451 resultados para Sachs, MichaelSachs, MichaelMichaelSachs


Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Mode of access: Internet.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Thesis (doctoral)--Grossherzogl. Herzogl. Sachs. Gesamt-Universitat Jena.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Berlin.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Thesis (doctoral)--Universität Bern, 1904.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Thesis (doctoral)--Grossherzogl. und Herzogl. Sachs. Gesamt-Universitat Jena.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Thesis (doctoral)--Grossherzogl. Herzogl. Sachs. Gesamt-Universitat Jena.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Thesis (Ph. D.)--Breslau.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Aus der Sammlung des Leo Baeck Institute, digitalisiert in Kooperation mit dem Center for Jewish History, NY

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Senior thesis written for Oceanography 445

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

Background. A systematic review was undertaken to assess the safety and efficacy of laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy (LLDN) compared with open live-donor nephrectomy (OLDN). Methods. Literature databases were searched from inception to March 2003 inclusive. Comparative studies of LLDN versus OLDN (randomized and nonrandomized) were included. Results. There were 44 included studies, and the quality of the available evidence was average. There was only one randomized controlled trial and six nonrandomized comparative studies with concurrent controls identified. In terms of safety, for donors, there did not seem to be any distinct difference between the laparoscopic and open approaches. No donor mortality was reported for either procedure, and the complication rates were similar although the types of complications experienced differed between the two procedures. The conversion rate for LLDN to an open procedure ranged from 0% to 13%. In terms of efficacy, LLDN seemed to be a slower operation with longer warm ischemia. times than OLDN, but this did not seem to have resulted in increased rates of delayed graft function for recipients. Donor postoperative recovery and convalescence seemed to be superior for LLDN, making it a potentially more attractive operation for living donors. Although in the short-term, graft function and survival did not seem to differ between the two techniques, long-term complication rates and allograft function could not be determined and further long-term follow-up is required. Conclusions. LLDN seems to be at least as safe and efficacious as OLDN in the short-term. However, it remains a technique in evolution. Further high-quality studies are required to resolve some of the outstanding issues surrounding its use, in particular, long-term follow-up of donor complications and recipient graft function and survival.

Relevância:

10.00% 10.00%

Publicador:

Resumo:

O objetivo desse trabalho foi investigar a contribuição do curso de Administração na formação de uma visão sistêmica das relações sociais, econômicas e ambientais dos seus egressos na visão dos mesmos. A tomada de decisões no ambiente corporativo requer que se considerem os interesses sociais e ambientais, além do econômico; devido, em particular, à atual crise civilizatória em que vivemos. A metodologia utilizada é a qualitativa, por meio da pesquisa exploratória, bibliográfica e de campo. O trabalho buscou aliar o suporte teórico, por meio das contribuições de Elkington (1994), Sachs (2006), Porrit (2007), Aligleri (2009), Barbierri (2010), Fazenda (2001,2008) Freire (1981,1987,1996), Leff (2009), Leonard (1997), Kleiton (2012), Tilbury e Wortman (2004), Freeman (1984), Savage (1991), Mitchell (1997), Katz (1990), Martinelli (1997), ao campo empírico, tendo sido aplicadas entrevistas em profundidade com egressos do curso bacharelado em Administração que cursaram a disciplina de sustentabilidade. De acordo com a pesquisa realizada, identificou-se que os egressos não consideram que a disciplina de sustentabilidade tenha contribuído para o desenvolvimento de competências profissionais significativas para um administrador com uma visão sistêmica, entretanto quando o tema foi abordado de forma interdisciplinar houve maior aproveitamento por parte dos egressos.