De la recommandation d'un dépistage à son (non) implantation: le cas de l'anévrisme de l'aorte abdominale. [From guidelines for screening to their (poor) implementation: the case of the abdominal aortic aneurysm].

Suite à des essais cliniques randomisés démontrant l'efficacité du dépistage de l'anévrisme de l'aorte abdominale (AAA) par échographie, plusieurs recommandations ont été publiées dans de nombreux pays en faveur du dépistage dans une partie de la population générale. De plus, au-delà de la rupture aortique, le dépistage d'un petit AAA semble être une bonne occasion d'appliquer les stratégies de prévention secondaire, permettant une amélioration globale du pronostic cardiovasculaire du patient. Ces recommandations sont cependant peu suivies; les campagnes de dépistage systématique sont rares, laissant la responsabilité du dépistage au médecin généraliste. Cet article se propose de discuter les raisons de la non-implantation du dépistage de l'AAA. [Abstract] Following the evidence of benefits of ultrasound screening for abdominal aorta aneurysms (AAA), several guidelines support this screening in population. Beyond the prompt diagnosis of AAA prior to its rupture of grim vital prognosis, small AAA can beconsidered as a prognostic marker for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). Yet, its detection is an opportunity for secondary prevention to reduce CVD mortality. Despite, these guidelines are poorly applied: systematic screening campaigns are infrequent, making the screening of family physicians responsibility. While the major benefit from this screening strategy is to reduce AAA-related death (but only trivial effect on long-term total mortality), this explains only partially the lack of guidelines implementation. The reasons of the poor implementation of these guidelines are discussed herein.

Endovascular Versus Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm: Best Decision.

Since the first implantation of an endograft in 1991, endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) rapidly gained recognition. Historical trials showed lower early mortality rates but these results were not maintained beyond 4 years. Despite newer-generation devices, higher rates of reintervention are associated with EVAR during follow-up. Therefore, the best therapeutic decision relies on many parameters that the physician has to take in consideration. Patient's preferences and characteristics are important, especially age and life expectancy besides health status. Aneurysmal anatomical conditions remain probably the most predictive factor that should be carefully evaluated to offer the best treatment. Unfavorable anatomy has been observed to be associated with more complications especially endoleak, leading to more re-interventions and higher risk of late mortality. Nevertheless, technological advances have made surgeons move forward beyond the set barriers. Thus, more endografts are implanted outside the instructions for use despite excellent results after open repair especially in low-risk patients. When debating about AAA repair, some other crucial points should be analysed. It has been shown that strict surveillance is mandatory after EVAR to offer durable results and prevent late rupture. Such program is associated with additional costs and with increased risk of radiation. Moreover, a risk of loss of renal function exists when repetitive imaging and secondary procedures are required. The aim of this article is to review the data associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm and its treatment in order to establish selection criteria to decide between open or endovascular repair.

Abdominal aortic aneurysm follow-up after endovascular repair in a canine model with non-invasive vascular elastography

