Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor increases hepatic sinusoidal perfusion during liver regeneration in mice

Conditioning with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) promotes liver regeneration in an experimental small-for-size liver remnant mouse model. The mechanisms involved in this extraordinary G-CSF effect are unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the influence of G-CSF on the hepatic microvasculature in the regenerating liver. The hepatic sinusoidal microvasculature and microarchitecture of the regenerating liver were evaluated by intravital microscopy in mice. Three experimental groups were compared: (1) unoperated unconditioned animals (control; n = 5), (2) animals conditioned with G-CSF 48 h after 60% partial hepatectomy (G-CSF-PH; n = 6), and (3) animals sham conditioned 48 h after 60% PH (sham-PH; n = 6). PH led to hepatocyte hypertrophy and increased hepatic sinusoidal velocity in the sham-PH and G-CSF-PH groups. Increased sinusoidal diameter and increased hepatic blood flow were observed in the G-CSF-PH group compared to the sham-PH and control groups. Furthermore, there was a strong positive correlation between spleen weight and hepatic sinusoidal diameter in the G-CSF-PH group. The increased hepatic blood flow could explain the observed benefit of G-CSF conditioning during liver regeneration. These results elucidate an unexplored aspect of pharmacological modulation of liver regeneration and motivate further experiments.

Prophylactic antibiotics or G-CSF for the prevention of infections and improvement of survival in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy

BACKGROUND: Febrile neutropenia (FN) and other infectious complications are some of the most serious treatment-related toxicities of chemotherapy for cancer, with a mortality rate of 2% to 21%. The two main types of prophylactic regimens are granulocyte (G-CSF) or granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factors (GM-CSF); and antibiotics, frequently quinolones or cotrimoxazole. Important current guidelines recommend the use of colony stimulating factors when the risk of febrile neutropenia is above 20% but they do not mention the use of antibiotics. However, both regimens have been shown to reduce the incidence of infections. Since no systematic review has compared the two regimens, a systematic review was undertaken. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of G-CSF or GM-CSF with antibiotics in cancer patients receiving myeloablative chemotherapy with respect to preventing fever, febrile neutropenia, infection, infection-related mortality, early mortality and improving quality of life. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, databases of ongoing trials, and conference proceedings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and the American Society of Hematology (1980 to 2007). We planned to include both full-text and abstract publications. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing prophylaxis with G-CSF or GM-CSF versus antibiotics in cancer patients of all ages receiving chemotherapy or bone marrow or stem cell transplantation were included for review. Both study arms had to receive identical chemotherapy regimes and other supportive care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial eligibility and quality assessment, data extraction and analysis were done in duplicate. Authors were contacted to obtain missing data. MAIN RESULTS: We included two eligible randomised controlled trials with 195 patients. Due to differences in the outcomes reported, the trials could not be pooled for meta-analysis. Both trials showed non-significant results favouring antibiotics for the prevention of fever or hospitalisation for febrile neutropenia. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence for or against antibiotics compared to G(M)-CSFs for the prevention of infections in cancer patients.

Myocardial salvage through coronary collateral growth by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in chronic coronary artery disease: a controlled randomized trial

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for coronary collateral growth promotion and thus impending myocardial salvage has not been studied so far, to our best knowledge. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 52 patients with chronic stable coronary artery disease, age 62+/-11 years, the effect on a marker of myocardial infarct size (ECG ST segment elevation) and on quantitative collateral function during a 1-minute coronary balloon occlusion was tested in a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind fashion. The study protocol before coronary intervention consisted of occlusive surface and intracoronary lead ECG recording as well as collateral flow index (CFI, no unit) measurement in a stenotic and a > or =1 normal coronary artery before and after a 2-week period with subcutaneous G-CSF (10 microg/kg; n=26) or placebo (n=26). The CFI was determined by simultaneous measurement of mean aortic, distal coronary occlusive, and central venous pressure. The ECG ST segment elevation >0.1 mV disappeared significantly more often in response to G-CSF (11/53 vessels; 21%) than to placebo (0/55 vessels; P=0.0005), and simultaneously, CFI changed from 0.121+/-0.087 at baseline to 0.166+/-0.086 at follow-up in the G-CSF group, and from 0.152+/-0.082 to 0.131+/-0.071 in the placebo group (P<0.0001 for interaction of treatment and time). The absolute change in CFI from baseline to follow-up amounted to +0.049+/-0.062 in the G-CSF group and to -0.010+/-0.060 in the placebo group (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Subcutaneous G-CSF is efficacious during a short-term protocol in improving signs of myocardial salvage by coronary collateral growth promotion.

