Debates and other proceedings of the Convention of Virginia, : convened at Richmond, on Monday the second day of June, 1788, for the purpose of deliberating on the Constitution recommended by the grand Federal Convention. : To which is prefixed the Federal Constitution. /

Second and third alphabets in collation signed in the form A2 and A3 rather than 2A or 3A.

Brevier legislative reports embracing short-hand sketches of the debates and journals of the General Assembly of the state of Indiana.

"Ariel & W.H. Drapier, Reporters."

Discussion and debate; tools of a democracy

"Readings" at end of each chapter except the first. "Selected bibliographies": p. 511-513.

Children, health and well-being:policy debates and lived experiences

This book brings together new and leading scholars, who demonstrate the importance of research with children and from a child perspective, allowing for a fuller understanding of the meaning and impact of health and illness in children’s lives. •Demonstrates the importance of research with children and research from a child perspective, in order to fully understand the meaning and impact of health and illness in children’s lives •Encourages critical reflection on contemporary health policy and its relationships to culturally specific ways of knowing and understanding children’s health •Brings together new and leading scholars in the field of children’s health and illness •Moves the highly important issue of children’s health into the mainstream sociology of health and illness

Theorising noncitizenship:concepts, debates and challenges

Existing political theory, particularly which deals with justice and/or rights, has long assumed citizenship as a core concept. Noncitizenship, if it is considered at all, is generally defined merely as the negation or deprivation of citizenship. As such, it is difficult to examine successfully the status of noncitizens, obligations towards them, and the nature of their role in political systems. This article addresses this critical gap by defining the theoretical problem that noncitizenship presents and demonstrating why it is an urgent concern. It surveys the contributions to the special issue for which the article is an introduction, drawing on cross-cutting themes and debates to highlight the importance of theorising noncitizenship due to both the problematic gap that exists in the theoretical literature, and the real world problems created as a result of noncitizenship which are not currently successfully addressed. Finally, the article discusses key future directions for the theorisation of noncitizenship.

Theorising noncitizenship:concepts, debates and challenges

‘Noncitizenship’, if it is considered at all, is generally seen only as the negation or deprivation of citizenship. It is rarely examined in its own right, whether in relation to States, to noncitizens, or citizens. This means that it is difficult to examine successfully the status of noncitizens, obligations towards them, and the nature of their role in political systems. As a result, not only are there theoretical black holes, but also the real world difficulties created as a result of noncitizenship are not currently successfully addressed. In response, Theorising Noncitizenship seeks to define the theoretical challenge that noncitizenship presents and to consider why it should be seen as a foundational concept in social science. The contributions, from leading scholars in the field and across disciplinary backgrounds, capture a diversity of perspectives on the meaning, position and lived experience of noncitizenship. They demonstrate that, we need to look beyond citizenship in order to take noncitizenship seriously and to capture fully the lived realities of the contemporary State system. This book was previously published as a special issue of Citizenship Studies.

Theses, in Comitiis publicis Harvardini Collegii quod est Cantabrigiae Nov-Anglorum, defensae & pro viribus propugnatae a Juvenibus in Artibus initiatis, [1660-1753]

The bound volume holds handwritten transcriptions of selected Harvard Commencement Theses copied by Isaac Mansfield (Harvard AB 1742). The manuscript volume holds only the Theses chosen for public disputation. The volume includes Theses transcriptions for which no original broadsides are known to still exists.

Dominium temporale non fundatur in gratia (Commencement Quaestiones), 1697 July 7

Small paper notebook of John Ballantine with the handwritten Latin quaestiones performed by Ballantine, Eliphalet Adams, Adam Winthrop, and Jabez Fitch as candidates for the Master’s degree during the July 7, 1697 Harvard Commencement ceremony. The Quaestiones begin with Ballantine’s “Dominum temporal non fundatur in gratia,” and follow with “An Jesuitae possint esse boni subditi? Neg Resp. Dom. Winthrop,” "An Ethnicae virtutes sint verae virtutes?" Neg. Resp. Dom. Adams,” and “An detur omnibus an sufficiens ad salutem? Neg. Resp. Dom. Fitch.” The title page bears the inscription: “Jno Ballantine’s Book” and the first page has been torn out.

Gravitatio est in Ratione Quantitatum Materia : 1750

One-page sheet with a handwritten Latin thesis defended by graduate Oliver Prescott in the 1750 Harvard College Commencement ceremony. The document is signed: "H. College July 3, 1750 Oliver Prescott. Verso: "Theses read when I took my degree 1750."

Risālah-ʼi istidlālīyah

li-ʻUthmān ibn Muṣṭafá al-Ṭarasūsī.

Majmūʻat al-rasāʼil fī ādāb al-baḥth : manuscript, 1869 or 70

1. Risālah fī ādāb al-muṭālaʻah / Ḥāmid ibn Burhān ibn Abī Dharr al-Ghifārī (ff. 1r-6v) -- 2. Ādāb ʻUthmānīyah (ff. 7r-14r) -- 3. Ādāb Sharīfīyah fī al-munāẓarah / al-Sayyid al-Sharīf al-Jurjānī (ff. 15r-27r) -- 4. Sharḥ ādāb al-baḥth fī ʻilm al-munāẓarah lil-ʻAḍudī (ff. 28r-46v) -- 5. Ḥāshiyah ʻalá Sharḥ Ādāb al-Ḥanafī (ff. 47r-55v).

Debate at Boston College : people, places, traditions /

"November 1991."

Effective group discussion: a guide for group members,

Mode of access: Internet.

University debaters' annual.

Edited by Edith M. Phelps and Ruth Ulman [et al]