1000 resultados para Appel, Jacques -- Portraits


Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Annotations manuscrites : Nadar, Paul (1856-1939)

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Pós-graduação em Letras - IBILCE

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

"Tiré à 380 exemplaires (tous numérotés) 300 papier de Hollande. 50 [papier de Hollande] portraits doubles. 30 [papier] Whatman, [portraits doubles] no. 50 [portraits double]"

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Includes bibliographical references.

Relevância:

30.00% 30.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

I. L'opinion publique au XVIIIe siècle. Montesquieu. Jean-Jacques Rousseau d'après des publications nouvelles. Le secret du roi. Diderot inédit.--II. La société français en 1765. Deux types de femmes: mme Du Defíand et mme Roland. La famille de Mirabeau. Coppet et mme de Staël. André Chénier inédit; sa lutte contre la terreur, son procès, sa mort.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Jacques Ranciere's work on aesthetics has received a great deal of attention recently. Given his work has enormous range – taking in art and literature, political theory, historiography, pedagogy and worker's history – Andrew McNamara and Toni Ross (UNSW) seek to explore his wider project in this interview, while showing how it leads to his alternative insights into aesthetics. Rancière sets aside the core suppositions linking the medium to aesthetic judgment, which has informed many definitions of modernism. Rancière is emphatic in freeing aesthetic judgment from issues of medium-specificity. He argues that the idea of autonomy associated with medium-specificity – or 'truth to the medium' – was 'a very late one' in modernism, and that post-medium trends were already evident in early modernism. While not stressing a simple continuity between early modernism and contemporary art, Ranciere nonetheless emphasizes the ethical and political ramifications of maintaining an a-disciplinary stance.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

In this paper I analyse UK artist Alison Jones’ sonic interventions Portrait of the Artist by Proxy (2008), Voyeurism by Proxy (2008) and Art, Lies and Audio Tapes (2009). In Portrait of the Artist by Proxy, Jones – who, due to deteriorating vision, has not seen her reflection in a mirror in years – asks and trusts participants to audio-describe her own image back to her. In Voyeurism by Proxy, Jones asks participants to audio-describe erotic drawings by Gustav Klimt. In Art, Lies and Audio Tapes, Jones asks participants to audio-describe other artworks, such as W.F. Yeames’ And When Did You Last see Your Father?. In these portraits by proxy, Jones opens her image, and other images, to interpretation. In doing so, Jones draws attention to the way sight is privileged as a mode of access to fixed, fundamental truths in Western culture – a mode assumed to be untainted by filters that skew perception of the object. “In a culture where vision is by far the dominant sense,” Jones says, “and as a visual artist with a visual impairment, I am reliant on audio-description …Inevitably, there are limitations imposed by language, time and the interpreter’s background knowledge of the subject viewed, as well as their personal bias of what is deemed important to impart in their description” . In these works, Jones strips these background knowledges, biases and assumptions bare. She reveals different perceptions, as well as tendencies or censor, edit or exaggerate descriptions. In this paper, I investigate how, by revealing unconscious biases, Jones’ works renders herself and her participants vulnerable to a change of perception. I also examine how Jones’ later editing of the audio-descriptions allows her to show the instabilities of sight, and, in Portrait of the Artist by Proxy, to reclaim authorship of her own image.