Mental health nursing standards and practice indicators for Australia: a review of current literature

There are many changes and challenges facing the mental health care professional working in Australia in the 21st Century. Given the significance of their number and the considerable extent to which care is delivered by them, mental health nurses in particular must be at the forefront of the movement to enhance and improve mental health care. Mental health nurses in Australia must not only keep up with the changes, we should be setting the pace for others across the profession worldwide. The increasingly complex field of mental health nursing demands nurses who are not only equipped to face the challenges but are confident in doing so. Definitive guidelines for practice, clear expectations regarding outcomes and specific means by which to evaluate both practice and outcomes are vital. Strengthening the role and vision of mental health nursing so that there is clarity about both and highlighting core values by which to perform will enable us to become focused on our future and what we can expect to both give to and receive from our chosen profession and how we can, and do, contribute to mental health care. The role of the mental health nurse is undergoing expansion and there are new hurdles to overcome along with the new benefits this brings. To support this, nationally adopted, formalised standards of practice and means by which to measure these, i.e., practice indicators formerly known as clinical indicators, are required. It is important to have national standards and practice indicators because of the variances in the provision of mental health across Australia – different legislation regarding mental health policies and processes, different nursing registration bodies and Nursing Councils, for example – which create additional barriers to cohesion and uniformity. Improvements in the practice of mental health nursing lead to benefits for consumer outcomes as well as the overall quality of mental health care available in Australia. The emphasis on rights-based care, particularly consumer and carer rights, demands evidence-based, up-to-date mental health care delivered by competent, capable professionals. Documented expectations for performance by nurses will provide all involved with yardsticks by which to evaluate outcomes. Flowing on from these benefits are advances in mental health care generally and enhancements to Australia’s reputation and position within the health care arena throughout the world. Currently, the ‘Standards for Practice’ published by the Australian New Zealand College of Mental Health Nurses (ANZCMHN) in 1995 and the practice indicators developed by Skews et al. (2000) provide a less formal guide for mental health nurses working in Australia. While these earlier standards and practice indicators have played some role in supporting mental health nurses they have not been nationally or enthusiastically adopted and there are a multitude of reasons for this. This report reviews the current literature available on practice indicators and standards for practice and describes an evidence-based rationale as to why a review and renewal of these is required and why it is important, not just for mental health nurses but to the field of mental health in general. The term ‘practice indicator’ is used, except where a quotation utilises ‘clinical indicator’, to more accurately reflect the broad spectrum of nursing roles, i.e. not all mental health nursing work involves a clinical role.

Surviving sepsis campaign in Brazil

Severe sepsis and septic shock have long been a challenge in intensive care because of their common occurrence, high associated costs of care, and significant mortality. The Surviving Sepsis Campaign (SSC) was developed in an attempt to address clinical inertia in the adoption of evidence-based strategies. The campaign relies on worldwide support from professional societies and has gained consensus on the management of patients with severe sepsis. The guidelines have subsequently been deployed into two bundles, with each bundle component sharing a common relationship in time. The widespread adoption of such evidence-based practice in clinical care has been disappointingly slow despite the quantifiable benefits regarding mortality. In Brazil, a country of continental dimensions with a heterogeneous population and unequal access to health services, this reality is no different. From 2004 to 2007, four prospective studies were published describing the country`s reality. In the multicenter Promoting Global Research Excellence in Severe Sepsis (PROGRESS) Study, the in-hospital mortality rate was higher in Brazil when compared with other countries: 56% against 30% in developed countries and 45% in other developing countries. During these 2.5 years of the campaign in Brazil, 43 hospitals have been receiving the necessary training to put in practice the recommended measures in all Brazilian regions, except for the North. The idea of the campaign is based on a 25% reduction in the relative risk of death from severe sepsis and septic shock within 5 years in the SSC-participating Brazilian hospitals. Ideally, the mortality rate should come to a 41.2% level subject to the 2009 deadline. This article aims to describe the actual scenario of the SSC implementation in Brazilian institutions and to report on some initiatives that have been used to overcome barriers.

Introducing OTseeker (Occupational Therapy Systematic Evaluation of Evidence): A new evidence database for occupational therapists

OTseeker (Occupational Therapy Systematic Evaluation of Evidence) is a new resource for occupational therapists that has been designed with the principle aim of increasing access to research to support clinical decisions. It contains abstracts of systematic reviews and quality ratings of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) relevant to occupational therapy. It is available, free of charge, at www.otseeker.com. This paper describes the OTseeker database and provides an example of how it may support occupational therapy practice.

Metabolic alterations in pregnant women: gestational diabetes

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and controversy are old friends. The impact of GDM on maternal and fetal health has been increasingly recognized. Nevertheless, universal consensus on the diagnostic methods and thresholds has long been lacking. Published guidelines from major societies differ significantly from one another, with recommendations ranging from aggressive screening to no routine screening at all. As a result, real-world practice is equally varied. This article recaps the latest evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and classification of GDM. It reviews the current evidence base for intensive multidisciplinary treatment of GDM and provides recommendations for postpartum management to delay and/or prevent progression to type 2 diabetes.

The use of indicators and evidence in governance and policy development of science, technology and innovation

This paper was first presented at the 2012 – EU SPRI Conference “Towards Transformative Governance? - Responses to mission-oriented innovation policy paradigms”, Fraunhofer ISI, June 2012, Karlsruhe

Barreiras e facilitadores à implementação de um modelo de gestão de cuidados em Saúde Mental

