841 resultados para 1209


Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Thesis (doctoral)--Universitat Greifswald.

Relevância:

20.00% 20.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

El artículo estudia casos de adición de la διαστολή en el Codex Vaticanus gr. 1209. Esta adición puede advertirse, asimismo, en pasajes del Nuevo Testamento y en la Septuaginta donde se utiliza el pronominal ὅτι. Este artículo sostiene que, en los pasajes examinados, la adición responde a propósitos filológicos en lugar de obedecer a razones de lectura. La διαστολή, de hecho, podría ser una especie de firma involuntaria que ayuda a establecer o confirmar los puntos clave antes de que el codex llegase a la Biblioteca Vaticana en 1475.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Tabling of report, "Investigation into the decriminalisation and regulation of altruistic surrogacy in Queensland' - issues - recommendations - need for decriminalisation of altruistic surrogacy in Queensland.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Intoxication of a plaintiff raises many issues in a negligence action – duty of care, breach of duty, causation and the defence of contributory negligence. Recently intoxication has been examined by the Full Court of Tasmania in relation to duty and breach and by the New South Wales Court of Appeal in respect of causation and contributory negligence.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

In Bonny Glen Pty Ltd v Country Energy [2009] NSWCA 26 (24 February 2009) the New South Wales Court of Appeal held that the pure economic loss suffered by the appellant was recoverable. However, rather than arguments as to whether the appellant was vulnerable and a member of an ascertainable class, whether the respondent had knowledge of the risk to the appellant and was in a position of control and considerations as to indeterminate liability as in Perre v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) 198 CLR 180, the arguments raised related to the foreseeability of the loss and causation.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

In Pollard v Trude [2008] QSC 119 (20 May 2008) the plaintiff claimed for personal injuries suffered when he was struck by a golf ball during the course of a tournament. The plaintiff was a member of a group of four, playing in a two-day tournament at Indooroopilly Golf Club. All four players had teed off at the second hole of the course and when the defendant took his second shot; his ball struck one of the trees bordering the fairway and deflected, hitting the plaintiff who was waiting to take his third stroke. As the ball was in flight, the defendant had called out "Watch out Errol", or words to that effect, to the plaintiff. The plaintiff suffered injury to his eye, leaving his vision impaired. The plaintiff sued in negligence, alleging that by failing to shout "fore" as is traditionally done in golf, the defendant had failed to warn the appellant and this was a breach of their duty. The claim in negligence was dismissed by the Queensland Supreme Court, holding that there had been no breach of the duty.