The p120-catenin/Kaiso signaling pathway

The canonical and non-canonical Wnt signaling pathways appear to interact with one another as a network in development, or when hyper-activated, in the progression of disease. A much studied key mediator of the canonical Wnt pathway, β-catenin, is characterized by a central armadillo-repeat domain that engages in multiple protein-protein interactions, such as those with cadherins functioning at cell-cell contact regions. In the nucleus, β-catenin forms a complex with the repressor TCF/LEF, promoting the activation of genes participating in processes such as proliferation, differentiation and stem cell survival. Somewhat similarly, the p120-catenin binds the distinct transcriptional repressor Kaiso, relieving Kaiso-mediated repression to promote gene activation. Here, employing Xenopus laevis, I report upon both downstream and upstream aspects of the p120-catenin/Kaiso pathway which was previously poorly understood. I first show that Kaiso, a BTB/POZ zinc-finger family member, directly represses canonical Wnt gene targets (Siamois, c-Fos, Cyclin-D1 and c-Myc) in conjunction with TCF. Depletion or dominant-negative inhibition of xKaiso results in Siamois de-repression, while xKaiso over-expression induces additional Siamois repression through recruitment of N-CoR co-repressor and chromatin modifications. Functional interdependencies are further corroborated by the capacity of Kaiso to suppress β-catenin-induced axis duplication. Thus, my work inter-relates the p120-catenin/Kaiso and β-catenin/TCF pathways at the level of specific gene promoters important in development and cancer progression. Regarding upstream aspects of the p120-catenin/Kaiso pathway, I collaboratively identified p120 in association with Frodo, a protein previously identified as a component of the canonical (β-catenin dependent) Wnt pathway. I determined that canonical Wnt signals result in Frodo-mediated stabilization of p120-catenin, resulting in the sequestration of Kaiso to the cytoplasm and thereby the activation (relief of repression) of gene targets. Developmental evidence supporting this view included findings that Frodo has the capacity to partially rescue Kaiso over-expression phenotypes in early Xenopus embryos. Taken together, my studies point to the convergence of p120-catenin/Kaiso and β-catenin/TCF signaling pathways at the level of gene transcription as well as at more upstream points during vertebrate development. ^

Tp53-dependent repression of cell cycle target genes: Global and mechanistic analysis

Most studies of p53 function have focused on genes transactivated by p53. It is less widely appreciated that p53 can repress target genes to affect a particular cellular response. There is evidence that repression is important for p53-induced apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. It is less clear if repression is important for other p53 functions. A comprehensive knowledge of the genes repressed by p53 and the cellular processes they affect is currently lacking. We used an expression profiling strategy to identify p53-responsive genes following adenoviral p53 gene transfer (Ad-p53) in PC3 prostate cancer cells. A total of 111 genes represented on the Affymetrix U133A microarray were repressed more than two fold (p ≤ 0.05) by p53. An objective assessment of array data quality was carried out using RT-PCR of 20 randomly selected genes. We estimate a confirmation rate of >95.5% for the complete data set. Functional over-representation analysis was used to identify cellular processes potentially affected by p53-mediated repression. Cell cycle regulatory genes exhibited significant enrichment (p ≤ 5E-28) within the repressed targets. Several of these genes are repressed in a p53-dependent manner following DNA damage, but preceding cell cycle arrest. These findings identify novel p53-repressed targets and indicate that p53-induced cell cycle arrest is a function of not only the transactivation of cell cycle inhibitors (e.g., p21), but also the repression of targets that act at each phase of the cell cycle. The mechanism of repression of this set of p53 targets was investigated. Most of the repressed genes identified here do not harbor consensus p53 DNA binding sites but do contain binding sites for E2F transcription factors. We demonstrate a role for E2F/RB repressor complexes in our system. Importantly, p53 is found at the promoter of CDC25A. CDC25A protein is rapidly degraded in response to DNA damage. Our group has demonstrated for the first time that CDC25A is also repressed at the transcript level by p53. This work has important implications for understanding the DNA damage cell cycle checkpoint response and the link between E2F/RB complexes and p53 in the repression of target genes. ^

