Holistically approaching curriculum renewal: A case study of the Queensland University of Technology

There are still many programs in Australia and overseas where curricula comprise largely 20th Century-relevant graduate outcomes, framed in 20th Century learning and teaching approaches. A ‘Dynamic and Deliberative Model for Curriculum Renewal’ (DDMCR) model exists for undertaking such curriculum renewal that draws on the experiences of educators around the world, however there are few experiences to date in applying this model. At the Queensland University of Technology, the 2012 accreditation by Engineers Australia observed that, despite being exposed to relevant discipline-specific engineering curriculum and practice, students did not seem to be aware of the relevance of sustainable development to their degree, beyond first year exposure. In addressing this feedback, level 8 Australian Qualifications Framework, and drawing ideas from the DDMCR model, faculty senior management undertook a full review of the engineering curriculum.

Conceptualising recognition of prior learning processes in the age of open learning

This chapter interrogates what recognition of prior learning (RPL) can and does mean in the higher education sector—a sector in the grip of the widening participation agenda and an open access age. The chapter discusses how open learning is making inroads into recognition processes and examines two studies in open learning recognition. A case study relating to e-portfolio-style RPL for entry into a Graduate Certificate in Policy and Governance at a metropolitan university in Queensland is described. In the first instance, candidates who do not possess a relevant Bachelor degree need to demonstrate skills in governmental policy work in order to be eligible to gain entry to a Graduate Certificate (at Australian Qualifications Framework Level 8) (Australian Qualifications Framework Council, 2013, p. 53). The chapter acknowledges the benefits and limitations of recognition in open learning and those of more traditional RPL, anticipating future developments in both (or their convergence).

Development and Accreditation of an Applied Climate Education Unit for Sustainable Land Use in Australia

In recent years, there have been significant developments in climate science relevant to agriculture and natural resource management. Assessing impacts of climate variability and use of seasonal climate forecasts have become increasingly important elements in the management "toolkit" for many Australian farmers. Consideration of climate change further increases the need for improved management strategies. While climate risk extension activities have kept pace with advances in climate science, a national review of the Vocational Education and Training system in Australia in relation to "weather and climate" showed that these topics were "poorly represented" at the management level in the Australian Qualifications Framework, and needed increased emphasis. Consequently, a new Unit of Competency concerning management of climatic risk was developed and accredited to address this deficiency. The objective of the unit was to build knowledge and skills for better management of climate variability via the elements of surveying climatic and enterprise data; analysing climatic risks and opportunities; and developing climatic risk management strategies. This paper describes establishment of a new unit for vocational education that is designed to harness recent developments in applied climate science for better management of Australia's highly variable climate. The main benefits of the new unit of competency, "Developing climatic risk management strategies,"were seen as improving decisions in climate and agriculture, and reducing climate risk exposure to enhance sustainable agriculture. The educational unit is now within the scope of agricultural colleges, universities, and registered training organisations as an accredited unit.

Educators of change

Child care is a topic at the forefront of much discussion. From politicians to internet commentators, seemingly everyone has an opinion on child care in Australia at the moment. This media of late should have been an excellent opportunity to share information with parents and the wider community on the advances made in the early childhood profession through the National Quality Framework. It should have provided us with a strong platform to highlight the pedagogy and practice of educators choosing a career in early childhood...

Qualidade do processo de supervisão da investigação doutoral - desenho de um referencial para a sua avaliação e monitorização

