparoscopic gastric bypass is safe

RAPPORT DE SYNTHESE : Introduction : les patients obèses morbides présentent un risque majeur de développer des calculs biliaires en raison d'une sécrétion accrue de cholestérol dans la bile. Ce risque, davantage élevé dans la phase de perte pondérale rapide consécutive à la chirurgie bariatrique ou lors de régimes amaigrissants, est souvent la cause de nombreux symptômes, voire de complications biliaires. Aussi l'association d'une cholécystectomie à la chirurgie bariatrique, notamment le bypass gastrique laparoscopique a-t-elle été proposée afin d'éviter ces complications parfois redoutables dans cette population fragile. Ce concept a cependant fait l'objet de démentis dans de récentes études où ce risque apparaîtrait moins élevé, et la cholécystectomie durant le by- pris gastrique laparoscopique pourrait être grevée de difficultés et présenter des risques opératoires non négligeables pour le patient. Patients et méthodes : notre série comporte 772 patients opérés entre 2000 et 2007 par by-pass gastrique laparoscopique, avec montage d'une anse en Y selon Roux. Ces patients obèses morbides avaient été sélectionnés sur la base d'une anamnèse concluante, d'un examen anthropométrique, d'un bilan sanguin et d'un ultrason abdominal. Une analyse rétrospective des résultats d'ultrason abdominal préopératoire et des rapports histopathologiques des vésicules biliaires en postopératoire a été réalisée chez les patients opérés avant 2004. Résultats : 58 patients (7,5 %) avaient déjà eu une cholécystectomie. L'US abdominal a révélé des calculs ou de la boue biliaire chez 81 patients (11,3 %), un polype chez un patient et une vésicule biliaire normale chez les patients restants. La cholécystectomie a été réalisée concomitamment au by-pass gastrique chez 66S patients (91,7 %) et des calculs biliaires retrouvés à l'examen per-opératoire des vésicules biliaires chez 25 patients (3,9 %), rapportant alors la prévalence de la cholélithiase à 21,2 % dans cette population. L'âge des patients porteurs de calculs biliaires était significativement plus élevé que celui des patients sans calculs biliares (43,5 contre 38,7 ans, P < 0,0001). A l'examen histopathologique, des anomalies ont été décrites dans 81,8 % des vésicules biliaires, consistant pour la plupart en cholécystite chronique et cholestérolose. Aucune complication post-opératoire n'a été associée à la cholécystectomie et le prolongement du temps opératoire était en moyenne de 19 minutes (4 - 45 minutes) sans aucun impact sur le séjour hospitalier. La cholécystectomie n'a pas été réalisée chez 59 patients (8,3 %) en raison de conditions opératoires défavorables, notamment une exposition insuffisante. Un traitement d'acide ursodésoxycholique a été prescrit sur une période de 6 mois et aucun de ces patients n'a manifesté de symptômes biliaires. Conclusion : la cholécystectomie peut être réalisée à titre prophylactique et en toute sécurité au cours du by-pass gastrique laparoscopique. Cet acte opératoire supplémentaire sans conséquence sur le séjour hospitalier, constitue selon la présente étude une forme de prophylaxie recommandable dans la prévention de la formation des calculs biliaires dans la phase de perte pondérale post-opératoire. Sa supériorité ou non par rapport à la prophylaxie médicamenteuse à l'acide ursodésoxycholique n'a pas encore été établie. Des études prospectives randomisées seraient nécessaires afin de confirmer l'avantage de l'une ou l'autre de ces deux alternatives.