Mechanisms of heterosynaptic modulation of transmission in Aplysia

Heterosynaptic plasticity has received considerable attention as a means to induce and maintain cell-wide, as opposed to synapse-specific, learning-related modifications. Modulatory neurotransmitters are thought to provide the attentional and motivational state for memory formation. However, the cellular and molecular mechanisms mediating the effects of most of these modulators on synaptic plasticity and learning remain unclear. A well established system for the study of heterosynaptic plasticity is the Aplysia sensorimotor synapse, which is subject regulation by at least two neuromodulators, serotonin (5-HT) and FMRFa. ^ 5-HT engages multiple second messenger cascades to induce short- and long-term facilitation (STF and LTF, respectively) of synaptic transmission. One mechanism proposed to be involved in STF is mobilization of synaptic vesicles from a storage pool to a releasable pool. To investigate this hypothesis, we examined the involvement of the protein synapsin, a central element in the regulation of the storage pool of vesicles in nerve terminals, in STF. 5-HT induced phosphorylation of synapsin and modified its subcellular distribution via PKA and p42/44 MAPK. Electrophysiological experiments and computer simulations suggested that synapsin can support heterosynaptic plasticity by regulating vesicle mobilization. ^ FMRFa induce short- and long-term synaptic depression in Aplysia . Long-term depression (LTD) correlates with morphological changes, the mechanisms of which remain elusive. LTD is also transcription- and translation-dependent, but little is known about the genes expressed and their regulation. We investigated the role of protein degradation via the ubiquitin-proteasome system and the regulation of one of its components, ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase (ap-uch), in LTD. LTD was sensitive to inhibition of the proteasome and was associated with upregulation of ap-uch mRNA and protein. This upregulation appeared to be mediated by the transcription factor CREB2, which is generally regarded as a transcription repressor. These results suggest that proteasome-mediated protein degradation is engaged in LTD and that CREB2 may act as a transcription activator under certain conditions. ^ These and additional studies on the interaction of the 5-HT and FMRFa-activated pathways suggest that different neuromodulators, by activating several and sometimes overlapping signaling cascades, can exercise bidirectional control on synaptic gain and information processing.^

Hypoxia-induced transcriptional regulation through chromatin modifications and NC2 function

In response to tumor hypoxia, specific genes that promote angiogenesis, proliferation, and survival are induced. Globally, I find that hypoxia induces a mixed pattern of histone modifications that are typically associated with either transcriptional activation or repression. Furthermore, I find that selective activation of hypoxia-inducible genes occurs simultaneously with widespread repression of transcription. I analyzed histone modifications at the core promoters of hypoxia-repressed and -activated genes and find that distinct patterns of histone modifications correlate with transcriptional activity. Additionally, I discovered that trimethylated H3-K4, a modification generally associated with transcriptional activation, is induced at both hypoxia-activated and repressed genes, suggesting a novel pattern of histone modifications induced during hypoxia. ^ In order to determine the mechanism of hypoxia-induced widespread repression of transcription, I focused my studies on negative cofactor 2 (NC2). Previously, we found that hypoxia-induced repression of the alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) gene occurs during preinitiation complex (PIC) assembly, and I find that NC2, an inhibitor of PIC assembly, is induced during hypoxia. Moreover, I find that the beta subunit of NC2 is essential for hypoxia-mediated repression of AFP, as well as the widespread repression of transcription observed during hypoxia. Previous data in Drosophila and S. cerevisiae indicate that NC2 functions as either an activator or a repressor of transcription. The mechanism of NC2-mediated activation remains unclear; although, Drosophila NC2 function correlates with specific core promoter elements. I tested if NC2 activates transcription in mammalian cells using this core promoter-specific model as a guide. Utilizing site-specific mutagenesis, I find that NC2 function in mammalian cells is not dependent upon specific core promoter elements; however, I do find that mammalian NC2 does function in a gene-specific manner as either an activator or repressor of transcription during hypoxia. Furthermore, I find that binding of the alpha subunit of NC2 specifically correlates with NC2-mediated transcriptional activation. NC2α and NC2β are both required for NC2-mediated transcriptional activation; whereas, NC2β alone is required for hypoxia-induced transcriptional repression. Together, these data indicate that hypoxia mediates changes in gene expression through both chromatin modifications and NC2 function. ^

