Applying the results of a systematic review in general practice

Objective: To assess how general practitioners might interpret and apply the results of a systematic review relevant to general practice. Design: Cross-sectional postal survey of general practitioners in August 1997. Participants: 51 general practitioners in the Southern Division of General Practice in Adelaide and 11 professors or heads of departments of general practice. Main outcome measures:Extent to which comments on the implications for practice and implications for research coincided with the evidence presented in a systematic review of antibiotics for the treatment of acute otitis media in children; and reported probability that respondents would prescribe antibiotics in three brief case scenarios. Results: There was considerable variation in the comments made by general practitioners on the implications of the review for clinical practice. After reading the review, respondents with training in critical appraisal were more likely to state that children with acute otitis media would usually recover spontaneously and reported a lower probability of prescribing antibiotics in two of the three case scenarios. Conclusions: Providing systematic reviews is not sufficient for the results of such evidence to be translated:into clinical practice. There is an association between critical appraisal skills and the application of evidence-based practice.

Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of schizophrenia and related disorders

Background: The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists is co-ordinating the development of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) in psychiatry, funded under the National Mental Health Strategy (Australia) and the New Zealand Health Funding Authority. This paper presents CPGs for schizophrenia and related disorders. Over the past decade schizophrenia has become more treatable than ever before. A new generation of drug therapies, a renaissance of psychological and psychosocial interventions and a first generation of reform within the specialist mental health system have combined to create an evidence-based climate of realistic optimism. Progressive neuroscientific advances hold out the strong possibility of more definitive biological treatments in the near future. However, this improved potential for better outcomes and quality of life for people with schizophrenia has not been translated into reality in Australia. The efficacy-effectiveness gap is wider for schizophrenia than any other serious medical disorder. Therapeutic nihilism, under-resourcing of services and a stalling of the service reform process, poor morale within specialist mental health services, a lack of broad-based recovery and life support programs, and a climate of tenacious stigma and consequent lack of concern for people with schizophrenia are the contributory causes for this failure to effectively treat. These guidelines therefore tackle only one element in the endeavour to reduce the impact of schizophrenia. They distil the current evidence-base and make recommendations based on the best available knowledge. Method: A comprehensive literature review (1990-2003) was conducted, including all Cochrane schizophrenia reviews and all relevant meta-analyses, and a number of recent international clinical practice guidelines were consulted. A series of drafts were refined by the expert committee and enhanced through a bi-national consultation process. Treatment recommendations: This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the management of schizophrenia by treatment type and by phase of illness. The essential features of the guidelines are: (i) Early detection and comprehensive treatment of first episode cases is a priority since the psychosocial and possibly the biological impact of illness can be minimized and outcome improved. An optimistic attitude on the part of health professionals is an essential ingredient from the outset and across all phases of illness. (ii) Comprehensive and sustained intervention should be assured during the initial 3-5 years following diagnosis since course of illness is strongly influenced by what occurs in this 'critical period'. Patients should not have to 'prove chronicity' before they gain consistent access and tenure to specialist mental health services. (iii) Antipsychotic medication is the cornerstone of treatment. These medicines have improved in quality and tolerability, yet should be used cautiously and in a more targeted manner than in the past. The treatment of choice for most patients is now the novel antipsychotic medications because of their superior tolerability and, in particular, the reduced risk of tardive dyskinesia. This is particularly so for the first episode patient where, due to superior tolerability, novel agents are the first, second and third line choice. These novel agents are nevertheless associated with potentially serious medium to long-term side-effects of their own for which patients must be carefully monitored. Conventional antipsychotic medications in low dosage may still have a role in a small proportion of patients, where there has been full remission and good tolerability; however, the indications are shrinking progressively. These principles are now accepted in most developed countries. (vi) Clozapine should be used early in the course, as soon as treatment resistance to at least two antipsychotics has been demonstrated. This usually means incomplete remission of positive symptomatology, but clozapine may also be considered where there are pervasive negative symptoms or significant or persistent suicidal risk is present. (v) Comprehensive psychosocial interventions should be routinely available to all patients and their families, and provided by appropriately trained mental health professionals with time to devote to the task. This includes family interventions, cognitive-behaviour therapy, vocational rehabilitation and other forms of therapy, especially for comorbid conditions, such as substance abuse, depression and anxiety. (vi) The social and cultural environment of people with schizophrenia is an essential arena for intervention. Adequate shelter, financial security, access to meaningful social roles and availability of social support are essential components of recovery and quality of life. (vii) Interventions should be carefully tailored to phase and stage of illness, and to gender and cultural background. (viii) Genuine involvement of consumers and relatives in service development and provision should be standard. (ix) Maintenance of good physical health and prevention and early treatment of serious medical illness has been seriously neglected in the management of schizophrenia, and results in premature death and widespread morbidity. Quality of medical care for people with schizophrenia should be equivalent to the general community standard. (x) General practitioners (GPs)s should always be closely involved in the care of people with schizophrenia. However, this should be truly shared care, and sole care by a GP with minimal or no special Optimal treatment of schizophrenia requires a multidisciplinary team approach with a consultant psychiatrist centrally involved.

