970 resultados para United States. National Archives
Resumo:
"December 17, 1987"--Pt. 2.
Resumo:
jsk
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Shipping list no.: 88-374-P (pt. 1).
Resumo:
"June 21, 1988"--Pt. 2.
Resumo:
Mode of access: Internet.
Resumo:
Some proceedings issued without series title.
Resumo:
"October 28, 1993"--Pt. 2.
Resumo:
Claude Pepper, chairman of subcommittee.
Resumo:
Includes bibliographies.
Resumo:
"February 28, 1989"--Pt. 1.
Resumo:
Shipping list no.: 90-134-P (pt. 1).
Resumo:
This study was designed to study the role of Host Country National categorizationof female expatriate co-workers, in two samples – U.S., and India. Using data from 54participants in the U.S. and 52 participants in India, we found that respondents from Indiacategorized potential expatriate co-workers from the U.S. into in-group or out-groupsignificantly more than respondents from the U.S. Further, we found that femaleexpatriates from the U.S. are preferred by Indian HCNs as co-workers significantly morethan male expatriates from the U.S. We discuss implications for organizations and offersuggestions for future research.
Resumo:
In this thesis I sought to explain the origins of national security concerns over foreign investments in the United States from 1919 to 2008. I identified and examined 29 cases of national security concerns over foreign investments in the United States during that period, and argued that in order to understand the circumstances under which foreign investments in the United States are perceived to be threats to the U.S. security we must rely on a combination of democratic peace theory and the version of political realism known as power transition theory. Thus, I tested the argument that national security concerns over foreign investments in the United States from 1919 to 2008 resulted from: (1) perceptions of international power transition, (2) perceptions of ideological and institutional differences between the United States and the home country of the investor, (3) perceptions of the strategic importance of the sector where the investment is made, and (4) perceptions of participation or control of the foreign investor by the government of the country of origin. I found that all these hypotheses have some explanatory power.