Isolation and analysis of regulatory and structural mutations in the {\it recA\/} gene of {\it Escherichia coli}

The recA gene is essential for homologous recombination and for inducible DNA repair in Escherichia coli. The level of recA expression is important for these functions. The growth defect of a lambda phage carrying a recA-lacZ fusion was used to select mutations that reduced recA expression. Nine of these mutations were single base changes in the recA promoter; each reduced both induced and basal (repressed) levels of expression, indicating that only one promoter is used under both circumstances. Deletion analysis of the promoter region and S1 mapping of transcripts confirmed that there is only one promoter responsible for both basal and induced expression. Some of the mutants, however, displayed a ratio of induced to repressed expression that was much lower than wild-type. For one of these mutants (recA1270) LexA binding studies showed that this was not due to a change in the affinity of LexA repressor for the operator site. The extent of binding of RNA polymerase to this mutant promoter, however, was much reduced, and the complexes formed were qualitatively different. Further binding experiments provided some evidence that LexA does not block RNA polymerase binding to the recA promoter, but inhibits a later step in initiation. Behavior of the mutants with altered induction ratios could be explained if LexA binding to the operator actually increases RNA polymerase binding to the promoter in a closed complex compensating for defects in polymerase binding caused by the mutations.^ In a study of mutations in the recA structural gene, site-directed mutagenesis was used to replace cysteine codons at positions 90, 116, and 129 with a number of different codons. In vivo analysis of the replacements showed that none of the cysteines is absolutely essential and that they do not have a direct role as catalysts in ATP hydrolysis. Some amino acid substitutions abolished all RecA functions, while a few resulted in partial or altered function. Amino acids at positions 90 and 129 tended to affect all functions equally, while the amino acid at position 116 appeared to have a particular effect on the protease activity of the protein. ^

Characterization of the beta-lactamase gene from {\it Enterococcus faecalis\/} strain HH22

The plasmid-encoded, constitutively produced $\beta$-lactamase gene from Enterococcus faecalis strain HH22 was genetically characterized. A restriction endonuclease map of the 5.1 kb EcoRI fragment encoding the enterococcal $\beta$-lactamase was prepared and compared with the restriction map of a cloned staphylococcal $\beta$-lactamase gene (from the naturally-occurring staphylococcal $\beta$-lactamase plasmid pI258). Comparison and hybridization studies showed that there were identical restriction sites in the region of the $\beta$-lactamase structural gene but not in the region surrounding this gene. Also the enterococcal $\beta$-lactamase plasmid did not encode resistance to mercury or cadmium which is encoded by the small, transducible staphylococcal $\beta$-lactamase plasmids. The nucleotide sequence of the enterococcal gene was shown to be identical to the published sequences of three of four staphylococcal type A $\beta$-lactamase genes; more differences were seen with the genes for staphylococcal type C and D enzymes. One hundred-forty nucleotides upstream of the $\beta$-lactamase start codon were also determined for the inducible staphylococcal $\beta$-lactamase gene on pI258; this sequence was identical to that of the constitutively expressed enterococcal gene indicating that the changes resulting in constitutive expression are not due to changes in the promoter or operator region. Moreover, complementation studies indicated that production of the enterococcal enzyme could be repressed. The gene for the enterococcal $\beta$-lactamase and an inducible staphylococcal $\beta$-lactamase were each cloned into a shuttle vector and then transformed into enterococcal and staphylococcal recipients. The major difference between the two host backgrounds was that more enzyme was produced by the staphylococcal host, regardless of the source of the gene but no qualitative difference was seen between the two genera. Also a difference in the level of resistance to ampicillin was seen between the two backgrounds with the cloned enzymes by MIC and time-kill studies. The location of the enzyme was found to be host dependent since each cloned gene generated extracellular (free) enzyme in the staphylococcus and cell bound enzyme in the enterococcus. Based on the identity of the enterococcal $\beta$-lactamase and several staphylococcal $\beta$-lactamases, these data suggest recent spread of $\beta$-lactamase to enterococci and also suggest loss of a functional repressor. ^

