Report on the Community Development Block Grant Program administered by the Southern Iowa Council of Governments (Council) for the period October 1, 2003 through September 30, 2007

Report on the Community Development Block Grant Program administered by the Southern Iowa Council of Governments (Council) for the period October 1, 2003 through September 30, 2007

Report on the Community Development Block Grant and Home Investment Partnerships Programs administered by the Region XII Council of Governments for the period July 1, 2005 through November 21, 2008

Report on the Community Development Block Grant and Home Investment Partnerships Programs administered by the Region XII Council of Governments for the period July 1, 2005 through November 21, 2008

Audit report on the Community Development Block Grants program for the City of Brooklyn, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2012

Audit report on the Community Development Block Grants program for the City of Brooklyn, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2012

Audit report on the Community Development Block Grants program for the City of Bedford, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2014

Audit report on the Community Development Block Grants program for the City of Bedford, Iowa for the year ended June 30, 2014

The State of Iowa Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development: Annual Action Plan, 2016

The state of Iowa must submit to HUD a Consolidated Plan and an Annual Action Plan. The Consolidated Plan is a 5-year plan to address housing and community development needs. The 2015-2019 Consolidated Plan was submitted to HUD in 2015 and outlines the state of Iowa’s goals for the 5-year period. The state’s Consolidated Plan includes goals and proposed activities under the Community Development Block Grant (CDBG), HOME Investment Partnerships (HOME), Emergency Solutions Grant (ESG), and Housing Opportunities for Persons with AIDS (HOPWA) programs.

Exploring the role and transformative potential of human rights in development practice and food security : case study from Malawi

Avhandlingen är en analys av den roll som mänskliga rättigheter spelar i utvecklingssamarbete i allmänhet och tre matsäkerhetsprojekt i Malawi i synnerhet. Författaren undersöker huruvida mänskliga rättigheter kan bidra till samhälleliga förändringsprocesser. Undersökningen har en diskursiv syn på mänskliga rättigheter; rättigheter ses som sociala konstruktioner skapade av människor, konstruktioner som förändras i takt med att aktörerna ger dem ny mening. Människorättsbaserade utvecklingsstrategier riktar uppmärksamheten mot olika aktörers skyldigheter samt vikten av att mänskliga rättigheter inte kränks genom utvecklingspolitiska beslut. En analys som utgår från mänskliga rättigheter kan leda till att nya frågor lyfts fram: vem har skyldigheter, vem har rättigheter, och varför förverkligas inte dessa? Fokus flyttas till hur politiska, ekonomiska och juridiska strukturer kan förändras så att de främjar mänskliga rättigheter. Författaren använder empiriskt material från Malawi för att visa vilken roll mänskliga rättigheter och så kallade människorättsprinciper spelar inom tre projekt: (1) ett mathjälpsprojekt; (2) ett rättighetsbaserat projekt med fokus på att stärka strategier för livsuppehälle; (3) ett juridiskt projekt inom ramen för vilket man skapat ett lagförslag om rätten till föda. Analysen visar att det rättighetsbaserade projektet strävade efter den mest djupgående samhälleliga förändringen. Människorättsprinciperna ansvarighet och deltagande handlade inte endast om verksamheten inom projektet utan man strävade även efter att stärka dessa principer mellan medborgare och myndigheter. Rättigheter, som ett sätt att tala, tänka och handla, inte som abstrakta juridiska normer, påverkade de lokala aktörernas sätt att kräva bl.a. tjänster av lokala myndigheter. Teoretiskt kan man säga att det rättighetsbaserade projektet representerar ett aktörsperspektiv på mänskliga rättigheter där aktörernas egna uppfattningar om vad de är berättigade till samt krav på myndigheters ansvar formade vilken mening rättigheterna kom att få.

