Implication of DNA methylation, CTCF and BORIS factors in the transcriptional regulation of the human telomerase catalytic subunit hTERT

RESUME La télomérase confère une durée de vie illimitée et est réactivée dans la plupart des cellules tumorales. Sa sous-unité catalytique hTERT est définie comme le facteur limitant pour son activation. De l'identification de facteurs liant la région régulatrice d'hTERT, au rôle de la méthylation de l'ADN et de la modification des histones, de nombreux modèles de régulation ont été suggérés. Cependant, aucun de ces modèles n'a pu expliquer l'inactivation de la télomérase dans la plupart des cellules somatiques et sa réactivation dans la majorité des cellules tumorales. De plus, les observations contradictoires entre le faible niveau d'expression d'ARN messager d'hTERT dans les cellules télomérase-positives et la très forte activité transcriptionnelle du promoteur d'hTERT en transfection restent incomprises. Dans cette étude, nous avons montré que la région proximale du gène hTERT (exon 1 et 2) était impliquée dans la répression de l'activité de son promoteur. Nous avons identifié le facteur CTCF comme étant un inhibiteur du promoteur d'hTERT, en se liant au niveau de son premier exon. La méthylation de l'exon 1 du gène hTERT, couramment observée dans les tumeurs mais pas dans les cellules normales, empêcherait la liaison de CTCF. L'étude du profil de méthylation du promoteur d'hTERT indique qu'une partie du promoteur reste déméthylée et qu'elle semble suffisante pour permettre une faible activité transcriptionnelle du gène hTERT. Ainsi, la méthylation particulière des régions régulatrices d'hTERT inhibe la liaison de CTCF tout en permettant une faible transcription du gène. Cependant, dans certaines cellules tumorales, le promoteur et la région proximale du gène hTERT ne sont pas méthylés. Dans les lignées cellulaires tumorales de tesitcules et d'ovaires, l'inhibition de CTCF est contrée par son paralogue BORIS, qui se lie aussi au niveau de l'exon 1 d'hTERT, mais permet ainsi l'activation du promoteur. L'étude de l'expression du gène BORIS montre qu'il est exclusivement exprimé dans les tissus normaux de testicules et d'ovaires jeunes, ainsi qu'à différents niveaux dans la plupart des tumeurs. Sa transcription est sous le contrôle de deux promoteurs. Le promoteur proximal est régulé par méthylation et un transcrit alternatif majoritaire, délété de l'exon 6, est trouvé lorsque ce promoteur est actif. Tous ces résultats conduisent à un modèle de régulation du gène hTERT qui tient compte du profil épigénétique du gène et qui permet d'expliquer le faible taux de transcription observé in vivo. De plus, l'expression de BORIS dans les cancers et son implication dans l'activation du gène hTERT pourrait permettre de comprendre les phénomènes de dérégulation épigénétique et d'immortalisation qui ont lieu durant la tumorigenèse. SUMMARY Telomerase confers an unlimited lifespan, and is reactivated in most tumor cells. The catalytic subunit of telomerase, hTERT, is defined as the limiting factor for telomerase activity. Between activators and repressors that bind to the hTERT 5' regulatory region, and the role of CpG methylation and histone acetylation, an abundance of regulatory models have been suggested. None of these models can explain the silence of telomerase in most somatic cells and its reactivation in tumor cells. Moreover, the contradictory observations of the low level of hTERT mRNA in telomerase-positive cells and the high transcriptional activity of the hTERT promoter in transfection experiments remain unresolved. In this study, we demonstrated that the proximal exonic region of the hTERT gene (exon 1 and 2) is involved in the inhibition of its promoter. We identified the protein CTCF as the inhibitor of the hTERT promoter, through its binding to the first exon. The methylation of the first exon region, which is often observed in cancer cells but not in noimal cells, represses CTCF binding. Study of hTERT promoter methylation shows a partial demethylation sufficient to activate the transcription of the hTERT gene. Therefore, we demonstrated that the particular methylation profile of the hTERT regulatory sequences inhibits the binding of CTCF, while it allows a low transcription of the gene. Nevertheless, in some tumor cells, the promoter and the proximal exonic region of hTERT are unmethylated. In testicular and ovarian cancer cell lines, CTCF inhibition is counteracted by its BORIS paralogue that also binds the hTERT first exon but allows the promoter activation. The study of BORIS gene regulation showed that this factor is exclusively expressed in normal tissue of testis and ovary of young woman, as well as in almost all tumors with different levels. Two promoters were found to induce its transcription. The proximal promoter was regulated by methylation. Moreover, a major alternative transcript, deleted of the exon 6, is detected when this promoter is active. All these results lead to a model for hTERT regulation that takes into account the epigenetic profile of the gene and provides an explanation for the low transcriptional level observed in vivo. BORIS expression in cancers and its implication in hTERT activation might also permit the understanding of epigenetic deregulation and immortalization phenomena that occur during tumorigenesis.

