Hypersensitivity of an Arabidopsis Sugar Signaling Mutant toward Exogenous Proline Application

In transgenic Arabidopsis a patatin class I promoter from potato is regulated by sugars and proline (Pro), thus integrating signals derived from carbon and nitrogen metabolism. In both cases a signaling cascade involving protein phosphatases is involved in induction. Other endogenous genes are also regulated by both Pro and carbohydrates. Chalcone synthase (CHS) gene expression is induced by both, whereas the Pro biosynthetic Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate synthetase (P5CS) is induced by high Suc concentrations but repressed by Pro, and Pro dehydrogenase (ProDH) is inversely regulated. The mutantrsr1-1, impaired in sugar dependent induction of the patatin promoter, is hypersensitive to low levels of external Pro and develops autofluorescence and necroses. Toxicity of Pro can be ameliorated by salt stress and exogenously supplied metabolizable carbohydrates. The rsr1-1 mutant shows a reduced response regarding sugar induction of CHS andP5CS expression. ProDH expression is de-repressed in the mutant but still down-regulated by sugar. Pro toxicity seems to be mediated by the degradation intermediate Δ1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate. Induction of the patatin promoter by carbohydrates and Pro, together with the Pro hypersensitivity of the mutant rsr1-1, demonstrate a new link between carbon/nitrogen and stress responses.

GENETIC ORGANIZATION OF THE STRUCTURAL GENES FOR NITRATE REDUCTASE (TN5)

Nitrate reductase in Escherichia coli is a membrane-bound anaerobic enzyme that is repressed by oxygen and induced by nitrate. The genetic organization of the structural genes for the two larger subunits of nitrate reductase ((alpha) and (beta)) was determined by immunoprecipitation analysis of the formation of these proteins in nitrate reductase-deficient mutants resulting from transposon Tn5 mutagenesis. The results suggested that the genes encoding the (alpha) and (beta) subunits (narG and H) were arranged in an operon with transcription in the direction promoter(--->)(alpha)(--->)(beta). Segments of the chromosome containing the Tn5 inserts from several of the mutants were cloned into plasmid pBR322 and the positions of the transposons determined by restriction mapping. The Tn5 insertion sites were localized on two contiguous EcoRI fragments spanning about 6.6 kilobases of DNA. The narI gene (proposed to encode the (gamma) subunit) was positioned immediately downstream from the (beta)-gene (narH) by Southern analysis of Tn10 insertions into the narI locus. A Tn10 insertion into the narK locus, proposed to encode a nitrate-sensitive repressor of other anaerobic enzymes, was located about 1.5 kilobases upstream from the narGHI operon promoter. The narL locus, proposed to encode a nitrate-sensitive positive regulator of the narGHI operon and known to be genetically linked to the other nar genes, was demonstrated to lie outside a 19.3-kilobase region of the chromosome which encompasses the other nar genes. The physical limit of the narGHI promoter was defined by studying the effect of Tn5 insertions into a hybrid plasmid containing the functional operon. The points of origin of the coding regions for the (alpha) and (beta) genes were deduced by alignment of the chromosomal map of Tn5 insertion sites with the sizes of (alpha) and (beta) subunit fragments produced by plasmids carrying these Tn5 inserts in the nar operon. The coding region for the (alpha) subunit (143,000 daltons) begins about 250 nucleotides downstream from the deduced limit of the promoter region and includes about 4.0 kilobases of DNA; the region encoding (beta) (60,000 daltons) lies immediately downstream from the (alpha)-gene and is approximately 1.6 kilobases in length. The adjacent region encoding the (gamma) subunit (19,000 daltons) is approximately 0.5 kilobase in length. ^

