The role of due diligence in cross-border acquisitions

Mergers and acquisitions (M&A) have become an important strategy for international expansion, even though numerous acquisitions fail to achieve their financial and strategic objectives. The risk associated with transactions partly depends on the extent to which the insight into the target company actually holds true. Due diligence is performed to eliminate this information asymmetry. Due diligence is an audit conducted prior to the planned transaction. It can be described as a purposeful and systematic investigation of business opportunity and risk during on-going sale negotiations. The importance of due diligence is emphasized widely in the academic literature as well as among M&A practitioners. On the other hand, researches and practitioners have differing views on what and how much is enough for a due diligence audit. Therefore, this study examines the role of due diligence in a cross-border acquisition process. The main objective of the research is fulfilled by examining the reasons for conducting due diligence, recognizing the elements affecting effective due diligence and analyzing the need and opportunities for enhancing the utilization of due diligence. For the empirical part of this qualitative study five expert interviews were conducted among experienced Finnish acquirers and advisors. In addition, five expert interviews conducted for a distinct study were utilized as a secondary source of data. The results of this study present fundamental reasons for conducting due diligence. However, conducting due diligence is not always self-evident. Doubtful attitude towards due diligence exists, though it is exceptional. Carefully planning the focus of due diligence and compiling and managing the team conducting due diligence are identified as the main elements affecting effective due diligence. Altogether, due diligence can have plural roles which in this study are categorized as the confirmatory, preparative, and cross-functional roles of due diligence. The older academic literature tends to emphasize the confirmatory role whereas the current academic discussion also supports the preparative role of due diligence. It can be argued that the roles of due diligence differ among experienced due diligence practitioners based on several factors. In attempt to increase the value of due diligence for acquirers, more than one role of due diligence is likely to exist. As a result of the different approaches and the controversy regarding the concept of due diligence, the demand for a new, wider definition of due diligence can be claimed to exist.

Projektien markkinoinnin ja myynnin kehittäminen rakennusalan pk-yrityksessä Venäjän markkinoilla

Tämä diplomityö keskittyy kehittämään työssä käsiteltävän Venäjällä toimivan rakennusalan urakoitsijan projektien markkinointia ja myyntiä. Työssä paneudutaan projektimarkkinoinnin kautta yrityksen markkinointiin ja myyntiin. Käsittelyn aiheena ovat myös proaktiivinen markkinointi ja Venäjän rakennusmarkkinoiden aiheuttamat erityispiirteet. Tutkimuksesta selvisi, että yrityksellä on erityisesti ollut vaikeuksia saada ison luokan projekteja. Usein tähän on ollut syynä kilpailijoiden parempi taloudellinen kilpailukyky. Muutama projekti on myös keskeytynyt tai peruuntunut. Onnistuneiden tarjouskilpailuiden taustalla taas ovat olleet referenssikäynnit, hyvät suhteet asiakkaaseen ja laadukas suorittaminen. Projektimarkkinoinnin kirjallisuuden ja yrityksessä suoritettujen teemahaastattelujen pohjalta yritykselle kehitettiin ennakoivaa markkinointia painottava kokonaisvaltainen markkinointi- ja myyntiprosessi. Tärkeimpiä kohtia prosessissa ovat proaktiivinen projektien etsintä ja projektin valmistelu. Projekteja etsitään osallistumalla teollisuuden alan konferensseihin sekä ottamalla itse yhteyttä asiakkaaseen ja eri toimijoihin. Potentiaaliset projektit seulotaan suuremmasta joukosta ennalta määrättyjen kriteereiden avulla. Projekteihin pyritään aktiivisesti vaikuttamaan ennen tarjouskilpailua, jolloin myös järjestetään referenssikäyntejä. Neuvotteluissa sovelletaan kilpailutilanteen mukaan joustavaa kustannusperusteista hinnoittelua. Suoritetun urakan jälkeen asiakasyrityksen investointisuunnitelmia tutkitaan ja tarpeen vaatiessa pyritään säilyttämään yhteys nukkuvan suhteen aikana. Tällöin järjestetään asiakkaan kanssa seminaareja sekä epävirallisia ta-pahtumia. Yrityksen markkinointia ja myyntiä hankaloittavat Venäjän rakennusmarkkinoiden erityispiirteet. Epävarmuudesta aiheutuvat riskit pitää huomioida katteessa, mutta usein Venäjän erityisolosuhteet tulee vain hyväksyä, koska niihin on vaikea vaikuttaa.

