Salud mental y ejecución penal

La investigación recoge la situación de las personas que sufren algún tipo de trastorno mental y se encuentran cumpliendo una medida de ejecución penal, ya sea internamiento en prisión o bien una medida de seguridad. La muestra del estudio la componen las personas que en el año 2005 pasaron como mínimo un día por las unidades psiquiátricas de los centros penitenciarios, o que cumplieron alguna medida de seguridad (en el ámbito territorial de las comarcas de Barcelona). En la segunda parte del estudio, más de un centenar de profesionales y expertos opinan sobre las principales necesidades presentes y futuras de la intervención en salud mental en el mundo de la ejecución penal.

Monaghan General Hospital - Proposals for further and future development

Monaghan General Hospital – Proposals for further and future development The Independent Review Panel recommended a review of the existing protocol for emergency obstetric cases presenting at Hospitals such as Monaghan which have no on-site obstetric expertise, and the implementation of a revised protocol. They also recommended that each maternity incident should be reviewed by a multidisciplinary team from the Cavan Monaghan Group. Click here to download PDF 49kb Appendix PDF 2.5mb

Review of the Operation of the Mental Health Act 2001

The Mental Health Act 2001 replaces the Mental Treatment Acts 1945-61 which provided the statutory framework for the detention of people with mental illness and the administration of psychiatric services for over 50 years.The 2001 Act was introduced on a phased basis to allow for the necessary preparatory work to be undertaken. In March 2002 sections 1 to 5, 7, and 31 to 55 were commenced with effect from the 5 April 2002 (Establishment Day). This allowed for the establishment of the Mental Health Commission and the Inspector of Mental Health Services to replace the Inspector of Mental Hospitals. The Mental Health Act 2001 replaces the Mental Treatment Acts 1945-61 which provided the statutory framework for the detention of people with mental illness and the administration of psychiatric services for over 50 years. The 2001 Act was introduced on a phased basis to allow for the necessary preparatory work to be undertaken. In March 2002 sections 1 to 5, 7, and 31 to 55 were commenced with effect from the 5 April 2002 (Establishment Day). This allowed for the establishment of the Mental Health Commission and the Inspector of Mental Health Services to replace the Inspector of Mental Hospitals. Click here to download PDF 202kb

Fourth Annual Report of the Independent Monitoring Group for A Vision for Change - the Report of the Expert Group on Mental Health Policy - June 2010

  Click here to download PDF 222KB Please scroll down for related documents   Related Documents: HSE National and Regional Progress Reports HSE – Key Deliverables 2009 – Report PDF 55KB HSE – National Report PDF 363KB HSE – Regional Report – Dublin Mid Leinster PDF 82KB HSE – Regional Report – Dublin North East PDF 89KB HSE – Regional Report – West PDF 91KB HSE – Regional Report -South PDF 152KB HSE Local Area Progress Reports HSE – Tipperay South PDF 395KB HSE – Tipperary North PDF 367KB HSE Sligo/Leitrim and West Cavan PDF 359KB HSE – Roscommon PDF 352KB HSE – Mayo PDF 338KB HSE – Louth/Meath PDF 525KB HSE – Limerick PDF 395KB HSE – Laois/Offaly PDF 366KB HSE – Kildare/West Wicklow PDF 317KB HSE – Galway West PDF 297KB HSE – Galway/Mayo and Roscommon Child and Adolescent PDF 59KB HSE – Galway East PDF 400KB HSE – Dun Laoghaire PDF 262KB HSE – Dublin West South West PDF 346KB HSE – Dublin South City PDF 361KB HSE – Dublin North PDF 371KB HSE – Dublin North West PDF 432KB HSE – Dublin North – Dublin Central & part of NW Dublin – Child and Adolescent PDF 53KB HSE – Dublin North Central PDF 341KB HSE – Donegal PDF 485KB HSE – Cork West PDF 424KB HSE – Cork South Lee PDF 469KB HSE – Cork North PDF 423KB HSE – Cavan/Monaghan PDF 371KB HSE – Carlow/Kilkenny PDF 451KB Progress Reports from Government Departments Department of Community Rural and Gaeltacht Affairs PDF 20KB Department of Education and Science PDF 121KB Department of Enterprise Trade and Employment PDF 25KB Department of Environment Heritage and Local Government PDF 47KB Department of Health and Children PDF 50KB Department of Justice Equality and Law Reform PDF 19KB Department of Social and Family Affairs PDF 27KB Submissions Received by the IMG Amnesty International Ireland submission PDF 87KB Association of Occupational Therapists submission PDF 81KB College of Psychiatry of Ireland submission PDF 21KB Disability Federation of Ireland submission PDF 81KB Health Research Board submission PDF 24KB Inclusion Ireland submission PDF 18KB Independent Mental Health Sevice Providers submission PDF 82KB Irish Association of Consultants in Psychiatry of Old Age submission PDF 37KB Irish College of General Practitioners submission PDF 25KB Irish Hospital Consultancts Association submission PDF 155KB Irish Medical Organisation submission PDF 63KB Irish Mental Health Coalition submission PDF 90KB Mental Health Commission submission PDF 64KB Mental Health Nurse Managers submission PDF 206KB National Council for the Professional Development of Nursing and Midwifery submission PDF 67KB National Disability Authority submission PDF 49KB National Service Users Executive submission PDF 28KB Neurobehaviour Clinic – National Rehabilitation Hospital submission PDF 24KB Neurological Alliance of Ireland submission PDF 20KB

