Reduced IFNλ4 activity is associated with improved HCV clearance and reduced expression of interferon-stimulated genes

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are the major cause of chronic liver disease, cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma worldwide. Both spontaneous and treatment-induced clearance of HCV depend on genetic variation within the interferon-lambda locus, but until now no clear causal relationship has been established. Here we demonstrate that an amino-acid substitution in the IFNλ4 protein changing a proline at position 70 to a serine (P70S) substantially alters its antiviral activity. Patients harbouring the impaired IFNλ4-S70 variant display lower interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) expression levels, better treatment response rates and better spontaneous clearance rates, compared with patients coding for the fully active IFNλ4-P70 variant. Altogether, these data provide evidence supporting a role for the active IFNλ4 protein as the driver of high hepatic ISG expression as well as the cause of poor HCV clearance.

Age of cleft monazites in the eastern Tauern Window: constraints on crystallization conditions of hydrothermal monazite

Monazite-bearing Alpine clefts located in the Sonnblick region of the eastern Tauern Window, Austria, are oriented perpendicular to the foliation and lineation. Ion probe (SIMS) Th–Pb and U–Pb dating of four cleft monazites yields crystallization ages of different growth domains and aggregate regions ranging from 18.99 ± 0.51 to 15.00 ± 0.51 Ma. The crystallization ages obtained are overlapping or slightly younger than zircon fission track ages but older than zircon (U–Th)/He cooling ages from the same area. This constrains cleft monazite crystallization in this area to *300–200 �C. LA-ICP-MS data of dated hydrothermal monazites indicate that in graphite-bearing, reduced host lithologies, cleft monazite is poor in As and has higher La/Yb values and U concentrations, whereas in oxidised host rocks opposite trends are observed. Monazites show negative Eu anomalies and variable La/Yb values ranging from 520 to 6050. The positive correlation between Ca and Sr concentration indicates dissolution of plagioclase or carbonates as the source of these elements. The data show that early exhumation and cleft formation in the Tauern is related to metamorphic dome formation caused by the collision of the Adriatic with the European plate and that monazite crystallization in the clefts occurred later. Our data also demonstrate that hydrothermal monazite ages offer great potential in helping to constrain the chronology of exhumation in collisional orogens.

Antisense properties of tricyclo-DNA.

Tricyclo (tc)-DNA belongs to the class of conformationally constrained DNA analogs that show enhanced binding properties to DNA and RNA. We prepared tc-oligonucleotides up to 17 nt in length, and evaluated their binding efficiency and selectivity towards complementary RNA, their biological stability in serum, their RNase H inducing potential and their antisense activity in a cellular assay. Relative to RNA or 2'-O-Me-phosphorothioate (PS)-RNA, fully modified tc-oligodeoxynucleotides, 10-17 nt in length, show enhanced selectivity and enhanced thermal stability by approximately 1 degrees C/modification in binding to RNA targets. Tricyclodeoxyoligonucleotides are completely stable in heat-deactivated fetal calf serum at 37 degree C. Moreover, tc-DNA-RNA duplexes are not substrates for RNase H. To test for antisense effects in vivo, we used HeLa cell lines stably expressing the human beta-globin gene with two different point mutations in the second intron. These mutations lead to the inclusion of an aberrant exon in beta-globin mRNA. Lipofectamine-mediated delivery of a 17mer tc-oligodeoxynucleotide complementary to the 3'-cryptic splice site results in correction of aberrant splicing already at nanomolar concentrations with up to 100-fold enhanced efficiency relative to a 2'-O-Me-PS-RNA oligonucleotide of the same length and sequence. In contrast to 2'-O-Me-PS-RNA, tc-DNA shows antisense activity even in the absence of lipofectamine, albeit only at much higher oligonucleotide concentrations.

