Quantifying ChIP-seq data: a spiking method providing an internal reference for sample-to-sample normalization.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by deep sequencing (ChIP-seq) experiments are widely used to determine, within entire genomes, the occupancy sites of any protein of interest, including, for example, transcription factors, RNA polymerases, or histones with or without various modifications. In addition to allowing the determination of occupancy sites within one cell type and under one condition, this method allows, in principle, the establishment and comparison of occupancy maps in various cell types, tissues, and conditions. Such comparisons require, however, that samples be normalized. Widely used normalization methods that include a quantile normalization step perform well when factor occupancy varies at a subset of sites, but may miss uniform genome-wide increases or decreases in site occupancy. We describe a spike adjustment procedure (SAP) that, unlike commonly used normalization methods intervening at the analysis stage, entails an experimental step prior to immunoprecipitation. A constant, low amount from a single batch of chromatin of a foreign genome is added to the experimental chromatin. This "spike" chromatin then serves as an internal control to which the experimental signals can be adjusted. We show that the method improves similarity between replicates and reveals biological differences including global and largely uniform changes.

Role of ATH5 in the specification of retinal ganglion cells and expression and cell compartmentalization of EFEMP1, a protein associated with Malattia Leventinese

ABSTRACT : The development of the retina is a very complex process, occurring through the progressive restriction of cell fates, from pluripotent cell populations to complex tissues and organs. In all vertebrate species analyzed so far, retinal differentiation starts with the generation of retinal ganglion cells (RGC)s. One of the documented key essential events in the specification of RGCs is the expression of ATHS, an atonal homolog encoding a bHLH transcription factor. Despite the putative role of master regulator of RGC differentiation, the mechanism of integrating its functions into a coherent program underlying the production of this subclass of retinal neurons has not yet been elucidated. By using chromatin immunoprecipitation combined with microarray (ChIP-on-chip) we have screened for ATH5 direct targets in the developing chick retina at two consecutive periods: E3.5 (stage HH22) and E6 (stage HH30), covering the stages of progenitor proliferation, neuroepithelium patterning, RGC specification, cell cycle exit and early neuronal differentiation. In parallel, complementary analysis with Affymetrix expression microarrays was conducted. We compared RGCs versus retina to see if the targets correspond to genes preferentially expressed in RGCs. We also precociously overexpressed ATH5 in the retina of individual embryo, and contralateral retina vas used as a control. Our integrated approach allowed us to establish a compendium of ATH5-targets and enabled us to position ATH5 in the transcription network underlying neurogenesis in the retina. Malattia Leventinese (ML) is an autosomal, dominant retinal dystrophy characterized by extracellular, amorphous deposits known as drusen, between the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and Bruch's membrane. On the genetic level, it has been associated with a single missense mutation (R345W) in a widely expressed gene with unknown function called EFEMP1. We determined expression patterns of the EFEMP1 gene in normal and ML human retinas. Our data shown that the upregulation of EFEMP1 is not specific to ML eye, except for the region of the ciliary body. We also analyzed the cell compartmentalization of different versions of the protein (both wild type and mutant). Our studies indicate that both abnormal expression of the EFEMP1 gene and mutation and accumulation of EFEMP 1 protein (inside or outside the cells) might contribute to the ML pathology. Résumé : 1er partie : L'ontogenèse de la rétine est un processus complexe au cours duquel des cellules progénitrices sont engagée, par vagues successives, dans des lignées où elles vont d'abord être déterminées puis vont se différencier pour finalement construire un tissu rétinien composé de cinq classes de neurones (les photorécepteurs, les cellules horizontales, bipolaires, amacrines et ganglionnaires) et d'une seule de cellules gliales (les cellules de Muller). Chez tous les vertébrés, la neurogenèse rétinienne est d'abord marquée par la production des cellules ganglionnaires (RGCs). La production de cette classe de neurone est liée à l'expression du gène ATH5 qui est un homologue du gène atonal chez la Drosophile et qui code pour un facteur de transcription de la famille des protéines basic Helix-Loop-Helix (bHLH). Malgré le rôle central que joue ATH5 dans la production des RGCs, le mécanisme qui intègre la fonction de cette protéine dans le programme de détermination neuronale et ceci en relation avec le développement de la rétine n'est pas encore élucidé. Grâce à une technologie qui permet de combiner la sélection de fragments de chromatine liant ATH5 et la recherche de séquences grâce à des puces d'ADN non-codants (ChIP-on-chip), nous avons recherché des cibles potentielles de la protéine ATH5 dans la rétine en développement. Nous avons conduit cette recherche à deux stades de développement de manière à englober la phase de prolifération cellulaire, la détermination des RGCs, la sortie du cycle cellulaire ainsi que les premières étapes de la différentiation de ces neurones. Des expériences complémentaires nous ont permis de définir les patrons d'expression des gènes sélectionnés ainsi que l'activité promotrice des éléments de régulation identifiés lors de notre criblage. Ces approches expérimentales diverses et complémentaires nous ont permis de répertorier des gènes cibles de la protéine ATH5 et d'établir ainsi des liens fonctionnels entre des voies métaboliques dont nous ne soupçonnions pas jusqu'alors qu'elles puissent être associées à la production d'une classe de neurones centraux. 2ème partie : Malattia Leventinese (ML) est une maladie génétique qui engendre une dystrophie de la rétine. Elle se caractérise par l'accumulation de dépôt amorphe entre l'épithélium pigmentaire et la membrane de Bruch et connu sous le nom de drusen. Cette maladie est liée à une simple mutation non-sens (R345W) dans un gène dénommé EFEMP1 qui est exprimé dans de nombreux tissus mais dont la fonction reste mal définie. Une étude détaillée de l'expression de ce gène dans des rétines humaines a révélé une expression à un niveau élevé du gène EFEMP1 dans divers tissus de l'oeil ML mais également dans des yeux contrôles. Alors que l'accumulation d'ARN messager EFEMP1 dans les cellules de l'épithélium pigmentaire n'est pas spécifique à ML, l'expression de ce gène dans le corps cilié n'a été observée que dans l'oeil ML. Nous avons également comparé la sécrétion de la protéine sauvage avec celle porteuse de la mutation. En résumé, notre étude révèle que le niveau élevé d'expression du gène EFEMP1 ainsi que l'accumulation de la protéine dans certains compartiments cellulaires pourraient contribuer au développement de pathologies rétiniennes liées à ML.

