968 resultados para Slope land
Resumo:
Erosion is deleterious because it reduces the soil's productivity capacity for growing crops and causes sedimentation and water pollution problems. Surface and buried crop residue, as well as live and dead plant roots, play an important role in erosion control. An efficient way to assess the effectiveness of such materials in erosion reduction is by means of decomposition constants as used within the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation - RUSLE's prior-land-use subfactor - PLU. This was investigated using simulated rainfall on a 0.12 m m-1 slope, sandy loam Paleudult soil, at the Agriculture Experimental Station of the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, in Eldorado do Sul, State of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The study area had been covered by native grass pasture for about fifteen years. By the middle of March 1996, the sod was mechanically mowed and the crop residue removed from the field. Late in April 1996, the sod was chemically desiccated with herbicide and, about one month later, the following treatments were established and evaluated for sod biomass decomposition and soil erosion, from June 1996 to May 1998, on duplicated 3.5 x 11.0 m erosion plots: (a) and (b) soil without tillage, with surface residue and dead roots; (c) soil without tillage, with dead roots only; (d) soil tilled conventionally every two-and-half months, with dead roots plus incorporated residue; and (e) soil tilled conventionally every six months, with dead roots plus incorporated residue. Simulated rainfall was applied with a rotating-boom rainfall simulator, at an intensity of 63.5 mm h-1 for 90 min, eight to nine times during the experimental period (about every two-and-half months). Surface and subsurface sod biomass amounts were measured before each rainfall test along with the erosion measurements of runoff rate, sediment concentration in runoff, soil loss rate, and total soil loss. Non-linear regression analysis was performed using an exponential and a power model. Surface sod biomass decomposition was better depicted by the exponential model, while subsurface sod biomass was by the power model. Subsurface sod biomass decomposed faster and more than surface sod biomass, with dead roots in untilled soil without residue on the surface decomposing more than dead roots in untilled soil with surface residue. Tillage type and frequency did not appreciably influence subsurface sod biomass decomposition. Soil loss rates increased greatly with both surface sod biomass decomposition and decomposition of subsurface sod biomass in the conventionally tilled soil, but they were minimally affected by subsurface sod biomass decomposition in the untilled soil. Runoff rates were little affected by the studied treatments. Dead roots plus incorporated residues were effective in reducing erosion in the conventionally tilled soil, while consolidation of the soil surface was important in no-till. The residual effect of the turned soil on erosion diminished gradually with time and ceased after two years.
Resumo:
A avaliação de terras é o processo que permite estimar o uso potencial da terra com base em seus atributos. Grande variedade de modelos analíticos pode ser usada neste processo. No Brasil, os dois sistemas de avaliação das terras mais utilizados são o Sistema de Classificação da Capacidade de Uso da Terra e o Sistema FAO/Brasileiro de Aptidão Agrícola das Terras. Embora difiram em vários aspectos, ambos exigem o cruzamento de inúmeras variáveis ambientais. O ALES (Automated Land Evaluation System) é um programa de computador que permite construir sistemas especialistas para avaliação de terras. As entidades avaliadas pelo ALES são as unidades de mapeamento, as quais podem ser de caráter generalizado ou detalhado. A área objeto desta avaliação é composta pelas microrregiões de Chapecó e Xanxerê, no Oeste catarinense, e engloba 54 municípios. Os dados sobre os solos e sobre as características da paisagem foram obtidos no levantamento de reconhecimento dos solos do Estado, na escala de 1:250.000. O presente estudo desenvolveu o sistema especialista ATOSC (Avaliação das Terras do Oeste de Santa Catarina) e, na sua construção, incluiu-se a definição dos requerimentos dos tipos de utilização da terra, bem como foi feita a subseqüente comparação destes com os atributos de cada unidade de mapeamento. Os tipos de utilização da terra considerados foram: feijão, milho, soja e trigo, em cultivos solteiros, sob condições de sequeiro e de manejo característicos destas culturas no Estado. As informações sobre os recursos naturais compreendem os atributos climáticos, de solos e das condições da paisagem que interferem na produção destas culturas. Para cada tipo de utilização da terra foram especificados, no ATOSC, o código, o nome e seus respectivos requerimentos de uso da terra. Os requerimentos de cada cultura foram definidos por uma combinação específica das características das terras selecionadas, que determina o nível de severidade de cada um deles em relação à cultura. Estabeleceram-se quatro níveis de severidade que indicam aumento do grau de limitação ou diminuição do potencial para determinado tipo de uso da terra, a saber: limitação nula ou ligeira (favorável); limitação moderada (moderadamente favorável), limitação forte (pouco favorável); e limitação muito forte (desfavorável). Na árvore de decisão, componente básico do sistema especialista, são implementadas as regras que permitirão o enquadramento das terras em classes de adequação definidas, baseado na qualidade dos requerimentos de acordo com o tipo de uso. O ATOSC facilitou o processo de comparação entre as características das terras das microrregiões de Chapecó e Xanxerê e os requerimentos de uso considerados, por permitir efetuar automaticamente a avaliação das terras, reduzindo, assim, o tempo gasto neste processo. As terras das microrregiões de Chapecó e Xanxerê foram enquadradas, em sua maior parte, nas classes de adequação pouco favorável (3) e desfavorável (4) para os cultivos considerados. Os principais fatores limitantes identificados nestas microrregiões foram a fertilidade natural e o risco de erosão, para o feijão e o milho, e condições de mecanização e risco de erosão, para a soja e o trigo.