"Futuristic medical education"

The Australian National Medical Education Colloquium provided a productive forum for medical educators to meet and to discuss and debate important contemporary issues affecting Australian medical schools. None of us know what the future will hold, and some of the possibilities discussed at the Colloquium were futuristic indeed. We would be wise to keep an open mind, to focus very much on competence and fitness to practice, and to develop a strong evidence base, as we travel this important path.

Unraveling the barriers to reconceptualization of the problem in chronic pain: The actual and perceived ability of patients and health professionals to understand the neurophysiology

To identify why reconceptualization of the problem is difficult in chronic pain, this study aimed to evaluate whether (1) health professionals and patients can understand currently accurate information about the neurophysiology of pain and (2) health professionals accurately estimate the ability of patients to understand the neurophysiology of pain. Knowledge tests were completed by 276 patients with chronic pain and 288 professionals either before (untrained) or after (trained) education about the neurophysiology of pain. Professionals estimated typical patient performance on the test. Untrained participants performed poorly (mean +/- standard deviation, 55% +/- 19% and 29% +/- 12% for professionals and patients, respectively), compared to their trained counterparts (78% +/- 21% and 61% +/- 19%, respectively). The estimated patient score (46% +/- 18%) was less than the actual patient score (P < .005). The results suggest that professionals and patients can understand the neurophysiology of pain but professionals underestimate patients' ability to understand. The implications are that (1) a poor knowledge of currently accurate information about pain and (2) the underestimation of patients' ability to understand currently accurate information about pain represent barriers to reconceptualization of the problem in chronic pain within the clinical and lay arenas. (C) 2003 by the American Pain Society.

Exporting "failure": why research from rich countries may not benefit the developing world

The '10/90 gap' was first highlighted by the Global Forum for Health Research. It refers to the finding that 90% of worldwide medical research expenditure is targeted at problems affecting only 10% of the world's population. Applying research results from the rich world to the problems of the poor may be a tempting, potentially easy and convenient solution for this gap. This paper had the objective of presenting arguments that such an approach runs the risk of exporting failure. Health interventions that are shown to be effective in the specific context of a Western industrialized setting will not necessarily work in the developing world.

Uma leitura sobre a medicina baseada na evidência a partir de Ludwik Fleck: entre incomensurabilidades e sincretismos

Tendo como base o contributo inovador de Fleck para o estudo do conhecimento médico, procura-se neste artigo explorar a ideia da incomensurabilidade entre estilos de pensamento. O objetivo principal é o de discutir em que medida as recentes reconfigurações suscitadas pela consolidação da Medicina Baseada na Evidência se têm traduzido na reformulação dos fundamentos da prática clínica. A partir da ilustração exploratória da especialidade de Medicina Geral e Familiar, sustenta-se que o contexto da praxis clínica implica articulações compósitas entre diferentes estilos de pensamento. Daí resulta que em lugar do conceito de incomensurabilidade, poderá ser mais adequado aprofundar as potencialidades da ideia de sincretismo epistemológico.