Analysis of Lim1 LIM domains in mouse development

Transcriptional regulation is fundamental for the precise development of all organisms. Through tight regulation, necessary genes are activated at proper spatial and temporal patterns, while unnecessary genes are repressed. A large family of regulator proteins that have been demonstrated to be involved in various developmental processes by activation and repression of target genes is the homeodomain family of proteins. To date, the function of many of these homeoproteins has been elucidated in diverse species. However, the molecular mechanism underlying the function of these proteins has not been fully understood. In this study, the molecular mechanism of the function of a LIM-homeoprotein, Lim1, was examined. In addition to the homeodomain, Lim1 contains two LIM domains that are highly conserved among species. This high conservation along with data from in vitro studies on Xenopus Lim1 suggests that the LIM domains might be important for the function of Lim1 as a transcriptional regulator. Here, the functional importance of the LIM domains of Lim1 was determined by using a novel gene-targeting strategy in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells. A cre-loxP system was used in conjunction with the unique genomic organization of Lim1 to obtain four types of mutant ES cell lines that would allow for the in vivo analysis of the function of both the LIM domains of Lim1 together and also singularly. These four mutant Lim1 alleles either contained base-pair changes at the LIM encoding exons that alters zinc-binding amino acids of the LIM domains or contained only exogenous loxP sequences in the first intron of Lim1, which serves as the control allele. These mutations in the LIM domains would presumably abolish the zinc-finger tertiary structure of the domain and thus render the domain non-functional. Mice carrying mutations at both the LIM domains of Lim1, L1L2, die around E10 without anterior head structures anterior to rhombomere 3, identical in phenotype to the Lim1 null mutants in spite of the presence of mutant Lim1 RNA. This result demonstrates that the integrity of both the LIM domains are essential for the function of Lim1. This is further supported by the phenotype of mice carrying mutation at only the second LIM domain of Lim1, L2. The L2 mice although still carrying one intact Lim1 LIM domain, also die in utero. The L2 mice die at varying times, from around E8 to E10 with anterior defects in addition to other axial defects which have yet to be fully characterized. The results of this study so far demonstrates that the integrity of both LIM domains are required for the function of Lim1. ^

Functional requirements of histone deacetylases in Tup1-Ssn6 repression

The corepressor complex Tup1-Ssn6 regulates many classes of genes in yeast including cell type specific, glucose repressible, and DNA damage inducible. Tup1 and Ssn6 are recruited to target promoters through their interactions with specific DNA binding proteins such as α2, Mig1, and Crt1. Most promoters that are repressed by this corepressor complex exhibit a high degree of nucleosomal organization. This chromatin domain occludes transcription factor access to the promoter element resulting in gene repression. Previous work indicated that Tup1 interacts with underacetylated isoforms of H3 and H4, and that mutation of these histones synergistically compromises repression. These studies predict that Tup1-hypoacetyalted histone interaction is important to the repression mechanism, and in vivo hyperacetylation might compromise the corepressors ability to repress target genes. ^ One way to alter histone acetylation levels in vivo is to alter the balance between histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases. To date five histone deacetylases (HDACs) have been identified in yeast Rpd3, Hos1, Hos2, Hos3 and Hda1. Deletion of single or double HDAC genes had little to no effect on Tup1-Ssn6 repression, but simultaneous deletion of three specific activities Rpd3, Hos1, and Hos2 abolished repression in vivo. Promoter regions of Tup1-Ssn6 target genes in these triple deacetylase mutant cells are dramatically hyperacetylated in both H3 and H4. Examination of bulk histone acetylation levels showed that this specific HDAC triple mutant combination (rpd3 hos1 hos2) caused a dramatic and concomitant hyperacetylation of both H3 and H4. The loss of repression in the rpd3 hos1 hos2 cells, but not in other mutants, is consistent with previous observations, which indicate that histones provide redundant functions in the repression mechanism and that high levels of acetylation are required to prevent Tup1 binding. Investigation into a potential direct interaction between the Tup1-Ssn6 corepressor complex and one or more HDAC activities showed that both Rpd3 and Hos2 interact with the corepressor complex in vivo. These findings indicate that Tup1-Ssn6 repression involves the recruitment of histone deacetylase activities to target promoters, where they locally deacetylate histone residues promoting Tup1-histone tail interaction to initiate and/or maintain the repressed state. ^

The heparan sulfate-fibroblast growth factor signaling system in liver growth and function