Ce(III) and Ce(IV) (re)distribution and fractionation in a laterite profile from Madagascar: Insights from in situ XANES spectroscopy at the Ce LIII-edge

The distribution of trivalent and tetravalent cerium, Ce(III) and Ce(IV) respectively, in a lateritic profile from Madagascar, has been characterized by X-ray-absorption near-edge structure (XANES) spectroscopy at the Ce LIII-edge on the LUCIA beamline (SOLEIL synchrotron, France). XANES spectra were acquired on bulk-rock samples as well as on specific lateritic minerals or polymineral zones (in-situ measurements) of the tonalite bedrock and the three overlying weathered horizons (C-, B- and A-horizons). Geochemically, the bedrock, and the A- and C-horizons show similar rare earth element content (REE = 363–405 mg/kg). They also display the same positive Ce-anomaly (CeCN/Ce∗ = 1.12–1.45), which is therefore likely to be inherited from the bedrock. In the B-horizon, the higher REE content (REE = 2194 mg/kg) and the larger Ce-anomaly (CeCN/Ce∗ = 4.26) are consistent with an accumulation zone caused by the evaporation of groundwater during the dry season. There is a good agreement between the Ce(III)/Cetotal ratio (XCe(III)) deduced from the positive Ce-anomaly (bulk-rock geochemical data) and that derived from XANES spectroscopy on the same bulk-rock samples (BR-XCe(III)-XANES) in the bedrock, and the C- and B-horizons. In the A-horizon, XANES measurements on bulk rock and minerals revealed a higher BR-XCe(III)-XANES (up to 100%) compared to the XCe(III) deduced from geochemical data (XCe(III) = 79%). The preservation of a positive Ce-anomaly in the A-horizon suggests that the Ce mobilization and redistribution during weathering occurred with no significant Ce fractionation from other trivalent REE. Remarkably, the only investigated sample where cerianite is observed belongs to the B-horizon. Within this horizon, Ce oxidation state varies depending on the microstructural position (porosity, cracks, clay-rich groundmass). The highest Ce(IV) concentrations are measured in cerianite (and aluminophosphates) localized in pores at the vicinity of Mn-rich domains (XCe(III)-XANES = 30–51%). Therefore, Ce fractionation from other REE is attributed to a Ce oxidation and precipitation potentially assisted by oxyhydroxide scavenging. In the C-horizon, Ce(III) and Ce(IV) are mainly distributed in REE-minerals of the rhabdophane group found in pores and cracks. The similarity between the Ce(III) proportion of rhabdophane grains (XCe(III)-XANES = 74–89%) with that of the bedrock (BR-XCe(III)-XANES = 79%) suggests no significant fractionation of Ce(III) and Ce(IV) between solution and mineral during the successive stages of primary REE-mineral alteration, transport in solution and secondary precipitation in the incipient stages of weathering. Overall, our novel spectroscopic approach shows that Ce is not necessarily oxidized nor fractionated from other REE during weathering in lateritic conditions. This implies that like Ce(III), Ce(IV) can be mobilized in aqueous fluids during weathering, possibly thanks to complexation with organic molecules, and can precipitate together with Ce(III) in secondary REE-bearing minerals. The corollary is that (paleo)redox reconstructions in soils and/or sediments based on Ce-anomaly in weathered rocks or minerals must be interpreted with caution.

A dispersive treatment of K ℓ 4 decays

Kℓ4 decays have several features of interest: they allow an accurate measurement of ππ-scattering lengths; they provide the best source for the determination of some low-energy constants of χPT; one form factor is directly related to the chiral anomaly, which can be measured here. We present a dispersive treatment of Kℓ4 decays that provides a resummation of ππ- and Kπ-rescattering effects. The free parameters of the dispersion relation are fitted to the data of the high-statistics experiments E865 and NA48/2. The matching to χPT at NLO and NNLO enables us to determine the LECs Lr1, Lr2 and Lr3. With recently published data from NA48/2, the LEC Lr9 can be determined as well. In contrast to a pure chiral treatment, the dispersion relation describes the observed curvature of one of the form factors, which we understand as a rescattering effect beyond NNLO.