Use of medicines recommended for secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome

ABSTRACT OBJECTIVE : To analyze if the demographic and socioeconomic variables, as well as percutaneous coronary intervention are associated with the use of medicines for secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome. METHODS : In this cohort study, we included 138 patients with acute coronary syndrome, aged 30 years or more and of both sexes. The data were collected at the time of hospital discharge, and after six and twelve months. The outcome of the study was the simultaneous use of medicines recommended for secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome: platelet antiaggregant, beta-blockers, statins and angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker. The independent variables were: sex, age, education in years of attending, monthly income in tertiles and percutaneous coronary intervention. We described the prevalence of use of each group of medicines with their 95% confidence intervals, as well as the simultaneous use of the four medicines, in all analyzed periods. In the crude analysis, we verified the outcome with the independent variables for each period through the Chi-square test. The adjusted analysis was carried out using Poisson Regression. RESULTS : More than a third of patients (36.2%; 95%CI 28.2;44.3) had the four medicines prescribed at the same time, at the moment of discharge. We did not observe any differences in the prevalence of use in comparison with the two follow-up periods. The most prescribed class of medicines during discharge was platelet antiaggregant (91.3%). In the crude analysis, the demographic and socioeconomic variables were not associated to the outcome in any of the three periods. CONCLUSIONS : The prevalence of simultaneous use of medicines at discharge and in the follow-ups pointed to the under-utilization of this therapy in clinical practice. Intervention strategies are needed to improve the quality of care given to patients that extend beyond the hospital discharge, a critical point of transition in care.

Medicina Baseada na Evidência e Meta-Análise: à Procura do Santo Graal

Os autores reflectem sobre a evolução da formação médica, achando excessiva a ênfase dada actualmente à Medicina baseada na evidência e à meta-análise. Baseados numa análise dos problemas metodológicos dos ensaios clínicos controlados aleatórios e da meta-análise, tecem algumas considerações sobre a utilização destes métodos na prática clínica.

A Review of National Guidelines for Management of COPD in Europe

The quality of care can be improved by the development and implementation of evidence-based treatment guidelines. Different national guidelines for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exist in Europe and relevant differences may exist among them.This was an evaluation of COPD treatment guidelines published in Europe and Russia in the past 7 years. Each guideline was reviewed in detail and information about the most important aspects of patient diagnosis, risk stratification and pharmacotherapy was extracted following a standardised process. Guidelines were available from the Czech Republic, England and Wales, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Spain and Sweden. The treatment goals, criteria for COPD diagnosis, consideration of comorbidities in treatment selection and support for use of long-acting bronchodilators, were similar across treatment guidelines. There were differences in measures used for stratification of disease severity, consideration of patient phenotypes, criteria for the use of inhaled corticosteroids and recommendations for other medications (e.g. theophylline and mucolytics) in addition to bronchodilators.There is generally good agreement on treatment goals, criteria for diagnosis of COPD and use of long-acting bronchodilators as the cornerstone of treatment among guidelines for COPD management in Europe and Russia. However, there are differences in the definitions of patient subgroups and other recommended treatments.

Fatores explicativos dos resultados obtidos na medida de independência funcional aplicada a doentes com lesão neurológica

RESUMO - A medicina baseada na evidência e as iniciativas para melhorar a qualidade dos cuidados de saúde, têm aumentado bem como o reconhecimento da necessidade de medir os resultados funcionais em todos os cuidados de saúde. A reabilitação tem dado grande importância à necessidade de existência de instrumentos clínicos sensíveis aos resultados funcionais e, tem procurado instrumentos que possam ser usados em ambientes clínicos. A doença cérebro-vascular não é uma entidade patológica ou clínica única, podendo apresentar-se segundo quadros clínicos distintos. É uma ameaça à qualidade de vida não só pela sua elevada incidência e mortalidade, mas também pela alta morbilidade. Considerando estas premissas, pretendeu-se estudar a influência das características individuais, demográficas e de prognóstico neurológico dos doentes em reabilitação nas avaliações de funcionalidade. Utilizou-se a base de dados do Centro de Medicina de Reabilitação de Alcoitão, com todos os episódios de internamento de adultos (2647) que ocorreram entre 2006 e 2011, avaliados com a Medida de Independência Funcional (MIF). Este estudo revela que as variáveis com maior impacto na MIF, quer ao nível do score motor quer no score cognitivo são: a idade, o tempo de evolução e o tempo de internamento. A MIF não apresenta grandes variações entre grupos de diagnóstico no score motor mas releva valores estatisticamente significativos, no que diz respeito a esta variável, ao nível do score cognitivo. Os resultados deste estudo suportam ainda a validade da escala de avaliação e sugerem que esta fornece informações fundamentais para um bom programa de reabilitação.