G-CSF induced arteriogenesis in humans: molecular insights into a randomized controlled trial

AIMS Recent data have demonstrated the feasibility of therapeutic induction of coronary collateral growth (arteriogenesis); however, mechanisms of action of such therapeutic collateral stimulation in humans are unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate potential mechanisms, especially the involvement of arteriogenesis-relevant genes. METHODS AND RESULTS A total of 52 patients were randomized into two groups: subcutaneous G-CSF (10 μg/kg; n=26) or placebo (n=26). Before and after this 2-week treatment, collateral-flow index (CFI) was determined by simultaneous measurement of mean aortic, distal coronary occlusive and central venous pressure. CD34+ endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) and monocytes were quantified before, during and after treatment; gene-expression analysis of monocytes was performed with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). G-CSF lead to a significant increase of EPC and monocytes (4.8 and 2.6 fold, p < 0.05); for both cell types, the extent of increase correlated with CFI increase (r=0.23 and 0.14, p < 0.05). G-CSF also induced a change in gene expression of pro-and anti-arteriogenic genes in monocytes. Among nine assessed genes, three were found to be differentially regulated (IL8, JAK2, and PNPLa4; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The mechanism of induction of collateral growth by G-CSF is related to an increase of EPC and of peripheral monocytes. It also leads to a change toward a pro-arteriogenic gene expression in peripheral monocytes.

Role of plerixafor in autologous stem cell mobilization with vinorelbine chemotherapy and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor in patients with myeloma: a phase II study (PAV-trial)

Current practice in Switzerland for the mobilization of autologous stem cells in patients with myeloma is combining vinorelbine chemotherapy and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) cytokine stimulation. We prospectively investigated adding intravenous plerixafor to the vinorelbine/G-CSF combination (VGP), and compared it with vinorelbine/plerixafor (VP) and G-CSF/plerixafor (GP) combinations. In a final cohort (VP-late), plerixafor was given on the first day of CD34 + cells increasing to > 15 000/mL peripheral blood. Four consecutive cohorts of 10 patients with myeloma were studied. We observed that intravenously administered plerixafor can be safely combined with vinorelbine/G-CSF. VGP was superior in mobilizing peripheral stem and progenitor cells compared to the three double combinations (VP, GP and VP-late), and GP mobilized better than VP. Our data indicate that the triple combination of VGP is an efficient strategy to collect autologous CD34 + cells, with G-CSF contributing predominantly in this concept. Plerixafor can be safely added to G-CSF and/or vinorelbine chemotherapy.

Comparaciones entre el factor "G" de Cattell y algunas pruebas de condición física en mis alumnos de 5º de EGB

