An iterative procedure for solving a Cauchy problem for second order elliptic equations

An iterative method for reconstruction of solutions to second order elliptic equations by Cauchy data given on a part of the boundary, is presented. At each iteration step, a series of mixed well-posed boundary value problems are solved for the elliptic operator and its adjoint. The convergence proof of this method in a weighted L2 space is included. (© 2004 WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim)

On a Class of Generalized Elliptic-type Integrals

The aim of this paper is to study a generalized form of elliptic-type integrals which unify and extend various families of elliptic-type integrals studied recently by several authors. In a recent communication [1] we have obtained recurrence relations and asymptotic formula for this generalized elliptic-type integral. Here we shall obtain some more results which are single and multiple integral formulae, differentiation formula, fractional integral and approximations for this class of generalized elliptic-type integrals.

Integer Points Close to a Smooth Curve

∗ This research is partially supported by the Bulgarian National Science Fund under contract MM-403/9

Structural Analysis of Contours as the Sequences of the Digital Straight Segments and of the Digital Curve Arcs

Recognition of the object contours in the image as sequences of digital straight segments and/or digital curve arcs is considered in this article. The definitions of digital straight segments and of digital curve arcs are proposed. The methods and programs to recognize the object contours are represented. The algorithm to recognize the digital straight segments is formulated in terms of the growing pyramidal networks taking into account the conceptual model of memory and identification (Rabinovich [4]).

On a Class of Elliptic Equations for the N-Laplacian in R^n with One-Sided Exponential Growth

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: 35J40, 49J52, 49J40, 46E30

Estimate for the Number of Zeros of Abelian Integrals on Elliptic Curves

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 34C07, secondary 34C08.

Weierstrass Points with First Non-Gap Four on a Double Covering of a Hyperelliptic Curve

2000 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 14H55; Secondary 14H30, 14H40, 20M14.

Complete Integrability of a Nonlinear Elliptic System, Generating Bi-umbilical Foliated Semi-symmetric Hypersurfaces in R^4

Николай Кутев, Величка Милушева - Намираме експлицитно всичките би-омбилични фолирани полусиметрични повърхнини в четиримерното евклидово пространство R^4

Lp Microlocal Properties for Multi-Quasi-Elliptic Pseudodifferential Operators

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 35S05; Secondary 35A17.

On the Holomorphic Extension of Solutions of Elliptic Pseudodifferential Equations

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 35B65, 35S05, 35A20.

Interior Boundaries for Degenerate Elliptic Equations of Second Order Some Theory and Numerical Observations

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary 35J70; Secondary 35J15, 35D05.

On Modified Method of Simplest Equation for Obtaining Exact Solutions of Nonlinear PDEs: Case of Elliptic Simplest Equation

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 74J30, 34L30.

Existence Theorems for Non-Cooperative Elliptic Systems

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification: 35J65, 35K60, 35B05, 35R05.

On Principle Eigenvalue for Linear Second Order Elliptic Equations in Divergence Form

2002 Mathematics Subject Classification: 35J15, 35J25, 35B05, 35B50

Corrigendum for "Weierstrass Points with first Non-Gap four on a Double Covering of a Hyperelliptic Curve"

In the proof of Lemma 3.1 in [1] we need to show that we may take the two points p and q with p ≠ q such that p+q+(b-2)g21(C′)∼2(q1+… +qb-1) where q1,…,qb-1 are points of C′, but in the paper [1] we did not show that p ≠ q. Moreover, we hadn't been able to prove this using the method of our paper [1]. So we must add some more assumption to Lemma 3.1 and rewrite the statements of our paper after Lemma 3.1. The following is the correct version of Lemma 3.1 in [1] with its proof.