Barreiras e facilitadores à implementação de um modelo de gestão de cuidados em Saúde Mental

RESUMO: Enquadramento teórico - Os estudos epidemiológicos demonstram que apesar de todo o progresso científico, muitas pessoas continuam sem acesso aos Serviços de Saúde Mental (SSM) e que, em muitos casos, os cuidados não têm a qualidade suficiente. A experiência de vários países mostra que os processos de implementação de modelos de intervenção terapêutica, como é o da Gestão de Cuidados, são lentos e complexos, não dependendo somente do grau de efectividade ou da complexidade das práticas a implementar. O Modelo de Gestão de Cuidados (MGC), é definido como uma prática baseada na evidência, utilizada para ajudar os doentes nos seus processos de recuperação. As estratégias para implementar práticas baseadas na evidência são críticas para a melhoria dos serviços. Existem, apesar de toda a evidência, muitas barreiras à implementação. Ao constatarmos que as práticas validadas pela ciência estão longe de estar claramente disseminadas nos serviços de saúde mental, fundamentamos a necessidade de utilizar metodologia de implementação que, além da efectividade das práticas, permita uma efectividade da implementação. Para responder às necessidades de formação e no âmbito da implementação do Plano Nacional de Saúde Mental, foram formados, em Portugal, 170 profissionais de saúde mental provenientes de serviços públicos e do sector social, de todas as regiões de Portugal Continental. Considerando que estes profissionais adquiriram competências específicas no MGC, através de um programa de formação nacional idêntico para todos os serviços de saúde mental, investigámos o grau de implementação deste modelo, bem como os facilitadores e as barreiras à sua correcta implementação. Existem vários estudos internacionais sobre as barreiras e os facilitadores à implementação de práticas baseadas na evidência, embora a maior parte desses estudos seja baseado em entrevistas semi-estruturadas a profissionais. Por outro lado, não existem, em Portugal, estudos sobre as barreiras e os facilitadores à implementação de práticas de saúde mental. Objectivos 1. Estimar o grau da implementação do MGC nos serviços de saúde mental portugueses 2. Caracterizar as regiões onde a implementação do MGC tenha ocorrido em maior grau. 3. Identificar os factores facilitadores e as barreiras à implementação do MGC, entre as regiõesde saúde do país. 4. Explorar as relações entre a fidelidade da implementação, as barreiras e os facilitadores da implementação, a cultura organizacional e as características dos serviços de saúde mental. Metodologia Estudo observacional, transversal e descritivo, com características exploratórias. População: profissionais dos serviços de saúde mental públicos e do sector social que frequentaram o Programa Nacional de Formação em Saúde Mental Comunitária no curso “Cuidados Integrados e Recuperação”, da Coordenação Nacional para a Saúde Mental / Ministério da Saúde, entre Outubro de 2008 e Dezembro de 2009, (n=71). Avaliação Fidelidade de implementação do Modelo de Gestão de Cuidados - IMR-S (Illness Management and Recovery Scale); Qualidade das guidelines utilizadas na implementação do Modelo de Gestão de Cuidados - AGREE II-PT (Appraisal of Guidelines, for Research and Evaluation); Avaliação das Barreiras e Facilitadores à implementação do MGC - BaFAI (Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument); Avaliação da Cultura Organizacional dos serviços de saúde mental - CVF-I (Competing Values Framework Instrument). Análise Estatística Para a descrição dos dados foram aplicados métodos de estatística descritiva. Para a comparação de subgrupos foram utilizados os testes de Mann Whitney e Kruskall-Wallis. Para a investigação de associações foram utilizados os métodos de correlação de Spearman e a Regressão Múltipla. O tratamento e análise dos dados foram realizados utilizando o programa estatístico IBM SPSS Statistics® para Mac/Apple® nas versões 19 e 20. Resultados Serviços: A articulação com os cuidados de saúde primários existe na maioria dos serviços (56.34%) e 77.46% dos serviços têm autonomia para definir os cuidados a prestar. A maioria dos serviços (63.38%) realiza duas ou mais reuniões clínicas por mês e a quase totalidade (95.77%) recebe estagiários e/ou internos. A área da investigação tem níveis