The heparan sulfate (HS)-fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling system is a ubiquitous regulator that senses local environmental changes and mediates cell-to-cell communication. This system consists of three mutually interactive components. These are regulatory polypeptides (FGF), FGF receptor (FGFR) and heparan sulfate proteoglycans (FGFRHS). All four FGFR genes are expressed in the adult liver. Expression of the FGFR1–3 genes is generally associated with non-parenchymal cells while expression of the FGFR4 gene is associated with parenchymal hepatocytes. We showed that livers of mice lacking FGFR4 exhibited normal morphology and regenerated normally in response to partial hepatectomy. However, the FGFR4 (−/−) mice exhibited depleted gallbladders, an elevated bile acid pool and elevated excretion of bile acids. Cholesterol- and bile acid-controlled liver cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase (Cyp7a), the limiting enzyme for bile acid synthesis, was elevated, unresponsive to dietary cholesterol, but repressed normally by dietary cholate. These results indicated that FGFR4 was not directly involved in liver growth but exerted negative control on liver bile acid synthesis. This was confirmed in transgenic mice overexpressing the constitutively active human FGFR4 in livers. The transgenic mice exhibited decreased fecal bile acid excretion, bile acid pool size, and expression of Cyp7a. Introduction of this constitutively active human FGFR4 into FGFR4 (−/−) mice restored the inhibition of bile acid synthesis. Activation of the c-Jun N-terminal Kinase (JNK) pathway by FGFR4 correlated with the repressive effect on bile acid synthesis. ^ To determine whether FGFR4 played a broader role in liver-specific metabolic function, we examined the impact of both acute and chronic exposure to CCl 4 in FGFR4 (−/−) mice. Following acute CCl4 exposure, the FGFR4 (−/−) mice exhibited accelerated liver injury, a significant increase in liver mass and delayed hepatolobular repair, with no apparent effect on liver cell proliferation and restoration of cellularity. Chronic CCl4 exposure resulted in severe fibrosis in livers of FGFR4 (−/−) mice compared to normal mice. Analysis at both mRNA and protein levels indicated an 8 hr delay in FGFR4-deficient mice in the down-regulation of cytochrome P450 2E1 (CYP2E1) protein, the major enzyme whose products underlie CCl 4-induced injury. These results show that hepatocyte FGFR4 protects against acute and chronic insult to the liver and prevents accompanying fibrosis. ^ Of the 23 FGF polypeptides, FGF1 and FGF2 are present at significant levels in the liver. To determine whether FGF1 and FGF2 played a role in CCl 4-induced liver injury and fibrosis, we examined the impact of both acute and chronic exposure to CCl4 in both wild-type and FGF1-FGF2 double-knockout mice. Following acute CCl4 exposure, FGF1(−/−)FGF2(−/−) mice exhibited accelerated liver injury, overall normal liver growth and repair, and decreased liver collagen α1(I) induction. Liver fibrosis resulting from chronic CCl4 exposure was markedly decreased in livers of FGF1(−/−)FGF2(−/−) mice compared to wild-type mice. This study suggests a role for FGF1 and FGF2 in hepatic fibrogenesis. ^ In summary, our three part study shows that specific components of the ubiquitous HS-FGF signaling family in the liver context interfaces with metabolite- and xenobiotic-controlled networks to regulate liver function, but has no apparent direct effect on liver cell growth. ^

A Generic Model of Financial Repression

The paper develops a growth model in an overlapping generations framework of a financially repressed small open economy, and analyzes the effects of financial liberalization. The following observations are made: An increase (decrease) of interest rate (reserve requirements) reduces (increases) the steady-state stock of capital and the trade balance, but improves (deteriorates) the level of foreign exchange reserves. However, financial liberalization, in any form, is always welfare-improving. The paper, thus, advocates financial liberalization policies to be oriented towards reduction of reserve requirements rather than interest rate deregulation, if foreign reserve holding is not in a critical position.