Vauhtikausi. Autoilun sukupuoli 1920-luvun Suomessa

The Age of Speed:Automobility’s Gender in the 1920s Finland The aim of this study is to analyze the connections between automobility and gender in Finland in the 1920s. In this study it is argued that the 1920s was the significant era in the Finnish history of automobility when many of the long-lasting gendered notions and cultural understandings were constructed. This study combines cultural history of technology with gender analysis. As the previous research on gender and technology has recognized, technology is a significant site of gender negotiations. Both from the cultural historical perspective and a gender perspective it is important to understand both technology and gender as cultural constructions. They were linked together and constructed each other. In other words: technology shapes gender and gender shapes technology. Historians of technology like Nina Lerman, Ruth Oldenziel and Arwen Mohun have argued that both gender and technology are about power: social, cultural, economic and political. In this study automobility means technology that can be analyzed in layers of identity, structures, institutions and representations. The source material consists of various types of historical sources, magazines and journals, advertisements, archival material together with films and literature. In the previous studies of the history of automobility gender has often been neglected. The term “gender” has also quite often been misunderstood. Some studies in the field have only focused on the early female drivers. However, far too little attention has been paid to the question, why automobility was considered as masculine sphere only. This study aims to give new insights to the previous interpretations of the history of automobility. As in various other countries also in Finland, the decade of the 1920s is characterized as a period of “modern times.” It was also the era of the automobiles. Although the number of cars in Finland was still low compared to the other European countries and the USA, in press, films and literature, images of automobiles and new women – and men – on the wheel became as an emblem of a new era. The thesis consists of three main chapters. The first main chapter focuses on the conflicts between drivers and non-drivers. The study shows how in the debate of the automobility “a driver” was constantly referred as a man and “a pedestrian” accordingly a woman, even though in the reality there were as much men and women walking on the streets and the roads. Thus, the public debate constructed and reconstructed the gendered traffic system where men were playing the key role. The second main chapter of the study analyses the automobile clubs and the cultural representations. The chapter answers the question how the concept of a driver was gendered. The Automobile clubs and the organizations of professional drivers were in a significant role in developing the early history of traffic in Finland. The Finnish Automobile Club (Suomen Automobiili Klubi, founded in 1919) was the oldest and the most powerful of all automobile organizations. The Finnish Automobile Club accepted women as members from the very beginning. The membership was strictly limited to the upper class and the very first female members were wives and daughters of the male members. However, Doctor of medicine and surgery 316 Karolina Eskelin (1867-1936) the founding member of the Club was an exception to that convention. The male members of the Finnish Automobile Club attended official international meetings and consulted Finnish authorities in traffic and road questions, whereas, female members joined car trips, picnics and social gatherings arranged by the club. Few young female members of the club drove in races and gross-country-tours. The cultural representations of drivers in the Finnish media in the 1920s both deconstructed and reconstructed the concept of gender. In Finnish press in general, motoring was seen as male dominated area. Men were represented as the experts of the automobility. The drivers’ uniforms and the automobile clubs underlined professionalism and expertise which, thus, got masculine meaning. Women were beautiful accessories in the car ads, but they were also becoming a new consumer group in the market. The representations of the female and the male drivers influenced and shaped actively the understandings of femininity and masculinity. In the third main chapter the analysis focuses on the automobile as an artifact.The automobile was considered as an artifact that primarily belonged to the masculine domain. However, the representations of the automobiles were ambivalent. The automobile was both masculine and feminine depending on the context. The representations of the automobile were also used to construct the discourse of heteronormativity.

Materian monitahoisuus ja ikäistävät apparaatit

Kirjallisuusarvostelu

In search of information systems value : a case study of the EHR benefits realisation efforts of three Swedish hospitals.