considerados baixos, quando comparados com outros países da Europa, tanto para a globalidade das áreas de investigação (25.35%), como para as áreas psicossociais (22.54%). Considerando componentes fundamentais para a implementação de modelos de gestão de cuidados, os resultados nacionais indicam que 66.20% dos serviços fazem registos em processo clínico único. As percentagens de utilização de planos individuais de cuidados são globalmente baixas (46.48%). Por seu turno, a utilização de guidelines, nos serviços do país, tem uma percentagem média nacional de 57.75%. Profissionais: São, na sua maioria, do sexo feminino (69.01%), com idades entre os 25 e os 56 anos (média 38.9, ± 7.41). Pertencem, maioritariamente, aos grupos profissionais da enfermagem (23.94%) e da psicologia (49.30%). A formação dos profissionais é de nível superior em todos os grupos, com uma percentagem total de licenciados de 80.3%, tendo os restantes uma formação ao nível do mestrado. Apesar dos valores baixos (17%) de formação prévia em modelos de gestão de cuidados, 39% dos profissionais indicou utilizar algumas vertentes destes modelos na sua prática. Apesar de 97,18% dos profissionais ter participado em dois ou mais encontros científicos, num período de dois anos, apenas 38.03% apresentou alguma comunicação científica no mesmo intervalo. Guideline: Os resultados da avaliação da guideline do MGC indicaram percentagens mais altas, quanto à qualidade do seu desenvolvimento, nos Domínios 1 (Objectivo e finalidade, com 72.2%) e 4 (Clareza de Apresentação, 77.7%). O Domínio 5 (Aplicabilidade) foi pontuado no limite inferior do desenvolvimento com qualidade suficiente (54.1%), ao passo que a guideline obteve uma pontuação negativa nos Domínios 2 (Envolvimento das partes interessadas, com 41.6%) e 3 (Rigor do Desenvolvimento, com 28.1%). Adicionalmente não foi possível às avaliadoras cotar o Domínio 6 (Independência editorial), por ausência de referências neste contexto. A guideline teve uma avaliação global positiva (66%), com recomendação de aceitação com modificações. Cultura Organizacional: O perfil de liderança com maior frequência nos serviços de saúde mental portugueses foi o de Mentor (45.61%). As percentagens mais baixas pertenceram aos perfis Monitor e Inovador (3.51%). Na perspectiva da cultura organizacional dos serviços, apontuação mais alta foi a da Cultura das Relações Humanas (74.07%). A estratégia de liderança, com predomínio em todas as regiões, foi a estratégia de Flexibilidade (66.10%). Os resultados mostram que a única associação positivamente significativa com o grau da implementação do MGC é a do perfil Produtor, com um peso específico de 14.55% na prevalência dos perfis de liderança nos serviços de saúde mental portugueses. Barreiras: As barreiras à implementação da prática do MGC, identificadas pelos profissionais dos serviços de saúde mental, com percentagens mais altas nos totais do país, foram: o tempo (57.7%), o conhecimento sobre o modelo e a motivação (40.8%), a colaboração dos outros profissionais (33.7%), o número de contactos reduzidos com os doentes (35.2%), as insuficiências do ponto de vista dos espaços (70.4%) e dos instrumentos disponíveis (69%) para implementar o MGC. Existiu uma variação entre as regiões de saúde do país. Os resultados mostram que houve uma correlação negativa, de forma significativa, entre a implementação do MGC e as barreiras: da resistência à utilização de protocolos, do formato da prática, da necessidade de mais treino e da não cooperação dos profissionais. Foram encontradas diferenças estatisticamente significativas entre as barreiras à implementação e as características dos serviços, dos profissionais e da cultura organizacional. Implementação: A média nacional da fidelidade de implementação do MGC (41.48) teve valores aproximados aos de estudos similares. Na pontuação por regiões, a implementação com maior fidelidade ocorreu no Alentejo. Se considerarmos a implementação com fidelidade esta ocorreu em 57.75% dos serviços e uma boa implementação em 15.49%. Os métodos de regressão permitiram confirmar a capacidade preditiva das barreiras e da cultura organizacional quanto à fidelidade da implementação do MGC. Discussão: No universo das hipóteses inicialmente colocadas foi possível verificar a variação da implementação do MGC entre as regiões do país. O