Face à existência de um vazio teórico-conceptual e empírico no contexto investigativo português no que concerne à supervisão da investigação doutoral, este trabalho visa contribuir para a compreensão integrada deste fenómeno. Especificamente, com este estudo pretendemos construir um referencial de qualidade do processo de supervisão da investigação doutoral, em particular na ‘corporização’ dos perfis de qualidade dos dois mais importantes intervenientes - supervisores e estudantes de doutoramento – pela identificação de competências transversais às mais variadas áreas disciplinares. Desta forma, será possível desenhar-se, num futuro próximo, não só recomendações a nível institucional de índole mais praxiológica, como também um processo de avaliação e de monitorização adequado. Tendo em consideração o contexto português e o objetivo central do estudo, foram revisitados (i) discursos da política educativa de Ensino Superior de âmbito europeu e (ii) discursos fundamentados na investigação de índole internacional. Ambos permitiram contextualizar o fenómeno, perceber as tendências existentes, sintetizar as contribuições de variados referenciais e modelos existentes, e planear, em específico, a investigação, particularmente em termos de recolha de dados. A investigação, predominantemente de cariz qualitativo, foi conduzida na Universidade de Aveiro, tendo sido seguido o método de estudo de caso: baseou-se nas ‘vozes’ de supervisores e estudantes de doutoramento desta instituição relativamente ao que deve estar presente no processo de supervisão de investigação doutoral. A recolha de dados iniciou-se com entrevistas semiestruturadas, de âmbito exploratório, a especialistas em supervisão pedagógica - o tema semântica e epistemologicamente mais próximo do fenómeno em estudo. Foi realizada, pois, uma primeira aproximação ao ‘terreno’ a nível nacional e foram depuradas as dimensões que deveriam estar presentes no instrumento de recolha de dados do momento subsequente. Em seguida, foram realizados focus groups com supervisores e estudantes de doutoramento da Universidade de Aveiro. As conceções partilhadas em grupo puderam ser categorizadas segundo (i) o enquadramento do processo supervisivo e investigativo de doutoramento, nomeadamente no que concerne à natureza e ao valor do doutoramento atribuídos pelos participantes, assim como ao processo de transformação que experienciam; (ii) a qualidade do processo supervisivo e investigativo de doutoramento, consoante aspectos intrínsecos, dos quais se ressalta o perfil desejável de qualidade do supervisor e do estudante, pela identificação de um conjunto de competências fulcrais, e aspectos extrínsecos aos indivíduos; e (iii) os problemas do processo supervisivo e investigativo de doutoramento, considerando, novamente, aspectos intrínsecos e extrínsecos aos indivíduos. O último momento de recolha de dados foi realizado através da aplicação de questionários a supervisores e estudantes da Universidade de Aveiro. Assim, foi possível debruçarmo-nos especificamente sobre os perfis de qualidade de estudantes e supervisores. As competências integradas nos questionários foram provenientes dos resultados dos focus groups, tendo sido consideradas as mais importantes. Nos questionários foi solicitado aos respondentes que revelassem o seu grau de concordância relativamente às competências que deveriam fazer parte dos perfis de qualidade. Foi, então, possível proceder a uma análise e reflexão sobre o estabelecimento de uma hierarquia de competências, numa tentativa de depurar os perfis de qualidade dos elementos da díade supervisiva. Assim, conclui-se que há variáveis que podem influenciar o estabelecimento dessa hierarquia, reforçando que o processo supervisivo, quando refletido, avaliado e monitorizado, deve considerar diversos ‘contextos’ que o poderão influenciar. Todavia, há um conjunto de competências que parecem ‘isentas’ de influências, apesar de serem necessários estudos mais aprofundados para esclarecer esta assunção. Face a todo o percurso investigativo, apresenta-se, no final, um referencial de qualidade integrado e sistematizado, considerando o enquadramento teórico e o estudo empírico, assim como um sistema articulado de competências referente aos perfis de qualidade que supervisores e estudantes de doutoramento devem demonstrar e desenvolver.

Aprendizagem potenciada pela tecnologia no ensino superior : construção de um referencial de qualidade