DNA methylation inhibits p53 mediated survivin repression in cancer cells

Survivin (BIRC5) is a member of the Inhibitor of Apoptosis (IAP) gene family and functions as a chromosomal passenger protein as well as a mediator of cell survival. Survivin is widely expressed during embryonic development then becomes transcriptionally silent in most highly differentiated adult tissues. It is also overexpressed in virtually every type of tumor. The survivin promoter contains a canonical CpG island that has been described as epigenetically regulated by DNA methylation. We observed that survivin is overexpressed in high grade, poorly differentiated endometrial tumors, and we hypothesized that DNA hypomethylation could explain this expression pattern. Surprisingly, methylation specific PCR and bisulfite pyrosequencing analysis showed that survivin was hypermethylated in endometrial tumors and that this hypermethylation correlated with increased survivin expression. We proposed that methylation could activate survivin expression by inhibit the binding of a transcriptional repressor. ^ The tumor suppressor protein p53 is a well documented transcriptional repressor of survivin and examination of the survivin promoter showed that the p53 binding site contains 3 CpG sites which often become methylated in endometrial tumors. To determine if methylation regulates survivin expression, we treated HCT116 cells with decitabine, a demethylation agent, and observed that survivin transcript and protein levels were significantly repressed following demethylation in a p53 dependent manner. Subsequent binding studies confirmed that DNA methylation inhibited the binding of p53 protein to its binding site in the survivin promoter. ^ We are the first to report this novel mechanism of epigenetic regulation of survivin. We also conducted microarray analysis which showed that many other cancer relevant genes may also be regulated in this manner. While demethylation agents are traditionally thought to inhibit cancer cell growth by reactivating tumor suppressors, our results indicate that an additional important mechanism is to decrease the expression of oncogenes. ^

The role of AKT-mediated phosphorylation in suppression of MAD1 and the development of new approach in protein complex detection

MAX dimerization protein 1 (MAD1) is a basic-helix-loop-helix transcription factors that recruits transcription repressor such as HDAC to suppress target genes transcription. It antagonizes to MYC because the promoter binding sites for MYC are usually also serve as the binding sites for MAD1 so they compete for it. However, the mechanism of the switch between MYC and MAD1 in turning on and off of genes' transcription is obscure. In this study, we demonstrated that AKT-mediated MAD1 phosphorylation inhibits MAD1 transcription repression function. The association between MAD1 and its target genes' promoter is reduced after been phosphorylated by AKT; therefore, consequently, allows MYC to occupy the binding site and activates transcription. Mutation of such phosphorylation site abrogates the inhibition from AKT. In addition, functional assays demonstrated that AKT suppressed MAD1-mediated transcription repression of its target genes hTERT and ODC. Cell cycle and cell growth were also been released from inhibition by MAD1 in the presents of AKT. Taken together, our study suggests that MAD1 is a novel substrate of AKT and AKT-mediated MAD1 phosphorylation inhibits MAD1function; therefore, activates MAD1 target genes expression. ^ Furthermore, analysis of protein-protein interaction is indispensable for current molecular biology research, but multiplex protein dynamics in cells is too complicated to be analyzed by using existing biochemical methods. To overcome the disadvantage, we have developed a single molecule level detection system with nanofluidic chip. Single molecule was analyzed based on their fluorescent profile and their profiles were plotted into 2 dimensional time co-incident photon burst diagram (2DTP). From this 2DTP, protein complexes were characterized. These results demonstrate that the nanochannel protein detection system is a promising tool for future molecular biology. ^

ARD1 stabilization of TSC2 suppresses tumorigenesis via the mTOR signaling pathway

Mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) plays an important role in regulating various cellular functions, and the tuberous sclerosis 1 (TSC1)/TSC2 complex serves as a major repressor of the mTOR pathway. Here we demonstrated that arrest-defective protein 1 (ARD1) physically interacts with, acetylates, and stabilizes TSC2, thereby reducing mTOR activity. The inhibition of mTOR by ARD1 suppresses cell proliferation and increases autophagy, which further impairs tumorigenicity. Correlation between the levels of ARD1 and TSC2 was found in multiple tumor types, suggesting the physiological importance of ARD1 in stabilizing TSC2. Moreover, evaluation of loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at Xq28 revealed allelic loss in 31% of tested breast cancer cell lines and tumor samples. Together, our findings suggest that ARD1 functions as a negative regulator of the mTOR pathway and that dysregulation of the ARD1/TSC2/mTOR axis may contribute to cancer development. To further explore the signaling pathway of ARD1, we provided evidence showing the phosphorylation of ARD1 by IKKβ, which mediated the destabilization of ARD1. Future work may be needed to study the biological effect of this post-translational modification. ^

