The consensus molecular subtypes of colorectal cancer.

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a frequently lethal disease with heterogeneous outcomes and drug responses. To resolve inconsistencies among the reported gene expression-based CRC classifications and facilitate clinical translation, we formed an international consortium dedicated to large-scale data sharing and analytics across expert groups. We show marked interconnectivity between six independent classification systems coalescing into four consensus molecular subtypes (CMSs) with distinguishing features: CMS1 (microsatellite instability immune, 14%), hypermutated, microsatellite unstable and strong immune activation; CMS2 (canonical, 37%), epithelial, marked WNT and MYC signaling activation; CMS3 (metabolic, 13%), epithelial and evident metabolic dysregulation; and CMS4 (mesenchymal, 23%), prominent transforming growth factor-β activation, stromal invasion and angiogenesis. Samples with mixed features (13%) possibly represent a transition phenotype or intratumoral heterogeneity. We consider the CMS groups the most robust classification system currently available for CRC-with clear biological interpretability-and the basis for future clinical stratification and subtype-based targeted interventions.

Ventilation artificielle et protection pulmonaire

Une ventilation artificielle avec un volume courant excessif génère dans le poumon une tension et une contrainte élevées, susceptibles d'engendrer des lésions. La situation de l'SDRA, dans laquelle le volume pulmonaire disponible est fortement réduit (baby lung), a permis de bien comprendre ces mécanismes lésionnels. Ceci a permis d'établir des stratégies ventilatoires protectrices efficaces. Cette problématique est également pertinente pour des poumons non lésés au préalable, situation dans laquelle une ventilation protectrice devrait aussi s'appliquer.

Towards actionable international comparisons of health system performance: expert revision of the OECD framework and quality indicators.

OBJECTIVE: To review and update the conceptual framework, indicator content and research priorities of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development's (OECD) Health Care Quality Indicators (HCQI) project, after a decade of collaborative work. DESIGN: A structured assessment was carried out using a modified Delphi approach, followed by a consensus meeting, to assess the suite of HCQI for international comparisons, agree on revisions to the original framework and set priorities for research and development. SETTING: International group of countries participating to OECD projects. PARTICIPANTS: Members of the OECD HCQI expert group. RESULTS: A reference matrix, based on a revised performance framework, was used to map and assess all seventy HCQI routinely calculated by the OECD expert group. A total of 21 indicators were agreed to be excluded, due to the following concerns: (i) relevance, (ii) international comparability, particularly where heterogeneous coding practices might induce bias, (iii) feasibility, when the number of countries able to report was limited and the added value did not justify sustained effort and (iv) actionability, for indicators that were unlikely to improve on the basis of targeted policy interventions. CONCLUSIONS: The revised OECD framework for HCQI represents a new milestone of a long-standing international collaboration among a group of countries committed to building common ground for performance measurement. The expert group believes that the continuation of this work is paramount to provide decision makers with a validated toolbox to directly act on quality improvement strategies.

Metabolic and nutritional support of critically ill patients: consensus and controversies.

The results of recent large-scale clinical trials have led us to review our understanding of the metabolic response to stress and the most appropriate means of managing nutrition in critically ill patients. This review presents an update in this field, identifying and discussing a number of areas for which consensus has been reached and others where controversy remains and presenting areas for future research. We discuss optimal calorie and protein intake, the incidence and management of re-feeding syndrome, the role of gastric residual volume monitoring, the place of supplemental parenteral nutrition when enteral feeding is deemed insufficient, the role of indirect calorimetry, and potential indications for several pharmaconutrients.

Bias in dissemination of clinical research findings: structured OPEN framework of what, who and why, based on literature review and expert consensus.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to review highly cited articles that focus on non-publication of studies, and to develop a consistent and comprehensive approach to defining (non-) dissemination of research findings. SETTING: We performed a scoping review of definitions of the term 'publication bias' in highly cited publications. PARTICIPANTS: Ideas and experiences of a core group of authors were collected in a draft document, which was complemented by the findings from our literature search. INTERVENTIONS: The draft document including findings from the literature search was circulated to an international group of experts and revised until no additional ideas emerged and consensus was reached. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: We propose a new approach to the comprehensive conceptualisation of (non-) dissemination of research. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: Our 'What, Who and Why?' approach includes issues that need to be considered when disseminating research findings (What?), the different players who should assume responsibility during the various stages of conducting a clinical trial and disseminating clinical trial documents (Who?), and motivations that might lead the various players to disseminate findings selectively, thereby introducing bias in the dissemination process (Why?). CONCLUSIONS: Our comprehensive framework of (non-) dissemination of research findings, based on the results of a scoping literature search and expert consensus will facilitate the development of future policies and guidelines regarding the multifaceted issue of selective publication, historically referred to as 'publication bias'.

