National Crash Severity Study - quality control. Task V: analysis to refine spinout aspects of CRASH. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

National Crashworthiness Severity Study. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Housing discrimination study : incidence and severity of unfavorable treatment /

"HUD-1327-PDR"--Cover p. 4.

Preliminary findings from the National Crash Severity Study (NCSS).

Mode of access: Internet.

Restraint usage and effectiveness on the National Crash Severity Study.

Mode of access: Internet.

Preliminary analysis of the National Crash Severity Study: factors in fatal accidents.

Mode of access: Internet.

Tri-level study: modification. Task 2: final report on driver/vehicle characteristics related to vehicle condition and causation and an assessment of Indiana PMVI effectiveness to reduce the frequency and severity of accident causes by vehicular-related malfunctions/degradations. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

Supplemental National Crash Severity Study accident reconstruction. Final report.

National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Washington, D.C.

The severity of large truck accidents.

Mode of access: Internet.

Feasibility of a grade severity rating system /

Mode of access: Internet.

A review of severity of illness rating systems /

Review conducted by Janice M. Moore.

Analysis of the refined DRG as a severity of illness system : the Illinois experience /

Cover title.

Quality assurance experience with the randomized neuropathic bone pain trial (Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group, 96.05)

Background and purpose: Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group 96.05 is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing a single 8 Gy with 20 Gy in five fractions of radiotherapy (RT) for neuropathic pain due to bone metastases. This paper summarizes the quality assurance (QA) activities for the first 234 patients (accrual target 270). Materials and methods: Independent audits to assess compliance with eligibility/exclusion criteria and appropriateness of treatment of the index site were conducted after each cohort of approximately 45 consecutive patients. Reported serious adverse events (SAEs) in the form of cord/cauda equina compression or pathological fracture developing at the index site were investigated and presented in batches to the Independent Data Monitoring Committee. Finally, source data verification of the RT prescription page and treatment records was undertaken for each of the first 234 patients to assess compliance with the protocol. Results: Only one patient was found conclusively not to have genuine neuropathic pain, and there were no detected 'geographical misses' with RT fields. The overall rate of detected infringements for other eligibility criteria over five audits (225 patients) was 8% with a dramatic improvement after the first audit. There has at no stage been a statistically significant difference in SAEs by randomization arm. There was a 22% rate of RT protocol variations involving ten of the 14 contributing centres, although the rate of major dose violations (more than +/- 10% from protocol dose) was only 6% with no statistically significant difference by randomization arm (P = 0.44). Conclusions: QA auditing is an essential but time-consuming component of RT trials, including those assessing palliative endpoints. Our experience confirms that all aspects should commence soon after study activation. Crown Copyright (C) 2003 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

The role of catastrophic misinterpretation of bodily sensations and panic self-efficacy in predicting panic severity

This study investigated the role of both negative and positive cognitions in predicting panic severity in an international sample of patients diagnosed with panic disorder (with and without agoraphobia). One hundred and fifty-nine patients were administered the Brief Bodily Sensations Interpretation Questionnaire (BBSIQ), the Self-efficacy to Control Panic Attacks Questionnaire, and the Panic and Agoraphobia Scale (PAS) prior to receiving treatment. Regression analyses indicated that both catastrophic misinterpretation of bodily sensations and panic self-efficacy independently predicted panic severity. The influence of panic self-efficacy upon panic severity remained significant even after controlling for the presence or absence of agoraphobia. There was no evidence to suggest a moderating relationship between the two cognitive factors. Results are discussed in terms of the need to consider both negative and positive cognitions in cognitive accounts of panic disorder. (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.