Population pharmacokinetics of itraconazole and its active metabolite hydroxy-itraconazole in paediatric cystic fibrosis and bone marrow transplant patients

Objective: The objective of the study was to characterise the population pharmacokinetic properties of itraconazole and its active metabolite hydroxyitraconazole in a representative paediatric population of cystic fibrosis and bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients and to identify patient characteristics influencing the pharmacokinetics of itraconazole. The ultimate goals were to determine the relative bioavailability between the two oral formulations (capsules vs oral solution) and to optimise dosing regimens in these patients. Methods: All paediatric patients with cystic fibrosis or patients undergoing BMT at The Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia, who were prescribed oral itraconazole for the treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis (cystic fibrosis patients) or for prophylaxis of any fungal infection (BMT patients) were eligible for the study. Blood samples were taken from the recruited patients as per an empirical sampling design either during hospitalisation or during outpatient clinic visits. ltraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole plasma concentrations were determined by a validated high-performance liquid chromatography assay with fluorometric detection. A nonlinear mixed-effect modelling approach using the NONMEM software to simultaneously describe the pharmacokinetics of itraconazole and its metabolite. Results: A one-compartment model with first-order absorption described the itraconazole data, and the metabolism of the parent drug to hydroxy-itraconazole was described by a first-order rate constant. The metabolite data also showed one-compartment characteristics with linear elimination. For itraconazole the apparent clearance (CLitraconazole) was 35.5 L/hour, the apparent volume of distribution (V-d(itraconazole)) was 672L, the absorption rate constant for the capsule formulation was 0.0901 h(-1) and for the oral solution formulation was 0.96 h-1. The lag time was estimated to be 19.1 minutes and the relative bioavailability between capsules and oral solution (F-rel) was 0.55. For the metabolite, volume of distribution, V-m/(F (.) f(m)), and clearance, CL/(F (.) fm), were 10.6L and 5.28 L/h, respectively. The influence of total bodyweight was significant, added as a covariate on CLitraconazoie/F and V-d(itraconazole)/F (standardised to a 70kg person) using allometric three-quarter power scaling on CLitraconazole/F, which therefore reflected adult values. The unexplained between-subject variability (coefficient of variation %) was 68.7%, 75.8%, 73.4% and 61.1% for CLitraconazoie/F, Vd(itraconazole)/F, CLm/(F (.) fm) and F-rel, respectively. The correlation between random effects of CLitraconazole and Vd((itraconazole)) was 0.69. Conclusion: The developed population pharmacokinetic model adequately described the pharmacokinetics of itraconazole and its active metabolite, hydroxy-itraconazole, in paediatric patients with either cystic fibrosis or undergoing BMT. More appropriate dosing schedules have been developed for the oral solution and the capsules to secure a minimum therapeutic trough plasma concentration of 0.5 mg/L for these patients.

Paediatric population pharmacokinetics of itraconazole and its active metabolite hydroxy-itraconazole in cystic fibrosis and bone marrow transplant patients

Objectives: The aim of the study was to characterise the population pharmacokinetics (popPK) properties of itraconazole (ITRA) and its active metabolite hydroxy-ITRA in a representative paediatric population of cystic fibrosis (CF) and bone marrow transplant (BMT) patients. The goals were to determine the relative bioavailability between the two oral formulations, and to explore improved dosage regimens in these patients. Methods: All paediatric patients with CF taking oral ITRA for the treatment of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis and patients undergoing BMT who were taking ITRA for prophylaxis of any fungal infection were eligible for the study. A minimum of two blood samples were drawn after the capsules and also after switching to oral solution, or vice versa. ITRA and hydroxy-ITRA plasma concentrations were measured by HPLC[1]. A nonlinear mixed-effect modelling approach (NONMEM 5.1.1) was used to describe the PK of ITRA and hydroxy-ITRA simultaneously. Simulations were used to assess dosing strategies in these patients. Results: Forty-nine patients (29CF, 20 BMT) were recruited to the study who provided 227 blood samples for the population analysis. A 1-compartment model with 1st order absorption and elimination best described ITRA kinetics, with 1st order conversion to hydroxy-ITRA. For ITRA, the apparent clearance (ClItra/F) and volume of distribution (Vitra/F) was 35.5L/h and 672L, respectively; the absorption rate constant for the capsule formulation was 0.0901 h-1 and for the oral solution formulation it was 0.959 h-1. The capsule comparative bioavailability (vs. solution) was 0.55. For hydroxy-ITRA, the apparent volume of distribution and clearance were 10.6 L and 5.28 L/h, respectively. Of several screened covariates only allometrically scaled total body weight significantly improved the fit to the data. No difference between the two populations was found. Conclusion: The developed popPK model adequately described the pharmacokinetics of ITRA and hydroxy-ITRA in paediatric patients with CF and patients undergoing BMT. High inter-patient variability confirmed previous data in CF[2], leukaemia and BMT[3] patients. From the population model, simulations showed the standard dose (5 mg/kg/day) needs to be doubled for the solution formulation and even 4 times more given of the capsules to achieve an adequate target therapeutic trough plasma concentration of 0.5 mg/L[4] in these patients.