Insight into the strand exchange reaction promoted by the RecA protein of {\it Escherichia coli\/}

In vitro, RecA protein catalyses the exchange of single strands of DNA between different DNA molecules with sequence complementarity. In order to gain insight into this complex reaction and the roles of ATP binding and hydrolysis, two different approaches have been taken. The first is to use short single-stranded deoxyoligonucleotides as the ssDNA in strand exchange. These were used to determine the signal for hydrolysis and the structure of the RecA-DNA complex that hydrolyses ATP. I present a defined kinetic analysis of the nucleotide triphosphatase activity of RecA protein using short oligonucleotides as ssDNA cofactor. I compare the effects of both homopolymers and mixed base composition oligomers on the ATPase activity of RecA protein. I examine the steady state kinetic parameters of the ATPase reaction using these oligonucleotides as ssDNA cofactor, and show that although RecA can both bind to, and utilise, oligonucleotides 7 to 20 residues in length to support the repressor cleavage activity of RecA, these oligonucleotides are unable to efficiently stimulate the ATPase activity of RecA protein. I show that the K$\sb{\rm m}\sp{\rm ATP}$, the Hill coefficient for ATP binding, the extent of reaction, and k$\sb{\rm cat}$ are all a function of ssDNA chain length and that secondary structure may also play a role in determining the effects of a particular chain length on the ATPase activity of RecA protein.^ The second approach is to utilise one of the many mutants of RecA to gain insight into this complex reaction. The mutant selected was RecA1332. Surprisingly, in vitro, this mutant possesses a DNA-dependent ATPase activity. The K$\sb{\rm m}\sp{\rm ATP}$, Hill coefficient for ATP binding, and K$\sb{\rm m}\sp{\rm DNA}$ are similar to that of wild type. k$\sb{\rm cat}$ for the ATPase activity is reduced 3 to 12-fold, however. RecA1332 is unable to use deoxyoligonucleotides as DNA cofactors in the ATPase reaction, and demonstrates an increased sensitivity to inhibition by monovalent ions. It is able to perform strand exchange with ATP and ATP$\lbrack\gamma\rbrack$S but not with UTP, whereas the wild type protein is able to use all three nucleotide triphosphates. RecA1332 appears to be slowed in its ability to form intermediates and to convert these intermediates to products. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) ^

The effect of v-{\it mos\/} expression on the regulation of the {\it fos\/} promoter in 490N3T cells

The v-mos oncogene acquired by Moloney murine sarcoma viruses by recombination with the c-mos proto-oncogene encodes a 37kD cytoplasmic serine/threonine protein kinase which can phosphorylate tubulin and vimentin, as well as the cyclin B component of the maturation promotion factor complex (MPF). Our earliest experiments asked whether the v-mos protein could activate the transcription of transin. Since the transcription of transin was known to be mediated by both fos-dependent and fos-independent pathways, it seemed possible that the induction of transin transcription by v-mos might be mediated by p55$\sp{\rm c-}\sp{fos}$. Surprisingly, when we examined the effect of v-mos on the fos promoter, we observed a significant inhibition of transcription in 49ON3T cells, a subclone of N1H3T3 mouse fibroblasts.^ In this thesis we show that in mouse 49ON3T cells, transcription from the fos promoter is up to 10-fold repressed in the presence of v-mos. Moreover, in this cell line several other transforming constructs (v-ras, v-src, neu) also cause repression of the fos promoter. Interestingly, nontransforming oncogenes (e.g. myc) do not repress fos transcription. The repressive effect was lost in v-mos mutants lacking in ATP-binding or kinase domain, arguing that the effect on fos transcription was mediated by v-mos transforming kinase activity. As mos is a cytoplasmic protein, it was assumed that transcriptional repression was mediated by conversion of a transcriptional regulator to a repressor by mos-induced phosphorylation. As a first approximation of the identity of this factor, we mapped the position of the mos effect on the fos promoter using reporter (CAT) constructs. We found that repression was mediated by regions $-$221 to $-$106 and $-$122 to $-$65 relative to the fos transcriptional start site, both of which regions regulate baseline fos transcription. There are direct repeats containing E2F transcriptional activator/repressor recognition motifs in these regions which bind similar nuclear proteins independently of v-mos presence or absence. Our data show that the contribution of the direct repeat to baseline fos transcription is mediated by these E2F sites with perhaps some contribution from the overlapping retinoblastoma control element (RCE). We have shown that there is a separate DNA protein interaction in the direct repeat which is more pronounced in the presence of v-mos. The recognition site for this protein, which we speculate mediates the mos-induced downregulation of fos transcription, overlaps but is distinct from the E2F and RCE binding sites. (Abstract shortened by UMI.) ^

