Meta-Rules: Reasoning About Control

How can we insure that knowledge embedded in a program is applied effectively? Traditionally the answer to this question has been sought in different problem solving paradigms and in different approaches to encoding and indexing knowledge. Each of these is useful with a certain variety of problem, but they all share a common problem: they become ineffective in the face of a sufficiently large knowledge base. How then can we make it possible for a system to continue to function in the face of a very large number of plausibly useful chunks of knowledge? In response to this question we propose a framework for viewing issues of knowledge indexing and retrieval, a framework that includes what appears to be a useful perspective on the concept of a strategy. We view strategies as a means of controlling invocation in situations where traditional selection mechanisms become ineffective. We examine ways to effect such control, and describe meta-rules, a means of specifying strategies which offers a number of advantages. We consider at some length how and when it is useful to reason about control, and explore the advantages meta-rules offer for doing this.

Breaking the Rules: writing reflectively for yourself.

The rules which epitomise good writing may on occasions be broken, deliberately and with what the writers judge to be good purpose. This can well occur when students or staff set out to engage effectively with their personal and professional development, through personal reflection on and in experiences. They may do this in what has been called “stream of consciousness” writing, which is deliberately compiled in a manner at variance with the general rules for best practice. The rationale for such an unusual decision, namely to engage in what is frankly disorderly writing, is set out briefly in this chapter. Its characteristics are summarised, in implicit contrast with more conventional styles of writing. Examples are included of claims for the effectiveness of this style when used for developmental purposes by students and staff; and reference is made to the publications of some of those who have endorsed this approach.

Fuzzy-Rough Sets Assisted Attribute Selection

R. Jensen and Q. Shen. Fuzzy-Rough Sets Assisted Attribute Selection. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 73-89, 2007.

Semantics-Preserving Dimensionality Reduction: Rough and Fuzzy-Rough-Based Approaches

R. Jensen and Q. Shen. Semantics-Preserving Dimensionality Reduction: Rough and Fuzzy-Rough Based Approaches. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 16(12): 1457-1471. 2004.

Towards Fuzzy Compositional Modelling

X. Fu, Q. Shen and R. Zhao. 'Towards fuzzy compositional modelling,' In Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, 2007, pp. 1233-1238. Sponsorship: EPSRC

Knowledge representation for fuzzy model composition

X. Fu and Q. Shen. 'Knowledge representation for fuzzy model composition', in Proceedings of the 21st International Workshop on Qualitative Reasoning, 2007, pp. 47-54. Sponsorship: EPSRC

Rough set feature selection and rule induction for prediction of malignancy degree in brain glioma

X. Wang, J. Yang, R. Jensen and X. Liu, 'Rough Set Feature Selection and Rule Induction for Prediction of Malignancy Degree in Brain Glioma,' Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 147-156, 2006.

Fuzzy-Rough Data Reduction with Ant Colony Optimization.

R. Jensen and Q. Shen, 'Fuzzy-Rough Data Reduction with Ant Colony Optimization,' Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 149, no. 1, pp. 5-20, 2005.

Fuzzy-Rough Attribute Reduction with Application to Web Categorization.

R. Jensen and Q. Shen, 'Fuzzy-Rough Attribute Reduction with Application to Web Categorization,' Fuzzy Sets and Systems, vol. 141, no. 3, pp. 469-485, 2004.

Selecting Informative Features with Fuzzy-Rough Sets and its Application for Complex Systems Monitoring.

Q. Shen and R. Jensen, 'Selecting Informative Features with Fuzzy-Rough Sets and its Application for Complex Systems Monitoring,' Pattern Recognition, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 1351-1363, 2004.

Survey of Rough and Fuzzy Hybridization.

P. Lingras and R. Jensen, 'Survey of Rough and Fuzzy Hybridization,' Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE'07), pp. 125-130, 2007.

Tolerance-based and Fuzzy-Rough Feature Selection.

R. Jensen and Q. Shen, 'Tolerance-based and Fuzzy-Rough Feature Selection,' Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Fuzzy Systems (FUZZ-IEEE'07), pp. 877-882, 2007.

Webpage Classification with ACO-enhanced Fuzzy-Rough Feature Selection.

R. Jensen and Q. Shen, 'Webpage Classification with ACO-enhanced Fuzzy-Rough Feature Selection,' Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Rough Sets and Current Trends in Computing (RSCTC 2006), LNAI 4259, pp. 147-156, 2006.