estudo permitiu, adicionalmente, concluir pela existência de denominadores comuns de maior sucesso da implementação do MGC. Foi ainda possível verificar uma relação significativa, existente entre o grau de implementação e as dimensões das barreiras, a cultura organizacional e os recursos dos SSM (aqui definidos pelas características dos serviços e dos profissionais). De uma forma mais conclusiva podemos afirmar que existem outros factores, que não estão relacionados com a avaliação restrita dos recursos financeiros ou humanos, associados à qualidade da implementação de práticas baseadas na evidência, como o MGC. Exemplo disso são os achados referentes à região de saúde do Alentejo, onde a distância dos grandes centros urbanos e as conhecidas dificuldades de acessibilidade, combinadas com os problemas conhecidos da falta de recursos, não impediram que fosse a região com os valores mais altos da fidelidade de implementação. Conclusões: Foram encontradas inúmeras barreiras à implementação do MGC. Existem barreiras diferentes entre regiões, que resultam das características dos serviços, dos profissionais e da cultura organizacional. Para existir implementação é necessária a consideração de metodologias próprias que vão para além dos tradicionais programas de formação. As práticas baseadas na evidência, amplamente defendidas, exigem implementações baseadas na evidência.-------------ABSTRACT: Introduction - Several epidemiological studies show that, despite all scientific progress, many people still continue to have no access to mental health services and in many situations the quality of care is poor. The experiences of several countries show that progress towards case management implementation is slow and complex, depending not only from the degree of effectiveness or the complexity of the practice. Case management is defined as an evidence-based practice used to help patients in the recovery process. Strategies to implement evidence-based practices are critical to services improvement. There are many barriers to their implementation, despite all available evidence. Realising that practices of proved scientific value are far from being clearly implemented, justifies the need to use implementation methodologies that, beyond practice effectiveness, allow implementation effectiveness. To answer training needs and in the framework of the National Mental Health Plan implementation, 170 mental health (MH) professionals from portuguese public and private sectors were trained. Considering that case management skills were acquired, as a result of this training programme, we decided to study the degree of implementation in the services.Barriers and facilitators to the implementation were studied as well. There are several studies related with barriers and facilitators to the implementation of evidence-based practices, but most of them use semi-structured interviews with professionals. Additionally, there are no studies in Portugal related with barriers and facilitators to the implementation of mental health practices. Objectives1. Estimate the degree of case management implementation in Portuguese MH Services. 2.Describe regions where implementation occurred with higher fidelity degree. 3. Identify barriers and facilitators to case management implementation across country regions. 4. Explore the relationships between implementation, barriers and facilitators, organisational culture and services characteristics. Methodology - Cross sectional, descriptive study. Assessments - Implementation fidelity - IMR-S (Illness Management and Recovery Scale); Guideline quality - AGREE II-PT (Appraisal of Guidelines, for Research and Evaluation); Barriers and facilitators assessment - BaFAI (Barriers and Facilitators Assessment Instrument); Organisational culture assessment - CVF-I (Competing Values Framework Instrument). Statistical analysis - Descriptives and cross-tabs. Subgroups comparison: Mann-Witney and Kruskall-Wallis. Associations between variables were calculated using Spearman correlation's and Multiple Regression. Results - Services: Liaison with primary care is done in most services (56.34%) and 77.46% have autonomy to determine care. Most services have regular clinical meetings and almost all give internship training (95.77%). Research activity is low compared with other European countries, for both