Effects of epigenetic regulatory elements on telomeric gene expression

Transgene expression in eukaryotic cells strongly depends on the locus of integration in the host genome and often results in limited transcription level because of unfavorable chromatin structure at the integration site. Epigenetic regulators are DNA sequences which are believed to act on the chromatin structure and may protect transgenes from this so-called position effect. Despite being extensively used to increase transgene expression, the mechanism of action of many of these elements remains largely unknown. Here we evaluated different epigenetic regulatory DNA elements for their ability to protect transgene transcription at telomeres, a defined chromatin environment associated to low or inconsistent expression caused by the Telomere Position Effect (TPE). For the assessment of the effects of epigenetic regulators at telomeres, a novel dual reporter system had to be designed. Telomeric integration of the newly-developed dual reporter system carrying different epigenetic regulators showed that MARs (Matrix Attachment Regions), a UCOE (Ubiquitous Chromatin-Opening Element) or the chicken cHS4 insulator have strong barrier activity which prevented TPE from spreading toward the centromere, resulting in stable and in some cases increased expression of a telomeric-distal reporter gene. In addition, MARs and STAR element 40 resulted in an increase of cells expressing the telomeric-proximal reporter gene, suggesting also an anti-silencing effect. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays revealed that at telomeres MARs actively promote the deposition of euchromatic histone marks, especially acetylation of both histone H3 and H4, which might be involved in MARs' barrier and transcriptional activator activities. Differently, the chromatin in proximity of the UCOE element was depleted of several repressive chromatin marks, such as trimethylated lysine 9 and lysine 27 on histone H3 and trimethylated lysine 20 of histone H4, possibly favoring the preservation of an open chromatin structure at the integration site. We conclude that epigenetic regulatory elements that may be used to enhance and sustain transgene expression have all a specific epigenetic signature which might be at the basis of their mechanism of action, and that a combination of different classes of epigenetic regulators might be advantageous when high levels of protein expression are required. - L'expression des transgènes dans les cellules eucaryotes est fortement influencée par leur site d'intégration dans le génome. En effet, une structure chromatinienne défavorable au niveau du site d'intégration peut fortement limiter le degré d'expression d'un transgène. Il existe toutefois des séquences d'ADN qui, en agissant sur la structure de la chromatine, permettent de limiter cet effet de position et, par conséquent, de promouvoir l'expression soutenue d'un transgène. Ces éléments génomiques, connus comme régulateurs épigénétiques, sont largement utilisés dans plusieurs domaines où une expression élevée et soutenue est requise, malgré un mode de fonctionnement parfois méconnu. Dans cette étude, j'ai évalué la capacité de différents régulateurs épigénétiques à protéger la transcription de transgènes au niveau des télomères, régions chromatiniennes bien définies qui ont été associées à un fort effet de silençage, connu comme «effet de position télomérique». Pour cela, un nouveau système à deux gènes rapporteurs a été développé. Lorsque des MARs (Matrix Attachment Regions, séquences d'ADN pouvant s'associer à la matrice nucléaire), un UCOE (Ubiquitous Chromatin-Opening Element, élément pouvant ouvrir la chromatine) ou l'isolateur génétique cHS4 (dérivé du locus de la β-globine de poulet) sont placés entre les deux gènes rapporteurs, une forte activité barrière bloquant la propagation de la chromatine répressive télomérique est observée, résultant en un plus grand nombre de cellules exprimant le gène télomérique-distal. D'autre part, une augmentation du nombre de cellules exprimant le gène télomérique-proximal, observée en présence des éléments MAR et STAR 40 (Stabilizing Anti-Repressor element 40, un élément pouvant prévenir la répression génique), suggère aussi un faible effet anti-silençage pour ces éléments. Des expériences d'immunoprécipitation de la chromatine démontrent qu'au télomère, les MARs favorisent l'assemblage de marqueurs de la chromatine active, surtout l'acétylation des histones H3 et H4, qui pourraient être à la base de l'activité barrière et de celle d'activateur transcriptionel. Différemment, la chromatine à proximité de l'élément UCOE est particulièrement pauvre en marqueurs de la chromatine silencieuse, comme la trimethylation des lysines 9 et 27 de l'histone H3, ainsi que la trimethylation de la lysine 20 de l'histone H4. Cela suggère que UCOE pourrait préserver une structure chromatinienne ouverte au site d'intégration, favorisant l'expression des gènes à sa proximité. En conclusion, les régulateurs épigénétiques analysés lors de cette étude ont tous montré une signature épigénétique spécifique qui pourrait être à la base de leurs mécanismes de fonctionnement, suggérant aussi qu'une utilisation d'éléments épigénétiques de classe différente dans un même vecteur d'expression pourrait être avantageuse lorsque de hauts et soutenus niveaux d'expression sont nécessaires.