Nutritional deficiencies after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity often cannot be prevented by standard multivitamin supplementation

BACKGROUND: Despite the increasing use of Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) in the treatment of morbid obesity, data about postoperative nutritional deficiencies and their treatment remain scarce. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a standard multivitamin preparation in the prevention and treatment of nutritional deficiencies in obese patients after RYGBP. DESIGN: This was a retrospective study of 2 y of follow-up of obese patients after RYGBP surgery. Between the first and the sixth postoperative months, a standardized multivitamin preparation was prescribed for all patients. Specific requirements for additional substitutive treatments were systematically assessed by a biologic workup at 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24 mo. RESULTS: A total of 137 morbidly obese patients (110 women and 27 men) were included. The mean (+/-SD) age at the time of surgery was 39.9 +/- 10.0 y, and the body mass index (in kg/m(2)) was 46.7 +/- 6.5. Three months after RYGBP, 34% of these patients required at least one specific supplement in addition to the multivitamin preparation. At 6 and 24 mo, this proportion increased to 59% and 98%, respectively. Two years after RYGBP, a mean amount of 2.9 +/- 1.4 specific supplements had been prescribed for each patient, including vitamin B-12, iron, calcium + vitamin D, and folic acid. At that time, the mean monthly cost of the substitutive treatment was $34.83. CONCLUSION: Nutritional deficiencies are very common after RYGBP and occur despite supplementation with the standard multivitamin preparation. Therefore, careful postoperative follow-up is indicated to detect and treat those deficiencies.

Effects of gastric bypass and gastric banding on glucose kinetics and gut hormone release

Rapport de Synthèse : Introduction : outre son effet bénéfique sur le poids, la chirurgie bariatrique améliore de façon considérable l'homéostasie glucide chez les patients diabétiques. Cette amélioration survient très tôt dans la période post-opératoire, avant que le poids ne soit réduit de manière importante. De plus, les interventions chirurgicales qui "court-circuitent" une partie de l'intestin grêle, telle que le by-pass gastrique, apparaissent être plus efficaces que les interventions purement restrictives, telles que le cerclage gastrique. Objectifs : cette étude a pour but d'étudier la cinétique du glucose et la sécrétion d'hormones gastro-intestinales, consécutive à l'ingestion d'une dose charge de glucose, chez des patients opérés d'un by-pass ou d'un cerclage gastrique. Méthodes : nous avons comparé des groupes de femmes non diabétiques ayant bénéficié d'un by-pass gastrique (BPG, n=8) ou d'un cerclage gastrique (CG, n=6) à un groupe de femmes contrôles d'âge et de poids appariées n'ayant subi aucune intervention bariatrique (C, n=8). L'étude a été réalisée alors que le poids des volontaires était stable, soit entre 9 et 48 mois après le BPG, et 25 à 85 mois après le CG. Nous avons étudié, pendant les 4 heures qui ont suivies l'ingestion d'une dose charge de glucose; la cinétique du glucose ingéré et du glucose total à l'aide d'un glucose radio-activement marqué, ainsi que la cinétique de l'insuline et de différentes hormones gastro-intestinales. Résultats : l'apparition du glucose exogène dans la circulation systémique est plus rapide chez les patients opérés d'un BPG et s'accompagne d'une hyperglycémie postprandiale plus brève. La réponse insulinique est également plus précoce et plus importante que dans les deux autres groupes. S'agissant des hormones gastro-intestinales, on observe dans la période postprandiale une augmentation de PYY et de GLP-1 et une suppression de la grehline significativement plus importante après BPG. Discussion : ces différentes observations suggèrent que le BPG est associé à de profonds changements de la cinétique du glucose et des altérations de la régulation d'hormones gastro-intestinales. Les modifications susmentionnées apparaissant être secondaires aux modifications anatomiques consécutives au BPG, i.e. la mise "hors-circuit" de l'estomac distal et de l'intestin grêle proximal, compte tenu du fait qu'elles ne sont pas observées après CG. Finalement, la stimulation de PYY et de GLP-1 ainsi que la suppression postprandiale plus importante de ghréline est compatible avec la diminution spontanée de la prise alimentaire observée chez les patients opérés d'un BPG.