RESUMO: Enquadramento teórico - Os estudos epidemiológicos demonstram que apesar de todo o progresso científico, muitas pessoas continuam sem acesso aos Serviços de Saúde Mental (SSM) e que, em muitos casos, os cuidados não têm a qualidade suficiente. A experiência de vários países mostra que os processos de implementação de modelos de intervenção terapêutica, como é o da Gestão de Cuidados, são lentos e complexos, não dependendo somente do grau de efectividade ou da complexidade das práticas a implementar. O Modelo de Gestão de Cuidados (MGC), é definido como uma prática baseada na evidência, utilizada para ajudar os doentes nos seus processos de recuperação. As estratégias para implementar práticas baseadas na evidência são críticas para a melhoria dos serviços. Existem, apesar de toda a evidência, muitas barreiras à implementação. Ao constatarmos que as práticas validadas pela ciência estão longe de estar claramente disseminadas nos serviços de saúde mental, fundamentamos a necessidade de utilizar metodologia de implementação que, além da efectividade das práticas, permita uma efectividade da implementação. Para responder às necessidades de formação e no âmbito da implementação do Plano Nacional de Saúde Mental, foram formados, em Portugal, 170 profissionais de saúde mental provenientes de serviços públicos e do sector social, de todas as regiões de Portugal Continental. Considerando que estes profissionais adquiriram competências específicas no MGC, através de um programa de formação nacional idêntico para todos os serviços de saúde mental, investigámos o grau de implementação deste modelo, bem como os facilitadores e as barreiras à sua correcta implementação. Existem vários estudos internacionais sobre as barreiras e os facilitadores à implementação de práticas baseadas na evidência, embora a maior parte desses estudos seja baseado em entrevistas semi-estruturadas a profissionais. Por outro lado, não existem, em Portugal, estudos sobre as barreiras e os facilitadores à implementação de práticas de saúde mental. Objectivos 1. Estimar o grau da implementação do MGC nos serviços de saúde mental portugueses 2. Caracterizar as regiões onde a implementação do MGC tenha ocorrido em maior grau. 3. Identificar os factores facilitadores e as barreiras à implementação do MGC, entre as regiõesde saúde do país. 4. Explorar as relações entre a fidelidade da implementação, as barreiras e os facilitadores da implementação, a cultura organizacional e as características dos serviços de saúde mental. Metodologia Estudo observacional, transversal e descritivo, com características exploratórias. População: profissionais dos serviços de saúde mental públicos e do sector social que frequentaram o Programa Nacional de Formação em Saúde Mental Comunitária no curso “Cuidados Integrados e Recuperação”, da Coordenação Nacional para a Saúde Mental / Ministério da Saúde, entre Outubro de 2008 e Dezembro de 2009, (n=71). Avaliação Fidelidade de implementação do Modelo de Gestão de Cuidados - IMR-S (Illness Management and Recovery Scale); Qualidade das guidelines utilizadas na implementação do Modelo de Gestão de Cuidados - AGREE II-PT (Appraisal of Guidelines, for Research and Evaluation); Avaliação das Barreiras e Facilitadores à implementação do MGC - BaFAI (Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument); Avaliação da Cultura Organizacional dos serviços de saúde mental - CVF-I (Competing Values Framework Instrument). Análise Estatística Para a descrição dos dados foram aplicados métodos de estatística descritiva. Para a comparação de subgrupos foram utilizados os testes de Mann Whitney e Kruskall-Wallis. Para a investigação de associações foram utilizados os métodos de correlação de Spearman e a Regressão Múltipla. O tratamento e análise dos dados foram realizados utilizando o programa estatístico IBM SPSS Statistics® para Mac/Apple® nas versões 19 e 20. Resultados Serviços: A articulação com os cuidados de saúde primários existe na maioria dos serviços (56.34%) e 77.46% dos serviços têm autonomia para definir os cuidados a prestar. A maioria dos serviços (63.38%) realiza duas ou mais reuniões clínicas por mês e a quase totalidade (95.77%) recebe estagiários e/ou internos. A área da investigação tem níveis considerados baixos, quando comparados com outros países da Europa, tanto para a globalidade das áreas de investigação (25.35%), como para as áreas psicossociais (22.54%). Considerando componentes fundamentais para a implementação de modelos de gestão de cuidados, os resultados nacionais indicam que 66.20% dos serviços fazem registos em processo clínico único. As percentagens de utilização de planos individuais de cuidados são globalmente baixas (46.48%). Por seu turno, a utilização de guidelines, nos serviços do país, tem uma percentagem média nacional de 57.75%. Profissionais: São, na sua maioria, do sexo feminino (69.01%), com idades entre os 25 e os 56 anos (média 38.9, ± 7.41). Pertencem, maioritariamente, aos grupos profissionais da enfermagem (23.94%) e da psicologia (49.30%). A formação dos profissionais é de nível superior em todos os grupos, com uma percentagem total de licenciados de 80.3%, tendo os restantes uma formação ao nível do mestrado. Apesar dos valores baixos (17%) de formação prévia em modelos de gestão de cuidados, 39% dos profissionais indicou utilizar algumas vertentes destes modelos na sua prática. Apesar de 97,18% dos profissionais ter participado em dois ou mais encontros científicos, num período de dois anos, apenas 38.03% apresentou alguma comunicação científica no mesmo intervalo. Guideline: Os resultados da avaliação da guideline do MGC indicaram percentagens mais altas, quanto à qualidade do seu desenvolvimento, nos Domínios 1 (Objectivo e finalidade, com 72.2%) e 4 (Clareza de Apresentação, 77.7%). O Domínio 5 (Aplicabilidade) foi pontuado no limite inferior do desenvolvimento com qualidade suficiente (54.1%), ao passo que a guideline obteve uma pontuação negativa nos Domínios 2 (Envolvimento das partes interessadas, com 41.6%) e 3 (Rigor do Desenvolvimento, com 28.1%). Adicionalmente não foi possível às avaliadoras cotar o Domínio 6 (Independência editorial), por ausência de referências neste contexto. A guideline teve uma avaliação global positiva (66%), com recomendação de aceitação com modificações. Cultura Organizacional: O perfil de liderança com maior frequência nos serviços de saúde mental portugueses foi o de Mentor (45.61%). As percentagens mais baixas pertenceram aos perfis Monitor e Inovador (3.51%). Na perspectiva da cultura organizacional dos serviços, apontuação mais alta foi a da Cultura das Relações Humanas (74.07%). A estratégia de liderança, com predomínio em todas as regiões, foi a estratégia de Flexibilidade (66.10%). Os resultados mostram que a única associação positivamente significativa com o grau da implementação do MGC é a do perfil Produtor, com um peso específico de 14.55% na prevalência dos perfis de liderança nos serviços de saúde mental portugueses. Barreiras: As barreiras à implementação da prática do MGC, identificadas pelos profissionais dos serviços de saúde mental, com percentagens mais altas nos totais do país, foram: o tempo (57.7%), o conhecimento sobre o modelo e a motivação (40.8%), a colaboração dos outros profissionais (33.7%), o número de contactos reduzidos com os doentes (35.2%), as insuficiências do ponto de vista dos espaços (70.4%) e dos instrumentos disponíveis (69%) para implementar o MGC. Existiu uma variação entre as regiões de saúde do país. Os resultados mostram que houve uma correlação negativa, de forma significativa, entre a implementação do MGC e as barreiras: da resistência à utilização de protocolos, do formato da prática, da necessidade de mais treino e da não cooperação dos profissionais. Foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre as barreiras à implementação e as características dos serviços, dos profissionais e da cultura organizacional. Implementação: A média nacional da fidelidade de implementação do MGC (41.48) teve valores aproximados aos de estudos similares. Na pontuação por regiões, a implementação com maior fidelidade ocorreu no Alentejo. Se considerarmos a implementação com fidelidade esta ocorreu em 57.75% dos serviços e uma boa implementação em 15.49%. Os métodos de regressão permitiram confirmar a capacidade preditiva das barreiras e da cultura organizacional quanto à fidelidade da implementação do MGC. Discussão: No universo das hipóteses inicialmente colocadas foi possível verificar a variação da implementação do MGC entre as regiões do país. O estudo permitiu, adicionalmente, concluir pela existência de