CNOT3 is a modifier of PRPF31 mutations in retinitis pigmentosa with incomplete penetrance.

Heterozygous mutations in the PRPF31 gene cause autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa (adRP), a hereditary disorder leading to progressive blindness. In some cases, such mutations display incomplete penetrance, implying that certain carriers develop retinal degeneration while others have no symptoms at all. Asymptomatic carriers are protected from the disease by a higher than average expression of the PRPF31 allele that is not mutated, mainly through the action of an unknown modifier gene mapping to chromosome 19q13.4. We investigated a large family with adRP segregating an 11-bp deletion in PRPF31. The analysis of cell lines derived from asymptomatic and affected individuals revealed that the expression of only one gene among a number of candidates within the 19q13.4 interval significantly correlated with that of PRPF31, both at the mRNA and protein levels, and according to an inverse relationship. This gene was CNOT3, encoding a subunit of the Ccr4-not transcription complex. In cultured cells, siRNA-mediated silencing of CNOT3 provoked an increase in PRPF31 expression, confirming a repressive nature of CNOT3 on PRPF31. Furthermore, chromatin immunoprecipitation revealed that CNOT3 directly binds to a specific PRPF31 promoter sequence, while next-generation sequencing of the CNOT3 genomic region indicated that its variable expression is associated with a common intronic SNP. In conclusion, we identify CNOT3 as the main modifier gene determining penetrance of PRPF31 mutations, via a mechanism of transcriptional repression. In asymptomatic carriers CNOT3 is expressed at low levels, allowing higher amounts of wild-type PRPF31 transcripts to be produced and preventing manifestation of retinal degeneration.

Nonsense Mutations in FAM161A Cause RP28-Associated Recessive Retinitis Pigmentosa.

Retinitis pigmentosa (RP) is a degenerative disease of the retina leading to progressive loss of vision and, in many instances, to legal blindness at the end stage. The RP28 locus was assigned in 1999 to the short arm of chromosome 2 by homozygosity mapping in a large Indian family segregating autosomal-recessive RP (arRP). Following a combined approach of chromatin immunoprecipitation and parallel sequencing of genomic DNA, we identified a gene, FAM161A, which was shown to carry a homozygous nonsense mutation (p.Arg229X) in patients from the original RP28 pedigree. Another homozygous FAM161A stop mutation (p.Arg437X) was detected in three subjects from a cohort of 118 apparently unrelated German RP patients. Age at disease onset in these patients was in the second to third decade, with severe visual handicap in the fifth decade and legal blindness in the sixth to seventh decades. FAM161A is a phylogenetically conserved gene, expressed in the retina at relatively high levels and encoding a putative 76 kDa protein of unknown function. In the mouse retina, Fam161a mRNA is developmentally regulated and controlled by the transcription factor Crx, as demonstrated by chromatin immunoprecipitation and organotypic reporter assays on explanted retinas. Fam161a protein localizes to photoreceptor cells during development, and in adult animals it is present in the inner segment as well as the outer plexiform layer of the retina, the synaptic interface between photoreceptors and their efferent neurons. Taken together, our data indicate that null mutations in FAM161A are responsible for the RP28-associated arRP.