Control of the master virulence regulatory gene atxA in Bacillus anthracis

Transcription of the Bacillus anthracis structural genes for the anthrax toxin proteins and biosynthetic operon for capsule are positively regulated by AtxA, a transcription regulator with unique properties. Consistent with the role of atxA in virulence factor expression, a B. anthracis atxA-null mutant is avirulent in a murine model for anthrax. In batch culture, multiple signals impact atxA transcript levels, and the timing and steady state level of atxA expression is critical for optimal toxin and capsule synthesis. Despite the apparent complex control of atxA transcription, only one trans-acting protein, the transition state regulator AbrB, has been demonstrated to directly interact with the atxA promoter. The AbrB-binding site has been described, but additional cis-acting control sequences have not been defined. Using transcriptional lacZ fusions, electrophoretic mobility shift assays, and Western blot analysis, the cis-acting elements and trans-acting factors involved in regulation of atxA in B. anthracis strains containing either both virulence plasmids, pXO1 and pXO2, or only one plasmid, pXO1, were studied. This work demonstrates that atxA transcription from the major start site P1 is dependent upon a consensus sequence for the housekeeping sigma factor SigA, and an A+T-rich upstream element (UP-element) for RNA polymerase (RNAP). In addition, the data show that a trans-acting protein(s) other than AbrB negatively impacts atxA transcription when it binds specifically to a 9-bp palindrome within atxA promoter sequences located downstream of P1. Mutation of the palindrome prevents binding of the trans-acting protein(s) and results in a corresponding increase in AtxA and anthrax toxin production in a strain- and culture-dependent manner. The identity of the trans-acting repressor protein(s) remains elusive; however, phenotypes associated with mutation of the repressor binding site have revealed that the trans-acting repressor protein(s) indirectly controls B. anthracis development. Mutation of the repressor binding site results in misregulation and overexpression of AtxA in conditions conducive for development, leading to a marked sporulation defect that is both atxA- and pXO2-61-dependent. pXO2-61 is homologous to the sensor domain of sporulation sensor histidine kinases and is proposed to titrate an activating signal away from the sporulation phosphorelay when overexpressed by AtxA. These results indicate that AtxA is not only a master virulence regulator, but also a modulator of proper B. anthracis development. Also demonstrated in this work is the impact of the developmental regulators AbrB, Spo0A, and SigH on atxA expression and anthrax toxin production in a genetically incomplete (pXO1+, pXO2-) and genetically complete (pXO1+, pXO2+) strain background. AtxA and anthrax toxin production resulting from deletion of the developmental regulators are strain-dependent suggesting that factors on pXO2 are involved in control of atxA. The only developmental deletion mutant that resulted in a prominent and consistent strain-independent increase in AtxA protein levels was an abrB-null mutant. As a result of increased AtxA levels, there is early and increased production of anthrax toxins in an abrB-null mutant. In addition, the abrB-null mutant exhibited an increase in virulence in a murine model for anthrax. In contrast, virulence of the atxA promoter mutant was unaffected in a murine model for anthrax despite the production of 5-fold more AtxA than the abrB-null mutant. These results imply that AtxA is not the only factor impacting pathogenesis in an abrB-null mutant. Overall, this work highlights the complex regulatory network that governs expression of atxA and provides an additional role for AtxA in B. anthracis development.

Potential REST Targets in Neural Stem Cells and Glioblastoma-Derived Stem Cells

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) tumors are the most common malignant primary brain tumors in adults. The current theory is that these tumors are caused by self-renewing glioblastoma-derived stem cells (GSCs). At the current time, the mechanisms that regulate self-renewal and other oncogenic properties of GSCs remain unknown. Recently, we found transcriptional repressor REST maintains self-renewal in neural stem cells (NSCs) and in GSCs. REST also regulates other oncogenic properties, such as apoptosis, invasion and proliferation. However, the mechanisms by which REST regulates these oncogenic properties are unknown. In an attempt to determine these mechanisms, we performed loss and gain-of-function experiments and genome-wide mRNA expression analysis in GSCs, and we were able to identify REST-regulated genes in GSCs. This was accomplished, after screening concordantly regulated genes in NSCs and GSCs, utilizing two RE1 databases, and setting two-fold expression as filters on the resulting genes. These results received further validation by qRT-PCR. Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (IPA) analysis further revealed the top REST target genes in GSCs were downstream targets of REST and/or involved in other cancers in other cell lines. IPA also revealed that many of the differentially-regulated genes identified in this study are involved in oncogenic properties seen in GBM, and which we believe are related to REST expression.

