[Admittatur of Charles Brooks], 1812 September 23

Published copy of the 1807 College Laws with the admittatur of undergraduate Charles Brooks signed by President John Kirkland on September 23, 1812.

Front elevation of cupola by Charles Bulfinch, [ca. 1812]

Pen and ink drawing by Charles Bulfinch of the proposed cupola of University Hall. Pencil drawing of interior of cupola on verso.

Lettres écrites d'Italie en 1812 et 13, à m. Charles Pictet, l'un des rédacteurs de la Bibliothèque britannique,

"La première édition a été publiée en 1815, sous le titre de Lettres sur l'agriculture de l'Italie." cf. Quérard, La France littéraire.

Notice sur le séjour à Marseille du roi d'Espagne, Charles IV : depuis la fin de 1808 jusqu'au printems de 1812 /

Authorship from Barbier, III, p. 475.

Pictures of travel : in Sweden, among the Hartz Mountains, and in Switzerland, with a visit at Charles Dickens's house /

Mode of access: Internet.

The Broken Mirror: Maternal Agency and Identity in Charles Dickens's Bleak House

This paper examined how Esther Summerson, Dickens’s ideal good mother, can be understood as a woman who has maternal agency and identity both as a character and as a narrator, and how she contrasts with other maternal characters in the novel, both major and minor. While more transgressive mothers, such as Lady Dedlock, Mrs. Jellyby and even Krook’s cat, are doomed to death, ineffectiveness and madness, Esther moves from a frozen, “unsexualized” state into a space of life and sexual possibility. In addition, Esther has agency and identity as a narrator since she shares the narration with a third-person male narrator. Esther becomes the one who speaks rather than the one who is spoken of, and her maternal, nurturing voice provides a balm for the often harsh, judgmental voice of the male narrator. As the narrator’s patriarchal voice dies away at the end, it is Esther’s maternal voice that survives.

Rule Britannia!: British Stock Market Returns, 1825-1870

This article presents a new series of monthly equity returns for the British stock market for the period 1825-1870. In addition to calculating capital appreciation and dividend yields, the article also estimates the effect of survivorship bias on returns. Three notable findings emerge from this study. First, stock market returns in the 1825-1870 period are broadly similar for Britain and the United States, although the British market is less risky. Second, real returns in the 1825-1870 period are higher than in subsequent epochs of British history. Third, unlike the modern era, dividends are the most important component of returns.