Comparison of the efficacy of two commercially available media for culturing one-cell embryos in the in vitro fertilization mouse model

Objective: To examine the effects of two commercial media on the development of mouse ova fertilized in vitro to the blastocyst stage. Design: Animal model. Setting: Academic institution. Animal(s): Eight-week old, superovulated mice. Intervention(s): One-cell embryos cultured in vitro up to the blastocyst stage in potassium-enriched simplex optimized medium (KSOM) or G1/G2 medium. Main Outcome Measure(s): Blastocyst and hatching rates, total cell number count, and proportion of allocation of cells to the inner cell mass (ICM) and trophectoderm (TE). Result(s): The percentage of zygotes that developed to the blastocyst stage 96 and 120 hours after insemination was statistically significantly higher in the KSOM group. The percentage of blastocysts that partially or completely hatched by day 5 of culture was 84% and 71% for the KSOM and G1/G2 groups, respectively, showing a statistically significant difference between the groups. The mean number of ICM cells was 11.7 +/- 4.0 and 9.2 +/- 5.2 for the zygotes cultured in KSOM and G1/G2 media, respectively, revealing a statistically significantly higher cell number in the ICM of blastocysts derived from culture in KSOM medium. The ICM/TE ratio in the blastocysts cultured in KSOM or G1/G2 media was similar in both groups. Conclusion(s): Commercially available KSOM medium is superior to sequential G1/G2 media for culturing one-cell embryos up to the blastocyst stage in the mouse IVF model.

Ovarian reserve evaluation: state of the art

Purpose Revise role of hormonal basal and dynamic tests, as well as ultrasonographic measures as ovarian reserve markers, in order to provide better counseling to subfertile couples. Methods Review of publications on the topic, with an emphasis on recent well designed articles. Results Currently available ovarian reserve tests do not provide sufficient evidence to be solely considered ideal, even for premature ovarian senescence patients who do not present subfertility complaints. However, these markers occupy important place in initial approach to treatment of subfertile couples, predicting unsatisfactory results that could be improved by differentiated induction schemes and reducing excessive psychological and financial burdens, and adverse effects. Conclusions In order to remedy the limitations due to the scarcity of strong evidence about this topic, future studies should try to clarify predictive value of markers in groups of specific diseases-related subfertility and pay special attention to propaedeutic multivariate models including anti-Mullerian hormone and antral follicle count.