Modelado en alto nivel con SystemC

El presente proyecto final de carrera titulado “Modelado de alto nivel con SystemC” tiene como objetivo principal el modelado de algunos módulos de un codificador de vídeo MPEG-2 utilizando el lenguaje de descripción de sistemas igitales SystemC con un nivel de abstracción TLM o Transaction Level Modeling. SystemC es un lenguaje de descripción de sistemas digitales basado en C++. En él hay un conjunto de rutinas y librerías que implementan tipos de datos, estructuras y procesos especiales para el modelado de sistemas digitales. Su descripción se puede consultar en [GLMS02] El nivel de abstracción TLM se caracteriza por separar la comunicación entre los módulos de su funcionalidad. Este nivel de abstracción hace un mayor énfasis en la funcionalidad de la comunicación entre los módulos (de donde a donde van datos) que la implementación exacta de la misma. En los documentos [RSPF] y [HG] se describen el TLM y un ejemplo de implementación. La arquitectura del modelo se basa en el codificador MVIP-2 descrito en [Gar04], de dicho modelo, los módulos implementados son: · IVIDEOH: módulo que realiza un filtrado del vídeo de entrada en la dimensión horizontal y guarda en memoria el video filtrado. · IVIDEOV: módulo que lee de la memoria el vídeo filtrado por IVIDEOH, realiza el filtrado en la dimensión horizontal y escribe el video filtrado en memoria. · DCT: módulo que lee el video filtrado por IVIDEOV, hace la transformada discreta del coseno y guarda el vídeo transformado en la memoria. · QUANT: módulo que lee el video transformado por DCT, lo cuantifica y guarda el resultado en la memoria. · IQUANT: módulo que lee el video cuantificado por QUANT, realiza la cuantificación inversa y guarda el resultado en memoria. · IDCT: módulo que lee el video procesado por IQUANT, realiza la transformada inversa del coseno y guarda el resultado en memoria. · IMEM: módulo que hace de interfaz entre los módulos anteriores y la memoria. Gestiona las peticiones simultáneas de acceso a la memoria y asegura el acceso exclusivo a la memoria en cada instante de tiempo. Todos estos módulos aparecen en gris en la siguiente figura en la que se muestra la arquitectura del modelo: Figura 1. Arquitectura del modelo (VER PDF DEL PFC) En figura también aparecen unos módulos en blanco, dichos módulos son de pruebas y se han añadido para realizar simulaciones y probar los módulos del modelo: · CAMARA: módulo que simula una cámara en blanco y negro, lee la luminancia de un fichero de vídeo y lo envía al modelo a través de una FIFO. · FIFO: hace de interfaz entre la cámara y el modelo, guarda los datos que envía la cámara hasta que IVIDEOH los lee. · CONTROL: módulo que se encarga de controlar los módulos que procesan el vídeo, estos le indican cuando terminan de procesar un frame de vídeo y este módulo se encarga de iniciar los módulos que sean necesarios para seguir con la codificación. Este módulo se encarga del correcto secuenciamiento de los módulos procesadores de vídeo. · RAM: módulo que simula una memoria RAM, incluye un retardo programable en el acceso. Para las pruebas también se han generado ficheros de vídeo con el resultado de cada módulo procesador de vídeo, ficheros con mensajes y un fichero de trazas en el que se muestra el secuenciamiento de los procesadores. Como resultado del trabajo en el presente PFC se puede concluir que SystemC permite el modelado de sistemas digitales con bastante sencillez (hace falta conocimientos previos de C++ y programación orientada objetos) y permite la realización de modelos con un nivel de abstracción mayor a RTL, el habitual en Verilog y VHDL, en el caso del presente PFC, el TLM. ABSTRACT This final career project titled “High level modeling with SystemC” have as main objective the modeling of some of the modules of an MPEG-2 video coder using the SystemC digital systems description language at the TLM or Transaction Level Modeling abstraction level. SystemC is a digital systems description language based in C++. It contains routines and libraries that define special data types, structures and process to model digital systems. There is a complete description of the SystemC language in the document [GLMS02]. The main characteristic of TLM abstraction level is that it separates the communication among modules of their functionality. This abstraction level puts a higher emphasis in the functionality of the communication (from where to where the data go) than the exact implementation of it. The TLM and an example are described in the documents [RSPF] and [HG]. The architecture of the model is based in the MVIP-2 video coder (described in the document [Gar04]) The modeled modules are: · IVIDEOH: module that filter the video input in the horizontal dimension. It saves the filtered video in the memory. · IVIDEOV: module that read the IVIDEOH filtered video, filter it in the vertical dimension and save the filtered video in the memory. · DCT: module that read the IVIDEOV filtered video, do the discrete cosine transform and save the transformed video in the memory. · QUANT: module that read the DCT transformed video, quantify it and save the quantified video in the memory. · IQUANT: module that read the QUANT processed video, do the inverse quantification and save the result in the memory. · IDCT: module that read the IQUANT processed video, do the inverse cosine transform and save the result in the memory. · IMEM: this module is the interface between the modules described previously and the memory. It manage the simultaneous accesses to the memory and ensure an unique access at each instant of time All this modules are included in grey in the following figure (SEE PDF OF PFC). This figure shows the architecture of the model: Figure 1. Architecture of the model This figure also includes other modules in white, these modules have been added to the model in order to simulate and prove the modules of the model: · CAMARA: simulates a black and white video camera, it reads the luminance of a video file and sends it to the model through a FIFO. · FIFO: is the interface between the camera and the model, it saves the video data sent by the camera until the IVIDEOH module reads it. · CONTROL: controls the modules that process the video. These modules indicate the CONTROL module when they have finished the processing of a video frame. The CONTROL module, then, init the necessary modules to continue with the video coding. This module is responsible of the right sequence of the video processing modules. · RAM: it simulates a RAM memory; it also simulates a programmable delay in the access to the memory. It has been generated video files, text files and a trace file to check the correct function of the model. The trace file shows the sequence of the video processing modules. As a result of the present final career project, it can be deduced that it is quite easy to model digital systems with SystemC (it is only needed previous knowledge of C++ and object oriented programming) and it also allow the modeling with a level of abstraction higher than the RTL used in Verilog and VHDL, in the case of the present final career project, the TLM.