GENETIC INTERACTIONS OF FACTORS THAT REGULATE ALTERNATIVE RNA SPLICING IN THE MALE GERM LINE OF DROSOPHILA

Alternative RNA splicing is a critical process that contributes variety to protein functions, and further controls cell differentiation and normal development. Although it is known that most eukaryotic genes produce multiple transcripts in which splice site selection is regulated, how RNA binding proteins cooperate to activate and repress specific splice sites is still poorly understood. In addition how the regulation of alternative splicing affects germ cell development is also not well known. In this study, Drosophila Transformer 2 (Tra2) was used as a model to explore both the mechanism of its repressive function on its own pre-mRNA splicing, and the effect of the splicing regulation on spermatogenesis in testis. Half-pint (Hfp), a protein known as splicing activator, was identified in an S2 cell-based RNAi screen as a co-repressor that functions in combination with Tra2 in the splicing repression of the M1 intron. Its repressive splicing function is found to be sequence specific and is dependent on both the weak 3’ splice site and an intronic splicing silencer within the M1 intron. In addition we found that in vivo, two forms of Hfp are expressed in a cell type specific manner. These alternative forms differ at their amino terminus affecting the presence of a region with four RS dipeptides. Using assays in Drosophila S2 cells, we determined that the alternative N terminal domain is necessary in repression. This difference is probably due to differential localization of the two isoforms in the nucleus and cytoplasm. Our in vivo studies show that both Hfp and Tra2 are required for normal spermatogenesis and cooperate in repression of M1 splicing in spermatocytes. But interestingly, Tra2 and Hfp antagonize each other’s function in regulating germline specific alternative splicing of Taf1 (TBP associated factor 1). Genetic and cytological studies showed that mutants of Hfp and Taf1 both cause similar defects in meiosis and spermatogenesis. These results suggest Hfp regulates normal spermatogenesis partially through the regulation of taf1 splicing. These observations indicate that Hfp regulates tra2 and taf1 activity and play an important role in germ cell differentiation of male flies.

Regulation of the {\it neu\/} oncogene by the GTG element binding proteins

A previous study in our lab has shown that the transforming neu oncogene ($neu\sp\*$) was able to initiate signals that lead to repression of the neu promoter activity. Further deletion mapping of the neu promoter identified that the GTG element (GGTGGGGGGG), located between $-$243 and $-$234 relative to the translation initiation codon, mediates such a repression effect. I have characterized the four major protein complexes that interact with this GTG element. In situ UV-crosslinking indicated that each complex contains proteins of different molecular weights. The slowest migrating complex (S) contain Sp1 or Sp1-related proteins, as indicated by the data that both have similar molecular weights, similar properties in two affinity chromatographies, and both are antigenically related in gel shift analysis. Methylation protection and interference experiments demonstrated these complexes bind to overlapping regions of the GTG element. Mutations within the GTG element that either abrogate or enhance complex S binding conferred on the neu promoter with lower activity, indicating that positive factors other than Sp1 family proteins also contribute to neu promoter activity. A mutated version (mutant 4) of the GTG element, which binds mainly the fastest migrating complex that contains a very small protein of 26-kDa, can repress transcription when fused to a heterologous promoter. Further deletion and mutation studies suggested that this GTG mutant and its binding protein(s) may cooperate with some DNA element within a heterologous promoter to lock the basal transcription machinery; such a repressor might also repress neu transcription by interfering with the DNA binding of other transactivators. Our results suggest that both positive and negative trans-acting factors converge their binding sites on the GTG element and confer combinatorial control on the neu gene expression. ^

Analysis of VirB4, a membrane-associated ATPase subunit essential for T -complex transport in Agrobacterium tumefaciens

Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a plant pathogen with the unique ability to export oncogenic DNA-protein complexes (T-complexes) to susceptible plant cells and cause crown gall tumors. Delivery of the T-complexes across the bacterial membranes requires eleven VirB proteins and VirD4, which are postulated to form a transmembrane transporter. This thesis examines the subcellular localization and oligomeric structure of the 87-kDa VirB4 protein, which is one of three essential ATPases proposed to energize T-complex transport and/or assembly. Results of subcellular localization studies showed that VirB4 is tightly associated with the cytoplasmic membrane, suggesting that it is a membrane-spanning protein. The membrane topology of VirB4 was determined by using a nested deletion strategy to generate random fusions between virB4 and the periplasmically-active alkaline phosphatase, $\sp\prime phoA$. Analysis of PhoA and complementary $\beta$-galactosidase reporter fusions identified two putative periplasmically-exposed regions in VirB4. A periplasmic exposure of one of these regions was further confirmed by protease susceptibility assays using A. tumefaciens spheroplasts. To gain insight into the structure of the transporter, the topological configurations of other VirB proteins were also examined. Results from hydropathy analyses, subcellular localization, protease susceptibility, and PhoA reporter fusion studies support a model that all of the VirB proteins localize at one or both of the bacterial membranes. Immunoprecipitation and Co$\sp{2+}$ affinity chromatography studies demonstrated that native VirB4 (87-kDa) and a functional N-terminally tagged HIS-VirB4 derivative (89-kDa) interact and that the interaction is independent of other VirB proteins. A $\lambda$ cI repressor fusion assay supplied further evidence for VirB4 dimer formation. A VirB4 dimerization domain was localized to the N-terminal third of the protein, as judged by: (i) transdominance of an allele that codes for this region of VirB4; (ii) co-retention of a His-tagged N-terminal truncation derivative and native VirB4 on Co$\sp{2+}$ affinity columns; and (iii) dimer formation of the N-terminal third of VirB4 fused to the cI repressor protein. Taken together, these findings are consistent with a model that VirB4 is topologically configured as an integral cytoplasmic membrane protein with two periplasmic domains and that VirB4 assembles as homodimers via an N-terminal dimerization domain. Dimer formation is postulated to be essential for stabilization of VirB4 monomers during T-complex transporter assembly. ^

Transcriptional repression of serum amyloid A1 by AP -2 contributes to its liver -specific expression

Studies on the transcriptional regulation of serum amyloid A1 (SAA1) gene, a liver specific acute-phase gene, identified a regulatory element in its promoter that functioned to repress (SAA1) gene transcription in nonliver cells. This silencer element interacts with a nuclear protein that is detectable in HeLa cells, fibroblasts and placental tissues but not in liver or liver-derived cells. As the expression pattern of this repressor is consistent with its potential regulatory role in repressing SAA1 expression, and that many other liver gene promoters also contain this repressor binding site, we sought to investigate whether this repressor may have a broader functional role in repressing liver genes. ^ We have utilized protein purification, cell culture, transient and stable gene transfection, and molecular biology approaches to identify this protein and investigate its possible function in the regulation of (SAA1) and other liver genes. Analyses of amino acid sequence of the purified nuclear protein, and western blot and gel shift studies identified the repressor as transcription factor AP-2 or AP-2-like protein. Using transient transfection of DNA into cultured cells, we demonstrate that AP-2 can indeed function as a repressor to inhibit transcription of SAA1 gene promoter. This conclusion is supported by the following experimental results: (1) overexpression of AP-2 in hepatoma cells inhibits conditioned medium (CM)-induced expression of SAA1 promoter; (2) binding of AP-2 to the SAA1 promoter is required for AP-2 repression function; (3) one mechanism by which AP-2 inhibits SAA1 may be by antagonizing the activation function of the strong transactivator NFκB; (4) mutation of AP-2 binding sites results in derepression of SAM promoter in HeLa cells; and (5) inhibition of endogenous AP-2 activity by a dominant-negative mutant abolishes AP-2's inhibitory effect on SAM promoter in HeLa cells. In addition to the SAM promoter, AP-2 also can bind to the promoter regions of six other liver genes tested, suggesting that it may have a broad functional role in restricting the expression of many liver genes in nonliver cells. Consistent with this notion, ectopic expression of AP-2 also represses CM-mediated activation of human third component of complement 3 promoter. Finally, in AP-2-expressing stable hepatoma cell lines, AP-2 inhibits not only the expression of endogenous SAA, but also the expression of several other endogenous liver genes including albumin, α-fetoprotein. ^ Our findings that AP-2 has the ability to repress the expression of liver genes in nonliver cells opens a new avenue of investigation of negative regulation of gene transcription, and should improve our understanding of tissue-specific expression of liver genes. In summary, our data provide evidence suggesting a novel role of AP-2 as a repressor, inhibiting the expression of liver genes in nonliver cells. Thus, the tissue-specific expression of AP-2 may constitute an important mechanism contributing to the liver-specific expression of liver genes. ^

PML tumor suppressor potentiates cell death through inhibition of the NF -kappa B survival pathway

