Least-Cost Planning and electricity industry reform in Australia

Least-Cost Planning played a key role in the development of the energy efficiency and renewable energy industries in the USA, It has not been widely used elsewhere, largely due to differences in other nations' regulatory environments and the emergence of competitive markets as the dominant paradigm for electricity planning, Least-Cost Planning, however may over valuable insights for creating regulatory framework for competitive electricity markers. This paper examines some lessons which may be extracted from an analysis of the Least-Cost Planning experience in the USA and suggests how these lessons might prove beneficial in guiding Australia's electricity industry reform, This analysis demonstrates how market-based reforms may be flawed if they ignore the history of previous reform processes.

Commercial-in-confidence: An obituary to transparency?

This article addresses the issue of accountability and transparency in relation to the use of commercial-in-confidence clauses to withhold information. The issue is contentious. On the one hand some like the Senate Finance and Public Administration Reference Committee (SFPARC) argue that: 'Put simply there can be no accountability if there is no information' (SFPARC 2000). On the other hand, an alternative view is: 'I think that the sanctity of contract... [is] a fundamental pillar of our legal system, and if private businesses enter into contracts with governments that specify confidentiality, then that ought to be respected' (Paterson 1999). This paper is an abridged version of a keynote address to CPA Australia (Queensland Division) Audit Intensive Day 2000, Brisbane Hilton, 10 November 2000.

The future role of government in knowledge-based economies

In this article, we draw together aspects of contemporary theories of knowledge (particularly organisational knowledge) and complexity theory to demonstrate how appropriate conceptual rigor enables both the role of government and the directions of policy development in knowledge-based economies to be identified. Specifically we ask, what is the role of government in helping shape the knowledge society of the future? We argue that knowledge policy regimes must go beyond the modes of policy analysis currently used in innovation, information and technology policy because they are based in an industrial rather than post-industrial analytical framework. We also argue that if we are to develop knowledge-based economies, more encompassing images of the future than currently obtain in policy discourse are required. We therefore seek to stimulate and provoke an array of lines of thought about government and policy for such economies. Our objective is to focus on ideas more than argument and persuasion.

Youth unemployment outflow rates and labor market programs: Australian evidence

A matching function methodology is used to investigate the macroeconomic effects of labor market program (LMP) commencements on youth unemployment outflows in Australia using unpublished data that classify commencements and outflows by duration of unemployment. The results indicate that LMPs have had significant effects on outflows from short-term unemployment. There is a net positive effect from LMP commencements on short-term unemployed female outflow rates. However; females experienced negative spillover effects from male LMP commencements. These spillover effects appear to be associated with wage subsidy programs and suggest the net impact Of such programs may have been overstated in previous studies.

Beyond participation, hierarchies, management and markets: 'New' governance and place policies

This paper argues that a 'new local governance' discourse offers some promise as a policy framework that can re-conceptualise the state-community (and market) relationship and deliver improved community outcomes, particularly in the context of place based or spatial policies and programs.

Practices and attitudes to derivatives use in Australian commonwealth organisations

Little is known about risk management in the public sector This study reports on a survey of senior officers in Australian Commonwealth companies and statutory authorities concerning their practice and attitudes towards the use of derivative instruments for risk management. Using a variety of tests, the most important issue identified by respondents concerning the use of derivatives is for budgeting purposes. Of note, respondents rank commonly cited reasons advanced in the private sector such as reduced bankruptcy costs and taxation, as being relatively unimportant, which is consistent with arguments advanced in the paper The results also indicate that there are significant differences in the level of importance in some issues regarding derivatives use across public sector organisations, particularly those differentiated by a documented risk management plan. The study also documents for the first time the extent of derivatives use in the Australian public sector.

An Australian PR state?

In their 1994 study Taxation and Representation, Deacon and Golding point to the extensive use of press and public relations professionals by governments to promote policy, and to outmanouvre their opponents. With the UK specifically in mind, they warn: 'we cannot ignore the massive expansion of the public relations state.' (p.6). What distinguishes their approach from the more usual preoccupation with the use of 'spin' to 'package' political leaders is a focus on the institutionalisation of public relations within government. In this paper, I explore the utililty of the concept, and consider what the broad features of an Australian 'PR State' might be.

Reforma da administra????o p??blica e cultura pol??tica no Brasil: uma vis??o geral

Texto bastante did??tico que compreende uma revis??o da evolu????o da administra????o p??blica brasileira, dos anos 30 aos 90, incluindo tra??os da heran??a colonial. Enfoca a deteriora????o da administra????o p??blica federal e discute diretrizes para a reforma do Estado no Brasil, apontando problemas e resist??ncias pol??ticas a serem enfrentadas

Texto para discuss??o 16: novos padr??es gerenciais no setor p??blico: medidas do governo americano orientadas para o desempenho e resultados

O estudo realizado envolve um benchmarking de novos padr??es gerenciais adotados pelo governo dos Estados Unidos, notadamente no que se refere a formas inovadoras de gest??o, de controle de gest??o, de gest??o or??ament??ria e de avalia????o institucional. Para a realiza????o do presente trabalho, os autores valeram-se de consulta bibliogr??fica a livros e documentos produzidos nos ??ltimos cinco anos, cabendo destacar, dentre os diversos documentos citados nas refer??ncias bibliogr??ficas e notas, os estudos produzidos pela National Academy of Public Administration ??? NAPA e pelo General Accounting Office ??? GAO sobre o processo de ???reinven????o do governo??? americano. Integram, tamb??m, o presente trabalho informa????es obtidas atrav??s de participa????o em semin??rios e palestras conduzidas pela NAPA e pela Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, no per??odo de 03 a 14 de junho de 1996, no ??mbito de projeto de Avalia????o de Programas P??blicos Orientada para Resultados, desenvolvido pela Escola Brasileira de Administra????o P??blica da Funda????o Get??lio Vargas (EBAP/FGV) para o Tribunal de Contas da Uni??o (TCU) do Brasil. Tais palestras inclu??ram, dentre outros assuntos, a vis??o geral da avalia????o no ??mbito do governo federal americano; o papel do Office of Management and Budget (OMB) na avalia????o e mensura????o de desempenho; a evolu????o da auditoria interna e externa, bem como a avalia????o de programas efetuada pela Rand Corporation. Finalmente, ainda no ??mbito do programa referido, foram utilizados materiais e informa????es coletadas a partir de entrevistas efetuadas em organiza????es governamentais como, dentre outras, o U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, e em organiza????es particulares que realizam avalia????o de programas, por for??a de contratos de presta????o de servi??os, como o Urban Institute, a Mathematic Policy Research e a Maximus, todas situadas em Washington D.C