denominadores comuns de maior sucesso da implementação do MGC. Foi ainda possível verificar uma relação significativa, existente entre o grau de implementação e as dimensões das barreiras, a cultura organizacional e os recursos dos SSM (aqui definidos pelas características dos serviços e dos profissionais). De uma forma mais conclusiva podemos afirmar que existem outros factores, que não estão relacionados com a avaliação restrita dos recursos financeiros ou humanos, associados à qualidade da implementação de práticas baseadas na evidência, como o MGC. Exemplo disso são os achados referentes à região de saúde do Alentejo, onde a distância dos grandes centros urbanos e as conhecidas dificuldades de acessibilidade, combinadas com os problemas conhecidos da falta de recursos, não impediram que fosse a região com os valores mais altos da fidelidade de implementação. Conclusões: Foram encontradas inúmeras barreiras à implementação do MGC. Existem barreiras diferentes entre regiões, que resultam das características dos serviços, dos profissionais e da cultura organizacional. Para existir implementação é necessária a consideração de metodologias próprias que vão para além dos tradicionais programas de formação. As práticas baseadas na evidência, amplamente defendidas, exigem implementações baseadas na evidência.-------------ABSTRACT: Introduction - Several epidemiological studies show that, despite all scientific progress, many people still continue to have no access to mental health services and in many situations the quality of care is poor. The experiences of several countries show that progress towards case management implementation is slow and complex, depending not only from the degree of effectiveness or the complexity of the practice. Case management is defined as an evidence-based practice used to help patients in the recovery process. Strategies to implement evidence-based practices are critical to services improvement. There are many barriers to their implementation, despite all available evidence. Realising that practices of proved scientific value are far from being clearly implemented, justifies the need to use implementation methodologies that, beyond practice effectiveness, allow implementation effectiveness. To answer training needs and in the framework of the National Mental Health Plan implementation, 170 mental health (MH) professionals from portuguese public and private sectors were trained. Considering that case management skills were acquired, as a result of this training programme, we decided to study the degree of implementation in the services.Barriers and facilitators to the implementation were studied as well. There are several studies related with barriers and facilitators to the implementation of evidence-based practices, but most of them use semi-structured interviews with professionals. Additionally, there are no studies in Portugal related with barriers and facilitators to the implementation of mental health practices. Objectives1. Estimate the degree of case management implementation in Portuguese MH Services. 2.Describe regions where implementation occurred with higher fidelity degree. 3. Identify barriers and facilitators to case management implementation across country regions. 4. Explore the relationships between implementation, barriers and facilitators, organisational culture and services characteristics. Methodology - Cross sectional, descriptive study. Assessments - Implementation fidelity - IMR-S (Illness Management and Recovery Scale); Guideline quality - AGREE II-PT (Appraisal of Guidelines, for Research and Evaluation); Barriers and facilitators assessment - BaFAI (Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument); Organisational culture assessment - CVF-I (Competing Values Framework Instrument). Statistical analysis - Descriptives and cross-tabs. Subgroups comparison: Mann-Witney and Kruskall-Wallis. Associations between variables were calculated using Spearman correlation's and Multiple Regression. Results - Services: Liaison with primary care is done in most services (56.34%) and 77.46% have autonomy to determine care. Most services have regular clinical meetings and almost all give internship training (95.77%). Research activity is low compared with other European countries, for both general and psychosocial research. Considering key components for the case management implementation, 66.20% of all services use single clinical records. The use of individual care plans is globally low (46.48%) and there is a use of guidelines in 57.75% of services. Human Resources: most are women (69.01%), with age ranging from 25-56 (average 39.9, SD 7.41). The majority are psychologists (49.30%) and nurses (23.94%). All have a university degree, 19.7% have a masters degree and 83% didn’t have any case management training before the above mentioned national training. Despite the low levels of preceding case management training, 39% have used model components in day-to-day practice and although 97.18% of the workforce have attended scientific meetings in the last 2 years, only 38.03% presented communications in the same period. Guideline: Results show that higher scores were obtained in Domain 1. Scope and Purpose (72.2.%),and Domain 4. Clarity of presentation (77.7%). Domain 5. pplicability scored near low boundary (54.1%) and negative scores were found in Domain 2. Stakeholder Involvement (41.6%) and Domain 3. Rigour of Development (28.1%). Global score was 66% and the guideline was recommended with modifications. Organisational Culture: The most frequent leadership profile was the Mentor profile (45.61%). Lower scores belonged to Innovator and Monitor profiles (3.51%). On the organisational culture overall, higher scores were found in the Human Relations culture (74.07%). The higher leadership strategy was the strategy of flexibility (66.10%). The results additionally showed that the only leadership profile associated with case management implementation was the Producer profile, representing 14.55% of all leadership profiles in the country.Barriers: The barriers identified by MH professionals, with high percentages, were: lack of time (57.7%), knowledge and motivation (40.8%), other colleagues cooperation (33.7%), low number of contacts with patients (35.2%), lack of facilities (70.4%) and lack of instruments (69%) to implement case management, varying across regions. Results show that there was a negative correlation between implementation and the following barriers: using protocols, practice format, need for more training and lack of cooperation from colleagues. Additionally, statistical differences were found between barriers to implementation and: services characteristics, workforce characteristics, organisational culture. Implementation: The national average results of case management implementation fidelity was (41.48), close to values found in similar studies. In the regional scores South Region Alentejo had the highest implementation score. If we look at minimum scores to assume implementation fidelity, these occurred in 57.75% of services and a good implementation occurred in 15.49% of these. Regression methods allowed to confirm that implementation score prediction was possible using the combination of barriers and organisational culture scores. Discussion - Considering the initial study hypotheses, it was possible to confirm the variation of case management implementation across country regions. Additionally, we could conclude that common denominators exist when successful implementation occurred. It was possible to observe a significant relationship between implementation degree and the dimensions of barriers, organisational culture and services resources (defined as professionals and services characteristics). In a more conclusive way, we can say that there are factors, other than financial and human resources, that are associated with evidence based practices implementation like case management. An example is the Alentejo region, were the distance from urban centres, and the known difficulties associated with accessibility, plus the lack of financial and human resources, have not impeded the regional higher score on implementation. Conclusions: Case management implementation had several barriers to implementation. There are different barriers across country regions, resulting from organisational culture, services and professionals characteristics. To reach implementation it is necessary to consider specific methodologies that go beyond traditional training programs and evident practices, widely promoted. Evidence-based practices require evidence-based implementations.