The Swedish public health care organisation could very well be undergoing its most significant change since its specialisation during the late 19th and early 20th century. At the heart of this change is a move from using manual patient journals to electronic health records (EHR). EHR are complex integrated organisational wide information systems (IS) that promise great benefits and value as well as presenting great challenges to the organisation. The Swedish public health care is not the first organisation to implement integrated IS, and by no means alone in their quest for realising the potential benefits and value that it has to offer. As organisations invest in IS they embark on a journey of value-creation and capture. A journey where a costbased approach towards their IS-investments is replaced with a value-centric focus, and where the main challenges lie in the practical day-to-day task of finding ways to intertwine technology, people and business processes. This has however proven to be a problematic task. The problematic situation arises from a shift of perspective regarding how to manage IS in order to gain value. This is a shift from technology delivery to benefits delivery; from an ISimplementation plan to a change management plan. The shift gives rise to challenges related to the inability of IS and the elusiveness of value. As a response to these challenges the field of IS-benefits management has emerged offering a framework and a process in order to better understand and formalise benefits realisation activities. In this thesis the benefits realisation efforts of three Swedish hospitals within the same county council are studied. The thesis focuses on the participants of benefits analysis projects; their perceptions, judgments, negotiations and descriptions of potential benefits. The purpose is to address the process where organisations seek to identify which potential IS-benefits to pursue and realise, this in order to better understand what affects the process, so that realisation actions of potential IS-benefits could be supported. A qualitative case study research design is adopted and provides a framework for sample selection, data collection, and data analysis. It also provides a framework for discussions of validity, reliability and generalizability. Findings displayed a benefits fluctuation, which showed that participants’ perception of what constituted potential benefits and value changed throughout the formal benefits management process. Issues like structure, knowledge, expectation and experience affected perception differently, and this in the end changed the amount and composition of potential benefits and value. Five dimensions of benefits judgment were identified and used by participants when finding accommodations of potential benefits and value to pursue. Identified dimensions affected participants’ perceptions, which in turn affected the amount and composition of potential benefits. During the formal benefits management process participants shifted between judgment dimensions. These movements emerged through debates and interactions between participants. Judgments based on what was perceived as expected due to one’s role and perceived best for the organisation as a whole were the two dominant benefits judgment dimensions. A benefits negotiation was identified. Negotiations were divided into two main categories, rational and irrational, depending on participants’ drive when initiating and participating in negotiations. In each category three different types of negotiations were identified having different characteristics and generating different outcomes. There was also a benefits negotiation process identified that displayed management challenges corresponding to its five phases. A discrepancy was also found between how IS-benefits are spoken of and how actions of IS benefits realisation are understood. This was a discrepancy between an evaluation and a realisation focus towards IS value creation. An evaluation focus described IS-benefits as well-defined and measurable effects and a realisation focus spoke of establishing and managing an on-going place of value creation. The notion of valuescape was introduced in order to describe and support the understanding of IS value creation. Valuescape corresponded to a realisation focus and outlined a value configuration consisting of activities, logic, structure, drivers and role of IS.

Repository sustainability

Presentation at Open Repositories 2014, Helsinki, Finland, June 9-13, 2014

"Minä kuulun maailmalle"

Kirjallisuusarvostelu

Ei-henkilöityvän organisatorisen luottamuksen merkitys YT-neuvotteluja läpikäyvän kuntaomisteisen ICT-palveluyhtiön toiminnassa

Tutkimuksessa tarkasteltiin mikä on ei-henkilöityvän organisatorisen luottamuksen merkitys yrityksen toiminnassa ja voidaanko ei-henkilöityvää organisatorista luottamusta jälleenrakentaa ja kehittää yrityksessä, joka parhaillaan käy YT-neuvotteluita. Tutkimusongelmaa lähestyttiin ei-henkilöityvän organisatorisen luottamuksen viitekehyksen kautta. Tutkimus toteutettiin kvalitatiivisena tapaustutkimuksena kuntaomisteisessa ICT-palveluyhtiössä. Kvalitatiivinen tutkimusaineisto kerättiin puolistrukturoidulla teemahaastattelukyselylomakkeella ja vastaukset analysoitiin sisällönanalyysimenetelmällä. Tutkimuksessa saatujen tulosten perusteella yrityksen henkilöstön kokemalla ei-henkilöityvällä organisatorisella luottamuksella yritystä kohtaan on yhteys työntekijöiden työmotivaation, työtehokkuuteen ja sitoutumiseen ja vaikutus yrityksen toimintaan. Luottamuksen jälleenrakentaminen ja kehittäminen organisaatiossa edellyttävät toimenpiteitä yrityksen johdolta.