Structural Insight into Multivalent Galactoside Binding to Pseudomonas aeroginosa lectin LecA

Multivalent galactosides inhibiting Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms may help control this problematic pathogen. To understand the binding mode of tetravalent glycopeptide dendrimer GalAG2 [(Gal-β-OC6H4CO-Lys-Pro-Leu)4(Lys-Phe-Lys-Ile)2Lys-His-Ile-NH2] to its target lectin LecA, crystal structures of LecA complexes with divalent analog GalAG1 [(Gal-β-OC6H4CO-Lys-Pro-Leu)2Lys-Phe-Lys-Ile-NH2] and related glucose-triazole linked bis-galactosides 3u3 [Gal-β-O(CH2)n-(C2HN3)-4-Glc-β-(C2HN3)-[β-Glc-4-(N3HC2)]2-(CH2)n-O-β-Gal (n = 1)] and 5u3 (n = 3) were obtained, revealing a chelate bound 3u3, cross-linked 5u3, and monovalently bound GalAG1. Nevertheless, a chelate bound model better explaining their strong LecA binding and the absence of lectin aggregation was obtained by modeling for all three ligands. A model of the chelate bound GalAG2·LecA complex was also obtained rationalizing its unusually tight LecA binding (KD = 2.5 nM) and aggregation by lectin cross-linking. The very weak biofilm inhibition with divalent LecA inhibitors suggests that lectin aggregation is necessary for biofilm inhibition by GalAG2, pointing to multivalent glycoclusters as a unique opportunity to control P. aeruginosa biofilms.

Multivalency effects in Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm inhibition and dispersal by glycopeptide dendrimers targeting lectin LecA

The galactose specific lectin LecA partly mediates the formation of antibiotic resistant biofilms by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, an opportunistic pathogen causing lethal airways infections in immunocompromised and cystic fibrosis patients, suggesting that preventing LecA binding to natural saccharides might provide new opportunities for treatment. Here 8-fold (G3) and 16-fold (G4) galactosylated analogs of GalAG2, a tetravalent G2 glycopeptide dendrimer LecA ligand and P. aeruginosa biofilm inhibitor, were obtained by convergent chloroacetyl thioether (ClAc) ligation between 4-fold or 8-fold chloroacetylated dendrimer cores and digalactosylated dendritic arms. Hemagglutination inhibition, isothermal titration calorimetry and biofilm inhibition assays showed that G3 dendrimers bind LecA slightly better than their parent G2 dendrimers and induce complete biofilm inhibition and dispersal of P. aeruginosa biofilms, while G4 dendrimers show reduced binding and no biofilm inhibition. A binding model accounting for the observed saturation of glycopeptide dendrimer galactosyl groups and LecA binding sites is proposed based on the crystal structure of a G3 dendrimer LecA complex.

Der Einsiedler auf der Johannis-Klippe : Küsten-Roman ; aus dem Schwedischen

von Emilie (Flygare-) Carlén

Copper-64 Labeled Macrobicyclic Sarcophagine Coupled to a GRP Receptor Antagonist Shows Great Promise for PET Imaging of Prostate Cancer

The gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPr) is an important molecular target for the visualization and therapy of tumors and can be targeted with radiolabeled bombesin derivatives. The present study aims to develop statine-based bombesin receptor antagonists suitable for labeling with 64Cu for imaging by positron emission tomography (PET). The potent GRPr antagonist D-Phe-Gln-Trp-Ala-Val-Gly-His-Sta-Leu-NH2 was conjugated to the sarcophagine (3,6,10,13,16,19-hexaazabicyclo[6.6.6] icosane=Sar) derivative 5-(8-methyl-3,6,10,13,16,19-hexaaza-bicyclo[6.6.6]icosan-1-ylamino)-5-oxopentanoic acid (MeCOSar) via PEG4 (LE1) and PEG2 (LE2) spacers and radiolabeled with 64Cu2+ with >95% yield and specific activities of about 100 MBq/nmol. Both Cu(II) conjugates have high affinity for GRPr (IC50: natCu-LE1, 1.4±0.1 nM; natCu-LE2, 3.8±0.6 nM). The antagonistic properties of both conjugates were confirmed by Ca2+-flux measurements. Biodistribution studies of Cu-64-LE1 exhibited specific targeting of the tumor (19.6±4.7% IA/g at 1 h p.i.) and GRPr-positive organs. Biodistribution and PET images at 4 and 24 h postinjection showed increasing tumor-to-background ratios with time. This was illustrated by the acquisition of PET images showing high tumor-to-normal tissue contrast. This study demonstrates the high affinity of the MeCOSar-PEGx-bombesin conjugates to GRPr. The stability of 64Cu complexes of MeCOSar, the long half-life of 64Cu, and the suitable biodistribution profile of the 64Cu-labeled peptides lead to PET images of high contrast suitable for potential translation into the clinic.

Spatial genomic heterogeneity within localized, multifocal prostate cancer

Herein we provide a detailed molecular analysis of the spatial heterogeneity of clinically localized, multifocal prostate cancer to delineate new oncogenes or tumor suppressors. We initially determined the copy number aberration (CNA) profiles of 74 patients with index tumors of Gleason score 7. Of these, 5 patients were subjected to whole-genome sequencing using DNA quantities achievable in diagnostic biopsies, with detailed spatial sampling of 23 distinct tumor regions to assess intraprostatic heterogeneity in focal genomics. Multifocal tumors are highly heterogeneous for single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), CNAs and genomic rearrangements. We identified and validated a new recurrent amplification of MYCL, which is associated with TP53 deletion and unique profiles of DNA damage and transcriptional dysregulation. Moreover, we demonstrate divergent tumor evolution in multifocal cancer and, in some cases, tumors of independent clonal origin. These data represent the first systematic relation of intraprostatic genomic heterogeneity to predicted clinical outcome and inform the development of novel biomarkers that reflect individual prognosis.

Corrigendum: reduced IFNλ4 activity is associated with improved HCV clearance and reduced expression of interferon-stimulated genes

Erratum for Reduced IFNλ4 activity is associated with improved HCV clearance and reduced expression of interferon-stimulated genes. [Nat Commun. 2014]

Na 50 Nachlass Arthur Schopenhauer - 'Schopenhauer-Archiv', 600 - Außergerichtliches Vergleichsangebot von A. Jean Pierre Sarre

u.a.: Obligation; Joseph Mendelssohn; Louise Lusche, geborene Fröning; Johan Michael Brunow; Carl Otto; Emilie Schmiede, geborene Sarre; Ehescheidung der Tochter;

Na 1 Nachlass Max Horkheimer, 96 - Korrespondenzen u.a. mit Jürgen Habermas (p. III 6, 1-421)

