976 resultados para steel industry
Resumo:
At head of title: Imperial Mineral Resources Bureau.
Resumo:
At head of title: Imperial Mineral Resources Bureau.
Resumo:
Description based on: Nov. 1967.
Resumo:
Listeria monocytogenes is of particular concern for the food industry due to its psychrotolerant and ubiquitous nature. In this work, the ability of L monocytogenes culturable cells to adhere to stainless steel coupons was studied in co-culture with the bacteriocin-producing food isolate Lactobacillus sakei 1 as well as in the presence of the cell-free neutralized supernatant of L sakei 1 (CFSN-S1) containing sakacin 1. Results were compared with counts obtained using a non bacteriocin-producing strain (L sakei ATCC 15521) and its bacteriocin free supernatant (CFSN-SA). Culturable adherent L monocytogenes and lactobacilli cells were enumerated respectively on PALCAM and MRS agars at 3-h intervals for up to 12 h and after 24 and 48 h of incubation. Bacteriocin activity was evaluated by critical dilution method. After 6 h of incubation, the number of adhered L monocytogenes cells in pure culture increased from 3.8 to 5.3 log CFU/cm(2) (48h). Co-culture with L sakei 1 decreased the number of adhered L monocytogenes cells (P < 0.001) during all sampling times with counts lower than 3.0 log CFU/cm(2). The CFNS-S1 also led to a significant and similar reduction in culturable adhered L. monocytogenes counts for up to 24 h of incubation, however after 48 h of incubation, re-growth of L monocytogenes number of adhered cells was observed, likely due to lack of competition for nutrients. L sakei ATCC 15521 or its supernatant (CFNS-SA) did not reduce the number of adhered L monocytogenes cells on stainless steel surface and from 6 h of incubation, listerial counts were between 4.3 and 4.5 log CFU/cm(2). These results indicate that L sakei 1 and its bacteriocin sakacin 1 may be useful to inhibit early stages of L monocytogenes adherence to abiotic surface. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Resumo:
Detailed view of poles used in construction. Poles were spliced in their length with steel bars (like 3 pin plugs) and these joints were restrained from splitting with steel strap belts. The belts were tightened with opposing wedges like the old Greene & Greene wrought iron detail.
Resumo:
View to underside of roof with steel beam and insulation.
Resumo:
In reinforced concrete systems, ensuring that a good bond between the concrete and the embedded reinforcing steel is critical to long-term structural performance. Without good bond between the two, the system simply cannot behave as intended. The bond strength of reinforcing bars is a complex interaction between localized deformations, chemical adhesion, and other factors. Coating of reinforcing bars, although sometimes debated, has been commonly found to be an effective way to delay the initiation of corrosion in reinforced concrete systems. For many years, the standard practice has been to coat reinforcing steel with an epoxy coating, which provides a barrier between the steel and the corrosive elements of water, air, and chloride ions. Recently, there has been an industry-led effort to use galvanizing to provide the protective barrier commonly provided by traditional epoxy coatings. However, as with any new structural product, questions exist regarding both the structural performance and corrosion resistance of the system. In the fall of 2013, Buchanan County, Iowa constructed a demonstration bridge in which the steel girders and all internal reinforcing steel were galvanized. The work completed in this project sought to understand the structural performance of galvanized reinforcing steel as compared to epoxy-coated steel and to initiate a long-term corrosion monitoring program. This work consisted of a series of controlled laboratory tests and the installation of a corrosion monitoring system that can be observed for years in the future. The results of this work indicate there is no appreciable difference between the bond strength of epoxy-coated reinforcing steel and galvanized reinforcing steel. Although some differences were observed, no notable difference in either peak load, slip, or failure mode could be identified. Additionally, a long-term monitoring system was installed in this Buchanan County bridge and, to date, no corrosion activity has been identified.