The Harmonic Oscillator, a Review of Classical and Elementary Quantum Mechanics

The classical harmonic oscillator and an elementary discussion of the quantum mechanical solutions for the harmonic oscillator are discussed.

Na 50 Nachlass Arthur Schopenhauer - 'Schopenhauer-Archiv', 480 - Konzept der Eingabe zum Urteil zweiter Instanz in der Injuriensache

u.a.: Caroline Marquet; Carolin Médon;

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 32 - Korrespondenzen mit Familie Lehmann (p. I 16, 236-480)

6 Briefe zwischen E. Lederer und Max Horkheimer, 1936-1939; 1 Brief von Theodor W. Adorno an Minna Ledermann, 26.04.1941; 1 Brief von W. W. Lee an Max Horkheimer, 15.11.1938; 69 Brief zwischen Berta Lehmann, Flora Lehmann an Max Horkheimer, 1939-1944; 2 Briefe von Berta Lehmann, Flora Lehmann an Juliette Favez, März 1939; 1 Brief vom Reisebüro Anselm Stuttgart an Max Horkheimer, 02.04.1941; 4 Briefe zwischen der Auswandererstelle Marx Stuttgart und Max Horkheimer, 28.11.1940, 1941; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Karl Adler, 24.01.1941; 2 Briefe von Max Horkheimer an Walter C. Louchheim, 1940; 5 Briefe zwischen dem American Consul General Stuttgart und Max Horkheimer, 1939-23.11.1940; 4 Brief zwischen der Auswandererstelle Adler Stuttgart und Max Horkheimer, 1940; 2 Briefe zwischen der Auswandererstelle Stuttgart und Max Horkheimer, 20.02.1940; 5 Briefe zwischen N. C. Leites und Max Horkheimer, 17.05.1937, 1937; 4 Briefe zwischen Irmgard Lenel und Max Horkheimer, 1941, 1942; 3 Briefe zwischen Heidi Lenssen und Max Horkheimer, 01.02.1937, 1937; 3 Briefe zwischen Theo F. Lentz und Max Horkheimer, 05.07.1945, 1945; 11 Briefe zwischen Jella Lepman und Max Horkheimer,1939-1941; 2 Briefe von Max Horkheimer an das American Consul General London, 1941; 1 Brief von R. Leppla an Max Horkheimer, 21.06.1948; 7 Briefe zwischen Max Lerner und Max Horkheimer, 1941, 1942; 5 Briefe und Beilagen zwischen Adolf Laschnitzer und Max Horkheimer, 1939-1940; 2 Briefe ziwschen dem The Emergency Committee in Aid of Displaced Foreign Scholars, New York und Max Horkheimer, 23.110.1940, 07.11.1940; 3 Briefe und 1 Beilage zwischen Andrée Lespiaut und Max Horkheimer, 13.11.1948; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an A. Lesser, 21.05.1935; 1 Brief von Bobby Level und Frank Level an Max Horkheimer, 20.07.1949; 1 Brief von Julius Walter Levi an Max Horkheimer, 15.05.1940; 1 Brief von Bernhard W. Levmore an Leo Löwenthal, 13.08.1940; 3 Briefe von Margot von Mendelssohn an Bernhard W. Levmore, 1940; 3 Briefe zwischen Ernst Levy und Max Horkheimer, 21.05.1927, 1937; 1 Brief von Erwin Levy an Max Horkheimer, 23.03.1935; 17 Briefe zwsichen Hanna Levy und Max Horkheimer, Friedrich Pollock, 1936-1937; 6 Briefe zwischen Herbert Levy und Friedichpollock, 1939-1940; 1 Brief von Friedrich Pollock an Heinz Langerhans, 11.08.1939; 2 Briefe von Max Horkheimer an die Society of the Protection of Science and Learning, The Scott Polar Research Institut, Cambridge, England, 24.11.1939; 2 Briefe zwischen Marie Levy und Max Horkheimer, 18.12.1938, 03.08.1939; 10 Briefe und 1 Beilage zwischen Max Lexandrowitz, Magarete Lexandrowitz und Max Horkheimer, 1940; 1 Brief vom National Refugee Service New York an Max Horkheimer, 19.03.1940; 1 Rechnung vom Librairie Generale de Droit & de Jurisprudence Paris an Max Horkheimer, 18.05.1938; 2 Briefe zwsichen L. Lichtwitz und Max Horkheimer, 16.04.1936, 25.07.1938;