Financial Liberalization and Inflationary Dynamics in the Context of a Small Open Economy

The paper develops a short-run model of a small open financially repressed economy characterized by unorganized money markets, capital good imports, capital mobility, wage indexation, and flexible exchange rates. The analysis shows that financial liberalization, in the form of an increased rate of interest on deposits and tight monetary policy, unambiguously and unconditionally causes deflation. Moreover, the results do not depend on the degree of capital mobility and structure of wage setting. The paper recommends that a small open developing economy should deregulate interest rates and tighten monetary policy if reducing inflation is a priority. The pre-requisite for such a policy, however, requires the establishment of a flexible exchange rate regime.

POU domain transcription factor Brn3b is critical for the normal development and survival of retinal ganglion cells

The POU domain transcription factor Brn3b/POU4F2 plays a critical role regulating gene expression in mouse retinal ganglion cells (RGCs). Previous investigations have shown that Brn3b is not required for initial cell fate specification or migration; however, it is essential for normal RGC differentiation. In contrast to wild type axons, the mutant neurites were phenotypically different: shorter, rougher, disorganized, and poorly fasciculated. Wild type axons stained intensely with axon specific marker tau-1, while mutant projections were weakly stained and the mutant projections showed strong labeling with dendrite specific marker MAP2. Brn-3b mutant axonal projections contained more microtubules and fewer neurofilaments, a dendritic characteristic, than the wild type. The mutant neurites also exhibited significantly weaker staining of neurofilament low-molecular-weight (NF-L) in the axon when compared to the wild type, and NF-L accumulation in the neuron cell body. The absence of Brn-3b results in an inability to form normal axons and enhanced apoptosis in RGCs, suggesting that Brn-3b may control a set of genes involved in axon formation. ^ Brn3b contains several distinct sequence motifs: a glycine/serine rich region, two histidine rich regions, and a fifteen amino acid conserved sequence shared by all Brn3 family members in the N-terminus and a POU specific and POU homeodomain in the C-terminus. Brn3b activates a Luciferase reporter over 25 fold in cell culture when binding to native brn3 binding sites upstream of a minimal promoter. When fused to the Gal4 DNA Binding domain (DBD) and driven by either a strong (CMV) or weaker (pAHD) promoter, the N-terminal of Brn3b is capable of similar activation when binding to Gal4 UAS sites, indicating a presumptive activator of transcription. Both full length Brn3b or the C-terminus fused to the Gal4DBD and driven by pCMV repressed a Luciferase reporter downstream of UAS binding sites. Lower levels of expression of the fusion protein driven by pADH resulted in an alleviation of repression. This repression appears to be a limitation of this system of transcriptional analysis and a potential pitfall in conventional pCMV based transfection assays. ^

Negative regulation of Drosophila Transformer2 by SR splicing factors

The Drosophila Transformer-2 (Tra2) protein activates the splicing of doublesex and fruitless pre-mRNA and represses M1 intron splicing in its own RNA in male germline. The M1 retention is part of negative feedback mechanism that controls Tra2 protein synthesis. However it is not known how the M1 intron is repressed or why Tra2 activates splicing of some RNAs while repressing splicing in others. Here we show that Tra2 and SR protein Rbp1 function together to specifically repress M1 splicing in vitro through the same intronic silencer by binding independently to distinct sites. The role of Rbp1 in M1 repression in vivo was validated by the finding that increased expression of Rbp1 in S2 cells promotes M1 retention. Furthermore, Tra2 blocks prespliceosomal A complex formation, a step corresponding to U2 snRNP recruitment to the branchpoint. High levels of Tra2 repression require an upstream enhancer. Together, we propose that the complex formed by Tra2 and Rbp1 on the silencer achieves splicing repression by blocking the recognition of the branchpoint or antagonizing enhancer function. ^ In addition, both splicing regulatory activities of Tra2 are essential developmental events, doublesex splicing is the key for Drosophila sex determination in the soma, while M1 retention occurs in the male germline and is necessary for spermatogenesis. However, active Tra2 is expressed ubiquitously. So another issue we have studied is how Tra2 accomplishes negative and positive splicing regulation in a tissue-specific fashion. Surprisingly, we found that nuclear extract from somatically-derived S2 cells support M1 repression in vitro. This led us to hypothesize that no germline specific factor is required and that high levels of Tra2 expression in the male germline is sufficient to trigger M1 retention. To test it, I examined whether increased expression of Tra2 could promote M1 retention in cells outside male germline. My results show that increased Tra2 expression promotes M1 retention in somatically-derived S2 cells as well as in the somatic tissues of living flies. These results show that somatic tissues are capable of supporting M1 repression but do not normally do so because the low levels of Tra2 do not trigger negative feedback regulation. ^