The promyelocytic leukemia protein PML is a growth suppressor essential for induction of apoptosis by diverse apoptotic stimuli. The mechanism by which PML regulates cell death remains unclear. In this study we found that ectopic expression of PML potentiates cell death in the TNFα-resistant tumor line U2OS and significantly sensitized these cells to apoptosis induced by TNFα in a p53-independent manner. Our study demonstrated that both PML and PML/TNFα-induced cell death are associated with DNA fragmentation, activation of caspase-3, -7, -8, and degradation of DFF/ICAD. Furthermore, we found that PML-induced and PML/TNFα-induced cell death could be blocked by the caspase-8 inhibitors crmA and c-FLIP, but not by Bcl-2, the inhibitor of mitochondria-mediated apoptotic pathway. These findings indicate that this cell death event is initiated through the death receptor-dependent apoptosis pathway. Our study further showed that PML recruits NF-kappa B (NF-κB) to the PML nuclear body, blocks NF-κB binding to its cognate enhancer, and represses its transactivation function with the C-terminal region. Therefore PML inhibits the NF-κB survival pathway. Overexpression of NF-κB rescued cell death induced by PML and PML/TNFκ. These results imply that PML is a functional repressor of NF-κB. This notion was further supported by the finding that the PML−/− mouse embryo fibroblasts (MEFs) are more resistant than the wild-type MEFs to TNFκ-induced apoptosis. In conclusion, our studies convincingly demonstrated that PML potentiates cell death through inhibition of the NF-κB survival pathway. Activation of NF-κB frequently occurs during oncogenesis. Our study here suggests that a loss of PML function enhances the NF-κB survival pathway and this event may contribute to tumorigenesis. ^

Regulation of p53 antiproliferative function by transactivation domain phosphorylation at threonine 18 and serine 20

We investigated the induction and physiological role of Thr18 and Ser20 phosphorylation of p53 in response to DNA damage caused by treatment with ionizing (IR) or ultraviolet (UV) radiation. Polyclonal antibodies specifically recognizing phospho-Thr18 and phospho-Ser20 were used to detect p53 phosphorylation in vivo. Analyses of five wild-type (wt) p53 containing cell lines revealed lineage specific differences in phosphorylation of Thr18 and Ser20 after treatment with IR or UV. Importantly, the phosphorylation of p53 at Thr18 and Ser20 correlated with induction of the p53 downstream targets p21Waf1/Cip1 (p21) and Mdm-2, suggesting a transactivation enhancing role for Thr18 and Ser20 phosphorylation. Whereas Thr18 phosphorylation appears to abolish side-chain hydrogen bonding between Thr18 and Asp21, Ser20 phosphorylation may introduce charge attraction between Ser20 and Lys24. Both of these interactions could contribute to stabilizing α-helical conformation within the p53 transactivation domain. Mutagenesis-derived phosphorylation mimicry of p53 at Thr18 and Ser20 by Asp substitution (p53T18D/S20D) altered transactivation domain conformation and significantly reduced the interaction of p53 with the transactivation repressor Mdm-2. Mdm-2 interaction was also reduced with p53 containing a single site Asp substitution at Ser20 (p53S20D) and with the Thr18/Asp21 hydrogen bond disrupting p53 mutants p53T18A, p53T18D and p53D21A. In contrast, no direct effect was observed on the interaction of p53T18A, p53T18D and p53D21A with the basal transcription factor TAF II31. However, prior incubation of p53T18A, p53T18D and p53D21A with Mdm-2 modulated TAFII31 interaction, suggesting Mdm-2 blocks the accessibility of p53 to TAFII31. Consistently, p53-null cells transfected with p53S20D and p53T18A, p53T18D and p53D21A demonstrated enhanced endogenous p21 expression; transfection with p53T18D/S20D most significantly enhanced p21 and fas/APO-1 (fas ) expression. Expression of p53T18A, p53T18D and p53D21A in p53/Mdm-2-double null cells exhibited no discernible differences in p21 expression. Cell proliferation was also significantly curtailed in p53-null cells transfected with p53T18D/S20D relative to cells transfected with wt p53. We conclude the irradiation-induced phosphorylation of p53 at Thr18 and Ser20 alters the α-helical conformation of its transactivation domain. Altered conformation reduces direct interaction with the transrepressor Mdm-2, enhancing indirect recruitment of the basal transcription factor TAFII31, facilitating sequence-specific transactivation function resulting in proliferative arrest. ^