Validation du GAP Index, un outil prédictif de mortalité dans la fibrose pulmonaire idiopathique

Fibrose pulmonaire idiopathique La fibrose pulmonaire idiopathique (FPI, Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis) est une maladie diffuse du parenchyme pulmonaire de cause inconnue caractérisée par une aggravation de la dyspnée, une réduction du volume pulmonaire et une altération des échanges gazeux. Elle est la plus fréquente de pneumopathies interstitielles idiopathiques (IIPs, Idiopathic Interstitial Pneumonias), avec une incidence annuelle estimée entre 4,6 et 16,3 pour 100'000 personnes et une prévalence de 13 à 20 cas pour 100 000 personnes. Son évolution est progressive, irréversible et de mauvais pronostic avec une survie médiane de 2 à 3.5 ans et une survie à 5 ans de moins de 20%.

Searching for consensus in ahp-group decision making. A bayesian perspective

This paper sets out to identify the initial positions of the different decisionmakers who intervene in a group decision making process with a reducednumber of actors, and to establish possible consensus paths between theseactors. As a methodological support, it employs one of the most widely-knownmulticriteria decision techniques, namely, the Analytic Hierarchy Process(AHP). Assuming that the judgements elicited by the decision makers follow theso-called multiplicative model (Crawford and Williams, 1985; Altuzarra et al.,1997; Laininen and Hämäläinen, 2003) with log-normal errors and unknownvariance, a Bayesian approach is used in the estimation of the relative prioritiesof the alternatives being compared. These priorities, estimated by way of themedian of the posterior distribution and normalised in a distributive manner(priorities add up to one), are a clear example of compositional data that will beused in the search for consensus between the actors involved in the resolution ofthe problem through the use of Multidimensional Scaling tools

Resultados de la implantación de la norma ISO 9000 y el modelo EFQM: conclusiones de un estudio tipo Delphi

Desde el ámbito académico el auge de la Gestión de la Calidad (GC) ha sido analizadoextensamente a través de numerosos estudios de carácter empírico. Una parte importante de estos estudios han tratado de analizar cuáles han sido los principales efectos de laimplantación de estos modelos sobre los resultados o el desempeño (performance) empresarial. Hay que señalar que la mayor parte de dichos estudios son de tipo cuantitativo, basados en la utilización de encuestas dirigidas a los directivos de las empresas que han participado en el proceso de implantación. Ahora bien, el análisis de los efectos de la GC realizado de esta forma, cuenta, a nuestro entender, con una posible debilidad y distorsión metodológica al tomar sólo como base las opiniones de los directivos de las empresas involucradas en el proceso de implantación sobre los efectos del propio proceso y los resultados pueden tener cierto sesgo, tal y como ha sido subrayado por diversos investigadores (ver, por ejemplo, Wayhan et al, 2002 y Heras et al, 2002). Por estos motivos, en el estudio que aquí presentamos hemos considerado necesario utilizar una metodología que tenga en cuenta la opinión de expertos de diversa índole que tienen distintas funciones en la implantación de modelos de GC, de forma que se pueda obtener una información de interés para contrastarla y triangularizarla con la obtenida en estudios empíricos previos llevados a cabo con la metodología tradicional

Conflicto, colaboración y consenso en la enseñanza de las ciencias sociales = Conflict, collaboration and consensus in the teaching of the Social sciences

This article suggests the study of the key concept of conflict as a means of implementing a critical and communicativecurriculum based on the study of relevant social themes. To this end we put forward the principal characteristics of thecritical/communicative curriculum. We offer a didactic proposal about conflict and explain the results of its application intwo Secondary Education classrooms

The purpose and use of passenger ships in 2058 - Future scenarios generated by the Delphi method

The purpose of the thesis is to generate scenarios of future purposes and of use of ships, suitable for STX Finland Cruise Oy to design and build, over a 50 year time span by applying the Delphi method and an open innovation approach in a future workshop. The scenarios were mapped out with help of two Delphi survey rounds and one future workshop. The number of participants in both surveys and the workshop was some twenty experts in each, representing various fields. On the basis of the first survey round, four different subject areas were selected for analysis: purposes for the use of ships; energy efficiency of cruises and ships; cost efficiency of sea transportation and vacation; and the views and expectations of the customers in the future. As a result of the future workshop, four different themes were established, which were studied further during the second Delphi round. The themes are future service and operation concepts; versatile uses of the space in ships; communication of environmental benefits of ships, future energy solutions and social interaction between passengers onboard. In addition to generating the scenarios, further aim of the thesis is to implement the Delphi method and workshop activity as foresight tools for STX Europe and to produce a chart of a future shipbuilding foresight community to can serve the open innovation processes in the maritime cluster as a whole.