Suomen mahdollisuudet vaikuttaa Euroopan unionin lainsäädäntömenettelyyn

Väitöstutkimuksen kohteena on säädösten valmistelu ja niitä koskevaa päätöksenteko Euroopan unionissa erityisesti siitä näkökulmasta, miten Suomen kaltainen pieni jäsenvaltio voi vaikuttaa EU-säädöksiin. Väitöskirjassa analysoidaan unionin toimielinten välillä vallitsevaa dynamiikkaa ja Suomen asemaa erityisesti EUT-sopimuksen 289 artiklan 1 kohdan ja 294 artiklan mukaisessa tavallisessa lainsäätämisjärjestyksessä. Lissabonin sopimuksen voimaantulon jälkeen tavallinen lainsäätämisjärjestys, joka aiemmin tunnettiin yhteispäätösmenettelynä, on selvästi yleisin lainsäädäntömenettely unionissa. Väitöskirja koostuu kuudesta erillisjulkaistusta pääosin vertaisarvioidusta artikkelista ja niitä täydentävästä ja kokoavasta yhteenveto-osasta. Kirjan tämä painos sisältää vain yhteenvetoluvun, ei erikseen julkaistuja artikkeleita. Väitöskirjassa hyödynnetään eurooppaoikeuden ja politiikan tutkimuksen kirjallisuutta. Metodologisesti väitöstutkimus edustaa empiiristä oikeustutkimusta, jossa yhdistyy lainopillinen analyysi ja empiiristen, tässä tapauksessa lähinnä laadullisten aineistojen analyysi. Yhteenvedossa on seurattu lainsäädäntömuutoksia ja oikeuskäytäntöä 10. huhtikuuta 2015 asti. Väitöskirjatutkimuksen kantavana teemana on oikeuden ja politiikan suhde EUlainsäätämisessä. Artikkeleita ja yhteenvetoa sitovat yhteen kaksi yleisen tason argumenttia. Ensiksi, EU:n lainsäädäntömenettelyä koskevat oikeussäännöt ja institutionalisoituneet käytännöt luovat kehikon toimielinten sisäiselle päätöksenteolle sekä niiden välisille poliittisluonteisille neuvotteluille, vaikkakaan sääntöihin ja käytäntöihin ei yleensä ole tarvetta nimenomaisesti vedota menettelyn kuluessa. Toiseksi, koska Suomen kaltaisen pienen jäsenvaltion muodollinen valta – siis äänimäärä neuvostossa – on hyvin rajallinen, suomalaisten ministerien ja virkamiesten tulisi hyödyntää erilaisia epävirallisia vaikuttamiskanavia, jos halutaan vahvistaa Suomen tosiasiallista vaikutusvaltaa menettelyssä. Unionin lainsäädäntötoiminta ei tyypillisesti ole rationaalisen mallin mukaan etenevää päätöksentekoa, vaan tempoilevaa ja vaikeasti ennakoitavaa kamppailua eri preferenssejä edustavien toimijoiden välillä. Väitöskirjan ensimmäisessä artikkelissa analysoidaan säädösvalmistelua ja lainsäätämismenettelyä unionissa vaihe vaiheelta. Johtopäätöksenä todetaan, että unioniin on syntynyt yhteispäätösmenettelyn, sittemmin tavallisen lainsäätämisjärjestyksen myötä uudenlainen lainsäätämiskulttuuri, jolle on leimallista tiiviit yhteydet komission, Euroopan parlamentin ja neuvoston välillä. Toimielimet ottavat nykyisin joustavasti huomioon toistensa kantoja menettelyn edetessä, mikä mahdollistaa sen, että valtaosa EU-säädöksistä voidaan hyväksyä jo ensimmäisessä käsittelyssä. Toisessa tutkimusartikkelissa analysoidaan komission asemaa unionin toimielinrakenteessa. Artikkelissa tarkastellaan komission aloiteoikeutta sekä komission puheenjohtajan ja sen jäsenten valintamenettelyjä siitä näkökulmasta, edistääkö komissio todella unionin yleistä etua itsenäisenä ja riippumattomana, kuten EU-sopimuksen 17 artiklassa edellytetään. Tiettyjen järjestelyjen myötä Euroopan parlamentin ja komission suhde on kehittynyt siihen suuntaan, että komissio toimii jossain määrin parlamentille vastuunalaisena hallituksena. Artikkelissa kritisoidaan, että kehitys ei välttämättä lähennä kansalaisia unionin toimielimiin ja että kehitys omiaan vaarantamaan komission aseman verrattain riippumattomana välittäjänä trilogeissa. Kolmas artikkeli sisältää tapaustutkimuksen kuluttajille myönnettäviä luottoja sääntelevän direktiivin (2008/48/EY) valmisteluvaiheista. Tapaustutkimus konkretisoi Suomen hallituksen edustajien tekemän EU-vaikuttamisen keinoja, vahvuuksia ja kehittämiskohteita. Artikkelissa todetaan, että Suomelle aivan keskeinen vaikuttamisresurssi ovat sellaiset virkamiehet, jotka hallitsevat niin käsiteltävän säädöshankkeen sisältökysymykset kuin unionin päätöksentekomenettelyt ja toimielinten institutionalisoituneet käytännöt. Artikkelissa tehdyt empiiriset havainnot jäsenvaltioiden välillä käydyistä neuvotteluista tukevat konstruktiivisen mallin perusoletuksia. Neljännessä artikkelissa, joka on laadittu yhteistyönä professori Tapio Raunion kanssa, analysoidaan unioniasioiden kansallista valmistelua ja tarkemmin ottaen sitä, miten Suomen neuvottelukannat muotoutuvat valtioneuvoston yhteensovittamisjärjestelmän ylimmällä