Gene expression in sea urchin development: Study of {\it LpS1\/} gene regulation and cloning and characterization of the {\it SpKrox}-{\it 1\/} gene

Cell differentiation are associated with activation of cell lineage-specific genes. The $LpS{\it 1}\beta$ gene of Lytechinus pictus is activated at the late cleavage stage. $LpS{\it 1}\beta$ transcripts accumulate exclusively in aboral ectoderm lineages. Previous studies demonstrated two G-string DNA-elements, proximal and distal G-strings, which bind to an ectoderm-enriched nuclear factor. In order to define the cis-elements which control positive expression of the $LpS{\it 1}\beta$ gene, the regulatory region from $-$108 to +17 bp of the $LpS{\it 1}\beta$ gene promoter was characterized. The ectoderm G-string factor binds to a G/C-rich region larger than the G-string itself and the binding of the G-string factor requires sequences immediately downstream from the G-string. These downstream sequences are essential for full promoter activity. In addition, only 108 bp of $LpS{\it 1}\beta\ 5\sp\prime$ flanking DNA drives $LpS{\it 1}\beta$ gene expression in aboral ectoderm/mesenchyme cells. Therefore, for positive control of $LpS{\it 1}\beta$ gene expression, two regions of 5$\sp\prime$ flanking DNA are required: region I from base pairs $-$762 to $-$511, and region II, which includes the G/C-rich element, from base pairs $-$108 to $-$61. A mesenchyme cell repressor element is located within region I.^ DNA-binding proteins play key roles in determination of cell differentiation. The zinc finger domain is a DNA-binding domain present in many transcription factors. Based on homologies in zinc fingers, a zinc finger-encoding gene, SpKrox-1, was cloned from S. purpuratus. The putative SpKrox-1 protein has all structural characteristics of a transcription factor: four zinc fingers for DNA binding; acidic domain for transactivation; basic domain for nuclear targeting; and leucine zipper for dimerization. SpKrox-1 RNA transcripts showed a transient expression pattern which correlates largely with early embryonic development. The spatial expression of SpKrox-1 mRNA was distributed throughout the gastrula and larva ectodermal wall. However, SpKrox-1 was not expressed in pigment cells. The SpKrox-1 gene is thus a marker of a subset of SMCs or ectoderm cells. The structural features, and the transient temporal and restricted spatial expression patterns suggest that SpKrox-1 plays a role in a specific developmental event. ^