Functional analysis of human POT1 and RPA : insights into the role of single stranded DNA binding proteins at telomeres

Abstract Telomeres, the natural ends of chromosomes, need to be protected from chromosome end fusions, aberrant homologous recombination and degradation. In humans, chromosome ends are specified through arrays of tandemly repeated 5'-TTAGGG-3' hexamers, ending in a 3' overhang. A complex formed by the six proteins TRF1, TRF2, hRap1, TIN2, TPP1 and POT1 specifically assocìates with and protects telomeres. Telomeres are maintained by semiconservative DNA replication and by a specialized reverse transcriptase, telomerase, that carries an RNA subunit which templates new telomeric repeat synthesis. The telomeric single stranded (ss) DNA binding protein POT1 protects the telomeric 3' overhang and modulates telomerase-mediated telomere elongation. It is possible that POT1 also influences DNA synthesis during semiconservative DNA replication, which is initiated by the DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex. The heterotrimeric ss DNA-binding protein RPA plays essential roles during DNA replication. RPA binds to ss DNA with high affinity in order to stabilize ss DNA and facilitate nascent strand synthesis at the replication fork. Here we investigate how the two proteins RPA and POT1 contribute to telomere maintenance by regulating semi-conservative DNA replication and telomerase. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments, we show that RPA associates with telomeres during S-phase. Analysis of telomere structure in cells shRNA-depleted for RPA and POT1 reveals that loss of RPA and POT1 causes exposure of single-stranded DNA at telomeres, suggestive of incomplete DNA replication. Biochemical experiments using purified recombinant POT1 and RPA show that saturating telomeric oligonucleotides with POT1 or RPA reduces the primase activity of the DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex and the overall activity of telomerase. POT1 and RPA also increase the primer extension by DNA polymerase alpha-primase complex and the processivity of telomerase under certain conditions, although POT1 increases the activities to a greater extent than RPA. We propose that POT1 is required for proper replication of the lagging strand of telomeres and that some phenotypes observed in POT1-depleted cells may stern from incomplete DNA replication rather than de-protection of the single-stranded overhang. Résumé Les télomères, les extrémités normales des chromosomes linéaires, doivent être protégés des fusions chromosomiques, d'événements de recombinaison homologue aberrants et de phénomènes de dégradation. Chez l'Homme, les extrémités des chromosomes sont constitués d'ADN double brin répétitif de séquence 5'-TTAGGG-3', d'une extension simple brin 3' sortante et d'un complexe protéique formé des six facteurs TRF1, TRF2, hRap1, TIN2, TPP1 et POT1 qui, s'associant à cette séquence, protègent l'ADN télomèrique. Les télomères sont maintenus par la télomérase, une transcriptase inverse capable d'allonger l'extension 3' sortante télomérique. POT1 lie l'ADN simple brin télomérique et module l'élongation des télomères par la télomérase. POT1 pourrait en théorie également influencer la réplication semi-conservative de l'ADN. L'ADN-polymérase Pal alpha-primase amorce et initie la synthèse d'ADN. Pendant la réplication, l'ADN simple brin est stabilisé par RPA, un complexe hétérotrimèrique qui lie l'ADN simple brin. RPA facilite la synthèse du brin naissant à la fourche de réplication. Ici nous avons étudié comment ces deux protéines qui lient l'ADN simple brin, RPA et POT1, régulent la réplication des télomères par la télomérase et la machinerie classique de réplication de l'ADN. Par immunoprécipitation de chromatine (ChIP), nous montrons que RPA est localisé aux télomères lors de la phase S du cycle cellulaire. De plus, l'analyse de la structure des télomeres indique que !a perte de RPA ou de POT1 conduit à l'apparition d'ADN simple brin télomérique, suggérant une réplication incomplète de l'ADN télomérique in vivo. Par une approche complémentaire biochimique utilisant les protéines POT1 et RPA recombinantes purifiées, nous montrons également que la liaison de POT1 ou de RPA à des oligonucléotides télomériques bloque l'activité primase du complexe polymérase alpha/primase et réduit l'activité télomérase sur ces substrats. En revanche, leur liaison augmente l'activité ADN-polymérase du complexe polymérase alpha/primase, ainsi que fa processivité de la télomérase dans certaines conditions, POT1 étant le plus efficace des deux facteurs. Nous proposons que POT1 est nécessaire à la réplication du brin retardé au niveau des télomères, ce qui suggère que certains phénotypes des cellules déplétés en POT1 puissent résulter d'une réplication incomplète de l'ADN télémétrique plutôt que d'une déprotection de l'extrémité sortante des télomères.

Identification and removal of low-complexity sites in allele-specific analysis of ChIP-seq data.

MOTIVATION: High-throughput sequencing technologies enable the genome-wide analysis of the impact of genetic variation on molecular phenotypes at unprecedented resolution. However, although powerful, these technologies can also introduce unexpected artifacts. Results: We investigated the impact of library amplification bias on the identification of allele-specific (AS) molecular events from high-throughput sequencing data derived from chromatin immunoprecipitation assays (ChIP-seq). Putative AS DNA binding activity for RNA polymerase II was determined using ChIP-seq data derived from lymphoblastoid cell lines of two parent-daughter trios. We found that, at high-sequencing depth, many significant AS binding sites suffered from an amplification bias, as evidenced by a larger number of clonal reads representing one of the two alleles. To alleviate this bias, we devised an amplification bias detection strategy, which filters out sites with low read complexity and sites featuring a significant excess of clonal reads. This method will be useful for AS analyses involving ChIP-seq and other functional sequencing assays.