tasolla EU-ministerivaliokunnassa. Artikkelissa todetaan laajan pöytäkirja-aineiston ja sitä täydentävän haastatteluaineiston pohjalta, että EUministerivaliokunnan asialistan laadinta on delegoitu kokonaisuudessaan asiantuntijavirkamiehille. Lisäksi asialistan muotoutumiseen vaikuttaa luonnollisesti unionin toimielinten, erityisesti Eurooppa-neuvoston agenda. Toisaalta, EU-ministerivaliokunnan kokouksissa ministerit yksin tekevät päätöksiä ja linjaavat Suomen EU-politiikkaa. Viidennessä artikkelissa selvitetään, miten olisi toimittava, jos pyritään siihen, että uusi tai muutettu EU-säädös vastaisi mahdollisimman pitkälti Suomen kansallisesti määriteltyä neuvottelukantaa. Tehokkainta on vaikuttaa aloiteoikeutta lainsäädäntömenettelyssä käyttävään komissioon, tarvittaessa myös virkahierarkian ylimmillä tasoilla, sekä tehdä yhteistyötä muiden jäsenvaltioiden kanssa, erityisesti puheenjohtajavaltion, tulevien puheenjohtajavaltioiden ja suurten jäsenvaltioiden kanssa. Mikäli käsittelyssä oleva EU-säädöshanke arvioidaan kansallisesti erityisen tärkeiksi tai ongelmalliseksi, tulisi vaikuttamistoimia laajentaa kattamaan myös Euroopan parlamentin avainhenkilöitä. Kuudennessa artikkelissa analysoidaan suomalaisen kansalaisyhteiskunnan ja etujärjestöjen vaikutusmahdollisuuksia EU-asioiden valmistelussa. Johtopäätöksenä todetaan, että muodollinen yhteensovittaminen EU-valmistelujaostojen laajan kokoonpanon kokouksissa ei ole sidosryhmille ensisijainen eikä tehokkain vaikuttamisen keino. Sen sijaan korostuvat epäviralliset yhteydet toimivaltaisen ministeriön vastuuvirkamieheen kotimaassa ja vaikuttaminen eurooppalaisen kattojärjestön välityksellä. Väitöskirjan yhteenveto-osassa on eritelty, missä EU:n säädösvalmistelun ja lainsäätämismenettelyn vaiheissa Suomen kaltaisella pienellä jäsenvaltiolla on parhaat edellytykset vaikuttaa valmisteltavana olevaan säädökseen. Parhaat vaikutusmahdollisuudet ovat aivan EU-säädöksen elinkaaren alkuvaiheessa, kun komissio on vasta käynnistämässä uutta säädösvalmistelua. Väitöstutkimuksessa todetaan, että varhaista kannanmuodostusta ja sen mahdollistamaa ennakkovaikuttamista on Suomessa kyetty kehittämään etenkin niissä poliittisesti, taloudellisesti tai oikeudellisesti tärkeissä hankkeissa, joissa hallituksen kannanmuodostus tapahtuu EU-ministerivaliokunnassa. Muissa unionin säädöshankkeissa ennakollisen vaikuttamisen intensiteetti näyttäisi vaihtelevan, riippuen muun muassa toimivaltaisen ministeriön keskijohdon ja ylimmän johdon sitoutumisesta. Toinen Suomelle otollinen vaikuttamisen ajankohta on silloin, kun komission antamaa ehdotusta käsitellään asiantuntijavirkamiesten kesken neuvoston työryhmässä. Tehokas vaikuttaminen edellyttää, että Suomea neuvotteluissa edustavat henkilöt kokoavat ”samanmielisistä” jäsenvaltioista kaksoisenemmistösäännön mukaisen voittavan koalition. Viimeinen vaikuttamisen ikkuna aukeaa silloin, kun Coreper-komiteassa laaditaan neuvoston puheenjohtajalle neuvottelumandaattia toimielinten välisiin trilogeihin tavallisen lainsäätämisjärjestyksen ensimmäisessä käsittelyssä. Tässä varsin myöhäisessä menettelyvaiheessa vaikuttaminen on pienen jäsenvaltion näkökulmasta jo selvästi vaikeampaa. Väitöskirja sijoittuu luontevasti osaksi valtiotieteellistä eurooppalaistumis-kirjallisuutta siltä osin, kuin siinä on tutkittu EU-jäsenyyden vaikutuksia kotimaisiin hallinnon rakenteisiin ja politiikan asialistaan. Kuten tunnettua, Suomen EU-politiikka rakentuu eduskunnalle vastuullisen valtioneuvoston varaan. Väitöskirjassa ei kuitenkaan ole otettu erityiseen tarkasteluun perustuslakiin sidottua eduskunnan ja hallituksen yhteistoimintaa EU-asioissa. Sen sijaan on tutkittu unioniasioiden valmistelua ja yhteensovittamista valtioneuvoston sisällä. Kun EU-asioiden yhteensovittamisjärjestelmää luotiin, pidettiin tärkeänä, että jokaisessa säädöshankkeessa ja politiikkahankkeessa kyetään muodostamaan kansallisesti yksi ja yhtenäinen neuvottelupositio. Yhtenäisen kansallisen linjan ajamisen katsottiin parantavan Suomen asemaa unionin päätöksenteossa. Väitöskirjassa todetaan johtopäätöksenä, että EU-asioiden kansallinen valmistelujärjestelmä toteuttaa sille asetetut tavoitteet käytännössä varsin hyvin. Merkittävin kehittämiskohde liittyy kansallisen EU-valmistelun reaktiivisuuteen. Jos Suomi haluaa vaikuttaa yhä vahvemmin EU-lainsäätämiseen, Suomelle tärkeät hankkeet pitäisi tunnistaa jo varhaisessa vaiheessa ja priorisoida selkeästi niiden hoitamista ministeriöissä.