Transcriptional regulation and functional analysis of the Wilms' tumor gene WT1

The Wilms' tumor gene, WT1, encodes a zinc finger transcription factor which functions as a tumor suppressor. Defects in the WT1 gene can result in the development of nephroblastoma. WT1 is expressed during development, primarily in the metanephric kidney, the mesothelial lining of the abdomen and thorax, and the developing gonads. WT1 expression is tightly regulated and is essential for renal development. The WT1 gene encodes a protein with a proline-rich N-terminus which functions as a transcriptional repressor and C-terminus contains 4 zinc fingers that mediate DNA binding. WT1 represses transcription from a number of growth factors and growth factor receptors. WT1 mRNA undergoes alternative splicing at two sites, resulting in 4 mRNA species and polypeptide products. Exon 5, encoding 17 amino acids is alternatively spliced, and is located between the transcriptional repression domain and the DNA binding domain. The second alternative splice is the terminal 9 nucleotides of zinc finger 3, encoding the tripeptide Lys-Thr-Ser (KTS). The presence or absence of KTS within the zinc fingers of WT1 alters DNA binding.^ I have investigated transcriptional regulation of WT1, characterizing two means of repressing WT1 transcription. I have cloned a transcriptional silencer of the WT1 promoter which is located in the third intron of the WT1 gene. The silencer is 460 bp in length and contains an Alu repeat. The silencer functions in cells of non-renal origin.^ I have found that WT1 protein can autoregulate the WT1 promoter. Using the autoregulation of the WT1 promoter as a functional assay, I have defined differential consensus DNA binding motifs of WT1 isoforms lacking and containing the KTS tripeptide insertion. With these refined consensus DNA binding motifs, I have identified two additional targets of WT1 transcriptional repression, the proto-oncogenes bcl-2 and c-myc.^ I have investigated the ability of the alternatively spliced exon 5 to influence cell growth. In cell proliferation assays, isoforms of WT1 lacking exon 5 repress cell growth. WT1 isoforms containing exon 5 fail to repress cell growth to the same extent, but alter the morphology of the cells. These experiments demonstrate that the alternative splice isoforms of WT1 have differential effects on the function of WT1. These findings suggest a role for the alternative splicing of WT1 in metanephric development. ^

Regulation of pyridoxal $5\prime$-phosphate biosynthesis in {\it Escherichia coli\/} K-12

Vitamin B$\sb6$ (or pyridoxal 5$\sp\prime$-phosphate, PLP) is an essential, ubiquitous coenzyme that affects many aspects of amino acid and cellular metabolism in all organisms. The goal of this thesis is to examine the regulation of PLP biosynthesis in Escherichia coli K-12. First, PdxH oxidase is a PLP biosynthetic enzyme, which uses molecular oxygen as an electron acceptor under aerobic assay conditions. To test if facultative anaerobic E. coli uses another enzyme to replace the function of PdxH oxidase anaerobically, suppressors of a pdxH null mutant were isolated anaerobically after 2-aminopurine or spontaneous mutagenesis. Only one specific bypass mutation in another PLP biosynthetic gene pdxJ was found, suggesting that PdxH oxidase is able to function anaerobically and PdxT utilizes D-1-deoxyxyulose as a substrate. Second, regulation of the serC (pdxF)-aroA operon, which is involved the biosynthesis of L-serine, PLP and aromatic compounds was examined. A serC (pdxF) single gene transcript and a serC (pdXf)-aroA cotranscript initiated at P$\sb{serC\ (pdxF)}$ upstream of serC (pdxF) were detected. The expression of the operon is activated by leucine responsive regulatory protein (LRP) and repressed by cAMP receptor protein-cAMP complex (CRP$\cdot$cAMP) at the transcriptional level. LRP activates the operon by directly binding to the upstream consensus box. Binding of CRP$\cdot$cAMP to the upstream CRP box diminishes the activation effect of LRP. However, deletion of the CRP box did not affect the repression of CRP$\cdot$cAMP, suggesting that CRP$\cdot$cAMP may repress the operon indirectly by stimulating the activity or level of an unidentified repressor. The overall effect of this regulation is to maximize the expression of the operon when the cells are growing in minimal-glucose medium. In addition, the binding and the transcription of P$\sb{serC\ (pdxF)}$ by RNA polymerase require a supercoiled circular DNA, indicating that DNA supercoiling affects the transcription of the operon. Third, regulation of another PLP biosynthetic gene gapB was also examined. gapB is activated by CRP$\cdot$cAMP and repressed by catabolic repressor activator protein (CRA). However, the activation of CRP$\cdot$cAMP is epistatic to the repression of CRA. Due to the CRA repression, gapB was expressed at a low level in all the media tested, suggesting that it may be the rate-limiting step of PLP biosynthesis. In summary, unlike genes in many biosynthetic pathways, PLP biosynthetic genes are regulated by global regulators that are important for carbon and amino acid metabolism, instead of the end product(s) of the pathway. ^