Metodologias de planeamento e gestão da produção na indústria metalúrgica

O presente trabalho propõe demonstrar como o sistema PHC Manufactor se adequa à empresa em estudo, Ciclo Fapril, apresentando as opções de planeamento que este oferece, as dificuldades com que a empresa se irá deparar e, quando possível, o que fazer para ultrapassar as adversidades colocadas pelo sistema. Numa segunda parte são estudadas algumas heurísticas, nomeadamente FIFO, Tempo de Processamento, EDD, MOR e LOR, para se perceber qual a que melhor se adapta à empresa, de forma a poder cumprir com os prazos acordados. Posteriormente utilizou-se a heurística com melhores resultados e fez-se algumas alterações aos tempos de processamento dos centros de trabalho para melhorar a sua capacidade de resposta aos pedidos. No Final deste estudo percebeuse que o planeamento por EDD era o que melhor se adaptava a empresa. Percebeu-se ainda que os centros de trabalho AS e AT são os que têm menor produtividade e por este motivo se deveria aumentar a sua produtividade, de forma a aumentar a produtividade global.

A Research of Resource Scheduling Algorithm Based on Hadoop

With the development of electronic devices, more and more mobile clients are connected to the Internet and they generate massive data every day. We live in an age of “Big Data”, and every day we generate hundreds of million magnitude data. By analyzing the data and making prediction, we can carry out better development plan. Unfortunately, traditional computation framework cannot meet the demand, so the Hadoop would be put forward. First the paper introduces the background and development status of Hadoop, compares the MapReduce in Hadoop 1.0 and YARN in Hadoop 2.0, and analyzes the advantages and disadvantages of them. Because the resource management module is the core role of YARN, so next the paper would research about the resource allocation module including the resource management, resource allocation algorithm, resource preemption model and the whole resource scheduling process from applying resource to finishing allocation. Also it would introduce the FIFO Scheduler, Capacity Scheduler, and Fair Scheduler and compare them. The main work has been done in this paper is researching and analyzing the Dominant Resource Fair algorithm of YARN, putting forward a maximum resource utilization algorithm based on Dominant Resource Fair algorithm. The paper also provides a suggestion to improve the unreasonable facts in resource preemption model. Emphasizing “fairness” during resource allocation is the core concept of Dominant Resource Fair algorithm of YARM. Because the cluster is multiple users and multiple resources, so the user’s resource request is multiple too. The DRF algorithm would divide the user’s resources into dominant resource and normal resource. For a user, the dominant resource is the one whose share is highest among all the request resources, others are normal resource. The DRF algorithm requires the dominant resource share of each user being equal. But for these cases where different users’ dominant resource amount differs greatly, emphasizing “fairness” is not suitable and can’t promote the resource utilization of the cluster. By analyzing these cases, this thesis puts forward a new allocation algorithm based on DRF. The new algorithm takes the “fairness” into consideration but not the main principle. Maximizing the resource utilization is the main principle and goal of the new algorithm. According to comparing the result of the DRF and new algorithm based on DRF, we found that the new algorithm has more high resource utilization than DRF. The last part of the thesis is to install the environment of YARN and use the Scheduler Load Simulator (SLS) to simulate the cluster environment.

Simulación de esquemas de encolamiento

En este capítulo se presenta el proceso realizado para simular diferentes esquemas de encolamiento (FIFO, PQ y LLQ) de manera básica con el fin de ofrecer QoS en una red. También se presentan gráficas que permiten realizar el análisis posterior de los datos obtenidos en la simulación.

High performance and energy-efficient instruction cache design and optimisation for ultra-low-power multi-core clusters

High Energy efficiency and high performance are the key regiments for Internet of Things (IoT) end-nodes. Exploiting cluster of multiple programmable processors has recently emerged as a suitable solution to address this challenge. However, one of the main bottlenecks for multi-core architectures is the instruction cache. While private caches fall into data replication and wasting area, fully shared caches lack scalability and form a bottleneck for the operating frequency. Hence we propose a hybrid solution where a larger shared cache (L1.5) is shared by multiple cores connected through a low-latency interconnect to small private caches (L1). However, it is still limited by large capacity miss with a small L1. Thus, we propose a sequential prefetch from L1 to L1.5 to improve the performance with little area overhead. Moreover, to cut the critical path for better timing, we optimized the core instruction fetch stage with non-blocking transfer by adopting a 4 x 32-bit ring buffer FIFO and adding a pipeline for the conditional branch. We present a detailed comparison of different instruction cache architectures' performance and energy efficiency recently proposed for Parallel Ultra-Low-Power clusters. On average, when executing a set of real-life IoT applications, our two-level cache improves the performance by up to 20% and loses 7% energy efficiency with respect to the private cache. Compared to a shared cache system, it improves performance by up to 17% and keeps the same energy efficiency. In the end, up to 20% timing (maximum frequency) improvement and software control enable the two-level instruction cache with prefetch adapt to various battery-powered usage cases to balance high performance and energy efficiency.