Le traitement chirurgical des anévrismes de l'aorte abdominale est de plus en plus remplacé par la réparation endovasculaire de l’anévrisme (« endovascular aneurysm repair », EVAR) en utilisant des endoprothèses (« stent-grafts », SGs). Cependant, l'efficacité de cette approche moins invasive est compromise par l'incidence de l'écoulement persistant dans l'anévrisme, appelé endofuites menant à une rupture d'anévrisme si elle n'est pas détectée. Par conséquent, une surveillance de longue durée par tomodensitométrie sur une base annuelle est nécessaire ce qui augmente le coût de la procédure EVAR, exposant le patient à un rayonnement ionisants et un agent de contraste néphrotoxique. Le mécanisme de rupture d'anévrisme secondaire à l'endofuite est lié à une pression du sac de l'anévrisme proche de la pression systémique. Il existe une relation entre la contraction ou l'expansion du sac et la pressurisation du sac. La pressurisation résiduelle de l'anévrisme aortique abdominale va induire une pulsation et une circulation sanguine à l'intérieur du sac empêchant ainsi la thrombose du sac et la guérison de l'anévrisme. L'élastographie vasculaire non-invasive (« non-invasive vascular elastography », NIVE) utilisant le « Lagrangian Speckle Model Estimator » (LSME) peut devenir une technique d'imagerie complémentaire pour le suivi des anévrismes après réparation endovasculaire. NIVE a la capacité de fournir des informations importantes sur l'organisation d'un thrombus dans le sac de l'anévrisme et sur la détection des endofuites. La caractérisation de l'organisation d'un thrombus n'a pas été possible dans une étude NIVE précédente. Une limitation de cette étude était l'absence d'examen tomodensitométrique comme étalon-or pour le diagnostic d'endofuites. Nous avons cherché à appliquer et optimiser la technique NIVE pour le suivi des anévrismes de l'aorte abdominale (AAA) après EVAR avec endoprothèse dans un modèle canin dans le but de détecter et caractériser les endofuites et l'organisation du thrombus. Des SGs ont été implantés dans un groupe de 18 chiens avec un anévrisme créé dans l'aorte abdominale. Des endofuites de type I ont été créés dans 4 anévrismes, de type II dans 13 anévrismes tandis qu’un anévrisme n’avait aucune endofuite. L'échographie Doppler (« Doppler ultrasound », DUS) et les examens NIVE ont été réalisés avant puis à 1 semaine, 1 mois, 3 mois et 6 mois après l’EVAR. Une angiographie, une tomodensitométrie et des coupes macroscopiques ont été réalisées au moment du sacrifice. Les valeurs de contrainte ont été calculées en utilisant l`algorithme LSME. Les régions d'endofuite, de thrombus frais (non organisé) et de thrombus solide (organisé) ont été identifiées et segmentées en comparant les résultats de la tomodensitométrie et de l’étude macroscopique. Les valeurs de contrainte dans les zones avec endofuite, thrombus frais et organisé ont été comparées. Les valeurs de contrainte étaient significativement différentes entre les zones d'endofuites, les zones de thrombus frais ou organisé et entre les zones de thrombus frais et organisé. Toutes les endofuites ont été clairement caractérisées par les examens d'élastographie. Aucune corrélation n'a été trouvée entre les valeurs de contrainte et le type d'endofuite, la pression de sac, la taille des endofuites et la taille de l'anévrisme.

Unfavorable iliac artery anatomy causing access limitations during endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: application of the endoconduit technique

Endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is already considered the first choice treatment for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA). Several different strategies have been used to address limitations to arterial access caused by unfavorable iliac artery anatomy. The aim of this report is to illustrate the advantages and limitations of each option and present the results of using the internal endoconduit technique and the difficulties involved.

[Abdominal aortic aneurysm]

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) confer a substantial healthcare burden in the Western world. Surgical or endovascular therapy is indicated in patients with a maximum diameter exceeding 5.5 cm. Patients with smaller AAA must undergo a specific ultrasound surveillance program aimed at avoiding exposure to an increased risk of rupture once their AAA exceeds the threshold for active treatment. Based on improved understanding of the pathophysiology of AAA, recent years provided initial insight into potential medical treatment options. The presence of AAA is currently regarded a coronary artery disease risk equivalent. ACE inhibitors, statins and JNK-inhibitors were shown to have the potential to slow down progression. Since cigarette smoking is the main risk factor for both the development and progression of AAA, smoking cessation remains a key goal. Further prospective studies will assess the clinical efficacy of various promising drug treatment approaches aimed at slowing disease progression of small AAA and after endovascular therapy.

Dissecting abdominal aortic aneurysm in Angiotensin II-infused mice: the importance of imaging

INTRODUCTION Since the initial publication in 2000, Angiotensin II-infused mice have become one of the most popular models to study abdominal aortic aneurysm in a pre-clinical setting. We recently used phase contrast X-ray based computed tomography to demonstrate that these animals develop an apparent luminal dilatation and an intramural hematoma, both related to mural ruptures in the tunica media in the vicinity of suprarenal side branches. AIMS The aim of this narrative review was to provide an extensive overview of small animal applicable techniques that have provided relevant insight into the pathogenesis and morphology of dissecting AAA in mice, and to relate findings from these techniques to each other and to our recent PCXTM-based results. Combining insights from recent and consolidated publications we aimed to enhance our understanding of dissecting AAA morphology and anatomy. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION We analyzed in vivo and ex vivo images of aortas obtained from macroscopic anatomy, histology, high-frequency ultrasound, contrast-enhanced micro-CT, micro-MRI and PCXTM. We demonstrate how in almost all publications the aorta has been subdivided into a part in which an intact lumen lies adjacent to a remodeled wall/hematoma, and a part in which elastic lamellae are ruptured and the lumen appears to be dilated. We show how the novel paradigm fits within the existing one, and how 3D images can explain and connect previously published 2D structures. We conclude that PCXTM-based findings are in line with previous results, and all evidence points towards the fact that dissecting AAAs in Angiotensin II-infused mice are actually caused by ruptures of the tunica media in the immediate vicinity of small side branches.