Concise review:bone marrow for the treatment of spinal cord injury: mechanisms and clinical applications

Transplantation of bone marrow stem cells into spinal cord lesions enhances axonal regeneration and promotes functional recovery in animal studies. There are two types of adult bone marrow stem cell; hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs), and mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). The mechanisms by which HSCs and MSCs might promote spinal cord repair following transplantation have been extensively investigated. The objective of this review is to discuss these mechanisms; we briefly consider the controversial topic of HSC and MSC transdifferentiation into central nervous system cells but focus on the neurotrophic, tissue sparing, and reparative action of MSC grafts in the context of the spinal cord injury (SCI) milieu. We then discuss some of the specific issues related to the translation of HSC and MSC therapies for patients with SCI and present a comprehensive critique of the current bone marrow cell clinical trials for the treatment of SCI to date.

Blockade of interleukin 6 signaling improves the survival rate of transplanted bone marrow stromal cells and increases locomotor function in mice with spinal cord injury

Bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) have the potential to improve functional recovery in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI); however, they are limited by low survival rates after transplantation in the injured tissue. Our objective was to clarify the effects of a temporal blockade of interleukin 6 (IL-6)/IL-6 receptor (IL-6R) engagement using an anti-mouse IL-6R monoclonal antibody (MR16-1) on the survival rate of BMSCs after their transplantation in a mouse model of contusion SCI. MR16-1 cotreatment improved the survival rate of transplanted BMSCs, allowing some BMSCs to differentiate into neurons and astrocytes, and improved locomotor function recovery compared with BMSC transplantation or MR16-1 treatment alone. The death of transplanted BMSCs could be mainly related to apoptosis rather than necrosis. Transplantation of BMSC with cotreatment of MR16-1 was associated with a decrease of some proinflammatory cytokines, an increase of neurotrophic factors, decreased apoptosis rates of transplanted BMSCs, and enhanced expression of survival factors Akt and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinases 1/2. We conclude that MR16-1 treatment combined with BMSC transplants helped rescue neuronal cells and axons after contusion SCI better than BMSCs alone by modulating the inflammatory/immune responses and decreasing apoptosis. © 2013 by the American Association of Neuropathologists, Inc.

Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells become anti-angiogenic when chondrogenically or osteogenically differentiated:implications for bone and cartilage tissue engineering

Osteochondral tissue repair requires formation of vascularized bone and avascular cartilage. Mesenchymal stem cells stimulate angiogenesis both in vitro and in vivo but it is not known if these proangiogenic properties change as a result of chondrogenic or osteogenic differentiation. We investigated the angiogenic/antiangiogenic properties of equine bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (eBMSCs) before and after differentiation in vitro. Conditioned media from chondrogenic and osteogenic cell pellets and undifferentiated cells was applied to endothelial tube formation assays using Matrigel™. Additionally, the cell secretome was analysed using LC-MS/MS mass spectrometry and screened for angiogenesis and neurogenesis-related factors using protein arrays. Endothelial tube-like formation was supported by conditioned media from undifferentiated eBMSCs. Conversely, chondrogenic and osteogenic conditioned media was antiangiogenic as shown by significantly decreased length of endothelial tube-like structures and degree of branching compared to controls. Undifferentiated cells produced higher levels of angiogenesis-related proteins compared to chondrogenic and osteogenic pellets. In summary, eBMSCs produce an array of angiogenesis-related proteins and support angiogenesis in vitro via a paracrine mechanism. However, when these cells are differentiated chondrogenically or osteogenically, they produce a soluble factor(s) that inhibits angiogenesis. With respect to osteochondral tissue engineering, this may be beneficial for avascular articular cartilage formation but unfavourable for bone formation where a vascularized tissue is desired. © Copyright 2014, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

Bone marrow stromal cells stimulate neurite outgrowth over neural proteoglycans (CSPG), myelin associated glycoprotein and Nogo-A

In animal models, transplantation of bone marrow stromal cells (MSC) into the spinal cord following injury enhances axonal regeneration and promotes functional recovery. How these improvements come about is currently unclear. We have examined the interaction of MSC with neurons, using an established in vitro model of nerve growth, in the presence of substrate-bound extracellular molecules that are thought to inhibit axonal regeneration, i.e., neural proteoglycans (CSPG), myelin associated glycoprotein (MAG) and Nogo-A. Each of these molecules repelled neurite outgrowth from dorsal root ganglia (DRG) in a concentration-dependent manner. However, these nerve-inhibitory effects were much reduced in MSC/DRG co-cultures. Video microscopy demonstrated that MSC acted as "cellular bridges" and also "towed" neurites over the nerve-inhibitory substrates. Whereas conditioned medium from MSC cultures stimulated DRG neurite outgrowth over type I collagen, it did not promote outgrowth over CSPG, MAG or Nogo-A. These findings suggest that MSC transplantation may promote axonal regeneration both by stimulating nerve growth via secreted factors and also by reducing the nerve-inhibitory effects of the extracellular molecules present.

Nitric oxide-dependent bone marrow progenitor mobilization by carbon monoxide enhances endothelial repair after vascular injury

Carbon monoxide (CO) has emerged as a vascular homeostatic molecule that prevents balloon angioplasty-induced stenosis via antiproliferative effects on vascular smooth muscle cells. The effects of CO on reendothelialization have not been evaluated.

MRI and the distribution of bone marrow fat in hip osteoarthritis

Grant support This study was supported by an award (Ref: WHMSB-AU119) from the Translational Medicine Research Collaboration – a consortium made up of the Universities of Aberdeen, Dundee, Edinburgh and Glasgow, the four associated NHS Health Boards (Grampian, Tayside, Lothian and Greater Glasgow & Clyde), Scottish Enterprise and Wyeth. The funder played no part in the design, execution, analysis or publication of this paper.