general and psychosocial research. Considering key components for the case management implementation, 66.20% of all services use single clinical records. The use of individual care plans is globally low (46.48%) and there is a use of guidelines in 57.75% of services. Human Resources: most are women (69.01%), with age ranging from 25-56 (average 39.9, SD 7.41). The majority are psychologists (49.30%) and nurses (23.94%). All have a university degree, 19.7% have a masters degree and 83% didn’t have any case management training before the above mentioned national training. Despite the low levels of preceding case management training, 39% have used model components in day-to-day practice and although 97.18% of the workforce have attended scientific meetings in the last 2 years, only 38.03% presented communications in the same period. Guideline: Results show that higher scores were obtained in Domain 1. Scope and Purpose (72.2.%),and Domain 4. Clarity of presentation (77.7%). Domain 5. pplicability scored near low boundary (54.1%) and negative scores were found in Domain 2. Stakeholder Involvement (41.6%) and Domain 3. Rigour of Development (28.1%). Global score was 66% and the guideline was recommended with modifications. Organisational Culture: The most frequent leadership profile was the Mentor profile (45.61%). Lower scores belonged to Innovator and Monitor profiles (3.51%). On the organisational culture overall, higher scores were found in the Human Relations culture (74.07%). The higher leadership strategy was the strategy of flexibility (66.10%). The results additionally showed that the only leadership profile associated with case management implementation was the Producer profile, representing 14.55% of all leadership profiles in the country.Barriers: The barriers identified by MH professionals, with high percentages, were: lack of time (57.7%), knowledge and motivation (40.8%), other colleagues cooperation (33.7%), low number of contacts with patients (35.2%), lack of facilities (70.4%) and lack of instruments (69%) to implement case management, varying across regions. Results show that there was a negative correlation between implementation and the following barriers: using protocols, practice format, need for more training and lack of cooperation from colleagues. Additionally, statistical differences were found between barriers to implementation and: services characteristics, workforce characteristics, organisational culture. Implementation: The national average results of case management implementation fidelity was (41.48), close to values found in similar studies. In the regional scores South Region Alentejo had the highest implementation score. If we look at minimum scores to assume implementation fidelity, these occurred in 57.75% of services and a good implementation occurred in 15.49% of these. Regression methods allowed to confirm that implementation score prediction was possible using the combination of barriers and organisational culture scores. Discussion - Considering the initial study hypotheses, it was possible to confirm the variation of case management implementation across country regions. Additionally, we could conclude that common denominators exist when successful implementation occurred. It was possible to observe a significant relationship between implementation degree and the dimensions of barriers, organisational culture and services resources (defined as professionals and services characteristics). In a more conclusive way, we can say that there are factors, other than financial and human resources, that are associated with evidence based practices implementation like case management. An example is the Alentejo region, were the distance from urban centres, and the known difficulties associated with accessibility, plus the lack of financial and human resources, have not impeded the regional higher score on implementation. Conclusions: Case management implementation had several barriers to implementation. There are different barriers across country regions, resulting from organisational culture, services and professionals characteristics. To reach implementation it is necessary to consider specific methodologies that go beyond traditional training programs and evident practices, widely promoted. Evidence-based practices require evidence-based implementations.

