Patients' characteristics associated with the decision of "do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation" order in a Swiss hospital.

BACKGROUND: According to Swiss legislation, do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DNACPR) order can be made at any time by patients only, unless the resuscitation is considered as futile, based on the doctors' evaluation. Little is known about how this decision is made, and which are the factors influencing this decision. METHODS: Observational, cross-sectional study was conducted between March and May 2013 on 194 patients hospitalized in the general internal medicine ward of a Swiss hospital. The associations between patients' DNACPR orders and gender, age, marital status, nationality, religion, number and type of comorbidities were assessed. RESULTS: 102 patients (53%) had a DNACPR order: 27% issued by the patient him/herself, 12% by his/her relatives and 61% by the medical team. Patients with a DNACPR order were significantly older: 80.7±10.8 vs. 67.5±15.1years in the "with" and "without" DNACPR order group, respectively, p<0.001. Oncologic disease was associated with a DNACPR order issued by the medical team (37.5% vs. 16.9% in the "with" and "without" DNACPR order group, respectively, p<0.05). Being protestant was associated with a DNACPR order issued by the patient (57.9% vs. 25.9% in the "with" and "without" DNACPR order group, respectively p<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Over half of the patients admitted to a general internal medicine ward had a DNACPR order issued within the first 72h of hospitalization. Older age and oncologic disease were associated with a DNACPR decision by the medical team, while protestant religion was associated with a DNACPR decision by the patient.

Patients' characteristics associated with the decision of "do not attempt cardiopulmonary resuscitation" order in a Swiss hospital

Présentation En accord avec la loi suisse, seul le patient peut décider de la notification, dans son dossier, d'un ordre de «non réanimation » (DNACPR) en cas d'arrêt cardio-respiratoire. L'équipe médicale peut exceptionnellement prendre une telle décision, si elle juge qu'une réanimation n'a aucune chance d'aboutir. Les mécanismes menant à ce processus de décision n'ont pas encore été complètement investigués, en particulier en Suisse. Enjeu Notre étude vise à déterminer la prévalence de l'ordre de «non réanimation» après l'admission, l'auteur de cette décision, ainsi que son association avec certaines caractéristiques propres aux patients : le sexe, l'âge, la situation familiale, la nationalité, la religion, le nombre et le type de comorbidités. Nous cherchons ainsi à mieux définir quels sont les facteurs importants dans ce processus décisionnel complexe où le jugement médical, ainsi que l'information apportée aux patients sont primordiaux. Contexte de recherche Nous avons effectué une étude observationnelle sur une durée de 6 semaines, en analysant les formulaires d'admission de 194 patients hospitalisés dans le service de médecine interne du CHUV, dans les 72 heures après leur admission. Résultats L'étude montre que plus de la moitié des 194 dossiers de patients analysés ont un ordre de « non réanimation » (DNACPR) (53%). 27% de ces décisions ont été prises par les patients eux-mêmes, 12% par leur représentant thérapeutique/famille et 61% par les équipes médicales. Nous trouvons une association statistiquement significative entre l'ordre DNACPR et l'âge, avec un âge moyen de 80.7 +-10.8 ans dans le groupe « non réanimation » versus 67.5 +- 15.1 ans dans le groupe « réanimation », entre l'ordre DNACPR et une pathologie oncologique, quel que soit le stade de cette dernière, ainsi qu'entre l'ordre DNACPR et la religion protestante. Une analyse de sous-groupe montre que l'âge, ainsi que la pathologie oncologique sont statistiquement significatifs lors de l'analyse des décisions prises par les équipes médicales. La religion protestante est, quant à elle, significative lors de l'analyse des décisions prises par le patient ou son représentant. Perspectives Contrairement aux publications passées, cette étude montre une prédominance de l'ordre de «non réanimation » (DNACPR) à l'admission dans un service de médecine interne, principalement sur décision médicale. La plupart des patients ont été jugés incapables de discernement sur la question ou n'ont tout simplement pas été impliqués dans le processus décisionnel. Une réflexion doit avoir lieu afin de prendre des mesures de sensibilisation auprès des équipes médicales et d'approfondir la formation médicale et éthique sur le sujet de la détermination de l'attitude de réanimation. D'autres études qualitatives permettraient de mieux comprendre les motivations ayant mené à ces nombreuses décisions médicales, ainsi que les critères importants pour les patients.