Una de las cuestiones que más me ha interesado durante el tiempo que he estado cursando estudios en el Instituto Nacional de Educación Física de Madrid, y posteriormente en mi actividad educativa, es la posible relación entre la condición, la capacidad o el rendimiento físico o deportivo y la capacidad del rendimiento intelectual, así como las matizaciones posibles dentro de este amplísimo y complejo tema. Muchas veces he tenido que escuchar de compañeros en las tareas educativas, afirmaciones rotundas sin ninguna base científica acerca de la relación positiva o negativa, aunque casi siempre negativa, entre la capacidad física e intelectual, muy a menudo hechos en base a un sujeto que suspende prácticamente todas sus asignaturas y sin embargo obtiene sobresaliente en su calificación de Educación Física. No siendo este un caso muy frecuente, a estos educadores no se les ha ocurrido pensar en que la causa de esa diferencia tan destacada en el nivel de calificaciones, pueda ser la motivación y no la capacidad, tampoco piensan aun en el caso de que lo que hiciese la diferencia fuese una cuestión de capacidades, el que se produzca en algún caso aislado no implica ni que tenga que ocurrir siempre ni que a nivel general exista una relación negativa. La observación directa de los niños componentes de los equipos de baloncesto del colegio en el que imparto mis clases, me ha hecho ver que la mayor parte de ellos obtienen buenos rendimientos académicos, pocos mediocres, y muy pocos realmente bajos. Estos niños han sido seleccionados para formar parte de los equipos fundamentalmente por su buena condición física, lo cual podría hacer pensar en una posible relación, aunque no necesaria, entre condición física y rendimiento académico. Sin embargo gran cantidad de factores aparte de la inteligencia pueden influir en el mencionado rendimiento. Llegando el momento de plantear la realización de mi trabajo fin de carrera, en gran parte mediatizado por todo lo expuesto anteriormente, decidí centrarlo en la posible relación entre los diversos factores de la condición física, ésta misma y la inteligencia general. Teniendo en cuenta que estos son los factores más primarios y por consiguiente los que menos se van a ver influenciados por otros.

Autocrine production and action of IL-3 and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in chronic myeloid leukemia

Primitive subsets of leukemic cells isolated by using fluorescence-activated cell sorting from patients with newly diagnosed Ph+/BCR–ABL+ chronic myeloid leukemia display an abnormal ability to proliferate in vitro in the absence of added growth factors. We now show from analyses of growth-factor gene expression, protein production, and antibody inhibition studies that this deregulated growth can be explained, at least in part, by a novel differentiation-controlled autocrine mechanism. This mechanism involves the consistent and selective activation of IL-3 and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) production and a stimulation of STAT5 phosphorylation in CD34+ leukemic cells. When these cells differentiate into CD34− cells in vivo, IL-3 and G-CSF production declines, and the cells concomitantly lose their capacity for autonomous growth in vitro despite their continued expression of BCR–ABL. Based on previous studies of normal cells, excessive exposure of the most primitive chronic myeloid leukemia cells to IL-3 and G-CSF through an autocrine mechanism could explain their paradoxically decreased self-renewal in vitro and slow accumulation in vivo, in spite of an increased cycling activity and selective expansion of later compartments.

Myeloblastin is a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-responsive gene conferring factor-independent growth to hematopoietic cells

Hematopoiesis depends on a pool of quiescent hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. When exposed to specific cytokines, a portion of these cells enters the cell cycle to generate an amplified progeny. Myeloblastin (MBN) initially was described as involved in proliferation of human leukemia cells. The granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), which stimulates the proliferation of granulocytic precursors, up-regulates MBN expression. Here we show that constitutive overexpression of MBN confers factor-independent growth to murine bone marrow-derived Ba/F3/G-CSFR cells. Our results point to MBN as a G-CSF responsive gene critical to factor-independent growth and indicate that expression of the G-CSF receptor is a prerequisite to this process. A 91-bp MBN promoter region containing PU.1, C/EBP, and c-Myb binding sites is responsive to G-CSF treatment. Although PU.1, C/EBP, and c-Myb transcription factors all were critical for expression of MBN, its up-regulation by G-CSF was associated mainly with PU.1. These findings suggest that MBN is an important target of PU.1 and a key protease for factor-independent growth of hematopoietic cells.