Transcriptional regulation of the human {\it PAX6\/} gene

PAX6, a member of the paired-type homeobox gene family, is expressed in a partially and temporally restricted pattern in the developing central nervous system, and its mutation is responsible for human aniridia (AN) and mouse small eye (Sey). The objective of this study was to characterize the PAX6 gene regulation at the transcriptional level, and thereby gain a better understanding of the molecular basis of the dynamic expression pattern and the diversified function of the human PAX6 gene.^ Initially, we examined the transcriptional regulation of the PAX6 gene by transient transfection assays and identified multiple cis-regulatory elements that function differently in different cell lines. The transcriptional initiation site was identified by RNase protection and primer extension assays. Examination of the genomic DNA sequence indicated that the PAX6 promoter has a TATA like-box (ATATTTT) at $-$26 bp, and two CCAAT-boxes are located at positions $-$70 and $-$100 bp. A 38 bp ply (CA) sequence was located 992 bp upstream from the initiation site. Transient transfection assays in glioblastoma cells and leukemia cells indicate that a 92 bp region was required for basal level PAX6 promoter activity. Gel retardation assays showed that this 92 bp sequence can form four DNA-protein complexes which can be specifically competed by a 31-mer oligonucleotide containing a PAX6 TATA-like sequence or an adenovirus TATA box. The activation of the promoter is positively correlated with the expression of PAX6 transcripts in cells tested.^ Based on the results obtained from the in vitro transfection assays, we did further dissection assay and functional analysis in both cell-culture and transgenic mice. We found that a 5 kb upstream promoter sequence is required for the tissue specific expression in the forebrain region which is consistent with that of the endogenous PAX6 gene. A 267 bp cell-type specific repressor located within the 5 kb fragment was identified and shown to direct forebrain specific expression. The cell-type specific repressor element has been narrowed to a 30 bp region which contains a consensus E-box by in vitro transfection assays. The third regulatory element identified was contained in a 162 bp sequence (+167 to +328) which functions as a midbrain repressor, and it appeared to be required for establishing the normal expression pattern of the PAX6 gene. Finally, a highly conserved 216 bp sequence identified in intron 4 exhibited as a spinal cord specific enhancer. And this 216 bp cis-regulatory element can be used as a marker to trace the differentiation and migration of progenitor cells in the developing spinal cord. These studies show that the concerted action of multiple cis-acting regulatory elements located upstream and downstream of the transcription initiation site determines the tissue specific expression of PAX6 gene. ^

Studies of subcellular localization and complex formation of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens transport ATPase VirB11

The VirB11 ATPase is an essential component of an Agrobacterium tumefaciens type IV bacterial secretion system that transfers oncogenic nucleoprotein complexes to susceptible plant cells. This dissertation investigates the subcellular localization and homo-oligomeric state of the VirB11 ATPase in order to provide insights about the assembly of the protein as a subunit of this membrane-associated transfer system. Subcellular fractionation studies and quantitative immunoblot analysis demonstrated that $\sim$30% of VirB11 partitioned as soluble protein and $\sim$70% was tightly associated with the bacterial cytoplasmic membrane. No differences were detected in VirB11 subcellular localization and membrane association in the presence or absence of other transport system components. Mutations in virB11 affecting protein function were mapped near the amino terminus, just upstream of a region encoding a Walker 'A' nucleotide-binding site, and within the Walker 'A' motif partitioned almost exclusively with the cytoplasmic membrane, suggesting that an activity associated with nucleotide binding could modulate the affinity of VirB11 for the cytoplasmic membrane. Merodiploid analysis of VirB11 mutant and truncation derivatives provided strong evidence that VirB11 functions as a homo- or heteromultimer and that the C-terminal half of VirB11 contains a protein interaction domain. A combination of biochemical and molecular genetic approaches suggested that VirB11 and the green fluorescence protein (GFP) formed a mixed multimer as demonstrated by immunoprecipitation experiments with anti-GFP antibodies. Second, a hybrid protein composed of VirB11 fused to the N-terminal DNA-binding domain of bacteriophage $\lambda$ cI repressor conferred immunity to $\lambda$ superinfection, demonstrating that VirB11 self-association promotes dimerization of the chimeric repressor. A conserved Walker 'A' motif, though required for VirB11 function in T-complex export, was not necessary for VirB11 self-association. Sequences in both the N- and the C-terminal halves of the protein were found to contribute to self-association of the full length protein. Chemical cross-linking experiments with His$\sb6$ tagged VirB11 suggested that VirB11 probably assembles into a higher order homo-oligomeric complex. ^