Issues in the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership: A critical discourse analysis

Negotiating trade agreements is an important part of government trade policies, economic planning and part of the globally operating trading system of today. European Union and the United States have been active in the formation of trade agreements in global comparison. Now these two economic giants are engaged in negotiations to form their own trade agreement, the so called Transnational Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). The purpose of this thesis is to understand the reasons for making a trade agreement between two economic areas and understanding the issues it may include in the case of the TTIP. The TTIP has received a great deal of attention in the media. The opinions towards the partnership have been extreme, and the debate has been heated. The purpose of this study is to introduce the nature of the public discussion regarding the TTIP from Spring 2013 until 2014. The research problem is to find out what are the main issues in the agreement and what are the values influencing them. The study was conducted applying methods of critical discourse analysis to the chosen data. This includes gathering the issues from the data based on the attention each has received in the discussion. The underlying motives for raising different issues were analysed by investigating the authors’ position in the political, economic and social circuits. The perceived economic impacts of the TTIP are also under analysis with the same criteria. Some of the most respected economic newspapers globally were included in the research material as well as papers or reports published by the EU and global organisations. The analysis indicates a clear dichotomy of the attitudes towards the TTIP. Key problems include lack of transparency in the negotiations, the misunderstood investor-state dispute settlement, the constantly expanding regulatory issues and the risk of protectionism. The theory and data does suggest that the removal of tariffs is an effective tool for reaching economic gains in the TTIP and even more effective would be the reducing of non-tariff barriers, such as protectionism. Critics are worried over the rising influence of corporations over governments. The discourse analysis reveals that the supporters of the TTIP have values related to increasing welfare through economic growth. Critics do not deny the economic benefits but raise the question of inequality as a consequence. Overall they represent softer values such as sustainable development and democracy as a counter-attack to the corporate values of efficiency and the maximising of profits.