Tp53-dependent repression of cell cycle target genes: Global and mechanistic analysis

Most studies of p53 function have focused on genes transactivated by p53. It is less widely appreciated that p53 can repress target genes to affect a particular cellular response. There is evidence that repression is important for p53-induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. It is less clear if repression is important for other p53 functions. A comprehensive knowledge of the genes repressed by p53 and the cellular processes they affect is currently lacking. We used an expression profiling strategy to identify p53-responsive genes following adenoviral p53 gene transfer (Ad-p53) in PC3 prostate cancer cells. A total of 111 genes represented on the Affymetrix U133A microarray were repressed more than two fold (p ≤ 0.05) by p53. An objective assessment of array data quality was carried out using RT-PCR of 20 randomly selected genes. We estimate a confirmation rate of >95.5% for the complete data set. Functional over-representation analysis was used to identify cellular processes potentially affected by p53-mediated repression. Cell cycle regulatory genes exhibited significant enrichment (p ≤ 5E-28) within the repressed targets. Several of these genes are repressed in a p53-dependent manner following DNA damage, but preceding cell cycle arrest. These findings identify novel p53-repressed targets and indicate that p53-induced cell cycle arrest is a function of not only the transactivation of cell cycle inhibitors (e.g., p21), but also the repression of targets that act at each phase of the cell cycle. The mechanism of repression of this set of p53 targets was investigated. Most of the repressed genes identified here do not harbor consensus p53 DNA binding sites but do contain binding sites for E2F transcription factors. We demonstrate a role for E2F/RB repressor complexes in our system. Importantly, p53 is found at the promoter of CDC25A. CDC25A protein is rapidly degraded in response to DNA damage. Our group has demonstrated for the first time that CDC25A is also repressed at the transcript level by p53. This work has important implications for understanding the DNA damage cell cycle checkpoint response and the link between E2F/RB complexes and p53 in the repression of target genes. ^

Hypoxia-induced transcriptional regulation through chromatin modifications and NC2 function

In response to tumor hypoxia, specific genes that promote angiogenesis, proliferation, and survival are induced. Globally, I find that hypoxia induces a mixed pattern of histone modifications that are typically associated with either transcriptional activation or repression. Furthermore, I find that selective activation of hypoxia-inducible genes occurs simultaneously with widespread repression of transcription. I analyzed histone modifications at the core promoters of hypoxia-repressed and -activated genes and find that distinct patterns of histone modifications correlate with transcriptional activity. Additionally, I discovered that trimethylated H3-K4, a modification generally associated with transcriptional activation, is induced at both hypoxia-activated and repressed genes, suggesting a novel pattern of histone modifications induced during hypoxia. ^ In order to determine the mechanism of hypoxia-induced widespread repression of transcription, I focused my studies on negative cofactor 2 (NC2). Previously, we found that hypoxia-induced repression of the alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) gene occurs during preinitiation complex (PIC) assembly, and I find that NC2, an inhibitor of PIC assembly, is induced during hypoxia. Moreover, I find that the beta subunit of NC2 is essential for hypoxia-mediated repression of AFP, as well as the widespread repression of transcription observed during hypoxia. Previous data in Drosophila and S. cerevisiae indicate that NC2 functions as either an activator or a repressor of transcription. The mechanism of NC2-mediated activation remains unclear; although, Drosophila NC2 function correlates with specific core promoter elements. I tested if NC2 activates transcription in mammalian cells using this core promoter-specific model as a guide. Utilizing site-specific mutagenesis, I find that NC2 function in mammalian cells is not dependent upon specific core promoter elements; however, I do find that mammalian NC2 does function in a gene-specific manner as either an activator or repressor of transcription during hypoxia. Furthermore, I find that binding of the alpha subunit of NC2 specifically correlates with NC2-mediated transcriptional activation. NC2α and NC2β are both required for NC2-mediated transcriptional activation; whereas, NC2β alone is required for hypoxia-induced transcriptional repression. Together, these data indicate that hypoxia mediates changes in gene expression through both chromatin modifications and NC2 function. ^

