Effects of coagulation factors and inflammatory cytokines on development of acute myocardial infarction in patients younger than 60 years

Purpose: To investigate the effects of coagulation factors and inflammatory cytokines on acute myocardial infarction (AMI) development in patients younger than 60 years. Methods: In this study, 60 patients admitted to The First Affiliated Hospital of Dalian Medical University (Dalian, China) with AMI and 30 other subjects matched with the patients for age and ethnicity but without AMI were enrolled. Blood samples were collected from the AMI patients and the control subjects after a 12-h fast. Subsequently, the levels of coagulation factors (F) II (FII), VII (FVII), VIII (FVIII), fibrinogen (Fg) and von Willebrand factor (vWF) in plasma were analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The protein expression levels of these coagulation factors were determined by Western blot analysis. Inflammatory factors including C-reactive protein (CRP), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) and interleukin- 6 (IL-6) were also measured by ELISA. Results: FII, FVII, FVIII, Fg and vWF levels in plasm were significantly higher in AMI patients compared with control subjects (p < 0.01). Furthermore, the protein expression levels of FII, FVII, FVIII, Fg and vWF were also significantly up-regulated in AMI patients compared with those in control subjects. Additionally, no significant difference was observed in CRP between AMI patients and control subjects (p > 0.05). However, TNF-α and IL-6 levels in the plasma of AMI patients were significantly higher than those in control subjects (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The results reveal that the pathogenesis of AMI in patients younger than 60 years might be closely related to the high levels of coagulation factors and inflammatory cytokines in the blood.

Outcomes of global coagulation assays in patients with Philadelphia-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms with respect to genetic determinants of clonal progression

Classical myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are hematopoietic stem cell disorders that manifest with inflammation, promotion of atherosclerosis, hypercoagulability, fibrosis, and clonal evolution. The complex biological background lends itself to multi-omics studies. We have previously shown that reduced platelet fibrinogen receptor (PFR) expression may follow hyperactivation of plasma-dependent mechanisms, such as tissue factor (TF) release, unbalanced thrombin generation, involvement of protease-activated receptors (PARs). Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) helped to restore the expression of PFRs. In this study, we enrolled 53 MPN patients, subjecting them to advanced genetic testing (panel of 30 genes in NGS), global coagulation testing (Rotational Thromboelastometry - ROTEM) and cytofluorometric determination of PFRs. ROTEM parameters appear to differ considerably depending on the type of pathology under investigation, cell count, and selected mutations. Essential thrombocythemia (ET) and CALR mutation appear to correlate with increased efficiency of both classical coagulation pathways, with significantly more contracted clot formation times (CFTs). In contrast, primary myelofibrosis (PMF) and polycythemia vera (PV) show greater imbalances in the hemostatic system. PV, probably due to its peculiar hematological features, shows a lengthening of the CFT and, at the same time, a selective contraction of parameters in INTEM with the increase of platelets and white blood cells. PMF - in contrast - seems to exploit the extrinsic pathway more to increase cell numbers. The presence of DNMT3A mutations is associated with reduced clotting time (CT) in EXTEM, while ASXL1 causes reduced maximal lysis (ML). EZH2 could be responsible for the elongation of CFT in INTEM assay. In addition, increased PFR expression is associated with history of hemorrhage and sustained CT time in FIBTEM under ASA prophylaxis. Our findings corroborate the existing models on the connection between fibrosis, genetic complexity, clonal progression, and hypercoagulability. Global coagulation assays and PFR expression are potentially useful tools for dynamic evaluation of treatments’ outcomes.