Show me your brain! Stories of interdisciplinary knowledge creation in practice. Experiences and observations from Aalto Design Factory, Finland.

This dissertation centres on the themes of knowledge creation, interdisciplinarity and knowledge work. My research approaches interdisciplinary knowledge creation (IKC) as practical situated activity. I argue that by approaching IKC from the practice-based perspective makes it possible to “deconstruct” how knowledge creation actually happens, and demystify its strong intellectual, mentalistic and expertise-based connotations. I have rendered the work of the observed knowledge workers into something ordinary, accessible and routinized. Consequently this has made it possible to grasp the pragmatic challenges as well the concrete drivers of such activity. Thus the effective way of organizing such activities becomes a question of organizing and leading effective everyday practices. To achieve that end, I have conducted ethnographic research of one explicitly interdisciplinary space within higher education, Aalto Design Factory in Helsinki, Finland, where I observed how students from different disciplines collaborated in new product development projects. I argue that IKC is a multi-dimensional construct that intertwines a particular way of doing; a way of experiencing; a way of embodied being; and a way of reflecting on the very doing itself. This places emphasis not only the practices themselves, but also on the way the individual experiences the practices, as this directly affects how the individual practices. My findings suggest that in order to effectively organize and execute knowledge creation activities organizations need to better accept and manage the emergent diversity and complexity inherent in such activities. In order to accomplish this, I highlight the importance of understanding and using a variety of (material) objects, the centrality of mundane everyday practices, the acceptance of contradictions and negotiations well as the role of management that is involved and engaged. To succeed in interdisciplinary knowledge creation is to lead not only by example, but also by being very much present in the very everyday practices that make it happen.

Collective redundancies in the State of California of the United States and in the Republic of Finland. Procedures and Provisions

Video games industry has recently bonded California and Finland in a new way and where the employers are recruiting they also need to be aware of the provisions and procedures related to terminations. In general, collective dismissals are on a relatively high level both in Finland and in California. In California, collective redundancies are regulated under the WARN law. The WARN obligates employers with 75 or more employees to give a 60-day notice prior to a mass lay off and some other similar events. Employers with less than 75 employees are free to administer the terminations without the WARN notice period. Generally, the California at-will presumption allows employment relationship to be terminated any day with or without reason and without notice period if conditions of collective agreements or employment contract do not limit this right. Termination cannot anyhow be in violation of the anti-discrimination law. In Finland the termination related provisions are part of the Employment Contracts Act and the Act on Co-operation within Undertakings. Collective redundancies are allowed under financial and production related grounds. Small employers with less than 20 employees follow the termination provisions of the Employment Contracts Act and are obligated to inform the employee to be terminated on the details of the termination itself and also the services of the Employment and Economic Development Office. Employers with 20 or more employees are to initiate co-operation procedure under the Act on Co-operation within Undertakings when reducing personnel. The co- operation negotiations are to inform employees on the employer’s plans and financial situation as well as to involve them in the decision making regarding the terminations. The employer’s duty to inform the employees of the services of Employment and Economic Development Office needs to be fulfilled also in terminations under the co-operation procedure. Discrimination is prohibited in Finland in terminations of employment. As an alternative for terminations, employees can for example be transferred to another position or be temporarily laid off. Employer’s duties related to search of alternatives for layoff are broader in Finland than in California. The recent development of the labor laws in Finland and in California suggests that the labor law is not static in either one of these environments but changes can be expected as the needs of the business life so require.