Quality of resuscitation: flight attendants in an airplane simulator use a new mechanical resuscitation device--a randomized simulation study

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) during flight is challenging and has to be sustained for long periods. In this setting a mechanical-resuscitation-device (MRD) might improve performance. In this study we compared the quality of resuscitation of trained flight attendants practicing either standard basic life support (BLS) or using a MRD in a cabin-simulator.

Single rescuer exertion using a mechanical resuscitation device: a randomized controlled simulation study

The goal of this experimental study was to investigate rescuer exertion when using "Animax," a manually operated hand-powered mechanical resuscitation device (MRD) for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), compared to standard basic life support (BLS).

Effective compression ratio-A new measurement of the quality of thorax compression during CPR

PURPOSE: Computer-based feedback systems for assessing the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are widely used these days. Recordings usually involve compression and ventilation dependent variables. Thorax compression depth, sufficient decompression and correct hand position are displayed but interpreted independently of one another. We aimed to generate a parameter, which represents all the combined relevant parameters of compression to provide a rapid assessment of the quality of chest compression-the effective compression ratio (ECR). METHODS: The following parameters were used to determine the ECR: compression depth, correct hand position, correct decompression and the proportion of time used for chest compressions compared to the total time spent on CPR. Based on the ERC guidelines, we calculated that guideline compliant CPR (30:2) has a minimum ECR of 0.79. To calculate the ECR, we expanded the previously described software solution. In order to demonstrate the usefulness of the new ECR-parameter, we first performed a PubMed search for studies that included correct compression and no-flow time, after which we calculated the new parameter, the ECR. RESULTS: The PubMed search revealed 9 trials. Calculated ECR values ranged between 0.03 (for basic life support [BLS] study, two helpers, no feedback) and 0.67 (BLS with feedback from the 6th minute). CONCLUSION: ECR enables rapid, meaningful assessment of CPR and simplifies the comparability of studies as well as the individual performance of trainees. The structure of the software solution allows it to be easily adapted to any manikin, CPR feedback devices and different resuscitation guidelines (e.g. ILCOR, ERC).

Bilateral posterior ischaemic optic neuropathy after severe diabetic ketoacidosis, cardiopulmonary resuscitation and respiratory failure

A 44-year-old male European with type I diabetes mellitus fell into diabetic ketoacidosis. In the emergency room, he developed an episode of asystole and respiratory failure requiring one cycle of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Waking up 7 days later, he presented a bilateral complete loss of vision. Ophthalmological examination including funduscopy on days 1 and 10, after extubation, showed bilateral large round pupils non-reactive to light and a normal fundus. Neuroimaging studies, including MRI and MRA of the brain, were all within normal limits. A lumbar puncture and comprehensive serological testing excluded an infectious or rheumatic cause. An empirical high-dose intravenous steroid treatment administered for 5 days had no effect on his vision. His eye examination at 1.5 months follow-up showed a normal fundus except for progressive bilateral optic nerve disc pallor, which pointed towards the diagnosis of a posterior ischaemic optic neuropathy.

Comparing three CPR feedback devices and standard BLS in a single rescuer scenario: a randomised simulation study

BACKGROUND Efficiently performed basic life support (BLS) after cardiac arrest is proven to be effective. However, cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is strenuous and rescuers' performance declines rapidly over time. Audio-visual feedback devices reporting CPR quality may prevent this decline. We aimed to investigate the effect of various CPR feedback devices on CPR quality. METHODS In this open, prospective, randomised, controlled trial we compared three CPR feedback devices (PocketCPR, CPRmeter, iPhone app PocketCPR) with standard BLS without feedback in a simulated scenario. 240 trained medical students performed single rescuer BLS on a manikin for 8min. Effective compression (compressions with correct depth, pressure point and sufficient decompression) as well as compression rate, flow time fraction and ventilation parameters were compared between the four groups. RESULTS Study participants using the PocketCPR performed 17±19% effective compressions compared to 32±28% with CPRmeter, 25±27% with the iPhone app PocketCPR, and 35±30% applying standard BLS (PocketCPR vs. CPRmeter p=0.007, PocketCPR vs. standard BLS p=0.001, others: ns). PocketCPR and CPRmeter prevented a decline in effective compression over time, but overall performance in the PocketCPR group was considerably inferior to standard BLS. Compression depth and rate were within the range recommended in the guidelines in all groups. CONCLUSION While we found differences between the investigated CPR feedback devices, overall BLS quality was suboptimal in all groups. Surprisingly, effective compression was not improved by any CPR feedback device compared to standard BLS. All feedback devices caused substantial delay in starting CPR, which may worsen outcome.