FUS/TLS contributes to replication-dependent histone gene expression by interaction with U7 snRNPs and histone-specific transcription factors.

Replication-dependent histone genes are up-regulated during the G1/S phase transition to meet the requirement for histones to package the newly synthesized DNA. In mammalian cells, this increment is achieved by enhanced transcription and 3' end processing. The non-polyadenylated histone mRNA 3' ends are generated by a unique mechanism involving the U7 small ribonucleoprotein (U7 snRNP). By using affinity purification methods to enrich U7 snRNA, we identified FUS/TLS as a novel U7 snRNP interacting protein. Both U7 snRNA and histone transcripts can be precipitated by FUS antibodies predominantly in the S phase of the cell cycle. Moreover, FUS depletion leads to decreased levels of correctly processed histone mRNAs and increased levels of extended transcripts. Interestingly, FUS antibodies also co-immunoprecipitate histone transcriptional activator NPAT and transcriptional repressor hnRNP UL1 in different phases of the cell cycle. We further show that FUS binds to histone genes in S phase, promotes the recruitment of RNA polymerase II and is important for the activity of histone gene promoters. Thus, FUS may serve as a linking factor that positively regulates histone gene transcription and 3' end processing by interacting with the U7 snRNP and other factors involved in replication-dependent histone gene expression.

GENETIC ORGANIZATION OF THE STRUCTURAL GENES FOR NITRATE REDUCTASE (TN5)

Nitrate reductase in Escherichia coli is a membrane-bound anaerobic enzyme that is repressed by oxygen and induced by nitrate. The genetic organization of the structural genes for the two larger subunits of nitrate reductase ((alpha) and (beta)) was determined by immunoprecipitation analysis of the formation of these proteins in nitrate reductase-deficient mutants resulting from transposon Tn5 mutagenesis. The results suggested that the genes encoding the (alpha) and (beta) subunits (narG and H) were arranged in an operon with transcription in the direction promoter(--->)(alpha)(--->)(beta). Segments of the chromosome containing the Tn5 inserts from several of the mutants were cloned into plasmid pBR322 and the positions of the transposons determined by restriction mapping. The Tn5 insertion sites were localized on two contiguous EcoRI fragments spanning about 6.6 kilobases of DNA. The narI gene (proposed to encode the (gamma) subunit) was positioned immediately downstream from the (beta)-gene (narH) by Southern analysis of Tn10 insertions into the narI locus. A Tn10 insertion into the narK locus, proposed to encode a nitrate-sensitive repressor of other anaerobic enzymes, was located about 1.5 kilobases upstream from the narGHI operon promoter. The narL locus, proposed to encode a nitrate-sensitive positive regulator of the narGHI operon and known to be genetically linked to the other nar genes, was demonstrated to lie outside a 19.3-kilobase region of the chromosome which encompasses the other nar genes. The physical limit of the narGHI promoter was defined by studying the effect of Tn5 insertions into a hybrid plasmid containing the functional operon. The points of origin of the coding regions for the (alpha) and (beta) genes were deduced by alignment of the chromosomal map of Tn5 insertion sites with the sizes of (alpha) and (beta) subunit fragments produced by plasmids carrying these Tn5 inserts in the nar operon. The coding region for the (alpha) subunit (143,000 daltons) begins about 250 nucleotides downstream from the deduced limit of the promoter region and includes about 4.0 kilobases of DNA; the region encoding (beta) (60,000 daltons) lies immediately downstream from the (alpha)-gene and is approximately 1.6 kilobases in length. The adjacent region encoding the (gamma) subunit (19,000 daltons) is approximately 0.5 kilobase in length. ^