Visualization of elongation factor G on the Escherichia coli 70S ribosome: The mechanism of translocation

During protein synthesis, elongation factor G (EF-G) binds to the ribosome and promotes the step of translocation, a process in which tRNA moves from the A to the P site of the ribosome and the mRNA is advanced by one codon. By using three-dimensional cryo-electron microscopy, we have visualized EF-G in a ribosome–EF-G–GDP–fusidic acid complex. Fitting the crystal structure of EF-G–GDP into the cryo density map reveals a large conformational change mainly associated with domain IV, the domain that mimics the shape of the anticodon arm of the tRNA in the structurally homologous ternary complex of Phe-tRNAPhe, EF-Tu, and a GTP analog. The tip portion of this domain is found in a position that overlaps the anticodon arm of the A-site tRNA, whose position in the ribosome is known from a study of the pretranslocational complex, implying that EF-G displaces the A-site tRNA to the P site by physical interaction with the anticodon arm.

Improved retroviral gene transfer into murine and Rhesus peripheral blood or bone marrow repopulating cells primed in vivo with stem cell factor and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.

In previous studies we showed that 5 days of treatment with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and stem cell factor (SCF) mobilized murine repopulating cells to the peripheral blood (PB) and that these cells could be efficiently transduced with retroviral vectors. We also found that, 7-14 days after cytokine treatment, the repopulating ability of murine bone marrow (BM) increased 10-fold. In this study we examined the efficiency of gene transfer into cytokine-primed murine BM cells and extended our observations to a nonhuman primate autologous transplantation model. G-CSF/SCF-primed murine BM cells collected 7-14 days after cytokine treatment were equivalent to post-5-fluorouracil BM or G-CSF/SCF-mobilized PB cells as targets for retroviral gene transfer. In nonhuman primates, CD34-enriched PB cells collected after 5 days of G-CSF/SCF treatment and CD34-enriched BM cells collected 14 days later were superior targets for retroviral gene transfer. When a clinically approved supernatant infection protocol with low-titer vector preparations was used, monkeys had up to 5% of circulating cells containing the vector for up to a year after transplantation. This relatively high level of gene transfer was confirmed by Southern blot analysis. Engraftment after transplantation using primed BM cells was more rapid than that using steady-state bone marrow, and the fraction of BM cells saving the most primitive CD34+/CD38- or CD34+/CD38dim phenotype increased 3-fold. We conclude that cytokine priming with G-CSF/SCF may allow collection of increased numbers of primitive cells from both the PB and BM that have improved susceptibility to retroviral transduction, with many potential applications in hematopoietic stem cell-directed gene therapy.

Truncated elongation factor G lacking the G domain promotes translocation of the 3' end but not of the anticodon domain of peptidyl-tRNA.

The mechanism by which elongation factor G (EF-G) catalyzes the translocation of tRNAs and mRNA on the ribosome is not known. The reaction requires GTP, which is hydrolyzed to GDP. Here we show that EF-G from Escherichia coli lacking the G domain still catalyzed partial translocation in that it promoted the transfer of the 3' end of peptidyl-tRNA to the P site on the 50S ribosomal subunit into a puromycin-reactive state in a slow-turnover reaction. In contrast, it did not bring about translocation on the 30S subunit, since (i) deacylated tRNA was not released from the P site and (ii) the A site remained blocked for aminoacyl-tRNA binding during and after partial translocation. The reaction probably represents the first EF-G-dependent step of translocation that follows the spontaneous formation of the A/P state that is not puromycin-reactive [Moazed, D. & Noller, H. F. (1989) Nature (London) 342, 142-148]. In the complete system--i.e., with intact EF-G and GTP--the 50S phase of translocation is rapidly followed by the 30S phase during which the tRNAs together with the mRNA are shifted on the small ribosomal subunit, and GTP is hydrolyzed. As to the mechanism of EF-G function, the results show that the G domain has an important role, presumably exerted through interactions with other domains of EF-G, in the promotion of translocation on the small ribosomal subunit. The G domain's intramolecular interactions are likely to be modulated by GTP binding and hydrolysis.

Cell acidification in apoptosis: granulocyte colony-stimulating factor delays programmed cell death in neutrophils by up-regulating the vacuolar H(+)-ATPase.