Identification of novel functional TBP-binding sites and general factor repertoires.

Our current knowledge of the general factor requirement in transcription by the three mammalian RNA polymerases is based on a small number of model promoters. Here, we present a comprehensive chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-on-chip analysis for 28 transcription factors on a large set of known and novel TATA-binding protein (TBP)-binding sites experimentally identified via ChIP cloning. A large fraction of identified TBP-binding sites is located in introns or lacks a gene/mRNA annotation and is found to direct transcription. Integrated analysis of the ChIP-on-chip data and functional studies revealed that TAF12 hitherto regarded as RNA polymerase II (RNAP II)-specific was found to be also involved in RNAP I transcription. Distinct profiles for general transcription factors and TAF-containing complexes were uncovered for RNAP II promoters located in CpG and non-CpG islands suggesting distinct transcription initiation pathways. Our study broadens the spectrum of general transcription factor function and uncovers a plethora of novel, functional TBP-binding sites in the human genome.

ON THE ROLE OF PERIOD-2 IN THE CIRCADIAN AND HOMEOSTATIC REGULATION OF SLEEP

Humans spend one third of their life sleeping, then we could raise the basic question: Why do we sleep? Despite the fact that we still don't fully understand its function, we made much progress in understanding at different levels how sleep is regulated. One model suggests that sleep is regulated by two processes: a homeostatic process that tracks the need for sleep and by a circadian rhythm that determines the preferred time-of-day sleep occurs. At the molecular level circadian rhythms are a property of interlocking transcriptional regula-tors referred to as clock genes. The heterodimeric transcription factors BMAL1::CLOCK/NPAS2 drive the transcription of many target genes including the clock genes Cryptochome1 (Cry1), Cry2, Period1 (Per1), and Per2. The encoded CRY/PER proteins are transcriptional inhibitors of BMAL1::CLOCK/NPAS2 thereby providing negative feedback to their own transcription. These genes seem, however, also involved in sleep homeostasis because the brain expression of clock genes, es-pecially that of Per2, increase as a function of time-spent-awake and because mice lacking clock genes display altered sleep homeostasis. The aim of first part of my doctoral work has been to advance our understanding the link that exists between sleep homeostasis and circadian rhythms investigating a possible mechanism by which sleep deprivation could alter clock gene expression by quantifying DNA-binding of the core-clock genes BMAL1, CLOCK and NPAS2 to their target chromatin loci including the E-box enhancers of the Per2 promoter. We made use of chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and quantitative poly-merase chain reaction (qPCR) to show that DNA-binding of CLOCK and BMAL1 to their target genes changes as a function of time-of-day in both liver and cerebral cortex. We then performed a 6h sleep deprivation (SD) and observed a significant decrease in DNA-binding of CLOCK and BMAL1 to Dbp. This is consistent with a decrease in Dbp mRNA levels after SD. The DNA-binding of NPAS2 and BMAL1 to Per2 was similarly decreased following SD. However, SD has been previously shown to in-crease Per2 expression in the cortex which seems paradoxical. Our results demonstrate that sleep-wake history can affect the molecular clock machinery directly at the level of the chromatin thereby altering the cortical expression of Dbp and Per2, and likely other targets. However, the precise dy-namic relationship between DNA-binding and mRNA expression, especially for Per2, remains elusive. The second aim of my doctoral work has been to perform an in depth characterization of cir-cadian rhythmicity, sleep architecture, analyze the response to SD in full null-Per2 knock-out (Per2-/-) mice, and Per1-/- mice, as well as their double knock-out offspring (Per1,2-/-) and littermate wildtype (Wt) mice. The techniques used include locomotor activity recording by passive infrared (PIR) sen-sors, EEG/EMG surgery, recording, and analysis, and cerebral cortex extraction and quantification of mRNA levels by qPCR. Under standard LD12:12 conditions, we found that wakefulness onset, as well as the time courses of clock gene expression in the brain and corticosterone plasma levels were ad-vanced by about 2h in Per2-/- mice compared to Wt mice. When released under constant dark condi-tions almost all Per2-/- mice (97%) became arrhythmic immediately. From these observations, we conclude that while Per2-/- mice seem to be able to anticipate dark onset, this does not result from a self-sustained circadian clock. Our results suggest instead that the earlier onset of activity results from a labile, not-self sustained 22h rhythm linked to light onset suggesting the existence of a light-driven rhythm. Analyses of sleep under LD12:12 conditions revealed that in both Per2-/- and Per1,2-/- mice the same sleep phenotypes are observed compared to Wt mice: increased NREM sleep frag-mentation and inability to adequately compensate the loss of NREM sleep. That suggests a possible role of PER2 in sleep consolidation and recovery.