museology and community development in the XXI Century

Each time more, museology professionals are confronted with terms such as community, social inequality, social inclusion and development in their quotidian. Be it in conferences, publications or museum programmes, these are increasingly recurrent terms which, in great part, translate the dynamics of a relationship between museology and community development that has been constructed since the late 60’s. Although it is not new, such relationship has gone through a major bloom in the early 90’s and arrives today as an emerging priority within the world of museology. A first glance on the subject reveals that very different approaches and forms of action share the efforts in endowing museology with a role in community development today. In addition, despite of its growing popularity, it seems to be some misunderstandings on what the work with community development requires and truly signifies, as can be pointed out in a number of assertions originated from the field of museology. Accompanying such a plural environment, discussions and disagreements about to what extend museology is able to claim a role in social change also mark its affairs with community development. People are faced, indeed, with a rather polemic and intricate scenario. To a great extend, language barriers hinder the exchange of information on current initiatives and previous experiences, as well as on the development of concepts, approaches and proposals. Lack of better interactions among the groups of museology professionals and social actors who carry out different works with community development also contributes to making the potential of museology as a resource for development more difficult to be visualised.

The Maré Museum: an integrated project of community development

The Maré Museum, founded on 8 May 2006, arose from the desire of the inhabitants of the community to have a place of memory, a place that is immersed in the past and looks to the future, a place that reflects on this community, on their conditions and identities and on their territorial and cultural diversity. The intention of the Maré Museum is to break with the tradition that the experiences to be recollected and the places of memory to be remembered are those elected by the official version, the "winner" version of the story that restricts the representations of history and memory of large portions of the population. The Maré Museum, as a pioneer initiative in the city scene, proposed to expand the museological concept, so that it is not restricted to intellectual social groups and cultural spaces that are not accessible to the general population. The museum has established recognition that the slum is a place of memory and so has initiated a museographic reading of the Mare community. ..

Long-term effectiveness of sowing high and low diversity seed mixtures to enhance plant community development on ex-arable fields

Questions: How is succession on ex-arable land affected by sowing high and low diversity mixtures of grassland species as compared to natural succession? How long do effects persist? Location: Experimental plots installed in the Czech Republic, The Netherlands, Spain, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Methods: The experiment was established on ex-arable land, with five blocks, each containing three 10 m x 10 m experiment tal plots: natural colonization, a low- (four species) and high-diversity (15 species) seed mixture. Species composition and biomass was followed for eight years. Results: The sown plants considerably affected the whole successional pathway and the effects persisted during the whole eight year period. Whilst the proportion of sown species (characterized by their cover) increased during the study period, the number of sown species started to decrease from the third season onwards. Sowing caused suppression of natural colonizing species, and the sown plots had more biomass. These effects were on average larger in the high diversity mixtures. However, the low diversity replicate sown with the mixture that produced the largest biomass or largest suppression of natural colonizers fell within the range recorded at the five replicates of the high diversity plots. The natural colonization plots usually had the highest total species richness and lowest productivity at the end of the observation period. Conclusions: The effect of sowing demonstrated dispersal limitation as a factor controlling the rate of early secondary succession. Diversity was important primarily for its 'insurance effect': the high diversity mixtures were always able to compensate for the failure of some species.

'In practice it doesn't always work out like that.' Undergraduate experiences in a research community of practice

This paper examines the extent to which a structured undergraduate research intervention, UROP, permits undergraduate students early access to legitimate peripheral participation (LPP) in a research community of practice. Accounts of placement experiences suggest that UROP affords rich possibilities for engagement with research practice. Undergraduates tread a path of gaining access to mature practice while also building their own independence, participating in work that they see matters to the community and making gains in use of a shared research repertoire. Students place UROP experiences in a contrasting frame to research exercises experienced during degree programmes; their sense of the authenticity of the research experienced through UROP emerges as a key element of these accounts. The data generate the interesting question that the degree of engagement with mature practice may account for more of the gain from UROP than simply the quantity of contact other researchers.