An assessment of the integration of the mental health component into the care of women affected by intimate partner violence in Peru

RESUMO: A violência contra as mulheres (VCM) é um problema de saúde pública e uma violação dos direitos humanos. Ele tem uma alta prevalência na América Latina e no Caribe; o Estudo da Violência Contra as Mulheres da Organização Mundial de Saúde (OMS) identificou que as mulheres peruanas sofrem o maior índice de violência. O Perú é signatário da CEDAW e da Convenção de Belém do Pará, com recomendações para resolver este tipo de discriminação e descrever o papel do setor da saúde. A lei peruana define a violência como um problema de saúde mental. Objectivos: As três orientações clínicas do Ministério da Saúde para avaliar a integração da componente de saúde mental no cuidado de mulheres afetadas pela VCM foram revistas. Método: A proteção da saúde mental foi avaliada nas orientações acima mencionadas. A lei peruana relevante para perceber o reconhecimento das consequências de VCM na saúde mental e os cuidados prestados neste contexto foram revistos. Usando esses padrões nacionais e internacionais, foi realizada uma análise de conteúdo dos guias peruanos para a atenção da violência para ver como eles se integram a saúde mental. Resultados: Estas orientações são muito extensas e não definem claramente a responsabilidade dos profissionais de saúde. Não incluem um exame de saúde mental na avaliação da vítima e são vagas na descrição das atividades a serem realizadas pelo prestador dos cuidados de saúde. As orientações recomendam uma triagem universal usando um instrumento com formato antiquado e pesado. Em contrapartida, as orientações da OMS não recomendam qualquer triagem. Conclusão: As várias orientações analisadas não fornecem a informação necessária para o profissional de saúde avaliar o envolvimento da saúde mental e, desnecessariamente, tratam as mulheres sobreviventes de VCM como doentes mentais. Recomenda-se que as orientações recentes da OMS (Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines, 2013) para os cuidados de VCM sejam usadas como um modelo para o desenvolvimento de um único dispositivo técnico que incorpora directrizes com base científica. legislação com base no género, saúde, guias, prevenção e mujeres 6 RESUMO (PORTUGUESE) A violência contra as mulheres (VCM) é um problema de saúde pública e uma violação dos direitos humanos. Ele tem uma alta prevalência na América Latina e no Caribe; o Estudo da Violência Contra as Mulheres da Organização Mundial de Saúde (OMS) identificou que as mulheres peruanas sofrem o maior índice de violência. O Perú é signatário da CEDAW e da Convenção de Belém do Pará, com recomendações para resolver este tipo de discriminação e descrever o papel do setor da saúde. A lei peruana define a violência como um problema de saúde mental. Objectivos: As três orientações clínicas do Ministério da Saúde para avaliar a integração da componente de saúde mental no cuidado de mulheres afetadas pela VCM foram revistas. Método: A proteção da saúde mental foi avaliada nas orientações acima mencionadas. A lei peruana relevante para perceber o reconhecimento das consequências de VCM na saúde mental e os cuidados prestados neste contexto foram revistos. Usando esses padrões nacionais e internacionais, foi realizada uma análise de conteúdo dos guias peruanos para a atenção da violência para ver como eles se integram a saúde mental. Resultados: Estas orientações são muito extensas e não definem claramente a responsabilidade dos profissionais de saúde. Não incluem um exame de saúde mental na avaliação da vítima e são vagas na descrição das atividades a serem realizadas pelo prestador dos cuidados de saúde. As orientações recomendam uma triagem universal usando um instrumento com formato antiquado e pesado. Em contrapartida, as orientações da OMS não recomendam qualquer triagem. Conclusão: As várias orientações analisadas não fornecem a informação necessária para o profissional de saúde avaliar o envolvimento da saúde mental e, desnecessariamente, tratam as mulheres sobreviventes de VCM como doentes mentais. Recomenda-se que as orientações recentes da OMS (Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines, 2013) para os cuidados de VCM sejam usadas como um modelo para o desenvolvimento de um único dispositivo técnico que incorpora directrizes com base científica.-----------------ABSTRACT: Violence against women (VAW) is a public health problem and a human rights violation. It is highly prevalent in Latin America and the Caribbean; the Multi-country Study on Violence against Women by the World Health Organization identified rural Peruvian women as suffering the highest rates of VAW. The country is party to CEDAW and Belen Do Para Conventions, which set forth recommendations to overcome this form of discrimination and describe the role of the health sector. Peruvian law defines violence as a mental health issue. Objective: The Ministry of Health’s three technical guidelines were reviewed to assess the integration of mental health into the care of women affected by violence Method: The protection of the woman’s mental health was ascertained in the conventions mentioned above. The recognition of the mental health consequences of VAW and the inclusion of its evaluation and care were assessed in pertinent Peruvian legislation. Using these international and national parameters, the three guidelines for the attention of violence were subject to content analysis to see whether they conform to the conventions and integrate mental health care. Outcome: These guidelines are too extensive and do not clearly define the responsibility of health workers. They do not include a mental health exam in the evaluation of the victim and are vague in the description of the actions to be carried out by the health care provider. Guidelines prescribe universal screening using an outdated instrument and moreover, WHO Guidelines do not recommend screening. Conclusion: These multiple guidelines do not provide useful guidance for health care providers, particularly for the assessment of mental health sequelae, and unnecessarily stigmatize survivors of violence as mentally ill. It is recommended that the World Health Organization’s document Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines (2013) be used as a blueprint for only one technical instrument that incorporates evidence -based national policy and guidelines.