Ethical aspects in the management of the terminally ill patient in the pediatric intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE: To identify the prevalence of management plans and decision-making processes for terminal care patients in pediatric intensive care units. METHODOLOGY: Evidence-based medicine was done by a systematic review using an electronic data base (LILACS, 1982 through 2000) and (MEDLINE, 1966 through 2000). The key words used are listed and age limits (0 to 18 years) were used. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty two articles were found and after selection according to the exclusion/inclusion criteria and objectives 17 relevant papers were identified. The most common decisions found were do-not-resuscitation orders and withdrawal or withholding life support care. The justifications for these were "imminent death" and "unsatisfatory quality of life". CONCLUSION: Care management was based on ethical principles aiming at improving benefits, avoiding harm, and when possible, respecting the autonomy of the terminally ill patient.

Marcadores inflamatórios da doença cardiovascular em idosos

A maior parte das informações sobre o papel dos marcadores inflamatórios como preditores de doença cardiovascular envolve apenas indivíduos de meia-idade. Nesta revisão foi avaliado o papel dos marcadores inflamatórios como preditores de doença cardiovascular em idosos. Foram consultadas as bases de dados do Medline (Pubmed) e a base de dados da Cochrane, utilizando as palavras-chave. Após o acréscimo dos seguintes filtros: Limits: Aged 65+ years, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trial, Meta-Analysis, Review, Clinical Trials, foram encontrados 554 artigos. Desses, foram selecionados 120 artigos e avaliados quanto à sua força de evidência (classificação de Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine). Nos pacientes com >65 anos, a interleucina 6 (IL-6), fator de necrose tumoral alfa (TNF α) e interleucina-10 (IL-10) têm se mostrado bons preditores de desfechos cardiovasculares. Em relação à proteína C-reativa (PCR), os dados são inconsistentes e ela parece ter menor poder como preditor em idosos, quando comparada aos indivíduos de meia-idade. Níveis de fibrinogênio parecem ser preditores de mortalidade, porém de uma forma não específica, ou seja, não apenas para mortalidade cardiovascular. Além disso, os marcadores inflamatórios também são indicadores de declínio funcional e mortalidade, independentemente da presença de doença cardiovascular. As evidências atuais são insuficientes para uso rotineiro dos marcadores inflamatórios, em idosos, já que existem poucos estudos nessa faixa etária, sendo a maioria deles de curta duração e com número reduzido de marcadores inflamatórios. A solicitação desses marcadores, de rotina, deve ser considerada individualmente.

The management of brain metastases

Brain metastases occur in 20-50% of NSCLC and 50-80% of SCLC. In this review, we will look at evidence-based medicine data and give some perspectives on the management of BM. We will address the problems of multiple BM, single BM and prophylactic cranial irradiation. Recursive Partitioning Analysis (RPA) is a powerful prognostic tool to facilitate treatment decisions. Dealing with multiple BM, the use of corticosteroids was established more than 40 years ago by a unique randomized trial (RCT). Palliative effect is high (_80%) as well as side-effects. Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) was evaluated in many RCTs with a high (60-90%) response rate; several RT regimes are equivalent, but very high dose per fraction should be avoided. In multiple BM from SCLC, the effect of WBRT is comparable to that in NSCLC but chemotherapy (CXT) although advocated is probably less effective than RT. Single BM from NSCLC occurs in 30% of all BM cases; several prognostic classifications including RPA are very useful. Several options are available in single BM: WBRT, surgery (SX), radiosurgery (RS) or any combination of these. All were studied in RCTs and will be reviewed: the addition of WBRT to SX or RS gives a better neurological tumour control, has little or no impact on survival, and may be more toxic. However omitting WBRT after SX alone gives a higher risk of cerebro-spinal fluid dissemination. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) has a major role in SCLC. In limited disease, meta-analyses have shown a positive impact of PCI in the decrease of brain relapse and in survival improvement, especially for patients in complete remission. Surprisingly, this has been recently confirmed also in extensive disease. Experience with PCI for NSCLC is still limited, but RCT suggest a reduction of BM with no impact on survival. Toxicity of PCI is a matter of debate, as neurological or neuro-cognitive impairment is already present prior to PCI in almost half of patients. However RT toxicity is probably related to total dose and dose per fraction. Perspectives : Future research should concentrate on : 1) combined modalities in multiple BM. 2) Exploration of treatments in oligo-metastases. 3) Further exploration of PCI in NSCLC. 4) Exploration of new, toxicity-sparing radiotherapy techniques (IMRT, Tomotherapy etc).