Microwave-Assisted Phospha-Michael Reactions with Internal Alkenes

The atom efficient phospha-Michael reaction between bis 4-methylphenyl phosphine oxide and several activated internal alkenes has been shown to occur under microwave irradiation without added solvent or catalyst. The alkenes used for this study were ethyl 4-nitrocinnamate, two chalcones ((E)-3-(4-methoxy-phenyl)-1-(4- nitrophenyl)-prop-2-en-1-one and (E)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)-3-(3-nitro-phenyl)-prop-2- en-1-one), and 2-phenylmethylene-propanedinitrile. In the case of ethyl 4-nitrocinnamate, reaction with bis 4-methylphenyl phosphine oxide for sixty minutes at 130 °C yielded the desired phospha-Michael product in a 55% yield after purification. Varying the location of the nitro group on the phenyl rings of the chalcones did not seem to have a large effect on their reactivity. By NMR, both chalcones seemed to react to the same extent when the reaction times and temperatures were held constant. Interestingly, a phospha-Michael reaction was observed at a reaction temperature of 65°C for experiments involving 2- phenyl-methylene-propanedinitrile while the other substrates required a reaction temperature of 130 °C. Similar experiments were carried out with bis mesityl phosphine oxide and two internal alkenes: 2-phenylmethylene-propanedinitrile and ethyl-2-cyano-3- methyl-2-butenoate. These experiments did not yield any of the predicted phospha- Michael products, which suggest steric limitations to the Michael donor for this reaction.

Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy in higher eukaryotes

Research in autophagy continues to accelerate,(1) and as a result many new scientists are entering the field. Accordingly, it is important to establish a standard set of criteria for monitoring macroautophagy in different organisms. Recent reviews have described the range of assays that have been used for this purpose.(2,3) There are many useful and convenient methods that can be used to monitor macroautophagy in yeast, but relatively few in other model systems, and there is much confusion regarding acceptable methods to measure macroautophagy in higher eukaryotes. A key point that needs to be emphasized is that there is a difference between measurements that monitor the numbers of autophagosomes versus those that measure flux through the autophagy pathway; thus, a block in macroautophagy that results in autophagosome accumulation needs to be differentiated from fully functional autophagy that includes delivery to, and degradation within, lysosomes (in most higher eukaryotes) or the vacuole (in plants and fungi). Here, we present a set of guidelines for the selection and interpretation of the methods that can be used by investigators who are attempting to examine macroautophagy and related processes, as well as by reviewers who need to provide realistic and reasonable critiques of papers that investigate these processes. This set of guidelines is not meant to be a formulaic set of rules, because the appropriate assays depend in part on the question being asked and the system being used. In addition, we emphasize that no individual assay is guaranteed to be the most appropriate one in every situation, and we strongly recommend the use of multiple assays to verify an autophagic response.