The transcriptional network activated by Cln3 cyclin at the G1-to-S transition of the yeast cell cycle

Background: The G1-to-S transition of the cell cycle in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae involves an extensive transcriptional program driven by transcription factors SBF (Swi4-Swi6) and MBF (Mbp1-Swi6). Activation of these factors ultimately depends on the G1 cyclin Cln3. Results: To determine the transcriptional targets of Cln3 and their dependence on SBF or MBF, we first have used DNA microarrays to interrogate gene expression upon Cln3 overexpression in synchronized cultures of strains lacking components of SBF and/or MBF. Secondly, we have integrated this expression dataset together with other heterogeneous data sources into a single probabilistic model based on Bayesian statistics. Our analysis has produced more than 200 transcription factor-target assignments, validated by ChIP assays and by functional enrichment. Our predictions show higher internal coherence and predictive power than previous classifications. Our results support a model whereby SBF and MBF may be differentially activated by Cln3. Conclusions: Integration of heterogeneous genome-wide datasets is key to building accurate transcriptional networks. By such integration, we provide here a reliable transcriptional network at the G1-to-S transition in the budding yeast cell cycle. Our results suggest that to improve the reliability of predictions we need to feed our models with more informative experimental data.

Genome-wide transcriptional responses to shade: Linking shade avoidance and auxin

Plants have the ability to use the composition of incident light as a cue to adapt development and growth to their environment. Arabidopsis thaliana as well as many crops are best adapted to sunny habitats. When subjected to shade, these plants exhibit a variety of physiological responses collectively called shade avoidance syndrome (SAS). It includes increased growth of hypocotyl and petioles, decreased growth rate of cotyledons and reduced branching and crop yield. These responses are mainly mediated by phytochrome photoreceptors, which exist either in an active, far-red light (FR) absorbing or an inactive, red light (R) absorbing isoform. In direct sunlight, the R to FR light (R/FR) ratio is high and converts the phytochromes into their physiologically active state. The phytochromes interact with downstream transcription factors such as PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR (PIF), which are subsequently degraded. Light filtered through a canopy is strongly depleted in R, which result in a low R/FR ratio and renders the phytochromes inactive. Protein levels of downstream transcription factors are stabilized, which initiates the expression of shade-induced genes such as HFR1, PIL1 or ATHB-2. In my thesis, I investigated transcriptional responses mediated by the SAS in whole Arabidopsis seedlings. Using microarray and chromatin immunoprecipitation data, we identified genome-wide PIF4 and PIF5 dependent shade regulated gene as well as putative direct target genes of PIF5. This revealed evidence for a direct regulatory link between phytochrome signaling and the growth promoting phytohormone auxin (IAA) at the level of biosynthesis, transport and signaling. Subsequently, it was shown, that free-IAA levels are upregulated in response to shade. It is assumed that shade-induced auxin production takes predominantly place in cotyledons of seedlings. This implies, that IAA is subsequently transported basipetally to the hypocotyl and enhances elongation growth. The importance of auxin transport for growth responses has been established by chemical and genetic approaches. To gain a better understanding of spatio-temporal transcriptional regulation of shade-induce auxin, I generated in a second project, an organ specific high throughput data focusing on cotyledon and hypocotyl of young Arabidopsis seedlings. Interestingly, both organs show an opposite growth regulation by shade. I first investigated the spatio-transcriptional regulation of auxin re- sponsive gene, in order to determine how broad gene expression pattern can be explained by the hypothesized movement of auxin from cotyledons to hypocotyls in shade. The analysis suggests, that several genes are indeed regulated according to our prediction and others are regulated in a more complex manner. In addition, analysis of gene families of auxin biosynthetic and transport components, lead to the identification of essential family members for shade-induced growth re- sponses, which were subsequently experimentally confirmed. Finally, the analysis of expression pattern identified several candidate genes, which possibly explain aspects of the opposite growth response of the different organs.