The INO80 chromatin remodeling complex is involved in the nucleotide excision repair pathway

The genomic DNA of eukaryotic cells is well organized into chromatin structures. However, these repressed structures present barriers that block the access of regulatory factors to the genome during various nuclear events. To overcome the obstacle, two major cellular processes, post-modification of histone tails and ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling, are involved in reconfiguring chromatin structure and creating accessible DNA. Despite the current research progress, much remains to be explored concerning the relationship between chromatin remodeling and DNA repair. Recently, one member of the ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes, INO80, has been found to play a crucial role in DNA damage repair. However, the functions of this complex in higher eukaryotes have yet to be determined. The goal of my study is to generate a human somatic INO80 conditional knockout model and investigate the functions of Ino80 in damage repair.^ By homologous targeting of the INO80 locus in human HCT116 colon epithelial cells, I established a human somatic INO80 conditional knockout model. I have demonstrated that the conditional INO80 cells exhibited a sufficiently viable period when the INO80 protein is removed. Moreover, I found that loss of INO80 resulted in deficient UV lesion repair in response to UV while the protein levels of the NER factors such as XPC, XPA, XPD were not affected. And in vitro repair synthesis assay showed that the NER incision and repair synthesis activities were intact in the absence of INO80. Examination on the damage recognition factor XPC showed its recruitment to damage sites was impaired in the INO80 mutant cells. Loss of INO80 also led to reduced enrichment of XPA at the site of UV lesions. Despite the reduced recruitment of XPC and XPA observed in INO80 mutants, no direct interaction was detected. Meanwhile, direct interaction between INO80 and DDB1, the initial UV lesion detector, was detected by coimmunoprecipitation. UV-induced chromosome relaxation was reduced in cells devoid of INO80. These results demonstrate the INO80 complex may participates in the NER by interacting with DDB1 and having a critical role of in creating DNA accessibility for the nucleotide excision pathway. ^

DNA methylation inhibits p53 mediated survivin repression in cancer cells

Survivin (BIRC5) is a member of the Inhibitor of Apoptosis (IAP) gene family and functions as a chromosomal passenger protein as well as a mediator of cell survival. Survivin is widely expressed during embryonic development then becomes transcriptionally silent in most highly differentiated adult tissues. It is also overexpressed in virtually every type of tumor. The survivin promoter contains a canonical CpG island that has been described as epigenetically regulated by DNA methylation. We observed that survivin is overexpressed in high grade, poorly differentiated endometrial tumors, and we hypothesized that DNA hypomethylation could explain this expression pattern. Surprisingly, methylation specific PCR and bisulfite pyrosequencing analysis showed that survivin was hypermethylated in endometrial tumors and that this hypermethylation correlated with increased survivin expression. We proposed that methylation could activate survivin expression by inhibit the binding of a transcriptional repressor. ^ The tumor suppressor protein p53 is a well documented transcriptional repressor of survivin and examination of the survivin promoter showed that the p53 binding site contains 3 CpG sites which often become methylated in endometrial tumors. To determine if methylation regulates survivin expression, we treated HCT116 cells with decitabine, a demethylation agent, and observed that survivin transcript and protein levels were significantly repressed following demethylation in a p53 dependent manner. Subsequent binding studies confirmed that DNA methylation inhibited the binding of p53 protein to its binding site in the survivin promoter. ^ We are the first to report this novel mechanism of epigenetic regulation of survivin. We also conducted microarray analysis which showed that many other cancer relevant genes may also be regulated in this manner. While demethylation agents are traditionally thought to inhibit cancer cell growth by reactivating tumor suppressors, our results indicate that an additional important mechanism is to decrease the expression of oncogenes. ^

Transcriptional regulation of lung tumor suppressor GPRC5A in malignant and normal cells