Roux-en-y Gastric Bypass is Superior to Gastric Banding in Non-superobese Patients. a Matched-case Study with Five-year Follow-up

Background: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) and gastric banding (GB) are the two most popular bariatric procedures. Only few studies have compared their results and follow-up duration is usually limited to <3 years. Patients and Methods: Using our prospective bariatric database, we matched non-superobese GB to RYGBP patients for sex, age and BMI to RYGBP. Follow-up considered up to five years. Results: 442 patients were matched in 221 pairs. Mean age (38,6) and mean BMI (43) were identical. Overall operative morbidity was higher after RYGBP (17,2 versus 5,4 %, p<0,001), but major morbidity was similar (3,6 versus 2,2 %, p=0,57). More patients developed long-term complications after GB (43,9 % versus 19 %, p<0,001), and more required reoperations (24,4 % versus 12 %, p=0,001). After RYGBP, reoperations were mainly due to internal hernias (87 %), with no reversal, whereas 18,5 % of the GB patients required band removal. Even including only patients who retained their band, weight loss after RYGBP was better throughout the study period, with 5-year EBMIL of 77,6 % and 61,7 % (p<0,001) after RYGBP and GB respectively. RYGBP was associated with better food tolerance and greater improvement of the lipid profile. Conclusions: GB is associated with a smaller overall operative morbidity and similar major morbidity, but with more long-term complications, more reoperations, a significant number of reversal or conversion procedures, and reduced weight loss when compared with RYGBP. Five-year results of RYGBP are superior to GB and patients should be informed accordingly.

Bypass gastrique: prise en charge des complications et désagrements alimentaires [Gastric bypass: management of complications and food tolerance]

La chirurgie bariatrique est le seul traitement qui permette une perte pondérale significative sur le long terme mais le succès d'une telle intervention repose avant tout dans une sélection et une préparation attentive du patient. Une bonne connaissance des implications de l'opération permet de favoriser un changement de comportement alimentaire et par là aussi de diminuer les complications et les désagréments alimentaires. L'éducation du patient n'a de sens que si elle s'inscrit dans une prise en charge pluridisciplinaire, comprenant également un suivi diététique, planifié sur le long terme. La mastication, la vitesse d'ingestion des aliments, le fait de renoncer aux boissons gazeuses et de devoir boire régulièrement entre les repas, sont les éléments les plus difficiles à mettre en place pour le patient. Bariatric surgery is the only treatment inducing effective weight loss on the long term. The success of such an intervention is possible by carefully selecting and educating the candidates. Good understanding of the bariatric surgery implications allows the patients to modify their eating habits and thus decrease complications and food intolerance. Therefore patient education requires a multidisciplinary approach which implies the follow-up of a dietician on the long term. Mastication, speed of food ingestion, avoidance of carbonated beverages as well as the obligation to drink at frequent and regular intervals are the most difficult aspects to be taught to the patients

Improved Surgical Technique Reduces Complications at the Gastro-jejunostomy After Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass

Introduction: Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP) is one of the commonest procedure for morbid obesity. It is associated with effective long-term weight loss, but can lead to significant complications, especially at the gastrojejunostomy (GJS) Patients and Methods: All the patients undergoing laparoscopic RYGBP at one of our two institutions were included in this study, in which we compared two different techniques for the construction of the GJS and their effects on the incidence of complications. In group A, anatomosis was performed on the posterior aspect of the gastric pouch. In group B it was performed across the staple line used to form the gastric pouch. A 21-mm circular stapler was used in all patients. Results: A total of 1128 patients were included between June 1999 and September 2009, 639 in group A and 488 in group B. Sixty patients developed a total of 65 complications at the GJS, with 14 (1,2 %) leaks, 42 (3,7 %) stricture, and 9 (0,8 %) marginal ulcers. Leaks (0,2 versus 2 %, p=0,005) and strictures (0,8 versus 5,9%, p<0,0001) were significantly fewer in group B than in group A. Conclusions: Improved surgical technique, with the GJS across the staple line used to form the gastric pouch, significantly reduces the rate of anastomotic complications at the GJS. A circular 21-mm stapler can be used with a low complication rate, and especially a low stricture rate. Additional methods to limit complications at the GJS are probably not routinely warranted.