Stroke

Stroke is a preventable and treatable disease. It can present with the sudden onset of any neurological disturbance, including limb weakness or numbness, speech disturbance, visual loss or disturbance of balance. Over the last two decades, a growing body of evidence has overturned the traditional perception that stroke is simply a consequence of aging which inevitably results in death or severe disability. Evidence is accumulating for more effective primary and secondary prevention strategies, better recognition of people at highest risk and thus most in need of active intervention, interventions that are effective so on after the onset of symptoms, and an understanding of the processes of care that contribute to a better outcome. In addition, there is now good evidence to support interventions and care processes in stroke rehabilitation. In the UK, the National Sentinel Stroke Audits 2,3 have documented changes in secondary care provision over the last 10 years, with increasing numbers of patients being treated in stroke units, more evidence-based practice, and reductions in mortality and length of stay. In order for evidence from research studies to improve outcomes for patients, it needs to be put into practice. National guidelines provide clinicians, managers and service users with summaries of evidence and recommendations for clinical practice. Implementation of guidelines in practice, supported by regular audit, improves the processes of care and clinical outcome. This guideline covers interventions in the acute stage of a stroke (‘acute stroke’) or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). Most of the evidence considered relates to interventions in the first 48 hours after onset of symptoms, although some interventions of up to 2 weeks are covered as well. This guideline is a stand-alone document, but is designed to be read alongside the Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party guideline ‘National clinical guideline for stroke’* which considers evidence for interventions from the acute stage into rehabilitation and life after stroke. The Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party guideline is an update of the 2004 2nd edition and includes all the recommendations contained within this guideline. This acute stroke and TIA guideline is also designed to be read alongside the Department of Health’s (DH) ‘National stroke strategy’ (NSS). Where there are differences between the recommendations made within this acute stroke and TIA guideline and the NSS, the Guideline Development Group (GDG) members feel that their recommendations are derived from systematic methodology to identify all of the relevant literature.

Network Meta-analysis to Synthesize Evidence for Decision Making in Cardiovascular Research

Abstract Clinical decision-making requires synthesis of evidence from literature reviews focused on a specific theme. Evidence synthesis is performed with qualitative assessments and systematic reviews of randomized clinical trials, typically covering statistical pooling with pairwise meta-analyses. These methods include adjusted indirect comparison meta-analysis, network meta-analysis, and mixed-treatment comparison. These tools allow synthesis of evidence and comparison of effectiveness in cardiovascular research.

Appropriateness of methadone maintenance treatment for opiate addiction: evaluation by an expert panel.

With some 30,000 dependent persons, opiate addiction constitutes a major public health problem in Switzerland. The Swiss Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH) has long played a leading role in the prevention and treatment of opiate addiction and in research on effective means of containing the epidemic of opiate addiction and its consequences. Major milestones on that path have been the successive "Methadone reports" published by that Office and providing guidance on the care of opiate addiction with substitution treatment. In view of updating the recommendations for the appropriateness of substitution treatment for opiate addiction, in particular for the prescription of methadone, the FOPH commissioned a multi-component project involving the following elements. A survey of current attitudes and practices in Switzerland related to opiate substitution treatment Review of Swiss literature on methadone substitution treatment Review of international literature on methadone substitution treatment National Methadone Substitution Conference Multidisciplinary expert panel to evaluate the appropriateness of substitution treatment. The present report documents the process and summarises the results of the latter element above. The RAND appropriateness method (RAM) was used to distil from literature-based evidence and systematically formulated expert opinion, areas where consensus exist on the appropriateness (or inappropriateness) of methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) and areas where disagreement or uncertainty persist and which should be further pursued. The major areas which were addressed by this report are Initial assessment of candidates for MMT Appropriate settings for initiation of MMT (general and special cases) Appropriateness of methadone supportive therapy Co-treatments and accompanying measures Dosage schedules and pharmacokinetic testing Withdrawal from MMT Miscellaneous questions Appropriateness of other (non-methadone) substitution treatment Summary statements for each of the above categories are derived from the panel meeting and presented in the report. In the "first round", agreement was observed for 31% of the 553 theoretical scenarios evaluated. The "second round" rating, following discussion of divergent ratings, resulted in a much higher agreement among panellists, reaching 53% of the 537 scenarios. Frank disagreement was encountered for 7% of all scenarios. Overall 49% of the clinical situations (scenarios) presented were considered appropriate. The areas where at least 50% of the situations were considered appropriate were "initial assessment of candidates for MMT", the "appropriate settings for initiation of MMT", the "appropriate settings for methadone supportive treatment" and "Appropriateness of other (non-methadone) substitution treatment". The area where there was the least consensus on appropriateness concerned "appropriateness of withdrawal from MMT" (6%). The report discusses the implications and limitations of the panel results and provides recommendations for the dissemination, application, and future use of the criteria for the appropriateness of MMT. The RAND Appropriateness Method proved to be an accepted and appreciated method to assess the appropriateness of methadone maintenance treatment for opiate addicts. In the next step, the results of the expert panel process must now be combined with those of the Swiss and international literature reviews and the survey of current attitudes and practices in Switzerland, to be synthesized into formal practice guidelines. Such guidelines should be disseminated to all concerned, promoted, used and rigorously evaluated for compliance and outcome.

