Barroco y modernidad : De Maravall a Lezama Lima

En las décadas de 1960 y 1970 convergen varias de las líneas que, desde principios del siglo XX, habían centrado las discusiones en torno del Barroco. Tanto en Europa como en América, y desde diversas disciplinas -filología, ensayo literario, retórica, historia, filosofía, psicoanálisis- el Barroco es visto como un punto de partida de la cultura moderna. En 1975 José Antonio Maravall publica La cultura del Barroco, definida como un concepto histórico, en oposición a la teoría de los eones y las constantes desarrollada por Eugenio d'Ors. Para Maravall el Barroco vincula a España con el surgimiento de la modernidad. Años antes, el cubano José Lezama Lima ve en el Barroco el puente que establece la continuidad entre la cultura española y la americana, lanzándola hacia el futuro. Y en el París de la década de 1970, Severo Sarduy introduce el barroco y neobarroco entre los conceptos que circulan en el intenso intercambio intelectual del momento. Proponemos un abordaje de la cuestión en el cruce de esas líneas diversas

La perspectiva plástica en Paradiso de José Lezama Lima

El presente trabajo se propone examinar la presencia de la pintura en la obra narrativa de José Lezama Lima, particularmente a partir de la configuración espacial de su novela Paradiso (1966). Desde su producción ensayística -especialmente en La expresión americana- el autor ha realizado valiosos aportes al pensamiento sobre la identidad latinoamericana, hallando en las artes visuales una serie de temas, procedimientos y recursos mediante los cuales proyectar sus propias ideas e imágenes sobre América Latina. Nos proponemos conceptualizar los diversos modos en que el poeta cubano diseña nuevos tratamientos y significaciones la espacialidad americana a fin de construir una nueva expresión estética redefiniendo el ámbito propio con respecto a lo europeo

El péndulo poético de Valéry en Muerte de Narciso de Lezama Lima

Este trabajo sostiene que los 'Narcisos' de Paul Valéry son subtextos de 'Muerte de Narciso' y que a partir de ellos se establece la divergencia entre ambas poéticas. De esta manera 'Muerte de Narciso' plasma el rechazo por la poética de Valéry, inaugurando la poética lezamiana -pues este es su primer poema publicado. Lo interesante es el método al que recurre Lezama para expresar estas reflexiones intelectuales: forja en la figura de Narciso los visos negativos de la poética de Valéry y expresa su rechazo en la estrategia estética de la fragmentación, que refleja el desplazamiento al que es sometido el orbe valeriano bocetado en Narciso

Ficcion de racionalidad: La memoria como operador mitico en las esteticas polares de Jorge Luis Borges y Jose Lezama Lima

The aesthetic placement and period designation of Jorge Luis Borges (1899–1986) and José Lezama Lima (1910–1976) are complicated issues among critics. Borges is considered a predecessor of the Latin American literary “boom,” but despite that taxonomy his work transcends that definition and provides a foundation for new trends, such as the “neobarroco” cultivated by Severo Sarduy. Lezama is considered part of the second wave of the “boom,” but his work feeds, stylistically, from the Spanish baroque. At the same time, Lezama's daring treatment of homoeroticism and his system of images place him after the “boom” in a narrative style that is postmodern. This study undertakes a revision of external and internal issues, revealing the key fictive elements that characterize both writers. Through discourse analysis, a poetic system is formulated, which incorporates features of the “neobarroco,” and postmodern narrative styles. ^ This dissertation uses a polar structure to analyze both poetic visions and finds that they are symmetrical. From this perspective, Borges and Lezama belong to the “core” of literature that centers its emphasis in the creation of a system versus other modes of writing in which mimetic function prevails. By doing this and by recycling world culture, they create postmodern myth: the new building material for Hispanic American literature. ^ There are a few studies that explore the works of Borges and Lezama within the context of Baroque aesthetics. This dissertation offers a comprehensive analysis that considers their poetic visions at large. Besides the difference in perspective, defined as macro-spatial in Borges and micro-spatial in Lezama, there are many similarities. Both writers question the cause and effect relationship and the use of metaphor. They share a redefinition of genre as well as a hedonistic approach to literature. This kinship in poetic vision is revealed through the polar method used for this study, which proposes a new form of aesthetic placement and period designation. ^