Automatic segmentation of abdominal aortic aneurysm from medical images based on active shape models and texture models

A semi-automatic segmentation algorithm for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA), and based on Active Shape Models (ASM) and texture models, is presented in this work. The texture information is provided by a set of four 3D magnetic resonance (MR) images, composed of axial slices of the abdomen, where lumen, wall and intraluminal thrombus (ILT) are visible. Due to the reduced number of images in the MRI training set, an ASM and a custom texture model based on border intensity statistics are constructed. For the same reason the shape is characterized from 35-computed tomography angiography (CTA) images set so the shape variations are better represented. For the evaluation, leave-one-out experiments have been held over the four MRI set.

Influence of rurality, deprivation and distance from clinic on uptake in men invited for abdominal aortic aneurysm screening

Acknowledgements This study received no specific funding. The study involved the analysis of data collected routinely as part of the national AAA screening programme in Scotland.

CO2-EVAR: An innovative approach to Automated Carbon Dioxide Angiography during Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm repair

Objectives CO2-EVAR was proposed for treatment of AAA especially in patients with CKD. Issues regarding standardization, such as visualization of lowest renal artery (LoRA) and quality image in angiographies performed from pigtail or introducer-sheath, are still unsolved. Aim of the study was to analyze different steps of CO2-EVAR to create an operative protocol to standardize the procedure. Methods Patients undergoing CO2-EVAR were prospectively enrolled in 5 European centers (2018-2021). CO2-EVAR was performed using an automated injector. LoRA visualization and image quality (1-4) were analyzed and compared at different procedure steps: preoperative CO2-angiography from Pigtail/Introducer-sheath (1st Step), angiographies from Pigtail at 0%,50%,100% main body (MB) deployment (2nd Step), contralateral hypogastric artery (CHA) visualization with CO2 injection from femoral Introducer-sheath (3rd Step) and completion angiogram from Pigtail/Introducer-sheath (4th Step). Intra-/postoperative adverse events were evaluated. Results Sixty-five patients undergoing CO2-EVAR were enrolled, 55/65(84.5%) male, median age 75(11.5) years. Median ICM was 20(54)cc; 19/65(29.2%) procedures were performed with 0-iodine. 1st Step: median image quality was significantly higher with CO2 injected from femoral introducer [Pigtail2(3)vs.3(3)Introducer,p=.008]. 2nd Step: LoRA was more frequently detected at 50% (93%vs.73.2%, p=.002) and 100% (94.1%vs.78.4%, p=.01) of MB deployment compared with first angiography from Pigtail; image quality was significantly higher at 50% [3(3)vs.2(3),p=<.001] and 100% [4(3) vs.2(3),p=.001] of MB deployment. CHA was detected in 93% cases (3rd Step). Mean image quality was significantly higher when final angiogram (4th Step) was performed from introducer (Pigtail2.6±1.1vs.3.1±0.9Introducer,p=<.001). Rates of intra-/postoperative adverse events (pain,vomit,diarrhea) were 7.7% and 12.5%. Conclusions Preimplant CO2-angiography should be performed from Introducer-sheath. MB steric bulk during its deployment should be used to improve image quality and LoRA visualization with CO2. CHA can be satisfactorily visualized with CO2. Completion CO2-angiogram should be performed from femoral Introducer-sheath. This operative protocol allows to perform CO2-EVAR with minimal ICM and low rate of mild complications.

Development of a hydrogel construct to prevent endoleaks occurrence following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair

