Sur quelques derives de l'acide anthranilique.

Thesis (doctoral)--

Recherches sur l'acide trimelliq.

Thesis (doctoral)--

Contribution a l'etude des derives azoiques de l'acide salicyli...

Thesis (doctoral)--

1re these. Dedoublement de l'acide butanoloique 2. et recherches sur les derives acitifs de cet acide : 2me these. Etude numerique sur la formule transformee de MM. Thorpe et Rucker /

Thesis (doctoral)--Universite de Geneve, 1895.

Recherches sur quelques derives du 2, 4-dinitro-1-naphtol et sur les derives d'azonium obtenus par condensation de l'acide [beta]-naphtoquinone-4-sulfonique avec la phenylorthophenylenediamine /

Thesis (doctoral)--Universitate de Geneve, 1897.

Contribution a l'etude de l'acide nicotique et de quelques-uns de ses derives /

Thesis (doctoral)--Universite de Geneve, 1897.

Sur quelques derives de l'acide 2,6 diaminodiphenylamine-4-carb...

Thesis (doctoral)--

Recherches sur l'acide orthoaldehydophtalique.

Thesis (doctoral)--

Recherches l'action de l'acide chlorhydrique sur divers silicat...

Thesis (doctoral)--

Mémoire sur L'acide salicylique appliqué à la conservation des vins et des mouts.

Mode of access: Internet.

United States duties on imports. 1891. Rev., cor., and supplemented. By Lewis Heyl siisted by Mrs. M. K. Murphy.

Mode of access: Internet.

Workshop on Engineering Turbulence Modeling : proceedings of the Workshop on Engineering Turbulence Modeling sponsored by the Institute for Computational Mechanics in Propulsion and Center for Modeling of Turbulence and Transition, NASA Lewis Research Center, Cleveland, Ohio, August 21-22, 1991.

"ICOMP-92-02; CMOTT-92-02."

Lewis Cass,

Gilt stamped spine.

On labour market dualism in the Lewis model: A comment

In a special issue of this journal commemorating the 50th anniversary of W. Arthur Lewis's (The Manchester School, Vol. 28 (1954), No. 2, pp. 139-191) seminal paper, the Lewis model is treated as a model of labour market dualism (Fields, The Manchester School, Vol. 72 (2004), No. 6, pp. 724-735). This interpretation is flawed for a number of reasons. First, it overemphasizes the role ascribed by Lewis to intersectoral earnings differentials in his original model. Second, it fails to acknowledge that a major shortcoming of the model was its inability to account for the widening intersectoral earnings differential observed across a wide range of developing economies. For Lewis himself this was one of the 'major theoretical puzzles of the period' (1979, p. 150). Third, it ignores Lewis's subsequent revision of the model (Lewis, The Manchester School, Vol. 47 (1979), No. 3, pp. 211-229) that, ironically, incorporates a dual labour market to resolve this puzzle. However, for Lewis the critical issue was dualism within the modern sector, not, as Fields understands it, labour market dualism between the modern and traditional sectors. Fields's appreciation of the contribution of the Lewis model to understanding the process of wage determination in developing economies is therefore misplaced.