A utilização da tecnologia como mediadora do processo de ensino e de aprendizagem tem sido um aspeto incontornável no Ensino Superior e nas prioridades institucionais. A sua utilização tem sido, no entanto, mais norteada por um paradigma de disponibilização em vez de ser norteada por um paradigma de potenciação. Este estudo procura discutir o papel da tecnologia como potenciadora da aprendizagem, através da introdução de um conceito de aprendizagem potenciada pela tecnologia. Nesse sentido o estudo procura apresentar um referencial de qualidade dos pressupostos para a existência de uma aprendizagem potenciada pela tecnologia que permita orientar os diversos atores para práticas de qualidade na utilização da tecnologia e facilitar o desenho de instrumentos de avaliação, autoavaliação e monitorização. Assente num método de Grounded Theory, sustentado em abordagens interpretativas e qualitativas, o estudo procura identificar os alicerces da aprendizagem potenciada pela tecnologia através da identificação de instâncias e da formulação de conceitos reveladores de práticas de qualidade. Paralelamente, o estudo desenha um quadro referencial de qualidade que procura identificar dimensões e indicadores que permitam avaliar a qualidade dos pressupostos fundamentais para a concretização de uma aprendizagem potenciada pela tecnologia. O quadro referencial, assim como a definição do conceito de aprendizagem potenciada pela tecnologia, foi sustentado metodologicamente em dois estudos: (i) um estudo teórico, no qual foram identificados os alicerces da aprendizagem potenciada pela tecnologia no Ensino Superior, assim como uma revisão de modelos e de instrumentos nacionais e internacionais; e (ii) um estudo empírico que inclui a realização de entrevistas individuais a docentes, membros de órgãos de gestão e staff de suporte; Focus-Group a estudantes; e entrevistas a

The children that time forgot: Reframing housing standards to incorporate children's needs

This paper presents the findings from a recent study funded by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation examining the housing and neighbourhood needs of 44 visually impaired children. Our research found that disabled people’s needs have been too narrowly based on ‘accessibility’ criteria, which do not take into account the health and safety issues so important for children. Indeed, the home environment is the main site of accidental death or injury for young children under 4 years, and children from low income families are particularly susceptible to burns, scalds, falls, swallowing foreign objects or poisonous substances within it (CRDU 1994). As disabled children are statistically more likely to be in low income families, this places them at high risk. If ‘accessibility’ is to be reconceived as design for usability throughout the lifecourse, this challenges us to move beyond the pragmatic but limited application of design prescriptions for disabled people as a separate and adult group, and to re-think all of the dimensions of the housing quality framework in the light of this expanded approach.

How level and type of deafness affects user perception of multimedia video clips

Our research investigates the impact that hearing has on the perception of digital video clips, with and without captions, by discussing how hearing loss, captions and deafness type affects user QoP (Quality of Perception). QoP encompasses not only a user's satisfaction with the quality of a multimedia presentation, but also their ability to analyse, synthesise and assimilate informational content of multimedia . Results show that hearing has a significant effect on participants’ ability to assimilate information, independent of video type and use of captions. It is shown that captions do not necessarily provide deaf users with a ‘greater level of information’ from video, but cause a change in user QoP, depending on deafness type, which provides a ‘greater level of context of the video’. It is also shown that post-lingual mild and moderately deaf participants predict less accurately their level of information assimilation than post-lingual profoundly deaf participants, despite residual hearing. A positive correlation was identified between level of enjoyment (LOE) and self-predicted level of information assimilation (PIA), independent of hearing level or hearing type. When this is considered in a QoP quality framework, it puts into question how the user perceives certain factors, such as ‘informative’ and ‘quality’.

Marco de caracterización y cálculo de las métricas de calidad de los componentes web para el desarrollo de aplicaciones de usuario final

En la Web 2.0, donde usuarios finales sin grandes conocimientos de programación pueden interactuar y crear aplicaciones web utilizando componentes publicados en Internet, ofrecidos por una gran variedad de proveedores de servicio. La selección de estos componentes requiere de un análisis exhaustivo por parte de los usuarios sobre las propiedades de estos componentes en referencia a su calidad. En este proyecto, se presentan dos modelos de calidad según una estructura jerárquica, uno para componentes web como elementos autónomos y otro para componentes utilizados en aplicaciones de mashup, basado en un análisis de la emergente Web 2.0. Además, se define una herramienta de medición y anotación de calidad para los distintos niveles de los modelos. Estas herramientas pretenden ser un útil instrumento para los desarrolladores y usuarios de componentes y mashups.---ABSTRACT---In the Web 2.0, where end users without a technical programming background can interact and develop web applications leveraging web components published on the Internet, offered by a great diversity of service providers. This component selection requires an exhaustive analysis by these end users based on the requirements of these components related to their quality. In this work, two quality models are presented according to a hierarchical structure, one for web components as independent elements and another one for web components as parts of web mashup applications, based on an analysis of the emerging Web 2.0. In addition, a measuring and write down quality framework is defined to weigh the quality of all the levels of the models. These tools intend to provide a useful instrument to components and mashup developers and end users.