Molecular regulatory mechanisms and embryonic tissue specification in sea urchin development

To understand how a eukaryote achieves differential transcription of genes in precise spatial patterns, the molecular details of tissue specific expression of the Strongylocentrotus purpuratus Spec2a gene were investigated by functional studies of the cis-regulatory components in the upstream enhancer. Regional activation of Spec2a in the aboral ectoderm is conferred by a combination of activators and repressors. The positive regulators include previously identified SpOtx and a trans-regulatory factor binding at the CCAAT site in the Spec2a enhancer. The nuclear protein binding to the CCAAT box was determined to be the heterotrimeric CCAAT binding factor (SpCBF). SpCBF also mediates general activation in the ectoderm. The negative regulators consist of an oral ectoderm repressor (OER), an endoderm repressor (ENR), and an S. Purpuratus goosecoid homologue (SpGsc). OER functions to prevent expression in the oral ectoderm, while ENR is required to repress endoderm expression. SpGsc antagonizes the SpOtx function by competing for binding at SpOtx target genes in oral ectoderm, where it functions as an active repressor. Thus, SpOtx and SpGsc perform collectively to establish and maintain the oral-aboral axis. Finally, purification of ENR and OER proteins from sea urchin blastula stage nuclear extracts was performed using site-specific DNA-affmity chromatography. ^

Alteration of CEACAM1 gene transcription in prostate cancer cells: The role of AR, Sp2, and HDAC

Cell to cell adhesion molecule (CEACAM1), a type II tumor suppressor, has been found to be down-regulated in prostate cancer cells. The mechanism that causes CEACAM1's down-regulation in tumorigenesis is unknown. Here we show that the transcriptional activity of CEACAM1 is decreased in prostate cancer cells. This decrease is not due to methylation of the CEACAM1's promoter, but rather to the alteration of transcription factors regulating CEACAM1 expression. ^ Since androgen/androgen receptors (AR) are potent regulators of prostate growth and differentiation, their role on CEACAM1 gene transcription was examined. The androgen receptor could directly increase CEACAM1 transcriptional activity in a ligand dependent manner by interacting with an AR consensus element that resides in the CEACAM1 promoter. However, AR binding to the CEACAM1 promoter is not related to the loss of CEACAM1 during prostate cancer progression. ^ Further analysis enabled us to determine the particular region in the CEACAM1 promoter that mediates a decrease in CEACAM1 transcriptional activity in prostate cancer cells. Upon further examination, we found that this CEACAM1 promoter region interacts with the Sp1, Sp2, and Sp3 transcription factors. However, only Sp2 expression was found to increase in prostate cancer cells. Inhibiting Sp2 from binding to the CEACAM1 promoter caused an increase in CEACAM1 transcriptional activity in prostate cancer cells. In addition, over-expressing Sp2 in normal prostate cells resulted in a decrease in CEACAM1 transcriptional activity and endogenous protein expression. These observations suggest that Sp2 is a transcription repressor of CEACAM1. Furthermore, prostate cancer cells treated with trichostatin A (TSA), a specific histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, activated CEACAM1 transcriptional activity. This implies that HDACs are involved in CEACAM1 transcriptional activity. Mutation of the Sp2 DNA binding region on the CEACAM1 promoter inhibited TSA activation of CEACAM1 transcriptional activity. This indicates that HDACs inhibit CEACAM1 transcriptional activity through Sp2. Base on these results, we propose that Sp2 is critical for down-regulating CEACAM1 expression, and one mechanism by which Sp2 represses CEACAM1 expression is by recruiting HDAC to the CEACAM1 promoter in prostate cancer cells. Collectively, these findings provide novel insights into mechanisms that cause the down-regulation of CEACAM1 expression in prostate cancer cells. ^

Role of the transcription factor activator protein-2alpha in prostate carcinogenesis