General Palliative Care Guidance for Control of Pain in Patients with Cancer (PDF 56 KB)

This document is intended to be a practical clinical guideline for the control of pain in patients with cancer. Its target group is hospital staff, primary care team members and nursing home staff. It attempts to apply the clinical principles outlined in the document 'Control of Pain in Patients with Cancer' published by "Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network" (SIGN). This document has been adapted with the permission of SIGN. Rigour of Development A full evidence based reference list is available with the SIGN document. This can be accessed at www.sign.ac.uk. Contents not based on the SIGN document are referenced separately. This document has been developed as one part of the recommendations identified in the Regional Review of Palliative Care Services, 'Partnerships in Caring'. The development of these Pain Guidelines was led by the Northern Ireland Group of the National Council for Hospice and Specialist Palliative Care, whose membership is detailed in Appendix 4. They will be reviewed and updated in two years. A wide consultation process with potential users was undertaken. åÊ åÊ

A Review of the Bio-medical Evidence on Breast, Ovarian and Cervical Cancer

This review aims to provide good quality, up-to-date biomedical evidence of the therapies available to women in Ireland to treat breast, cervical and ovarian cancer. This review summarises evidence from guidelines and high quality studies. It should be noted however that scientific evidence is not infallible, and knowledge in this field is constantly evolving. The evidence summarised in this review presents the current consensus. Download document here   Download summary of report