Abdominal aortic aneurysm is the pathological dilation of the abdominal tract of the aorta and, if left untreated, could undergo rupture with a mortality rate of up to 90%. EVAR is the most common method for AAA treatment consisting in the internal coverage of the aorta with a metallic stent to isolate the aneurysmatic segment from the systemic circulation. Although EVAR technical success rate is high, reinterventions are common. Among the causes of reinterventions typeII endoleaks are the most frequent and consist in retrograde blood flow into the aneurysmal sac from collateral aortic branches. Continued perfusion of the aneurysm sac may lead to aneurysm rupture, therefore AAA sac embolization is performed using metallic coils. However, the presence of artifacts caused by the presence of metallic coils is a limitation because they are radiopaque and can hamper the endoleak during imaging follow-up. This study is aimed at developing a biocompatible hydrogel that could be injected into the aneurysmal sac and may allow a selective intraprocedural sac embolization to reduce post procedural typeII endoleak and eventual AAA rupture. P(BT75BSI25) was synthesized by polycondensation and its biocompatibility tested to assess whether the polymers had no toxic effects. HUVEC cell line was used to mimic the environment in which the polymer would be in contact with, PBS was used as a positive control and MTT assay was performed to evaluate cellular viability after being in contact with the hydrogel. MTT assay showed no significant difference between PBS and P(BT75BSI25), thus the polymer is biocompatible, as confirmed by the analysis of apoptosis by flow cytometry. An aromatic copolymer was obtained via polycondensation and was found to be biocompatible in contact with endothelial cells. This suggests that the hydrogel could be potentially used in the clinical setting for the treatment of type II endoleak after EVAR.

Response to Screening for abdominal aortic aneurysm - Screening reduces deaths related to aneurysm

Editor—We reported the study in a transparent fashion and were deliberately cautious in our conclusions. Australia and the United Kingdom are very different with regard to arrangements for primary care, which did not permit us to undertake a preliminary assessment of the eligibility of men for screening before we randomised them and issued half invitations to attend for the ultrasound examination.

Fish oil after abdominal aorta aneurysm surgery

OBJECTIVE: Fish oil (FO) may attenuate the inflammatory response after major surgery such as abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery. We aimed at evaluating the clinical impact and safety aspects of a FO containing parenteral nutrition (PN) after AAA surgery. METHODS: Intervention consisted in 4 days of either standard (STD: Lipofundin medium-chain triglyceride (MCT): long-chain triglyceride (LCT)50%-MCT50%) or FO containing PN (FO: Lipoplus: LCT40%-MCT50%-FO10%). Energy target were set at 1.3 times the preoperative resting energy expenditure by indirect calorimetry. Blood sampling on days 0, 2, 3 and 4. Glucose turnover by the (2)H(2)-glucose method. Muscle microdialysis. Clinical data: maximal daily T degrees, intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay. RESULTS: Both solutions were clinically well tolerated, without any differences in laboratory safety parameters, inflammatory, metabolic data, or in organ failures. Plasma tocopherol increased similarly; with FO, docosahexaenoic and eicosapentaenoic acid increased significantly by day 4 versus baseline or STD. To increased postoperatively, with a trend to lower values in FO group (P=0.09). After FO, a trend toward shorter ICU stay (1.6+/-0.4 versus 2.3+/-0.4), and hospital stay (9.9+/-2.4 versus 11.3+/-2.7 days: P=0.19) was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Both lipid emulsions were well tolerated. FO-PN enhanced the plasma n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid content, and was associated with trends to lower body temperature and shorter length of stay.

Treatment of ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm, a permanent challenge or a waste of resources? Prediction of outcome using a multi-organ-dysfunction score.

OBJECTIVES: in a retrospective study, attempts have been made to identify individual organ-dysfunction risk profiles influencing the outcome after surgery for ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms. METHODS: out of 235 patients undergoing graft replacement for abdominal aortic aneurysms, 57 (53 men, four women, mean age 72 years [s.d. 8.8]) were treated for ruptured aneurysms in a 3-year period. Forty-eight preoperative, 13 intraoperative and 34 postoperative variables were evaluated statistically. A simple multi-organ dysfunction (MOD) score was adopted. RESULTS: the perioperative mortality was 32%. Three patients died intraoperatively, four within 48 h and 11 died later. A significant influence for pre-existing risk factors was identified only for cardiovascular diseases. Multiple linear-regression analysis indicated that a haemoglobin <90 g/l, systolic blood pressure <80 mmHg and ECG signs of ischaemia at admission were highly significant risk factors. The cause of death for patients, who died more than 48 h postoperatively, was mainly MOD. All patients with a MOD score >/=4 died (n=7). These patients required 27% of the intensive-care unit (ICU) days of all patients and 72% of the ICU days of the non-survivors. CONCLUSION: patients with ruptured aortic aneurysms from treatment should not be excluded. However, a physiological scoring system after 48 h appears justifiable in order to decide on the appropriateness of continual ICU support.