Chronic exposure of the airways to cigarette smoke induces inflammatory response and genomic instability that play important roles in lung cancer development. Nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB), the major intracellular mediator of inflammatory signals, is frequently activated in preneoplastic and malignant lung lesions. ^ Previously, we had shown that a lung tumor suppressor GPRC5A is frequently repressed in human non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) cells and lung tumor specimens. Recently, other groups have shown that human GPRC5A transcript levels are higher in bronchial samples of former than of current smokers. These results suggested that smoking represses GPRC5A expression and thus promotes the occurrence of lung cancer. We hypothesized that cigarette smoking or associated inflammatory response repressed GPRC5A expression through NF-κB signaling. ^ To determine the effect of inflammation, we examined GPRC5A protein expression in several lung cell lines following by TNF-α treatment. TNF-α significantly suppressed GPRC5A expression in normal small airway epithelial cells (SAEC) as well as in Calu-1 cells. Real-time PCR analysis indicated that TNF-α inhibits GPRC5A expression at the transcriptional level. NF-κB, the major downstream effectors of TNF-α signaling, mediates TNF-α-induced repression of GPRC5A because over-expression of NF-κB suppressed GPRC5A. To determine the region in the GPRC5A promoter through which NF-κB acts, we examined the ability of TNF-α to inhibit a series of reporter constructs with different deletions of GPRC5A promoter. The luciferase assay showed that the potential NF-κB binding sites containing region are irresponsible for TNF-α-induced suppression. Further analysis using constructs with different deletions in p65 revealed that NF-κB-mediated repression of GPRC5A is transcription-independent. Co-immunoprecipitation assays revealed that NF-κB could form a complex with RAR/RXR heterodimer. Moreover, the inhibitory effect of NF-κB has been found to be proportional to NF-κB/RAR ratio in luciferase assay. Finally, Chromatin IP demonstrated that NF-κB/p65 bound to GPRC5A promoter as well as RAR/RXR and suppressed transcription. Taken together, we propose that inflammation-induced NF-κB activation disrupts the RA signaling and suppresses GPRC5A expression and thus contributes to the oncogenesis of lung cancer. Our studies shed new light on the pathogenesis of lung cancer and potentially provide novel interventions for preventing and treating this disease. ^

S100A4 is a molecular mediator of endometrial carcinoma invasion

The molecular mechanisms of endometrail cancer invasion are poorly understood. S100A4, a member of the S100 Ca2+-binding protein family, was identified by oligonucleotide microarray qRT-PCR, and IHC, to be highly overexpressed in invasive endometrial carcinomas compared to non-invasive tumors. HEC-1A endometrial cancer cells transfected with S100A4 siRNA had undetectable S100A4 protein, decreased migration and invasion. The mechanism of S100A4 upregulation in endometrial cancer remains unclear. Methylation of the S100A4 gene was detected in benign endometrial glands and grade 1 tumors with no S100A4 expression. In contrast, grade 3 endometrioid tumors with high S100A4 expression showed no methylation of the gene. 5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine, an inhibitor of DNA methyltransferase, induced the expression of S100A4 in the less invasive EC cell line, KLE, in which the S100A4 gene is hypermethylated and minimally expressed. S100A4 was induced during TGF-β1-triggered cell scattering in HEC-1A cells, in which S100A4 was demethylated. Transfection of HEC-1A cells with S100A4 siRNA significantly reduced the effect of TGF-β1 on basal migration and invasion. Our preliminary data suggested that this upregulation was mediated by the transcription factor Snail. One Snail binding consensus site was found in the region where DNA methylation was closely correlated with S100A4 gene expression. Chromatin immunoprecipitation assay confirmed the binding of Snail to this consensus site in HEC-1A cells. In SPEC2 endometrial cancer cells, loss of Snail leads to repressed S100A4 gene expression. Similar to S100A4, Snail was overexpressed in aggressive endometrial tumors. Our study suggested that the S100A4 gene was demethylated and further upregulated by the TGF-β1 and Snail pathway in invasive endometrial cancer. S100A4 could potentially serve as a good molecular marker for invasiveness and a target for therapeutic intervention for advanced endometrial cancer. ^