Appraising qualitative research for inclusion in systematic reviews:A quantitative and qualitative comparison of three methods

Objective: Qualitative research is increasingly valued as part of the evidence for policy and practice, but how it should be appraised is contested. Various appraisal methods, including checklists and other structured approaches, have been proposed but rarely evaluated. We aimed to compare three methods for appraising qualitative research papers that were candidates for inclusion in a systematic review of evidence on support for breast-feeding. Method: A sample of 12 research papers on support for breast-feeding was appraised by six qualitative reviewers using three appraisal methods: unprompted judgement, based on expert opinion; a UK Cabinet Office quality framework; and CASP, a Critical Appraisal Skills Programme tool. Papers were assigned, following appraisals, to 1 of 5 categories, which were dichotomized to indicate whether or not papers should be included in a systematic review. Patterns of agreement in categorization of papers were assessed quantitatively using κ statistics, and qualitatively using cross-case analysis. Results: Agreement in categorizing papers across the three methods was slight (κ =0.13; 95% CI 0.06-0.24). Structured approaches did not appear to yield higher agreement than that by unprompted judgement. Qualitative analysis revealed reviewers' dilemmas in deciding between the potential impact of findings and the quality of the research execution or reporting practice. Structured instruments appeared to make reviewers more explicit about the reasons for their judgements. Conclusions: Structured approaches may not produce greater consistency of judgements about whether to include qualitative papers in a systematic review. Future research should address how appraisals of qualitative research should be incorporated in systematic reviews. © The Royal Society of Medicine Press Ltd 2007.

Application of phytotoxicity data to a new Australian soil quality guideline framework for biosolids

To protect terrestrial ecosystems and humans from contaminants many countries and jurisdictions have developed soil quality guidelines (SQGs). This study proposes a new framework to derive SQGs and guidelines for amended soils and uses a case study based on phytotoxicity data of copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn) from field studies to illustrate how the framework could be applied. The proposed framework uses normalisation relationships to account for the effects of soil properties on toxicity data followed by a species sensitivity distribution (SSD) method to calculate a soil added contaminant limit (soil ACL) for a standard soil. The normalisation equations are then used to calculate soil ACLs for other soils. A soil amendment availability factor (SAAF) is then calculated as the toxicity and bioavailability of pure contaminants and contaminants in amendments can be different. The SAAF is used to modify soil ACLs to ACLs for amended soils. The framework was then used to calculate soil ACLs for copper (Cu) and zinc (Zn). For soils with pH of 4-8 and OC content of 1-6%, the ACLs range from 8 mg/kg to 970 mg/kg added Cu. The SAAF for Cu was pH dependant and varied from 1.44 at pH 4 to 2.15 at pH 8. For soils with pH of 4-8 and OC content of 1-6%, the ACLs for amended soils range from 11 mg/kg to 2080 mg/kg added Cu. For soils with pH of 4-8 and a CEC from 5-60, the ACLs for Zn ranged from 21 to 1470 mg/kg added Zn. A SAAF of one was used for Zn as it concentrations in plant tissue and soil to water partitioning showed no difference between biosolids and soluble Zn salt treatments, indicating that Zn from biosolids and Zn salts are equally bioavailable to plants.

Testing a framework for the quality of process models: A case study

Process modeling can be regarded as the currently most popular form of conceptual modeling. Research evidence illustrates how process modeling is applied across the different information system life cycle phases for a range of different applications, such as configuration of Enterprise Systems, workflow management, or software development. However, a detailed discussion of critical factors of the quality of process models is still missing. This paper proposes a framework consisting of six quality factors, which is derived from a comprehensive literature review. It then presents in a case study, a utility provider, who had designed various business process models for the selection of an Enterprise System. The paper summarizes potential means of conducting a successful process modeling initiative and evaluates the described modeling approach within the Guidelines of Modeling (GoM) framework. An outlook shows the potential lessons learnt, and concludes with insights to the next phases of this study.