Ms.Ff.F.Stoltze 3. 480 - Brief von Friedrich Stoltze an Lyda Stoltze

Frankfurter Latern: Produktion, Königstein: Kur, Schmitten

A classical tour through Italy : an 1802

by John Chetwode Eustace

Inc. oct. 480 - [Sammelband in 2 Teilen: Konvolut aus Inkunabeln]

Vorbesitzer: Dominikanerkloster Frankfurt am Main

Ms. Ff. Mus. 480 - Am ersten Ostertag : Cantate auf die Geburt des Prinzen Ferdinand 1754

[vom Seibert]. [Poesie: Reinhard]

Cellular mechanisms of operant and classical conditioning

The ability to associate a predictive stimulus with a subsequent salient event (i.e., classical conditioning) and the ability to associate an expressed behavior with the consequences (i.e., operant conditioning) allow for a predictive understanding of a changing environment. Although they are operationally distinct, there has been considerable debate whether at some fundamental level classical and operant conditioning are mechanistically distinct or similar. Feeding behavior of Aplysia (i.e., biting) was chosen as the model system and was successfully conditioned with appetitive forms of both operant and classical conditioning. The neuronal circuitry responsible for feeding is well understood and is suitable for cellular analyses, thus providing for a mechanistic comparison between these two forms of associative learning. ^ Neuron B51 is part of the feeding circuitry of Aplysia and is critical for the expression of ingestive behaviors. B51 also is a locus of plasticity following both operant and classical conditioning. Both in vivo and in vitro operant conditioning increased the input resistance and the excitability of B51. No pairing-specific changes in the input resistance were observed following both in vivo and in vitro classical conditioning. However, classical conditioning decreased the excitability of B51. Thus, both operant and classical conditioning modified the threshold level for activation of neuron B51, but in opposite directions, revealing key differences in the cellular mechanisms underlying these two forms of associative learning. ^ Next, the cellular mechanisms underlying operant conditioning were investigated in more detail using a single-cell analogue. The single-cell analogue successfully recapitulated the previous in vivo and in vitro operant conditioning results by increasing the input resistance and the excitability of B51. Both PKA and PKC were necessary for operant conditioning. Dopamine appears to be the transmitter mediating the reinforcement signal in this form of conditioning. A D1 dopamine receptor antibody revealed that the D1receptor localizes to the axon hillock, which is also the region that gives the strongest response when iontophoresing dopamine. ^ The studies presented herein, thus, provide for a greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying both of these forms of associative learning and demonstrate that they likely operate through distinct cellular mechanisms. ^

(Table 1) Counts and ratios of microfossils at DSDP Hole 64-480

We examined the relative abundance of various components in the coarse fraction (> 150 µm) from a selected portion of the DSDP Site 480 piston core. The components consist mainly of diatoms, radiolarians, benthic and planktonic foraminifers with minor amounts of sponge spicules, terrigenous material, volcanic glass(?), dehydrated gypsum crystals, and spines of unknown biological origin. The examination shows that the siliceous organisms abound in the laminated sediments and that the calcareous organisms are more abundant in the nonlaminated sediments. Seasonal upwelling is responsible for the deposition of laminated sediments. The upwelling creates a strong oxygen-minimum zone, restricting the occurrence of burrowing benthic organisms and benthic foraminifers.

Gray de Cerdán, Nelly (2013), Universidad y sector científico trabajando para la reducción del riesgo a desastres. Experiencia de una Cátedra Universitaria con proyección internacional. Buenos Aires, Editorial El Escriba CONICET-CETEM Universidad Nacional de Cuyo, 124 p. ISBN: 978-987-605-480-5

Fil: Quiroga, Silvia. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Filosofía y Letras

XIº Congress of the International Federation of the societies of classical studies (FIEC), Kavala (Grecia), 24 al 30 de agosto de 1999

Fil: Galán, Lía Margarita. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación; Argentina.

Ruggiero Romano. Mecanismo y elementos del sistema económico colonial americano. Siglos XVI-XVIII, México, El Colegio de México/Fondo de Cultura Económica, 2004, 480 páginas

Fil: Kraselsky, Javier Gerardo. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación; Argentina.

Anthony J. Bowen, Aeschylus. Suppliant Women. Edited with a Translation, Introduction and Commentary, Aris & Phillips Classical Texts, Oxford, 2013, 374 pp.

Fil: Fernández Deagustini, María del Pilar. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación. Instituto de Investigaciones en Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales (UNLP-CONICET); Argentina.

Michael Lloyd (Ed.). Oxford Readings in Classical Studies. Aeschylus, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2007, i-xv + 418 pp.

Fil: Fernández Deagustini, María del Pilar. Universidad Nacional de La Plata. Facultad de Humanidades y Ciencias de la Educación; Argentina.