Pro-inflammatory gene expression and neurotoxic effects of activated microglia are attenuated by absence of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein beta

Background. Microglia and astrocytes respond to homeostatic disturbances with profound changes of gene expression. This response, known as glial activation or neuroinflammation, can be detrimental to the surrounding tissue. The transcription factor CCAAT/enhancer binding protein ß (C/EBPß) is an important regulator of gene expression in inflammation but little is known about its involvement in glial activation. To explore the functional role of C/EBPß in glial activation we have analyzed pro-inflammatory gene expression and neurotoxicity in murine wild type and C/EBPß-null glial cultures. Methods. Due to fertility and mortality problems associated with the C/EBPß-null genotype we developed a protocol to prepare mixed glial cultures from cerebral cortex of a single mouse embryo with high yield. Wild-type and C/EBPß-null glial cultures were compared in terms of total cell density by Hoechst-33258 staining; microglial content by CD11b immunocytochemistry; astroglial content by GFAP western blot; gene expression by quantitative real-time PCR, western blot, immunocytochemistry and Griess reaction; and microglial neurotoxicity by estimating MAP2 content in neuronal/microglial cocultures. C/EBPß DNA binding activity was evaluated by electrophoretic mobility shift assay and quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation. Results. C/EBPß mRNA and protein levels, as well as DNA binding, were increased in glial cultures by treatment with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) or LPS + interferon ¿ (IFN¿). Quantitative chromatin immunoprecipitation showed binding of C/EBPß to pro-inflammatory gene promoters in glial activation in a stimulus- and gene-dependent manner. In agreement with these results, LPS and LPS+IFN¿ induced different transcriptional patterns between pro-inflammatory cytokines and NO synthase-2 genes. Furthermore, the expressions of IL-1ß and NO synthase-2, and consequent NO production, were reduced in the absence of C/EBPß. In addition, neurotoxicity elicited by LPS+IFN¿-treated microglia co-cultured with neurons was completely abolished by the absence of C/EBPß in microglia.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor beta/delta (PPARbeta/delta) but not PPARalpha serves as a plasma free fatty acid sensor in liver.

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARalpha) is an important transcription factor in liver that can be activated physiologically by fasting or pharmacologically by using high-affinity synthetic agonists. Here we initially set out to elucidate the similarities in gene induction between Wy14643 and fasting. Numerous genes were commonly regulated in liver between the two treatments, including many classical PPARalpha target genes, such as Aldh3a2 and Cpt2. Remarkably, several genes induced by Wy14643 were upregulated by fasting independently of PPARalpha, including Lpin2 and St3gal5, suggesting involvement of another transcription factor. Using chromatin immunoprecipitation, Lpin2 and St3gal5 were shown to be direct targets of PPARbeta/delta during fasting, whereas Aldh3a2 and Cpt2 were exclusive targets of PPARalpha. Binding of PPARbeta/delta to the Lpin2 and St3gal5 genes followed the plasma free fatty acid (FFA) concentration, consistent with activation of PPARbeta/delta by plasma FFAs. Subsequent experiments using transgenic and knockout mice for Angptl4, a potent stimulant of adipose tissue lipolysis, confirmed the stimulatory effect of plasma FFAs on Lpin2 and St3gal5 expression levels via PPARbeta/delta. In contrast, the data did not support activation of PPARalpha by plasma FFAs. The results identify Lpin2 and St3gal5 as novel PPARbeta/delta target genes and show that upregulation of gene expression by PPARbeta/delta is sensitive to plasma FFA levels. In contrast, this is not the case for PPARalpha, revealing a novel mechanism for functional differentiation between PPARs.

Genomic roles of the HCF transcriptional regulator in "Drosophila"