An activator/repressor dual system allows tight tetracycline-regulated gene expression in budding yeast

We have developed an activator/repressor expression system for budding yeast in which tetracyclines control in opposite ways the ability of tetR-based activator and repressor molecules to bind tetO promoters. This combination allows tight expression of tetO-driven genes, both in a direct (tetracycline-repressible) and reverse (tetracycline-inducible) dual system. Ssn6 and Tup1, that are components of a general repressor complex in yeast, have been tested for their repressing properties in the dual system, using lacZ and CLN2 as reporter genes. Ssn6 gives better results and allows complete switching-off of the regulated genes, although increasing the levels of the Tup1-based repressor by expressing it from a stronger promoter improves repressing efficiency of the latter. Effector-mediated shifts between expression and non-expression conditions are rapid. The dual system here described may be useful for the functional analysis of essential genes whose conditional expression can be tightly controlled by tetracyclines.

Genome-wide chromatin occupancy reveals a role for ASH2 in transcriptional pausing

While it is widely acknowledged that the ubiquitin-proteasome system plays an important role in transcription, little is known concerning the mechanistic basis, in particular the spatial organization of proteasome-dependent proteolysis at the transcription site. Here, we show that proteasomal activity and tetraubiquitinated proteins concentrate to nucleoplasmic microenvironments in the euchromatin. Such proteolytic domains are immobile and distinctly positioned in relation to transcriptional processes. Analysis of gene arrays and early genes in Caenorhabditis elegans embryos reveals that proteasomes and proteasomal activity are distantly located relative to transcriptionally active genes. In contrast, transcriptional inhibition generally induces local overlap of proteolytic microdomains with components of the transcription machinery and degradation of RNA polymerase II. The results establish that spatial organization of proteasomal activity differs with respect to distinct phases of the transcription cycle in at least some genes, and thus might contribute to the plasticity of gene expression in response to environmental stimuli.

Klammt's elastic open activator: Ricketts' cephalometrics results

The purpose of this study is to investigate the orthodontic and orthopaedic real effects of the Klammt's Elastic Open Activator (EOA) in 25 Class II Division 1 patients in growing period. We wanted to determine statistically the cephalometrics changes produced in the patients, comparing the lateral cranium teleradiographies we took for the diagnosis with the ones we took at the end of treatment. At the end of this study we confirm that by using the EOA we obtained the desired effects, especially reducing the molar relation 2.53 mm and the overjet 2.56 mm. The EOA corrected the inclination and protrusion of incisors, although we cannot avoid the use of fixed appliances to round off. The reduction of 2.48 mm of facial convexity stands out as the most important skeletal effect; the facial depth angle increases 0.8 degree, and the maxillary depth decreases 1.16 degrees. The length of the mandibular corpus also increases 6.7 mm, although this change is mainly due to the growth of the patient. The changes in the aesthetic profile do not stand out

ROS production is essential for the apoptotic function of E2F1 in pheochromocytoma and neuroblastoma cell lines

In this study we demonstrate that accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) is essential for E2F1 mediated apoptosis in ER-E2F1 PC12 pheochromocytoma, and SH-SY5Y and SK-N-JD neuroblastoma stable cell lines. In these cells, the ER-E2F1 fusion protein is expressed in the cytosol; the addition of 4-hydroxytamoxifen (OHT) induces its translocation to the nucleus and activation of E2F1target genes. Previously we demonstrated that, in ER-E2F1 PC12 cells, OHT treatment induced apoptosis through activation of caspase-3. Here we show that caspase-8 activity did not change upon treatment with OHT. Moreover, over-expression of Bcl-xL arrested OHT-induced apoptosis; by contrast, over-expression of c-FLIP, did not have any effect on OHT-induced apoptosis. OHT addition induces BimL expression, its translocation to mitochondria and activation of Bax, which is paralleled by diminished mitochondrial enrichment of Bcl-xL. Treatment with a Bax-inhibitory peptide reduced OHT-induced apoptosis. These results point out the essential role of mitochondria on the apoptotic process driven by E2F1. ROS accumulation followed E2F1 induction and treatment with the antioxidant N-acetylcysteine, inhibited E2F1-induced Bax translocation to mitochondria and subsequent apoptosis. The role of ROS in mediating OHT-induced apoptosis was also studied in two neuroblastoma cell lines, SH-SY5Y and SK-N-JD. In SH-SY5Y cells, activation of E2F1 by the addition of OHT induced ROS production and apoptosis, whereas over-expression of E2F1 in SK-N-JD cells failed to induce either response. Transcriptional profiling revealed that many of the genes responsible for scavenging ROS were down-regulated following E2F1-induction in SH-SY5Y, but not in SK-N-JD cells. Finally, inhibition of GSK3β blocked ROS production, Bax activation and the down regulation of ROS scavenging genes. These findings provide an explanation for the apparent contradictory role of E2F1 as an apoptotic agent versus a cell cycle activator.