Rapid Improvement and Maintenance of the Lipid Profile After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (RYGBP)

Background: Dyslipidemia, a major component of the metabolic syndrome and an important cardiovascular risk factor, is one of the commonest comorbidity associated with morbid obesity. The aim of this paper is to show that RYGBP markedly improves dyslipidemia and that this improvement maintains over time. Patients and Methods: Prospectively updated databank for bariatric patients. Patients undergoing RYGBP have yearly blood tests during follow-up. The results for lipids at one to five years were compared with preoperative values. Results: The mean excess BMI loss after one and five years was 77,9 % and 72,3%respectively. After one year, there was a significant reduction of the mean total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, total cholesterol/HDL ratio and triglyceride values, which maintained up to five years, and an increase of the HDL fraction, which progressed until five years. The proportion of patients with abnormal values decreased from 24,3 to 6,2% for total cholesterol, from 45,1 to 11,7 %for HDL, from 53,3 to 21,9 for LDL, and from 40,5 to 10 % for triglycerides, with no significant change between three and five years, despite some weight regain. Conclusions: RYGBP rapidly improves all components of dyslipidemia, and thereby reduces the overall cardiovascular risk in operated patients.

Jejunojejunal intussusception after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a review.

Small bowel intussusception is a rare long-term complication after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, the etiology of which remains unclear. Except for one series reporting on 23 patients, case reports represent the vast majority of all cases reported so far. With this complete review of the world literature, based on a total of 63 patients including 2 of our own cases, we provide an extensive overview of the subject. The origin of intussusception after gastric bypass is different from that of intussusception of other causes, in that there is usually no lead point. It is likely related to motility disorders in the divided small bowel, especially in the Roux limb. This rare condition may cause obstruction and lead to bowel necrosis if not recognized and treated promptly. Clinical presentation is not specific. Computerized tomography scan represents the diagnostic test of choice, but surgery is sometimes the only way to establish the diagnosis. Treatment may be limited to reduction if the small bowel is viable, but resection of the affected segment is recommended on the basis of this review, since it seems to result in fewer recurrences. Knowledge of this entity and a high index of suspicion are required to make the correct diagnosis and offer appropriate treatment in a timely fashion.

What is the Omega-Loop Gastric Bypass and Why is it Criticized?

The omega-loop gastric bypass (OLGBP), also called "mini-gastric bypass" or "single-anastomosis" gastric bypass is a form of gastric bypass where a long, narrow gastric pouch is created and anastomosed to the jejunum about 200- 250 cm from the angle of Treitz in an omega loop fashion, thereby avoiding a jejuno-jejunostomy.Proponents of the OLGBP claim that it is a safer and simpler operation than the traditional Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGBP), easier to teach, that gives the same results in terms of weight loss than the RYGBP. One randomized study comparing the two techniques showed similar results after five years.The OLGBP is criticized because it creates an anastomosis between the gastric pouch and the jejunum where a large amount of biliopancreatic juices travel, thereby creating a situation where reflux of the latter into the stomach and distal esophagus is likely to develop. Such a situation has clearly been associated, in several animal studies, with an increased incidence of gastric cancer, especially at or close to the gastro-jejunostomy, and with an increased risk of lower esophageal cancer. In clinical practice, omega-loop gastrojejunostomies such as those used for reconstruction after gastric resection for benign disease or distal gastric cancer have been associated with the so called classical anastomotic cancer, linked to biliary reflux into the stomach, despite the fact that epidemiological studies about this do not show uniform results. Although no evidence at the present time links OLGBP to an increased risk of gastric cancer in the human, this possibility raises a concern among many bariatric surgeons, especially in the view that bariatric surgery is performed in relatively young patients with a long life expectancy, hence prone to develop cancer if indeed the risk is increased. Another arguments used against the OLGBP is that the jejuno-jejunostomy in the traditional RYGBP is easy to perform and associated with virtually no complication.Supporters of the OLGBP claim that the liquid that refluxes into the stomach after their procedure is not pure bile and pancreatic juice, but a combination of those with jejunal secretions, and that the latter is not as harmful. We would urge the proponents of the OLGBP to undertake the necessary animal studies to show that their assumption is indeed true before the procedure is performed widely, possibly leading to the development of hundreds of late gastric or esophageal carcinoma in the bariatric population. In the meantime, we strongly believe that RYGBP should remain the gold standard in gastric bypass surgery for morbid obesity.