Hacia una poetica del Neobarroco: La vision de la historia en Jose Lezama Lima, Reinaldo Arenas y Severo Sarduy

Most of the critical studies of Baroque novels written in Spanish America during the 1960s and 1970s are characterized by a limited examination of their formal and stylistic representations. This dissertation explored the way in which certain writers developed a new Baroque tendency, the so-called Neobarroco, that presented a particular vision of history. José Lezama Lima, Reinaldo Arenas and Severo Sarduy developed innovative fictional and historiographic perceptions as alternative discourses to understand and perceive the cultural intricacies of Cuba and the New World. Their novels posited an elaborated poetic theory of history that can be summarized by the principle of supratemporal analogies, interweaved by a "metaphoric subject" that makes possible the conception of "imaginary eras". Since this poetry arises from a network of metaphoric correspondences, the image is conceived as a cultural creation that acts upon reality. ^ Although this study traced the trajectory of their writings from the point of view of their own essays, our focus was on the act of recovering the past as reshaped forms that are present in the memory. Paradiso, El mundo alucinante and De donde son los cantantes exemplified the attempt to place Americanness within the realm of poetics and history as one single discourse constructed by a combination of self-consciousness and historiographic meditation. ^ Basing my thesis on postmodernist theory (Ihab Hassan, Brian McHale, Linda Hutcheon) and philosophies of history (Michel Foucault, Hayden White, Keith Jenkins, Dominick LaCapra), I argued that the antagonistic paradoxes faced by postmodernism were reconcilable tendencies of the Neobarroco prior to the actual debate on the postmodern condition. The aesthetic trend initiated by these writers and their reading of history confronted the official historiographic discourse, thus empowering a contemporary voice in the current debate on historical skepticism. ^

Ficción de Racionalidad: La memoria como operador mítico en las estéticas polares de Jorge Luis Borges y José Lezama Lima

The aesthetic placement and period designation of Jorge Luis Borges (1899-1986) and José Lezama Lima (1910-1976) are complicated issues among critics. Borges is obviously considered a predecessor of the Latin American literary “boom,” but despite that taxonomy his work transcends that definition and provides a foundation for new trends and styles, such as the “neobarroco” cultivated by Severo Sarduy. Lezama is considered part of the second wave of the “boom,” but his work feeds, stylistically, from the Spanish baroque. At the same time, Lezama’s daring treatment of homoeroticism and his revolutionary system of images place him after the “boom” in a narrative style that is postmodern. This study undertakes a thorough revision of external and internal issues, revealing the key linguistic and fictive elements that characterize both writers. Through discourse analysis and close reading, a poetic system is formulated, which incorporate features of the “neobarroco,” “boom” and postmodern narrative styles. This dissertation uses a polar structure to analyze both poetic visions and concludes that they are compatible and symmetrical. From this perspective, Borges and Lezama belong to the “core” of literature that centers its emphasis in the creation of a system versus other modes of writing in which mimetic function prevails. By doing this and by recycling world culture, they create postmodern myth: the new building material for Hispanic American literature. There are only a few studies that explore the works of Borges and Lezama within the context of Baroque aesthetics. For the first time, this dissertation offers a comprehensive analysis that considers their poetic visions at large. Besides the difference in perspective, defined as macro-spatial in Borges and micro-spatial in Lezama, there are many similarities in content and form. Both writers question the cause and effect relationship and the modern use of metaphor. They also share a redefinition of genre as well as a hedonistic approach to literature and culture. This kinship in poetic vision is revealed through the polar method used for this study, which proposes a new form of aesthetic placement and period designation.

Tramas del linaje en Muerte de Narciso de José Lezama Lima

Fil: Chazarreta, Daniela Evangelina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales (UNLP-CONICET); Argentina.

Lecturas de la tradición en la poesía de José Lezama Lima

Fil: Chazarreta, Daniela Evangelina. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales (UNLP-CONICET); Argentina.