96 resultados para Cassirer
Resumo:
Enth. u.a.: Freimann, Aron: Meschullam b. Kalonymos' Polemik gegen die Karäer, S. 569
Resumo:
Ernst Cassirer
Resumo:
Ernst Cassirer
Resumo:
Ernst Cassirer
Resumo:
Ernst Cassirer
Resumo:
Karl Kautsky
Resumo:
Michel Fingesten
Resumo:
Vorlesung 1928: "Über Kants Erkenntnistheorie", eigenhändige Notizen, Manuskript, 2 Blatt; "Über das Recht soziologischer Interpretation"; a) Typoskript mit eigenhändigen Korrekturen, 8 Blatt, b) Typoskript mit eigenhändigen Korrekturen, 7 Blatt, c) Manuskript, 5 Blatt; "Notes"; "Max Scheler (1874-1828)", Typoskript mit eigenhändigen Korrekturen, 13 Blatt; "Zitate aus Werken Max Schelers", 6 Blatt; Notizen zur Vorlesung "Politik und Moral" von Max Scheler, 08.05.1928, 4 Blatt; Paul Ludwig Landsberg: "Zum Gedächtnis Max Schelers", Zeitungsausschnitt aus Literarische Rundschau der Rhein-Mainischen Volkszeitung, 25.05.1928, 1 Blatt; "Hegel und das Problem der Metaphysik", Typoskript mit eigenhändigen Korrekturen, 3 Blatt; "Über Schristian Wolff", Vorlesungsmanuskript, 6 Blatt; Friedrich Pollock: "Über antike und christliche Geschixhtsauffassung", eigenhändige Notizen, 4 Blatt; Diskussion zwischen Max Horkheimer, Mannheim, Tillich und Adorno, u.a. über Wissensoziologie und Pragmatismus, 16.01.1931, Mitschrift von Leo Löwenthal, Typoskript, 2 Blatt; Diskussion zwischen Max Horkheimer, Mannheim, Tillich und Adorno, u.a. über das Verhältnis von Philosophie und Wissenschaft gegenüber dem Schrecken. Mitschrift von Friedrich Pollock, 19.06.1931; a) Typoskript, 3 Blatt, b) eigenhändige Notizen, 12 Blatt; "Thesen über Wissenschaft. Bearbeitung Löwenthal", Frühjahr 1932, Typoskript, 5 Blatt; Friedrich Pollock: Notizheft, eigenhändige Notizen, 1 Heft, 19 Blatt und 8 zusätliche Blätter (enthält u.a.: "Zur heutigen Lage des Idealismus", Notizen zum Vortrag "Der Gegensatz von 'Geist' und 'Leben' in der gegenwärtigen Naturphilosophie" von Ernst Cassirer, gehalten am 03.10.1928; "Zur Kritik der gegenwärtigen Philosophie"; Disposition der Vorlesung von Max Horkheimers "Materialismus und Idealismus in der Geschichte der neueren Philosophie", Wintersemester 1928/29, 23.09.1928 und "Heidegger"); "Materialismus und Idealismus in der Geschichte der neuen Philosophie", Vorlesung Wintersemester 1928/29, (enthält: Vorlesungsmanuskript, 1 Heft, 8 Blatt und 22 zusätzliche Blätter; Friedrich Pollock: Kollegheft zur Vorlesung, 1 Heft, 48 Blatt, davon 9 leer, beiliegend eigenhändige Notizen zu einem Vortrag von Prinzhorn (?) über Lebensphilosophie und Psychoanalyse, 22.12.1928, 10 Blatt; Friedrich Pollock: Kollegheft zur Vorlesung, 05.-15.02.1929, 1 Heft, 12 Blatt, davon 4 leer, und 2 zusätzliche Blätter; Friedrich Pollock, Kolegheft zur Vorlesung, 22.-26.02.1929, 1 Heft, 7 Blatt);
Resumo:
[Hermann Sinsheimer... Umschlagzeichn.: Ernst E. Stern]
Resumo:
Fil: Torchia Estrada, Juan Carlos.
Resumo:
Regarding the twentieth century's interpretations of the Enlightenment and its actuality, it is noteworthy that some authors, like Habermas in "The philosophical discourse of Modernity", rely on Hegel to defend the Enlightenment and its project, whereas other close thinkers, like Adorno and Horkheimer in their "Dialectic of Enlightenment", quote Hegel to emphasize the destructive aspects of Enlightenment. In this work I show that in the Hegelian theory of Enlightenment both aspects, the negative and the programmatic, are present. I hold here that the Hegelian philosophy claims to be the consummation and not the rupture with this movement. This is expressed in the subtitle of the thesis: in the philosophy of Hegel the principle of autonomy is made absolute in terms of an immanentization of any transcendence that could have been still recognized or latent in the thought of the Enlightenment. For a theory of the Enlightenment I consider as reference the exposition of Cassirer, "The Philosophy of the Enlightenment ". As reference texts of the Hegelian philosophy I follow principally passages from "The Phenomenology of Spirit" and "Glauben und Wissen".
Resumo:
Regarding the twentieth century's interpretations of the Enlightenment and its actuality, it is noteworthy that some authors, like Habermas in "The philosophical discourse of Modernity", rely on Hegel to defend the Enlightenment and its project, whereas other close thinkers, like Adorno and Horkheimer in their "Dialectic of Enlightenment", quote Hegel to emphasize the destructive aspects of Enlightenment. In this work I show that in the Hegelian theory of Enlightenment both aspects, the negative and the programmatic, are present. I hold here that the Hegelian philosophy claims to be the consummation and not the rupture with this movement. This is expressed in the subtitle of the thesis: in the philosophy of Hegel the principle of autonomy is made absolute in terms of an immanentization of any transcendence that could have been still recognized or latent in the thought of the Enlightenment. For a theory of the Enlightenment I consider as reference the exposition of Cassirer, "The Philosophy of the Enlightenment ". As reference texts of the Hegelian philosophy I follow principally passages from "The Phenomenology of Spirit" and "Glauben und Wissen".
Resumo:
Regarding the twentieth century's interpretations of the Enlightenment and its actuality, it is noteworthy that some authors, like Habermas in "The philosophical discourse of Modernity", rely on Hegel to defend the Enlightenment and its project, whereas other close thinkers, like Adorno and Horkheimer in their "Dialectic of Enlightenment", quote Hegel to emphasize the destructive aspects of Enlightenment. In this work I show that in the Hegelian theory of Enlightenment both aspects, the negative and the programmatic, are present. I hold here that the Hegelian philosophy claims to be the consummation and not the rupture with this movement. This is expressed in the subtitle of the thesis: in the philosophy of Hegel the principle of autonomy is made absolute in terms of an immanentization of any transcendence that could have been still recognized or latent in the thought of the Enlightenment. For a theory of the Enlightenment I consider as reference the exposition of Cassirer, "The Philosophy of the Enlightenment ". As reference texts of the Hegelian philosophy I follow principally passages from "The Phenomenology of Spirit" and "Glauben und Wissen".
