774 resultados para Tang Dynasty (China)
Resumo:
v.34:no.21(1953)
Resumo:
v.31:no.12(1947)
Resumo:
v.2(1950)
Resumo:
v.20:no.32(1938)
Resumo:
v.18:no.3(1931)
Report on a collection of amphibians and reptiles from Sichuan, China / Robert F. Inger ... [et al.]
Resumo:
n.s. no.58(1990)
Resumo:
v.15:no.2(1917)
Resumo:
v.18:no.11(1932)
Resumo:
v.24:no.13(1940)
Resumo:
v.18:no.3(1931)
Resumo:
no.21(1925)
Resumo:
L’objectiu de l’estudi és respondre a la pregunta: Quan i emprant quins criteris es possible afirmar l’existència d’Estat a la Xina? A l’apartat teòric es realitza una revisió crítica de la categoria “Mode de Producció Asiàtic” i de les diferents definicions i causes de desenvolupament de l’Estat. Es presenten els fonaments d’una concepció materialista històrica de l’Estat. A l’apartat pràctic es contrasta la hipòtesi de l’existència d’Estat analitzant dues societats successives: els grups neolítics Henan Longshan (2800-1900 cal ANE) i els Erlitou d’inicis de l’Edat del Bronze (1900-1500 cal ANE)
Resumo:
This paper investigates the extent of disparities amongst the provinces of China since the economic reform in 1978 up to the most recent year for which data is available. After a brief review of theoretical and in particular recent empirical literature on regional inequality in China it investigates whether or not the dynamic economic growth in China has been coupled with increasing disparities amongst the Chinese provinces. The paper utilises a few models of convergence along the lines of those hypothesised by neoclassical economists. It employs per capita income and per capita consumption to identify the possible absolute and conditional convergence since the economic reforms. The coverage and impact of the disparities in terms of the relative size of population affected are then taken into account in the analysis of inequality in income and consumption.
Resumo:
This paper attempts to address a puzzle in China’s investment pattern: despite high aggregate investment and remarkable economic growth, negative net investment is commonly found at the microeconomic level. Using a large firm-level dataset, we test three hypotheses to explain the existence and extent of negative investment in each ownership group: what we term the efficiency (or restructuring) hypothesis, the (lack of) financing hypothesis, and the (slow) growth hypothesis. Our panel data probit estimations shows that negative investment by state-owned firms can be explained mainly by inefficiency: owing to over-investment or mis-investment in the past, these firms have had to restructure and to get rid of obsolete capital in the face of increasing competition and hardening budgets. The financing explanation holds for private firms, which have had to divest in order to raise capital. However, rapid economic growth weighs against both effects in all types of firms, with a larger impact for firms in the private and foreign sectors. A tobit model, estimated to examine the determinants of the amount of negative investment, yields similar conclusions.