Rural Health Partnership

This is their 3rd BCPP project and this is a Level 3 project. Rural Health Partnership is a community based initiative which assists people to recover from a mental illness. Previous BCPP projects focussed on supporting the needs of women in relation to mental health and more specifically, those experiencing post natal depression through the 2nd BCPP project using a lay health approach. This project seeks to build on this previous work. A very good working relationship has developed between the pharmacist and RHP. A programme of activities that can enhance the skills and knowledge base of the participants will be developed and so will relationships with other services eg GPs, primary care team etc. The project aims to educate the community at large on the issues faced by vulnerable women, with particular emphasis on symptoms of postnatal depression and anxiety.

Substance abuse treatment for persons with co-occurring disorders.

This TIP, Substance Abuse Treatment for Persons With Co-Occurring Disorders, revises TIP 9, Assessment and Treatment of Patients With Coexisting Mental Illness and Alcohol and Other Drug Abuse. The revised TIP provides information about new developments in the rapidly growing field of co-occurring substance use and mental disorders and captures the state-of-the-art in the treatment of people with co-occurring disorders. The TIP focuses on what the substance abuse treatment clinician needs to know and provides that information in an accessible manner. The TIP synthesizes knowledge and grounds it in the practical realities of clinical cases and real situations so the reader will come away with increased knowledge, encouragement, and resourcefulness in working with clients with co-occurring disorders. Contents: Executive Summary â?¢ 1 Introduction  2 Definitions, Terms, and Classification Systems for Co-Occurring Disorders  3 Keys to Successful Programming  4 Assessment  5 Strategies for Working With Clients With Co-Occurring Disorders  6 Traditional Settings and Models  7 Special Settings and Specific Populations  8 A Brief Overview of Specific Mental Disorders and Cross-Cutting Issues 9 Substance-Induced Disorders Appendix A: Bibliography Appendix B: Acronyms  Appendix C: Glossary of Terms Appendix D: Specific Mental Disorders: Additional Guidance for the Counselor  Appendix E: Emerging Models â?¢ Appendix F: Common Medications for Disorders  Appendix G: Screening and Assessment Instruments  Appendix H: Screening Instruments  Appendix I: Selected Sources of Training  Appendix J: Dual Recovery Mutual Self-Help Programs and Other Resources for Consumers and Providers  Appendix K: Confidentiality  Appendix L: Resource Panel  Appendix M: Cultural Competency and Diversity Network Participants Appendix N: Field ReviewersThis resource was contributed by The National Documentation Centre on Drug Use.

Dual diagnosis in mental health inpatient and day hospital settings.

Many mental health patients also have substance misuse problems, so mental health service staff need to be skilled to provide simple prevention and treatment interventions, assisted by drug and alcohol specialists. This guidance covers the assessment and clinical management of patients with mental illness being cared for in psychiatric inpatient or day care settings who also use or misuse alcohol and/or illicit or other drugs*. It also covers organisational and management issues to help mental health services manage these patients effectively. The key message is that the assessment and management of drug and alcohol use are core competences required by clinical staff in mental health services. The guidance aims to: â?¢ encourage integration of drug and alcohol expertise and related training into mental health service provision; â?¢ provide ideas and guidance to front-line staff and manages to help them provide the most effective therapeutic environments; â?¢ help mental health services plan action on dual diagnosisâ? .This resource was contributed by The National Documentation Centre on Drug Use.

