The theatre of the Greeks, a series of papers relating to the history and criticism of the Greek drama.

The first 3 editions of this work appeared under the name of the original author, P.W. Buckham. cf. British Mus. General cat. of printed books.

The higher criticism of the Hexateuch

Published without appendix and indices (p. 163-259) in 1892.

An introduction to the textual criticism of the New Testament.

Mode of access: Internet.

The province of reason a criticism of the Bampton lecture on "The limits of religious thought" /

Mode of access: Internet.

Ministerial priesthood. Chapters (preliminary to a study of the ordinal) on the rationale of ministry and the meaning of Christian priesthood, with an appendix upon Roman criticism of Anglican orders.

Mode of access: Internet.

A criticism of Lord Farrer on the monetary standard,

"Reprinted from the National review for January, 1895."

Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament,

Mode of access: Internet.

Reasons for the higher criticism of the Hexateuch,

Mode of access: Internet.

The history of materialism and criticism of its present importance /

v. 1. Materialism in antiquity.--The period of transition.--The seventeenth century.--v. 2. The eighteenth century.--Modern philosophy.--The natural sciences.--v. 3. The natural sciences (continued).--Man and the soul.--Morality and religion.

Schopenhauer's criticism of Kant's theory of experience.

Mode of access: Internet.

The Method, Meditations, and selections from the Principles of Descartes,

Tr. of: Discours sur lamethode

Liturgical right and national wrong, and a criticism of Wakeman's History and other books approved by bishops, and by the fellows of the "Australian School of Theology."

Mode of access: Internet.

The Method, Meditations and Philosophy of Descartes /

Spine title: The philosophy of Descartes.

Natural rights : a criticism of some political and ethical conceptions /

Includes some text in French.

The David and Goliath principle: Cultural, ideological, and attitudinal underpinnings of the normative protection of low-status groups from criticism

Two studies documented the “David and Goliath” rule—the tendency for people to perceive criticism of “David” groups (groups with low power and status) as less normatively permissible than criticism of “Goliath” groups (groups with high power and status). The authors confirmed the existence of the David and Goliath rule across Western and Chinese cultures (Study 1). However, the rule was endorsed more strongly in Western than in Chinese cultures, an effect mediated by cultural differences in power distance. Study 2 identified the psychological underpinnings of this rule in an Australian sample. Lower social dominance orientation (SDO) was associated with greater endorsement of the rule, an effect mediated through the differential attribution of stereotypes. Specifically, those low in SDO were more likely to attribute traits of warmth and incompetence to David versus Goliath groups, a pattern of stereotypes that was related to the protection of David groups from criticism.