5 Briefe mit Antwort an Inga Haag, 1951-1955; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Jürgen Habermas an Max Horkheimer, 1955; 1 Brief von Ministerialrat i. R. Theodor Häbich an Max Horkheimer, 1957; 2 Briefe mit Antwort von cand. phil. Walter Hähnle an Max Horkheimer, 1955, 1957; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Sekretärin Jutta Hagen an Max Horkheimer, 1956; 1 Dissertationsauszug von Volker Freiherr von Hagen, 1954; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Julia Hagenbucher an Max Horkheimer, 1951/1952; 1 Entwurf zu einem Gratulationsschreiben von Max Horkheimer an Professor Otto Hahn, ohne Jahr; 2 Drucksachen von Obermagistratsrat Julius Hahn, 1953, 1955; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Theodor W. Adorno, von Dr. Hans Hahn an Max Horkheimer, 1952; 1 Brief von Theodor W. Adorno an Dr. Hans Hahn, 1952; 1 Danksagung von Rabbi Hugo Hahn, 1955; 3 Briefe mit Antwort von Paul Hahn an Max Horkheimer, 1951-1958; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an die Gebrüder Haldy, 1952; 1 Brief mit Antwort und Beilage von Professor George W. F. Hallgarten an Max Horkheimer, 1950; 1 Rundschreiben von Arzt und Psychotherapeut Hans Hammer, 1957; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Margarete Hampf-Solm, 1955; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Professor Eduardo Hamuy an Max Horkheimer, 1952; 1 Brief von der Stadtärztin Dr. med. Carola Hannappel an Max Horkheimer, 1951; 1 Brief von Hansenmeister an Max Horkheimer, 1951; 1 Brief mit Antwort und Beilage von der Buchhandlung Ludwig Häntzschel an Max Horkheimer, 1958; 1 Brief von Professor Frederick Harris Harbison an Max Horkheimer, 1952; 3 Briefe mit Antwort von Robert Harcourt an Max Horkheimer, 1958; 1 Brief von Karl Hardach an Max Horkheimer, 1957; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Emilie Harlacher an Max Horkheimer, 1952; 1 Drucksache mit Antwort von Oberkirchenrat Otto L. A. von Harling an Max Horkheimer, 1955; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Gertrud Harms an Max Horkheimer, 1955; 2 Brief mit Antwort von Professor Wolfgang Hartke an Max Horkheimer, 1954-1956; 2 Briefe mit antwort von Max Horkheimer an Senator Georg Hartmann, 1951, 1954; 3 briefe mit Antwort und Beilage von Ökonom Heinz Hartmann an Max Horkheimer, 1956-1958; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Professor Wilbert E. Moore an Max Horkheimer, 1957; 3 Briefe mit Antwort und Beilage von Dr. phil. Leo Hartmann an Max Horkheimer, 1957-1858; 1 Brief mit Antowort von Dr. phil. Eckardt Mesch an Max Horkheimer, 1957; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Luzie Hatch an Max Horkheimer, 1954; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an den Direktor H. W. Haupt, 1950; 1 Drucksache von Haus Schwalbach, 1951; 4 Briefe mit Antwort von Professor Gottfried und Ellen Hausmann an Max Horkheimer, 1951-1958; 6 Briefe mit Antwort von Eva Haussner an Max Horkheimer, 1957, 1958; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Professor Robert J. Havighurst an Max Horkheimer, 1951; 1 Brief mit Beilage von Herbert Hax an Max Horkheimer, 1955; 2 Briefe mit Antwort und Beilage von Jean Louis Hébarre an Max Horkheimer, 1950-1952; 1 Brief mit Antwort von dem Hebedienst für Elektrizität, Gas und Wasser an Max Horkheimer, 1951; 5 Briefe mit Antwort und Beilage von Professor Otto Heckmann an Max Horkheimer, 1952, 1954; 1 Brief von Melvin J. Lasky an August Heckscher, 1957; 3 Briefe mit Antwort von Marie Heep an Max Horkheimer, 1956-1858; 1 Brief von der Buchhandlung Thekla Heer an Max Horkheimer, 1953; 1 Brief mit Antwort von dem Verleger Jakob Hegner an Max Horkheimer, 1955; 1 Brief von Dr. phil. Rudolf M. Heilbrunn an Max