Neutrophils in tissue culture spontaneously undergo programmed cell death (apoptosis), a process characterized by well-defined morphological alterations affecting the cell nucleus. We found that these morphological changes were preceded by intracellular acidification and that acidification and the apoptotic changes in nuclear morphology were both delayed by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Among the agents that defend neutrophils against intracellular acidification is a vacuolar H(+)-ATPase that pumps protons out of the cytosol. When this proton pump was inhibited by bafilomycin A1, G-CSF no longer protected the neutrophils against apoptosis. We conclude that G-CSF delays apoptosis in neutrophils by up-regulating the cells' vacuolar H(+)-ATPase and that intracellular acidification is an early event in the apoptosis program.

Donor pretreatment with progenipoietin-1 is superior to granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in preventing graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic stem cell transplantation

The granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and Fit-3 receptor agonist progenipoietin-1 (ProGP-1) has potent effects on dendritic cell (DC) expansion and may be an alternative to G-CSF for the mobilization of stem cells for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT). We studied the ability of stem cell grafts mobilized with this agent to induce graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) to minor and major histocompatibility antigens in the well-described B6 --> B6D2F1 SCT model. ProGP-1, G-CSIF, or control diluent was administered to donor B6 mice. ProGP-1 expanded all cell lineages in the spleen, and unseparated splenocytes from these animals produced large amounts of interleukin 10 (IL-10) and transforming growth factor beta (TGFbeta) whereas the expression of T-cell adhesion molecules was diminished. Transplantation survival was 0%, 50%, and 90% in recipients of control-, G-CSF-, and ProGP-1-treated allogeneic donor splenocytes, respectively (P < .0001). Donor pretreatment with ProGP-1 allowed a 4-fold escalation in T-cell dose over that possible with G-CSF. Donor CD4 T cells from allogeneic SCT recipients of ProGP-1 splenocytes demonstrated an anergic response to host antigen, and cytokine production (interferon gamma [IFNγ], IL-4, and IL-10) was also reduced while CD8 T-cell cytotoxicity to host antigens remained intact. Neither CD11c(hi) DCs nor CD11c(dim)/B220(hi) DCs from ProGP-1-treated animals conferred protection from GVHD when added to control spleen. Conversely, when equal numbers of purified T cells from control-, G-CSF-, or ProGP-1-treated allogeneic donors were added to allogeneic T-cell-depleted control spleen, survival at day 60 was 0%, 15%, and 90%, respectively (P < .0001). The improved survival in recipients of ProGP-1 T cells was associated with reductions in systemic tumor necrosis factor alpha generation and GVHD of the gastrointestinal tract. We conclude that donor pretreatment with ProGP-1 is superior to G-CSIF for the prevention of GVHD after allogeneic SCT, primarily due to incremental affects on T-cell phenotype and function

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor increases CD123hi blood dendritic cells with altered CD62L and CCR7 expression

Changes in blood dendritic cell (BDC) counts (CD123(hi)BDC and CD11c(+)BDC) and expression of CD62L, CCR7, and CD49d were analyzed in healthy donors, multiple myeloma (MM), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) patients, who received granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) containing peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization protocols. Low-dose G-CSF in healthy donors (8-10 mug/ kg/d subcutaneously) and high-dose G-CSF in patients (30 mug/kg/d) increased CD123(hi)BDC (2- to 22-fold, mean 3.7 x 10(6)/ L-17.7 x 10(6)/L and 1.9 x 10(6)/L-12.0 x 10(6)/ L) in healthy donors and MM but decreased CD11c(+)BDC (2- to 10-fold, mean 5.7 x 10(6)/L-1.6 x 10(6)/L) in NHL patients, on the day of apheresis, compared with steady state. After apheresis, CD123(hi)BDC counts remained high, whereas low CD11c(+)BDC counts tended to recover in the following 2-5 days. Down-regulation of CD62L and up-regulation of CCR7 on CD123(hi)BDC were found in most healthy donors and MM patients. CD49d expression was unchanged. Thus, PBSC mobilization may change BDC counts by altering molecules necessary for BDC homing from blood into tissues.