Mental health and growing up factsheet. Cannabis and mental health: information for young people.

About this leaflet This is one in a series of leaflets for parents, teachers and young people entitled Mental Health and Growing Up. These leaflets aim to provide practical, up-to-date information about mental health problems (emotional, behavioural and psychiatric disorders) that can affect children and young people. This leaflet gives you some basic facts about cannabis and also how it might affect your mental health. Introduction Lots of young people want to know about drugs. Often, people around you are taking them, and you may wonder how it will make you feel. You may even feel under pressure to use drugs in order to fit in, or be â?~coolâ?T. You may have heard that cannabis is no worse than cigarettes, or that it is harmless. What is cannabis? The cannabis plant is a member of the nettle family that has grown wild throughout the world for centuries. People have used it for lots of reasons, other than the popular relaxing effect. It comes in two main forms: ï,§ resin, which is a brown black lump also known as bhang, ganja or hashish ï,§ herbal cannabis, which is made up of the dried leaves and flowering tops, and is known as grass, marijuana, spliff, weed, etc. Skunk cannabis is made from a cannabis plant that has more active chemicals in it (THC), and the effect on your brain is stronger. Because â?~streetâ?T cannabis varies so much in strength, you will not be able to tell exactly how it will make you feel at any particular time. What does it do to you? When you smoke cannabis, the active compounds reach your brain quickly through your bloodstream. It then binds/sticks to a special receptor in your brain. This causes your nerve cells to release different chemicals, and causes the effects that you feel. These effects can be enjoyable or unpleasant. Often the bad effects take longer to appear than the pleasant ones. ï,§ Good/pleasant effects: You may feel relaxed and talkative, and colours or music may seem more intense. ï,§ Unpleasant effects: Feeling sick/panicky, feeling paranoid or hearing voices, feeling depressed and unmotivated. Unfortunately, some people can find cannabis addictive and so have trouble stopping use even when they are not enjoying it. The effects on your mental health Using cannabis triggers mental health problems in people who seemed to be well before, or it can worsen any mental health problems you already have. Research has shown that people who are already at risk of developing mental health problems are more likely to start showing symptoms of mental illness if they use cannabis regularly. For example if someone in your family has depression or schizophrenia, you are at higher risk of getting these illness when you use cannabis. The younger you are when you start using it, the more you may be at risk. This is because your brain is still developing and can be more easily damaged by the active chemicals in cannabis. If you stop using cannabis once you have started to show symptoms of mental illness, such as depression, paranoia or hearing voices, these symptoms may go away. However, not everyone will get better just by stopping smoking. If you go on using cannabis, the symptoms can get worse. It can also make any treatment that your doctor might prescribe for you, work less well. Your illness may come back more quickly, and more often if you continue to use cannabis once you get well again. Some people with mental health problems find that using cannabis makes them feel a bit better for a while. Unfortunately this does not last, and it does nothing to treat the illness. In fact, it may delay you from getting help you need and the illness may get worse in the longer term. [For the full factsheet, click on the link above]This resource was contributed by The National Documentation Centre on Drug Use.

Suicide prevention - Protect Life - Ministerial workshop report

The Minister for Health, Social Services and Public Safety, Mr Edwin Poots MLA, asked Department officials and the Public Health Agency to organise a workshop to support the implementation of the Protect Life Strategy and to consider what further action is needed in order to tackle the high level of suicides and self harm in Northern Ireland.The resulting report from the event is attached below.The event primarily provided an opportunity to explore the views and perspectives of the community and voluntary sector. Community�and Voluntary (C&V) organisations funded through the Northern Ireland�Suicide Prevention Strategy Protect Life - A Shared Vision (DHSSPS 2006) were personally invited to the workshop along with key representatives from the Department of Health, Social Services and Public Safety (DHSSPS), the Public Health Agency (PHA), the Health�and Social Care Trusts (HSCT), the Health�and Social Care Board (HSCB) and members of the NI Executive Health Committee.In total, there were 118 participants, 54 from the statutory sector and 64 from the C&V sector. A full list of attendees is detailed in Appendix 1.

Media guidelines for reporting suicide and self-harm

These guidelines are for those in the media who have involvement with the reporting or portrayal of suicide and represent an important source of information to help ensure that the quality of reporting and portrayal on this important and sensitive topic is of a high standard.