NICaN Regional Supportive & Palliative Care Network

NICaN Regional Supportive & Palliative Care Network Friday 30th May 2008 Lecture Theatre, Fern House Antrim 2.00 pm - 5.00 pm Welcome, Introductions Stuart MacDonnell, Chair of the Supportive and Palliative Care network welcomed everyone to the meeting. This meeting had been rescheduled to accommodate the validation workshop for the regional palliative care model, which took place on Friday,18th April. Acknowledging the full agenda, several items were pulled forward to accommodate speakers SPC_0809_03 Modernisation and Reform of Supportive and Palliative care Mr MacDonnell welcomed Dr Sonja McIlfatrick and Dr Donna Fitzimons, members of the Phase 1 Project Team for the Modernisation and Reform of palliative care. Their presentation highlighted the journey taken by the Project Team since January 2008 - May 2008. Seeking to deliver the network vision, for any person with palliative care need, cancer or non - cancer, the project team incorporated several methodologies. The literature review identified best practice. An assessment of need including epidemiological data and review of service provision. Consultation reflected the engagement with patients, carers and professional forums, primary care and non-malignant focus groups. The breadth of consultation confirmed the evidence for the identified components of the model. These were validated at the April workshop. External review of the work was provided by Dr Phil Larkin (Galway Uni) Prof David Clark (End of Life Care Observatory, Lancaster University) and Mr Bob Neillans (Chair of the Mid Trent Palliative care network, which has been involved in the Delivering choice programme within Lincolnshire). The Guiding Principles of the model reinforced Patient and family centred care, enhanced community provision and supported by specialists. The components of the model are · Identification of patient with Palliative careened · Holistic Assessment · Integration of services · Coordination of care · End of Life Care and Bereavement Care The consultation process also highlighted the need for Increased Public and Professional Awareness. This was recognised as an encompassing component. Underpinning the model is the need for robust Education and common core values e.g. dignity, choice, advocacy, empowerment, partnership working. Stuart MacDonnell, who also chaired the steering group during the project, congratulated the Project Team for delivering the comprehensive document on schedule. The Report has been submitted to the NICaN Board and the DHSSPSNI. In addition, an outline for Phase 2 of this work has been submitted. Mr MacDonnell recognised that there is real opportunity for palliative care to benefit from the DHSSPSNI commitment to concrete developments. Phase 2 will progress the current high-level components of the model into quality services developments at a local level, demonstrating integration throughout. The methods propose continued engagement with the Delivering Choice Programme enabled through a Central and also Local Teams. The report and the Appendices care available on the NICaN website www.nican@n-i.nhs.uk SPC_0809_01 Chairman's Business · Update on the Cancer Service Framework, the document has been submitted and presented to the Departmental Programme Board. Next stages will include the review of costs and development of a implementation guidance It is hoped that the completed document should be available for public consultation in Autumn 2008. with a launch of the framework document and accompanying implementation guide in Spring 2009. Some funding has already been identified to advance key areas of work including, Advanced communication skills training, peer review and an appointment of a post to develop the cancerni.net, focusing on children and e-learning tools. · Children's and Adolescent Cancer network group , Liz Henderson is to convene a group to consider how this is to be taken forward. · NICaN appointments Recognition was given to the significant contribution made by Dr Gerard Daly during his position as NICaN Lead Clinician, particularly throughout the early establishment of the NICaN. Dr Dermott Hughes (Western Trust) has been appointed as the NICaN Medical Director. The Primary Care Director post has been advertised and it is hoped that the Director of Network will be advertised later in Summer. Endorsement of End of Life care paper. The Paper was presented and endorsed at the March 2008 NICaN Board meeting. Mr David Galloway (Director of Secondary Care) emphasised the need for this important work to be recognised within the regional model to ensure that it is reflected in future models of service delivery Congratulations were again echoed to the Chair of the End of Life Group for this work, Dr Glynis Henry, and the working group Other recognition Mr MacDonnell congratulated the significant achievements across the network. These include: · Dr Francis Robinson (Consultant Palliative Medicine, Western Trust) Awarded - Consultant of the year at the NI Health Care awards. · Mrs Evelyn Whittaker Hospice Nurse Specialist, NI Hospice, Joint Second Prize in the Development award within the International Journal of Palliative Nursing Awards, for her work in development of palliative care education in nursing homes. · Mr Ray Elder is the newly appointed Team Leader of Community Palliative care, SE Trust. · Mrs Bridget Denvir, who managed the establishment of one of the first community multiprofessional palliative care teams is moving to work with establishing integrated teams within the Belfast Trust. Bridget has been an active core member of the network and here contribution has been much appreciated. Mrs Sharon Barr will attend in future. SPC_0809_02 Minutes & matters Arising from Meeting, 13th December 2007 No amendments were made to the draft minutes from the December meeting. These will be posted on the NICaN website for future reference. Palliative Care Research Following consultation, the response to the business case for the All Ireland Institute was forwarded on 22 February 2008 to Prof David Clark. Prof Judith Hill informed the group that terms of tender are now being developed. Awareness raising across academic institutions continues to engage interest in potential partnerships. Atlantic Philantrophies have offered financial support to the venture and match funding is being sought from across jurisdictions. Previous discussions at Network meetings have endorsed the need to establish a work strand for research and development within palliative and end of life care. To identify the body of interested parties and explore the strengths and weaknesses of a collaborative model for research, a workshop, - Building collaboration for Palliative and End of life Care Research -will take place on 4 June 10am - 2pm.in the Comfort Hotel.Antrim, The workshop will be chaired by Prof David Clark, Director of the International Observatory on End of Life Care. Prof Shelia Payne, Help the Hospices Chair in Hospice Studies and co director of the Cancer Experiences Collaborative will present the Experiences and Results from Research Collaborative. Feedback from this event will be brought back to the next meeting in September. SPC_0809_04 Patient Information pathways - a pathway for advanced disease Ms Danny Sinclair, NICaN Regional Coordinator for Patient Information informed the network of how patient information pathways have been developed in line with the Cancer Services Collaborative. Emerging themes, with regard to information needs of patients with advanced disease, are being identified from the work undertaken across the tumour groups. It is important to identify all information needs to develop a generic pathway of information resources for advanced disease to be endorsed by the Supportive and Palliative care network. This could be used across the all tumour specific information pathways and across organisational boundaries. The resulting pathway could potentially be used for non- cancer condition. A group is to be established to take this work forward. The group will: · Develop a list of advanced disease information themes · .Identify when they become relevant for the patient or their carer · .Identify existing resources · .Develop resources where needed · .Participate or nominate when review is required Dr Sheila Kelly nominated Helen Hume (SETrust) Paula Kealey will also contribute to this work; a nomination from the Patient and Public Information Forum has also been identified. A date will be circulated across the network to engage further interest and establish group SPC_0809_08 Development of a Regional Syringe Driver Prescription Chart Ms Kathy Stephenson reported that the second consultation of the draft regional syringe driver prescription chart and the focus group discussions, Pilots of the chart are to be undertaken within Trust, Hospices and General Practices. SPC_0809_05 A framework for Generalist and Specialist Palliative and End of Life Care Competency Dr Kathleen Dunne, lead of the Education works strand, reported on the findings following consultation of the Education framework. The report was widely appreciated across the network and valued as a significant and timely document for the commissioning of generalist and specialist adult palliative care education. Mr MacDonnell congratulated Dr Dunne and the members of the education workstrand for developing the framework aligning its significance to the underpinning needs of the regional model Amendments will be made to the document and then forwarded to the NICaN Board for endorsement. A process of implementation will be explored and reported to the network group at the September meeting. Key target areas for generalist palliative care education were highlighted within care of the elderly and general medicine. . SPC_0809_06 Pallcareni.net-a website for people with palliative care needs Ms Danny Sinclair, reminded the group of the pending amalgamation of the CAPriCORN and NICaN website. The resulting new web address will be www. cancerni.net. Recurrent funding has been secured to ensure the development of the supportive and palliative care website.www.Pallcareni.net The new website will host good information for people with palliative care needs, regardless of diagnosis. It will be accessible via the cancerni.net portal or independently as the pallcareni portal. It will signpost people with palliative care needs to condition- specific websites. The website will also enable the communication needs of the NI Regional Supportive & Palliative Care Network. This is a very significant method of seeking to enable greater understanding of palliative care for public and professionals, as highlighted within the regional model. Currently the material from the CAPriCORN website is being migrated onto cancerni and /or pallcareni.net as appropriate. To enable the further development of this opportunity a steering group of interested individuals is to be established. Their role will be to: · Drive the development of the website so it meets the needs of public and professionals through the sourcing and development of additional content · Identify any support that is needed, e.g. technical support · Review the website as a whole as it grows (coordinating condition-specific developments) · Review the functions of the website to aid communication throughout the Supportive and Palliative care network The steering group representation should reflect the constituencies within the Supportive and Palliative Care network. Current expressions of interest have come from Heather Reid and Valerie Peacock. A date will be circulated across the network to engage further interest and establish group SPC_0809_07 Update of Guidelines workstrand Dr Pauline Wilkinson presented the current work within the guidelines workstrand. 1. Brief Holistic Assessment & Referral Criteria to Specialist Palliative Care The development of an Holistic assessment Tool will help to identify holistic need at generalist and specialist level. Recognition of complex need prompts appropriate referral to specialist palliative care. The regional referral form is compatible with the Minimum Data set. The final drafts of this work are to be circulated widely, inclusive of service framework groups, primary care, secondary care and the supportive and palliative care network. Consultation will take place during June and July. Piloting of the forms will also be undertaken. 2. Control of Pain in Cancer Patients The original guidelines where developed 2003 and are now ready for review. The Mapping exercise, undertaken in May 2007, highlighted that the Guidelines were poorly adopted. The group have reviewed the pending SIGN 2 guidelines for pain with regard to practice in Northern Ireland. These are highly evidence based and are due to be launched this Summer. Whilst an excellent resource their comprehensiveness limits their readability, this may result in poor compliance. The Guidelines group feel it is important to have accessible and user-friendly guidelines particularly for Generalists and Out of hours. There are examples of good work that has taken place across the province, but there is a need for regional consistency. Dr Wilkinson has contacted Dr Carolyn Harper (Deputy CMO) and GAIN with regard to enabling funding to progress this work. The Guidelines group hope to approach the NICaN Primary Care Group to work in collaboratively on this piece, based on the templates already available. The works should be available in both electronic and paper versions. 3. Care of the dying & Breaking bad news Dr Gail Johnston has now completed an Audit of the Care of the Dying Pathways within the EHSSB. Gail is also seeking to examine to what extent the Regional Guidelines for Breaking Bad News are being implemented in the EHSSB with a view to identifying the need for further training or organisational structures that would facilitate future uptake. 4. Advances in new Technology Syringe Drivers Dr Wilkinson reported on a presentation made to the guidelines group by Mr Jim Elliot, Principle Engineer, Cardiology & Ann McLean, and Macmillan Palliative Care Nurse RVH. There is increasing concern with regard to how devices meet the recommended safety standards and how to reduce error. New devices have 3 point checking, automatic detection of syringe, automatic flow rates, full range of alarms, battery status and data download to provide an event log. There are now 2 companies in UK who have devices that meet these safety criteria. The current Graseby syringe drivers, which have been on the market and used predominately within Northern Ireland over the past 27 years Most new devices are not compatible with the regionally available monoject syringe, however contractual changes will lead to the withdrawal of the monoject syringes in October 2008. The Guidelines group supports a regional approach to this matter. This was echoed in the Supportive and Palliative care network. An option appraisal, identifying costs, and training issues should be developed through the engagement with Trusts and DHSSPSNI. The issue of Patient safety should be raised with the DHSSPSNI. SPC_0809_09 Evaluation of Supportive and Palliative Care network Deferred to next meeting. . SPC_0809_10 Emerging Issues Mrs Anne Coyle, Bereavement Coordinator, Southern Trust, announced that the Regional Bereavement Strategy is soon to be released. Anne supported the close alignment between the content of the strategy and the work of the regional model and other workstrands within the Supportive and Palliative care network. Ms Eleanor Donaghy, Transplant Coordinator, briefly highlighted the issue of tissue donation. Each year Northern Ireland has a dearth of corneal donations. There is no upper age limit for donation and retrieval is not limited by a cancer diagnosis. Recipients do not require immunosuppressive and the transplant is lifelong. The National Blood Service provided coordination of this donation they may be contacted via 07659180773. It is hoped that Mrs Coyle and Ms Donaghy could provide more comprehensive presentations at a future meeting. Events · Irish Psycho- Oncology Group Seminar, Cork 6 June, Exploring the Struggle for meaning in Cancer · Integrated Care: Putting Research into Practice, 13June, Trinity College, Dublin · Macmillan online conference Friday 13 June 2008, 9am - 5pm · Delivering effective end of life care: developing partnership working 15 Oct 2008, 9.30 -4.15 pm London Network Meeting was closed at 5.00pm SPC_0607_ Dates of Future Meetings (please note the change of venue) 10th September 2008, 1.30 - 5pm venue to be decided15th January 2009, 1.30 - 5pm venue to be decided12th May 2009, 1.30 - 5pm venue to be decided Attendances Apologies Stuart MacDonnellLorna NevinSonja McIlfatrick Donna FitzsimonsKathleen DunnePauline WilkinsonKathy StephensonSheila KellyMarie Nugent,Anne CoyleFiona GilmourJudith HillLorna DicksonMargaret CarlinLoretta GribbenYvonne Duff Lesley NelsonLiz HendersonSue FosterCathy PayneGraeme PaynePatricia MageeGeraldine WeatherupPaula KealyCaroline McAfeeLinda WrayValerie PeacockAnn McCleanRay Elder Martin BradleyHelen HumeGillian RankinHeather MonteverdeJulie DoyleAlison PorterYvonne SmythLiz Atkinson,Glynis HenryMaeve HullyCaroline HughesAnn FinnBob BrownSharon BarrJulie DoyleJanis McCulla .