Horkheimer, 1953; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Professor Eduard Heimann an Max Horkheimer, 1952; 1 Brief von Professor Eduard Heimann an Theodor W. Adorno, 1957; 1 Brief mit Antwort von stud. phil. Wolfgang Heinrich an Max Horkheimer, 1958; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an den Direktor Helmuth Heintzmann, 1955; 1 Aktennotiz von Professor Bernhard Heller, 1956; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Philipp A. Heller an Max Horkheimer, 1952; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Assistent Winfried Hellmann, 1957; 2 Briefe mit Antwort von Professor Arthur Henkel an Max Horkheimer, 1953/1954; 1 Brief von Max Horkheiemr an Dorothy Henkel, 1952; 2 Briefe mit Antwort von Dr. jur. Werner Hennig an Max Horkheimer, 1951; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Professor Wilhelm Hennis, 1957; 3 Briefe mit Antwort und Beilage von Professor Fritz Hepner an Max Horkheimer, 1953; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an den Hessischer Minister für Erziehung und Volksbildung, 1950; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Professor Henrietta Herbolsheimer an Max Horkheimer, 1957/1958; 2 Briefe mit Antwort von P. G. Herbst an Max Horkheimer, 1952; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an den Herder Verlag, 1953; 2 Briefe mit Antwort, Beilagen und Aktennotizen von Guenter R. Herz an Max Horkheimer, 1956-1957; 2 Briefe mit Antwort unv Beilagen von Professor Theodor W. Adorno, von Dr. phil. Günther Herzberg an Max Horkheimer, 1951-1953; 1 Brief von Professor Theodor W. Adrono an Dr. phil. Günther Herzberg, 1951; 1 Brief von Dr. phil. G. Herzfeld an Max Horkheimer, 1952; 1 Brief von dem Herzog-Film an Max Horkheimer, 1952; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Professor Theodor W. Adorno, von Professor Erich Herzog an Max Horkheimer, 1952; 1 Brief von Professor Theodor W. Adorno an Professor Erich Herzog, 1952; 1 Brief mit Antwort von dem Verlag Otto H. Hess an Max Horkheimer, 1954; 1 Brief von Professor Gerhard Hess an Max Horkheimer, 1953; 1 Drucksachevon dem Hessischer Arbeitsausschuss gegen Rekrutierung, 1952; 1 Brief mit Beilage von dem Hotel Hessischer Hof an Max Horkheimer, 1956; 1 Brief mit Antwort von dem Hessischer Landesverband für Erwachsenenbildung an Max Horkheimer, 1956; 2 Briefe mit Antwort und Beilage von Marc Heurgon an Max Horkheimer, 1958; 1 Brief mit Beilage von Ruth Heydebrand an Max Horkheimer, [1955]; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Professor Frederick W. J. Heuser an Max Horkheimer, 1954; 2 Briefe mit Antwort von Professor Joh Erich Heyde an Max Horkheimer, 1958; 1 Befürwortung von Wolf von Heydebrand an Max Horkheimer, 1954; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Professor Heinz Joachim Heydorn an Max Horkheimer, 1953; 1 Brief mit Antwort und Beilage von dem Arzt Otto Heymann an Max Horkheimer, 1955; 5 Briefe zwischen dem Devisenberater und Steuerhelfer Joseph Christ und Max Horkheimer, 1955, 1956, 1961; 1 Brief von dem Office of the United States High Commissioner for Germany an Max Horkheimer, 1953; 1 Lebenslauf von Elen B. Hill, ohne Jahr; 1 Brief von Kurt H. Wolff an Max Horkheimer, 1952; 1 Brief von Rolf Himmelreich an Max Horkheimer, 1956; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Dr. Rolf Hinder an Max Horkheimer, 1953; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Anton Hinsinger an Max Horkheimer, 1953; 1 Brief mit Antwort von dem Hippokrates-Verlag an Max Horkheimer, 1952; 1 Brief von Bernice L. Hirsch anMax Horkheimer, 1957; 4 Briefe und Beilagen zwischen dem Historiker und Soziologe Helmut Hirsch an Max Horkheimer, 1951-1954, 25.05.1951; 3 Briefe mit Antwort von Lux Hirsch an Max Horkheimer, 