Overview of the State Mental Health Institutes, August 24th, 2009

Iowa’s four Mental Health Institutes (MHIs), located in Cherokee, Clarinda, Independence and Mount Pleasant, provide critical access to quality acute psychiatric care for Iowa’s adults and children needing mental health treatment, and provide specialized mental health related services. The specialized services include substance abuse treatment, dual diagnosis treatment for persons with mental illness and substance addiction, psychiatric medical institution for children (PMIC), and long-term psychiatric care for the elderly (geropsychiatric).

Collaboration entre médecin de famille et psychiatre pour les problèmes de santé mentale [Family physicians and psychiatrists' collaborative care for mental health problems].

The burden of disease linked to mental disorders represents more than one-fifth of years lived with disability in the world. Less than half of people suffering from mental disorders are adequately treated. Three quarter of those who receive treatment are followed by primary care. Collaborative care aims to increase the efficiency of direct general practitioner's treatment. Main components are sustainable and individualized consultation-liaison relationship (1/2 day of psychiatrist by 15 days for 10-15 general practitioners), and support of a clinical case manager for complex situations. Collaboration is bidirectional: early or crisis access to specialist care and long-term followup by general practitioner. This model is a challenge for the doctor-patient dual relationship and requires incentives in a public health perspective.

Chronically connected? Internet use among adolescents with chronic conditions.

Little is known about Internet use among adolescents with chronic conditions (CCs). Our results indicate that CC females, but not males, are more likely to be heavy Internet users than their peers. CC youths are also more likely to visit health-related web sites, but less frequently than other sites.

Quelle perception ont les médecins de famille en Suisse de leur rôle dans la prévention et la promotion de la santé? : comprendre les barrières à l'implémentation