Abstract : Transcriptional regulation is the result of a combination of positive and negative effectors, such as transcription factors, cofactors and chromatin modifiers. During my thesis project I studied chromatin association, and transcriptional and cell cycle regulatory functions of dHCF, the Drosophila homologue of the human protein HCF-1 (host cell factor-1). The human and Drosophila HCF proteins are synthesized as large polypeptides that are cleaved into two subunits (HCFN and HCFC), which remain associated with one another by non covalent interactions. Studies in mammalian cells over the past 20 years have been devoted to understanding the cellular functions of HCF-1 and have revealed that it is a key regulator of transcription and cell cycle regulation. In human cells, HCF-1 interacts with the histone methyltransferase Set1/Ash2 and MLL/Ash2 complexes and the histone deacetylase Sin3 complex, which are involved in transcriptional activation and repression, respectively. HCF-1 is also recruited to promoters to regulate G1 -to-S phase progression during the cell cycle by the activator transcription factors E2F1 and E2F3, and by the repressor transcription factor E2F4. HCF-1 protein structure and these interactions between HCP-1 and E2F transcriptional regulator proteins are also conserved in Drosophila. In this doctoral thesis, I use proliferating Drosophila SL2 cells to study both the genomic-binding sites of dHCF, using a combination of chromatin immunoprecipitation and ultra high throughput sequencing (ChIP-seq) analysis, and dHCF regulated genes, employing RNAi and microarray expression analysis. I show that dHCF is bound to over 7500 chromosomal sites in proliferating SL2 cells, and is located at +-200 bp relative to the transcriptional start sites of about 30% of Drosophila genes. There is also a direct relationship between dHCF promoter association and promoter- associated transcriptional activity. Thus, dHCF binding levels at promoters correlated directly with transcriptional activity. In contrast, expression studies showed that dHCF appears to be involved in both transcriptional activation and repression. Analysis of dHCF-binding sites identified nine dHCF-associated motifs, four of them linked dHCF to (i) two insulator proteins, GAGA and BEAF, (ii) the E-box motif, and (iii) a degenerated TATA-box. The dHCF-associated motifs allowed the organization of the dHCF-bound genes into five biological processes: differentiation, cell cycle and gene expression, regulation of endocytosis, and cellular localization. I further show that different mechanisms regulate dHCF association with chromatin. Despite that after dHCF cleavage the dHCFN and dHCFC subunits remain associated, the two subunits showed different affinities for chromatin and differential binding to a set of tested promoters, suggesting that dHCF could target specific promoters through each of the two subunits. Moreover, in addition to the interaction between dHCF and E2F transcription factors, the dHCF binding pattern is correlated with dE2F2 genomic 4 distribution. I show that dE2F factors are necessary for recruitment of dHCF to the promoter of a set of dHCF regulated genes. Therefore dHCF, as in mammals, is involved in regulation of G1 to S phase progression in collaboration with the dE2Fs transcription factors. In addition, gene expression arrays reveal that dHCF could indirectly regulate cell cycle progression by promoting expression of genes involved in gene expression and protein synthesis, and inhibiting expression of genes involved in cell-cell adhesion. Therefore, dHCF is an evolutionary conserved protein, which binds to many specific sites of the Drosophila genome via interaction with DNA of chromatin-binding proteins to regulate the expression of genes involved in many different cellular functions. Résumé : La regulation de la transcription est le résultat des effets positifs et négatifs des facteurs de transcription, cofacteurs et protéines effectrices qui modifient la chromatine. Pendant mon projet de thèse, j'ai étudié l'association a la chromatine, ainsi que la régulation de la transcription et du cycle cellulaire par dHCF, l'homologue chez la drosophile de la protéine humaine HCF-1 (host cell factor-1). Chez 1'humain et la V drosophile, les deux protéines HCF sont synthétisées sous la forme d'un long polypeptide, qui est ensuite coupé en deux sous-unités au centre de la protéine. Les deux sous-unités restent associées ensemble grâce a des interactions non-covalentes. Des études réalisées pendant les 20 dernières années ont permit d'établir que HCF-l et un facteur clé dans la régulation de la transcription et du cycle cellulaire. Dans les cellules humaines, HCF-1 active et réprime la transcription en interagissant avec des complexes de protéines qui activent la transcription en méthylant les histones (HMT), comme par Set1/Ash2 et MLL/Ash2, et d'autres complexes qui répriment la transcription et sont responsables de la déacétylation des histones (HDAC) comme la protéine Sin3. HCF-l est aussi recruté aux promoteurs par les activateurs de la transcription E2F l et E2F3a, et par le répresseur de la transcription E2F4 pour réguler la transition entre les phases G1 et S du cycle cellulaire. La structure de HCF-1 et les interactions entre HCF-l et les régulateurs de la transcription sont conservées chez la drosophile. Pendant ma these j'ai utilisé les cellules de la drosophile, SL2 en culture, pour étudier les endroits de liaisons de HCF-l à la chromatine, grâce a immunoprecipitation de la chromatine et du séquençage de l'ADN massif ainsi que les gènes régulés par dHCF 3 grâce a la technique de RNAi et des microarrays. Mes résultats on montré que dHCF se lie à environ 7565 endroits, et estimé a 1200 paire de bases autour des sites d'initiation de la transcription de 30% des gènes de la drosophile. J 'ai observe une relation entre dHCF et le niveau de la transcription. En effet, le niveau de liaison dHCF au promoteur corrèle avec l'activité de la transcription. Cependant, mes études d'expression ont montré que dHCF est implique dans le processus d'activation et mais aussi de répression de la transcription. L'analyse des séquences d'ADN liées par dHCF a révèle neuf motifs, quatre de ces motifs ont permis d'associer dl-ICF a deux protéines isolatrices GAGA et BEAF, au motif pour les E-boxes et a une TATA-box dégénérée. Les neuf motifs associes à dHCF ont permis d'associer les gènes lies par dHCF au promoteur a cinq processus biologiques: différentiation, cycle cellulaire, expression de gènes, régulation de l'endocytosis et la localisation cellulaire, J 'ai aussi montré qu'il y a plusieurs mécanismes qui régulent l'association de dHCF a la chromatine, malgré qu'après clivage, les deux sous-unites dHCFN and dHCFC, restent associées, elles montrent différentes affinités pour la chromatine et lient différemment un group de promoteurs, les résultats suggèrent que dHCF peut se lier aux promoteurs en utilisant chacune de ses sous-unitées. En plus de l'association de dHCF avec les facteurs de transcription dE2F s, la distribution de dHCF sur le génome corrèle avec celle du facteur de transcription dE2F2. J'ai aussi montré que les dE2Fs sont nécessaires pour le recrutement de dHCF aux promoteurs d'un sous-groupe de gènes régules par dHCF. Mes résultats ont aussi montré que chez la drosophile comme chez les humains, dl-ICF est implique dans la régulation de la progression de la phase G1 a la phase S du cycle cellulaire en collaboration avec dE2Fs. D'ailleurs, les arrays d'expression ont suggéré que dHCF pourrait réguler le cycle cellulaire de façon indirecte en activant l'expression de gènes impliqués dans l'expression génique et la synthèse de protéines, et en inhibant l'expression de gènes impliqués dans l'adhésion cellulaire. En conclusion, dHCF est une protéine, conservée dans l'évolution, qui se lie spécifiquement a beaucoup d'endroits du génome de Drosophile, grâce à l'interaction avec d'autres protéines, pour réguler l'expression des gènes impliqués dans plusieurs fonctions cellulaires.