1958; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Trude Hirschberg an Max Horkheimer, 1951; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Ingineur Paul F. Hirschfelder an Max Horkheimer, 1952; 1 Brief von Johannes Hirzel an Max Horkheimer, 1955; 1 Brief mit Antwort von dem Historisches Seminar Köln an Max Horkheimer, 1956; 1 Brief mit Antwort und Beilage von Professor Wolfgang Hochheimer an Professor Theodor W. Adorno, 1952; 2 Briefe von Max Horkheimer an Professor Wolfgang Hochheimer, 1953, 1954; 2 Memoranden von der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Psychologie, 1953; 1 Brief mit Beilage von Stud. phil. Erna Hochleitner an Max Horkheimer, 1956; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Professor Helmut Coing an Max Horkheimer, 1957; 3 Briefe mit Antwort von der Hochschule für Sozialwissenschaften Wilhelmshaven an Max Horkheimer, 1957, 1958; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an die Hochschule für Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften Nürnberg, 1953; 2 Drucksachen von dem Hochschul-Dienst, 1952; 2 Drucksachen von der Hochschule für politische Wissenschaften München, 1952; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Dr. Wolfram Hodermann an Max Horkheimer, 1951; 4 Briefe zwischen Dr. phil. Walter Höllerer und Max Horkheimer, 1956; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Privatdozent Dr. phil. Walter Hoeres anMax Horkheimer, 1956; 2 Briefe mit Antwort von Stud. phil. Charlotte Hoffmann an Max Horkheimer, 1950; 3 Briefe mit Antwort und Beilage von Professor Walter Hoffmann an Max Horkheimer, 1950-1955; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Wolfhart E. V. Hoffmann an Max Horkheimer, 1953; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Dr. Werner Hofmann, 1956; 1 Glückwunschtelegramm mit Antwort von Ernst und Karl Hohner, 1953; 1 Brief von Dozent Uvo Hölscher an Max Horkheimer, 1950; 2 Briefe mit Antwort von Professor Dr. med. K. Holldack an Max Horkheimer, 1957; 2 Briefe mit Antwort von Dipl. Landwirt Bernhard Hollenhorst an Max Horkheimer, 1956; 1 Brief von Hans Heinz Holz an Max Horkheimer, 1951; 2 Briefe mit Antwort und Beilage von Dr. phil. Rudolf Holzinger an Max Horkheimer, 1951, 1952; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Jakob Hommen an Max Horkheimer, 1953; 1 Brief von Adele Hoppe anMax Horkheimer, 1953; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Dr. jur. Anton Horn an Max Horkheimer, 1954; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Dr. phil. Emil Horn an Max Horkheimer, 1953; 1 Brief von der Landesabgeordneten Ruth Horn an H. Maidon, 1953; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Reg.-Direktor Dr. phil. Kurt Horstmann an Max Horkheimer, 1953; 1 Brief von dem Hotel Baur au Lac an H. Maidon, 1958; 2 Briefe mit 1 Antwort von dem Hotel Frankfurter Hof an Max Horkheimer, 1956, 1958; 1 Brief mit Antwort von dem Hotel Stafflenberg an H. Maidon, 1953; 1 Brief von dem Hotel Vier Jahreszeiten, München an Max Horkheimer, 1951; 1 Brief von Max Horkheimer an Jean J. Hubener, 1951; 2 Briefe mit Antwort und Beilage von Susanna Huber-Weisser an Max Horkheimer, 1956; 1 Todesanzeige von dem Sozialgerichtsdirektor Gustav Adolf Hünniger, 1955; 1 Brief von dem Oberstudiendirektor F. Huf an Max Horkheimer, 1952; 1 Brief mit Antwort von Professor H. D. Huggins an Max Horkheimer, 1954; 2 Briefe mit 1 Antwort und 1 Beilage von dem Humboldt-Verlag, Wien-Stuttgart an Max Horkheimer, 1951; 1 Brief von Helge Pross an stud. rer. pol. Kristian Hungar, 1957; 1 Brief von Helmut Hungerland an Max Horkheimer, 1950; 1 Brief mit Antwort von James R. Huntley an Max Horkheimer, 1954; 1 Brief von Professor Robert Maynard Hutchins an Max Horkheimer, 1957;