Introduction: The importance of health promotion and prevention and the potential of general practitioners (GPs) to conduct individual prevention procedures have been demonstrated in several studies. Clinical recommendations for screening and prevention activities, an important condition for success, are published regularly, but their implementation into daily practice does not necessarily follow. Information is lacking about the actual conditions of how prevention is carried out on a daily basis by Swiss GPs, about their perceptions and needs, their attitudes and the present barriers they face. Such information is essential for the development of new tools and programs targeting better implementation of clinical recommendations for prevention in primary care in Switzerland. Objectives: The objectives of the study were to analyze how Swiss GPs perceive their role in prevention by obtaining information regarding the following issues: What do disease prevention and health promotion mean to them? What are the current incentives and barriers they face? What are their ideas and suggestions to deal with these barriers? What are their needs and expectations regarding prevention guidelines and tools? Methods: We conducted a qualitative research project using focus groups to examine the questions mentioned above. A total of 13 focus groups took place including GPs from eight cantons: five groups in German- speaking Switzerland and eight in French- speaking Switzerland. Each group was composed of 4-11 GPs, making in total 102 participants, who were paid expenses to cover their participation. The sessions were audio-recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data analysis: Content analysis of the transcriptions began by classifying the data according to a typology, the first level of which was developed in line with the structure of the interview guide. This typology was extended by successively regrouping similar statements. Synopsis and interpretation was then performed on each category thus obtained. This research report is based on the results from the French-speaking cantons. Results: Physicians perceive a change in their role as a consequence of changes in society and the health system. They emphasize the importance of a personalized and long lasting relationship between the family doctor and his/her patient; a privileged position allowing them to perform individualized prevention activities, considered to be more effective, as they are appropriate to the specific situation and needs of the patient. They point out their need for training and for better information concerning prevention and health promotion interventions, and stress difficulties arising from the lack of a clear political signal conferring them with a mandate for prevention. -- INTRODUCTION L'importance de la prévention et de la promotion de la santé et le potentiel des médecins de famillea à mettre en oeuvre des mesures individuelles de prévention, de dépistage et de conseils, a été démontrée dans plusieurs études. Régulièrement durant les dernières années, de nombreuses associations médicales ont publié des recommandations cliniques concernant les activités de dépistage et de prévention qui sont une condition essentielle pour le succès, mais ne sont pas forcément appliquées de manière systématique dans la pratique médicale quotidienne. Des contraintes spécifiques contribuent à l'écart entre le désir des médecins de pratiquer une médecine préventive et la réalité d'un cabinet médical. Nous n'avons que peu de données sur les conditions actuelles dans lesquelles la prévention et la promotion de la santé sont réalisées par les médecins de famille suisses dans leur travail quotidien. Des informations précises et représentatives sur leurs perceptions et leurs besoins, leurs attitudes et les contraintes auxquelles ils sont confrontés manquent. Or ces données sont essentielles dans le développement de nouveaux outils et programmes visant une meilleure implémentation des recommandations cliniques dans le domaine de la prévention et la promotion de la santé dans la médecine de famille en Suisse. OBJECTIFS Le développement de concepts pour une prévention systématique ainsi que d'outils adéquats, tout comme l'amélioration des conditions qui permettent une implémentation à grande échelle, implique, avant tout, l'analyse de la perception que les médecins de famille suisses ont de leur rôle dans la prévention. Par conséquent, cette étude a eu pour objectif d'obtenir des informations concernant les questions suivantes : ? Que signifient la prévention et la promotion de la santé pour les médecins de famille suisses ? ? Quelles sont leurs incitations et les barrières rencontrées ? ? Quelles sont leurs idées et leurs suggestions pour faire face à ces contraintes ? ? Quels sont leurs besoins et leurs attentes concernant les outils pour la prévention ? METHODES Nous avons mené un projet de recherche qualitative en utilisant la technique des focus groups pour examiner les questions mentionnées ci-dessus. Une telle technique de collecte de données est particulièrement adaptée à un domaine où l'on connaît mal les perceptions des parties prenantes. Nous avons mené 13 focus groups au total, comprenant des médecins issus de huit cantons: cinq groupes ont eu lieu en Suisse alémanique et huit groupes en Suisse romande. Chaque groupe était composé de 4 à 11 médecins de famille, avec au total 102 participants qui ont été défrayés pour leur participation. Les séances ont été audio-enregistrées et transcrites. ANALYSE DES DONNEES L'analyse du contenu des transcriptions a commencé par la classification des données selon une typologie dont le premier niveau a été développé à partir de la structure de la grille d'entretiens. Cette typologie a été affinée et élargie en regroupant successivement des propos similaires. Une synthèse a été effectuée pour chaque catégorie. Ce rapport est basé sur les résultats de l'analyse des données des cantons francophones. RESULTATS Les médecins perçoivent un changement de leur rôle dans une société et dans un système de santé qui évoluent. Ils soulignent l'importance de la relation personnalisée et durable du médecin de famille avec son patient, atout précieux, qui leur permet de réaliser des activités de prévention individualisées et adaptées à la situation et aux besoins du patient, considérées plus efficaces. Afin de surmonter leur doutes et découragement par rapport aux interventions de prévention, ils pointent la nécessité d'une formation aux nouvelles connaissances en prévention et promotion de la santé et d'une meilleure information aux médecins quant à leur efficacité et importance. Ils montrent le besoin d'un signal clair des politiques par rapport à l'attribution de ce mandat aux médecins de famille et de leur reconnaissance en tant qu'acteur de prévention dans le système de santé.

Health-related quality of life in patients with dual diagnosis: clinical correlates

Background: Although the studies published so far have found an affectation in the Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) in both psychiatric and substance use dependence disorders, very few studies have applied HRQOL as an assessment measure in patients suffering both comorbid conditions, or Dual Diagnosis. The aim of the current study was to assess HRQOL in a group of patients with Dual Diagnosis compared to two other non-comorbid groups and to determine what clinical factors are related to HRQOL. Methods: Cross-sectional assessment of three experimental groups was made through the Short Form 36 Item Health Survey (SF-36). The sample consisted of a group with Dual Diagnosis (DD; N=35), one with Severe Mental Illness alone (SMI; N=35) and another one with Substance Use Dependence alone (SUD; N=35). The sample was composed only by males. To assess the clinical correlates of SF-36 HRQOL, lineal regression analyses were carried out. Results: The DD group showed lower scores in most of the subscales, and in the mental health domain. The group with SUD showed in general a better state in the HRQOL while the group with SMI held an intermediate position with respect to the other two groups. Daily medication, suicidal attempts and daily number of coffees were significantly associated to HRQOL, especially in the DD group. Conclusions: The DD group showed lower self-reported mental health quality of life. Assessment of HRQOL in dual patients allows to identify specific needs in this population, and may help to establish therapeutic goals to improve interventions.