The best practices in the formation phase of Sino-Finnish joint ventures in China: For Finnish software companies

This study discusses the formation phase of Chinese-Finnish joint ventures in China. The purpose of this thesis is to create best practices for Finnish software companies in forming a joint venture with a local Chinese company in China. Therefore, the main research question, in what are the best practices for forming Sino-Finnish joint ventures in China for Finnish software firms, is examined through four different themes within the joint venture formation phase; the motives, the partner se- lection, the choice of a joint venture type and joint venture negotiations. The theoretical background of the study consists of literature relating to the establishment process of Sino-Western joint ventures in China. The empirical research conducted for this study is based on the expert interviews. The empirical data was gathered via nine semi-structured interviews with both Chinese and Finnish experts in software and technology industry, who have experience or knowledge in establishing Sino-Finnish joint ventures in China. Thematic analysis was used to cat- egorize and interpret the interview data. In addition, a thematic network was built to act as a basis of the analysis. According to the main findings, the main motives for Finnish software companies to establish a joint venture in China are lack of skills or experience, little resources to enter on their own, and China’s large market. The main motives for Chinese companies are to gain new technology or man- agerial skills, and expand internationally. The intellectual property rights (IPR) have recently im- proved a lot in China, but the Finnish companies’ knowledge on IPR is inadequate. The Finnish software companies should conduct a market and industry research in order to understand their po- sition in the market and to find a suitable location and potential joint venture partners. It is essential to define partner selection criteria and partner attributes. In addition, it is important to build the joint venture around complementary motives and a win-win situation between the joint venture partners. The Finnish companies should be prepared that the joint venture negotiations will be challenging and they will take a long time. The challenges can be overcome by gaining understanding about the Chinese culture and business environment. The findings of this study enhance understanding of the joint venture formation phase in China. This study provides guidelines for Finnish software companies to establish a joint venture in China. In addition, this study brings new insights to the Sino-Western joint venture literature with its soft- ware industry context. Future research is, however, necessary in order to gain an understanding of the advantages and disadvantages of a joint venture as an entry mode into China for Finnish soft- ware companies

Climate change and global responsibility - the role of energy consumption, GDP and CO2 emissions

Climate change is one of the biggest challenges faced by this generation. Despite being the single most important environmental challenge facing the planet and despite over two decades of international climate negotiations, global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions continue to rise. By the middle of this century, GHGs must be reduced by as much as 40-70% if dangerous climate change is to be avoided. In the Kyoto Protocol no quantitative emission limitation and reduction commitments were placed on the developing countries. For the planning of the future commitments period and possible participation of developing countries, information of the functioning of the energy systems, CO2 emissions development in different sectors, energy use and technological development in developing countries is essential. In addition to the per capita emissions, the efficiency of the energy system in relation to GHG emissions is crucial for the decision of future long-term burden sharing between countries. Country’s future development of CO2 emissions can be defined by the estimated CO2 intensity of the future and the estimated GDP growth. The changes in CO2 intensity depend on several factors, but generally developed countries’ intensity has been increasing in the industrialization phase and decreasing when their economy shifts more towards the system dominated by the service sector. The level of the CO2 intensity depends by a large extent on the production structure and the energy sources that are used. Currently one of the most urgent issues regarding global climate change is to decide the future of the Kyoto Protocol. Negotiations on this topic have already been initiated, with the aim of being finalised by the 2015. This thesis provides insights into the various approaches that can be used to characterise the concept of comparable efforts for developing countries in a future international climate agreement. The thesis examines the post-Kyoto burden sharing questions for developing countries using the contraction and convergence model, which is one approach that has been proposed to allocate commitments regarding future GHG emissions mitigation. This new approach is a practical tool for the evaluation of the Kyoto climate policy process and global climate change negotiations from the perspective of the developing countries.

Perspectivas das negociações entre o Mercosul e a União Europeia em um contexto de paralisia do sistema multilateral e da nova geografia econômica global

The aim of this paper is to scale the impact of changes in the patterns of international trade and Foreign Investment and how the shift in the world economic geography affects the relations between Mercosur and the European Union. The perception is that the outcome of negotiations between the two blocks is linked to the paralysis of the multilateral system and the European perspective of the economic dimension of the Agreement. The study suggests that the European Union faces conceptual and operational problems to establish clear goals and business strategies towards Mercosur and to insert them under a new global economic geography.