p21 as a transcriptional co-repressor of S-phase and mitotic control genes.

It has been previously described that p21 functions not only as a CDK inhibitor but also as a transcriptional co-repressor in some systems. To investigate the roles of p21 in transcriptional control, we studied the gene expression changes in two human cell systems. Using a human leukemia cell line (K562) with inducible p21 expression and human primary keratinocytes with adenoviral-mediated p21 expression, we carried out microarray-based gene expression profiling. We found that p21 rapidly and strongly repressed the mRNA levels of a number of genes involved in cell cycle and mitosis. One of the most strongly down-regulated genes was CCNE2 (cyclin E2 gene). Mutational analysis in K562 cells showed that the N-terminal region of p21 is required for repression of gene expression of CCNE2 and other genes. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays indicated that p21 was bound to human CCNE2 and other p21-repressed genes gene in the vicinity of the transcription start site. Moreover, p21 repressed human CCNE2 promoter-luciferase constructs in K562 cells. Bioinformatic analysis revealed that the CDE motif is present in most of the promoters of the p21-regulated genes. Altogether, the results suggest that p21 exerts a repressive effect on a relevant number of genes controlling S phase and mitosis. Thus, p21 activity as inhibitor of cell cycle progression would be mediated not only by the inhibition of CDKs but also by the transcriptional down-regulation of key genes.

MADAP, a flexible clustering tool for the interpretation of one-dimensional genome annotation data.

A recurring task in the analysis of mass genome annotation data from high-throughput technologies is the identification of peaks or clusters in a noisy signal profile. Examples of such applications are the definition of promoters on the basis of transcription start site profiles, the mapping of transcription factor binding sites based on ChIP-chip data and the identification of quantitative trait loci (QTL) from whole genome SNP profiles. Input to such an analysis is a set of genome coordinates associated with counts or intensities. The output consists of a discrete number of peaks with respective volumes, extensions and center positions. We have developed for this purpose a flexible one-dimensional clustering tool, called MADAP, which we make available as a web server and as standalone program. A set of parameters enables the user to customize the procedure to a specific problem. The web server, which returns results in textual and graphical form, is useful for small to medium-scale applications, as well as for evaluation and parameter tuning in view of large-scale applications, requiring a local installation. The program written in C++ can be freely downloaded from ftp://ftp.epd.unil.ch/pub/software/unix/madap. The MADAP web server can be accessed at http://www.isrec.isb-sib.ch/madap/.

PPARalpha governs glycerol metabolism.

Glycerol, a product of adipose tissue lipolysis, is an important substrate for hepatic glucose synthesis. However, little is known about the regulation of hepatic glycerol metabolism. Here we show that several genes involved in the hepatic metabolism of glycerol, i.e., cytosolic and mitochondrial glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GPDH), glycerol kinase, and glycerol transporters aquaporin 3 and 9, are upregulated by fasting in wild-type mice but not in mice lacking PPARalpha. Furthermore, expression of these genes was induced by the PPARalpha agonist Wy14643 in wild-type but not PPARalpha-null mice. In adipocytes, which express high levels of PPARgamma, expression of cytosolic GPDH was enhanced by PPARgamma and beta/delta agonists, while expression was decreased in PPARgamma(+/-) and PPARbeta/delta(-/-) mice. Transactivation, gel shift, and chromatin immunoprecipitation experiments demonstrated that cytosolic GPDH is a direct PPAR target gene. In line with a stimulating role of PPARalpha in hepatic glycerol utilization, administration of synthetic PPARalpha agonists in mice and humans decreased plasma glycerol. Finally, hepatic glucose production was decreased in PPARalpha-null mice simultaneously fasted and exposed to Wy14643, suggesting that the stimulatory effect of PPARalpha on gluconeogenic gene expression was translated at the functional level. Overall, these data indicate that PPARalpha directly governs glycerol metabolism in liver, whereas PPARgamma regulates glycerol metabolism in adipose tissue.