Beyond the usual suspects: positive attitudes towards positive symptoms is associated with medication noncompliance in psychosis.

Antipsychotic medication represents the treatment of choice in psychosis according to clinical guidelines. Nevertheless, studies show that half to almost three-quarter of all patients discontinue medication with antipsychotics after some time, a fact which is traditionally ascribed to side-effects, mistrust against the clinician and poor illness insight. The present study investigated whether positive attitudes toward psychotic symptoms (ie, gain from illness) represent a further factor for medication noncompliance. An anonymous online survey was set up in order to prevent conservative response biases that likely emerge in a clinical setting. Following an iterative selection process, data from a total of 113 patients with a likely diagnosis of schizophrenia and a history of antipsychotic treatment were retained for the final analyses (80%). While side-effect profile and mistrust emerged as the most frequent reasons for drug discontinuation, 28% of the sample reported gain from illness (eg, missing voices, feeling of power) as a motive for noncompliance. At least every fourth patient reported the following reasons: stigma (31%), mistrust against the physician/therapist (31%), and rejection of medication in general (28%). Approximately every fifth patient had discontinued antipsychotic treatment because of forgetfulness. On average, patients provided 4 different explanations for noncompliance. Ambivalence toward symptoms and treatment should thoroughly be considered when planning treatment in psychosis. While antipsychotic medication represents the evidence-based cornerstone of the current treatment in schizophrenia, further research is needed on nonpharmacological interventions for noncompliant patients who are willing to undergo intervention but refuse pharmacotherapy.