Resumo:
The 13C natural abundance technique was applied to study C dynamics after land-use change from native savanna to Brachiaria, Pinus, and Eucalyptus in differently textured Cerrado Oxisols. But due to differences in the d13C signatures of subsoils under native savanna and under introduced species, C substitution could only be calculated based on results of cultivated soils nearby. It was estimated that after 20 years, Pinus C had replaced only 5 % of the native C in the 0-1.2 m layer, in which substitution was restricted to the top 0.4 m. Conversely, after 12 years, Brachiaria had replaced 21 % of Cerrado C to a depth of 1.2 m, where substitution decreased only slightly throughout the entire profile. The high d13C values in the subsoils of the cultivated sites led to the hypothesis that the natural vegetation there had been grassland rather than Cerrado sensu stricto, in spite of the comparable soil and site characteristics and the proximity of the studied sites. The hypothesis was tested using aerial photographs of 1964, which showed that the cultivated sites were located on a desiccated runoff head. The vegetation shift to a grass-dominated savanna formation might therefore have occurred in response to waterlogging and reduced soil aeration. A simple model was developed thereof, which ascribes the different Cerrado formations mainly to the plant-available water content and soil aeration. Soil fertility is considered of minor significance only, since at the studied native savanna sites tree density was independent of soil texture or nutrient status.
Resumo:
Report on the Iowa Department of Agriculture and Land Stewardship for the year ended June 30, 2009
Resumo:
Want to know what conditions to expect over the next stage of RAGBRAI? How hilly will it be, what towns and parks are between here and there, or what services are coming up in the next town?
Resumo:
The University of Iowa Office of the State Archaeologist and Team Archaeology are back on RAGBRAI for our third year of Archaeology on the Road, and pleased to partner this year with the IDNR: Geological and Water Survey and the U.S. Geological Survey under the theme “Human and Natural History Partners.” Archaeology on the Road brings you the unique cultural history and prehistory of Iowa on the RAGBRAI route, pointing out interesting and significant archaeological sites and sharing Iowa’s past along the way. Look for our booth at Expo and then again on Days 1, 5 and 6 on the route, and also keep an eye out for our Team Archaeology
Resumo:
The University of Iowa Office of the State Archaeologist and Team Archaeology are back on RAGBRAI for our third year of Archaeology on the Road, and pleased to partner this year with the IDNR: Geological and Water Survey and the U.S. Geological Survey under the theme “Human and Natural History Partners.” Archaeology on the Road brings you the unique cultural history and prehistory of Iowa on the RAGBRAI route, pointing out interesting and significant archaeological sites and sharing Iowa’s past along the way. Look for our booth at Expo and then again on Days 1, 5 and 6 on the route, and also keep an eye out for our Team Archaeology
Resumo:
The University of Iowa Office of the State Archaeologist and Team Archaeology are back on RAGBRAI for our third year of Archaeology on the Road, and pleased to partner this year with the IDNR: Geological and Water Survey and the U.S. Geological Survey under the theme “Human and Natural History Partners.” Archaeology on the Road brings you the unique cultural history and prehistory of Iowa on the RAGBRAI route, pointing out interesting and significant archaeological sites and sharing Iowa’s past along the way. Look for our booth at Expo and then again on Days 1, 5 and 6 on the route, and also keep an eye out for our Team Archaeology
Resumo:
The University of Iowa Office of the State Archaeologist and Team Archaeology are back on RAGBRAI for our third year of Archaeology on the Road, and pleased to partner this year with the IDNR: Geological and Water Survey and the U.S. Geological Survey under the theme “Human and Natural History Partners.” Archaeology on the Road brings you the unique cultural history and prehistory of Iowa on the RAGBRAI route, pointing out interesting and significant archaeological sites and sharing Iowa’s past along the way. Look for our booth at Expo and then again on Days 1, 5 and 6 on the route, and also keep an eye out for our Team Archaeology
Resumo:
The University of Iowa Office of the State Archaeologist and Team Archaeology are back on RAGBRAI for our third year of Archaeology on the Road, and pleased to partner this year with the IDNR: Geological and Water Survey and the U.S. Geological Survey under the theme “Human and Natural History Partners.” Archaeology on the Road brings you the unique cultural history and prehistory of Iowa on the RAGBRAI route, pointing out interesting and significant archaeological sites and sharing Iowa’s past along the way. Look for our booth at Expo and then again on Days 1, 5 and 6 on the route, and also keep an eye out for our Team Archaeology
Resumo:
The University of Iowa Office of the State Archaeologist and Team Archaeology are back on RAGBRAI for our third year of Archaeology on the Road, and pleased to partner this year with the IDNR: Geological and Water Survey and the U.S. Geological Survey under the theme “Human and Natural History Partners.” Archaeology on the Road brings you the unique cultural history and prehistory of Iowa on the RAGBRAI route, pointing out interesting and significant archaeological sites and sharing Iowa’s past along the way. Look for our booth at Expo and then again on Days 1, 5 and 6 on the route, and also keep an eye out for our Team Archaeology
Resumo:
Want to know what conditions to expect over the next stage of RAGBRAI? How hilly will it be, what towns and parks are between here and there, or what services are coming up in the next town?
Resumo:
Want to know what conditions to expect over the next stage of RAGBRAI? How hilly will it be, what towns and parks are between here and there, or what services are coming up in the next town?
Resumo:
Want to know what conditions to expect over the next stage of RAGBRAI? How hilly will it be, what towns and parks are between here and there, or what services are coming up in the next town?
Resumo:
Want to know what conditions to expect over the next stage of RAGBRAI? How hilly will it be, what towns and parks are between here and there, or what services are coming up in the next town?