Activator protein 2α (AP-2) is a transcription factor known to play a crucial role in the progression of malignant melanoma, colorectal carcinoma, and breast cancer. Several AP-2 target genes are known to be deregulated in prostate cancer, therefore, we hypothesize that loss AP-2 expression plays a causal role in prostate carcinogenesis. Immunofluorescent staining for AP-2 of 30 radical prostatectomy specimens demonstrated that while AP-2 was highly expressed in normal prostate epithelium, its expression was lost in most cases of high grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), and all cases of prostate cancer studied. Additional analyses demonstrated that AP-2 was associated with normal luminal differentiation and it was not expressed in the basal cell layer. In cell lines, AP-2 was strongly expressed in immortalized normal prostate epithelial cells, whereas low expression was observed in the LNCaP, LNCaP-LN3, and PC3M-LN4 prostate cancer cell lines. Transfection of the highly tumorigenic and metastatic cell line PC3M-LN4 with the AP-2 gene significantly decreased tumor growth in the prostate of nude mice (p = 0.032) and inhibited metastases to the lymph nodes. Moreover, transfection of the low tumorigenic, low metastatic cell line LNCaP-LN3 with full length AP-2; resulted in complete inhibition of tumor incidence in the AP-2 transfectants (0/19) vs. neo control (10/16). A potential mechanism for this loss of tumorigenicity was the modulation of gene expression in prostate cancer cells that mimicked the normal phenotype. Analysis of differential expression between neo control- and AP-2-transfected cells in vitro and in tumors demonstrated low VEGF expression in AP-2 transfectants. We further demonstrated that AP-2 acted as a transcriptional repressor of the VEGF promoter by binding to a GC-rich region located between −88 and −66. This region contains an AP-2 consensus element overlapping two Sp1 consensus elements. We found that Sp3 and AP-2 bound to this region in a mutually exclusive manner to promote activation or repression. Increased VEGF expression has been observed in high grade PIN and in prostate cancer. Here we provide evidence that this early molecular change could be a result of loss of AP-2 expression in the prostatic epithelium. ^

Involvement of histone H3 methylation in Tup1-Ssn6 repression

The Tup1-Ssn6 complex regulates the expression of diverse classes of genes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae including those regulated by mating type, DNA damage, glucose, and anaerobic stress. The complex is recruited to target genes by sequence-specific repressor proteins. Once recruited to particular promoters, it is not completely clear how it functions to block transcription. Repression probably occurs through interactions with both the basal transcriptional machinery and components of chromatin. Tup1 interactions with chromatin are strongly influenced by acetylation of histories H3 and H4. Tup1 binds to underacetylated histone tails and requires multiple histone deacetylases (HDACs) for its repressive functions. Like acetylation, histone methylation is involved in regulation of gene expression. The possible role of histone methylation in Tup1 repression is not known. Here we examined possible roles of histone methyltransferases in Tup1-Ssn6 functions. We found that like other genes, Tup1-Ssn6 target genes exhibit increases in the levels of histone H3 lysine 4 methylation upon activation. However, deletion of individual or multiple histone methyltransferases (HMTs) and other SET-domain containing genes has no apparent effect on Tup1-Ssn6 mediated repression of a number of well-defined targets. Interestingly, we discovered that Ssn6 interacts with Set2. Since deletion of SET2 does not affect Tup1-Ssn6 repression, Ssn6 may utilize Set2 in other contexts to regulate gene repression. In order examine if the two components of the Tup1-Ssn6 complex have independent functions in the cell, we identified genes differentially expressed in tup1Δ and ssn6Δ mutants using DNA microarrays. Our data indicate that ∼4% of genes in the cell are regulated by Ssn6 independently of Tup1. In addition, expression of genes regulated by Tup1-Ssn6 seems to be differently affected by deletion of Ssn6 and deletion of Tup1, which indicates that these components might have separate functions. Our data shed new light on the classical view of Tup1-Ssn6 functions, and indicate that Ssn6 might have repressive functions as well. ^