beta-Arrestin1 modulates lymphoid enhancer factor transcriptional activity through interaction with phosphorylated dishevelled proteins.

One aspect of the function of the beta-arrestins is to serve as scaffold or adapter molecules coupling G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) to signal transduction pathways distinct from traditional second messenger pathways. Here we report the identification of Dishevelled 1 and Dishevelled 2 (Dvl1 and Dvl2) as beta-arrestin1 (betaarr1) interacting proteins. Dvl proteins participate as key intermediates in signal transmission from the seven membrane-spanning Frizzled receptors leading to inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase-3beta (GSK-3beta), stabilization of beta-catenin, and activation of the lymphoid enhancer factor (LEF) transcription factor. We find that phosphorylation of Dvl strongly enhances its interaction with betaarr1, suggesting that regulation of Dvl phosphorylation and subsequent interaction with betaarr1 may play a key role in the activation of the LEF transcription pathway. Because coexpression of the Dvl kinases, CK1epsilon and PAR-1, with Dvl synergistically activates LEF reporter gene activity, we reasoned that coexpression of betaarr1 with Dvl might also affect LEF-dependent gene activation. Interestingly, whereas betaarr1 or Dvl alone leads to low-level stimulation of LEF (2- to 5-fold), coexpression of betaarr1 with either Dvl1 or Dvl2 leads to a synergistic activation of LEF (up to 16-fold). Additional experiments with LiCl as an inhibitor of GSK-3beta kinase activity indicate that the step affected by betaarr1 is upstream of GSK-3beta and most likely at the level of Dvl. These results identify betaarr1 as a regulator of Dvl-dependent LEF transcription and suggest that betaarr1 might serve as an adapter molecule that can couple Frizzled receptors and perhaps other GPCRs to these important transcription pathways.

Les récepteurs GPR91 et GPR99 et leur implication dans le développement du système nerveux visuel

Les récepteurs couplés aux protéines G (RCPG) démontrent de plus en plus de capacités à activer des mécanismes jusqu’alors associés à des facteurs de transcription ou des molécules d’adhésion. En effet, de nouvelles preuves rapportent qu’ils pourraient également participer au guidage axonal qui est le mécanisme permettant aux axones de cellules nerveuses de rejoindre leur cible anatomique. Le guidage axonal se fait par l’interaction entre les molécules de guidage et une structure particulière présente à l’extrémité de l’axone, le cône de croissance. Par exemple, les RCPGs participent au guidage des cellules ganglionnaires de la rétine (CGR), dont les axones s’étendent de la rétine jusqu’au noyaux cérébraux associés à la vision. Cet effet est observé avec des RCPGs tels que les récepteurs aux cannabinoïdes (CB1 et CB2) et celui du lysophosphatidylinositol, le GPR55. Les RCPGs GPR91 et GPRG99, respectivement récepteurs au succinate et à l’α-cétoglutarate, se trouvent à la surface de ces CGRs, ce qui en font des candidats potentiels pouvant participer au guidage axonal. Dans ce mémoire, l’effet des ligands de ces récepteurs sur la croissance et la navigation des axones des CGRs fut analysé. L’impact produit par ces récepteurs ainsi que leurs ligands sur la morphologie des cônes de croissance fut déterminé en mesurant leur taille et le nombre de filopodes présents sur ces cônes. Pour évaluer le rôle du succinate et de l’a-cétoglutarate sur la croissance globale des axones de CGRs, la longueur totale des projections axonales d’explants rétiniens a été mesurée. L’effet de ces ligands des récepteurs GPR91 et GPR99 sur le guidage axonal a également été évalué en temps réel à l’aide d’un gradient créé par un micro injecteur placé à 45° et à 100µm du cône de croissance. La distribution in vivo des récepteurs GPR91 et GPR99 sur la rétine a été étudié à l’aide d’expériences d’immunohistochimie. Les résultats obtenus indiquent que l’ajout de 100µM de succinate produit une augmentation de la taille des cônes de croissance et du nombre de filopodes présents à leur surface. Il augmente également la croissance des axones. Ce type de réponse fut également observé lorsque les cellules furent soumises à 200µM d’α-cétoglutarate. Fait à noter, les deux récepteurs n’ont pas d’impact sur le guidage axonal. Ces résultats indiquent donc que les agonistes des récepteurs GPR91 et GPR99 augmentent la croissance des cellules ganglionnaires lorsqu’ils sont présents lors du développement. Par contre, ils n’ont pas d’influence sur la direction prise par les cônes de croissance. Ces nouvelles données sont un pas de plus dans la compréhension des mécanismes qui gèrent et participent au développement et la croissance des CGRs, ce qui pourrait donner de nouvelles cibles thérapeutique pouvant mener à la régénération de nerfs optiques endommagés.

Wine phenolics: looking for a smooth mouthfeel

Each grape variety has its own phenolic profile. However, the concentration of the phenolic compounds present in wine mainly dependson winemaking processes. Phenolic compounds influence wine sensorial characteristics namely taste or mouthfeel, bitterness, astringency and color. Humans can perceive six basic tastes: sweet, salty; sour; umami; fat-taste and bitter taste. This last basic taste is considered as a defense mechanism against the ingestion of potential poisons. Some of the genes,encoding G-protein-coupled receptors - TAS2Rs, which translate for these distinct bitter compounds detectors have been identified. Different phenolic compounds activate distinguished combination of TAS2Rs. Astringency in wine is primarily driven by proanthocyanidins, soluble protein-proanthocyanidins complexes which diminish the protective salivary film and bind to the salivary pellicle; insoluble protein-proanthocyanidins complex and proanthocyanidins are rejected against salivary film and trigger astringency sensation via increasing friction. Thus, the aim of this review is to expand the knowledge about the role of wine phenolic compounds in wine sensorial properties, namely in bitterness and astringency phenomenon’s.

Les récepteurs GPR91 et GPR99 et leur implication dans le développement du système nerveux visuel

Les récepteurs couplés aux protéines G (RCPG) démontrent de plus en plus de capacités à activer des mécanismes jusqu’alors associés à des facteurs de transcription ou des molécules d’adhésion. En effet, de nouvelles preuves rapportent qu’ils pourraient également participer au guidage axonal qui est le mécanisme permettant aux axones de cellules nerveuses de rejoindre leur cible anatomique. Le guidage axonal se fait par l’interaction entre les molécules de guidage et une structure particulière présente à l’extrémité de l’axone, le cône de croissance. Par exemple, les RCPGs participent au guidage des cellules ganglionnaires de la rétine (CGR), dont les axones s’étendent de la rétine jusqu’au noyaux cérébraux associés à la vision. Cet effet est observé avec des RCPGs tels que les récepteurs aux cannabinoïdes (CB1 et CB2) et celui du lysophosphatidylinositol, le GPR55. Les RCPGs GPR91 et GPRG99, respectivement récepteurs au succinate et à l’α-cétoglutarate, se trouvent à la surface de ces CGRs, ce qui en font des candidats potentiels pouvant participer au guidage axonal. Dans ce mémoire, l’effet des ligands de ces récepteurs sur la croissance et la navigation des axones des CGRs fut analysé. L’impact produit par ces récepteurs ainsi que leurs ligands sur la morphologie des cônes de croissance fut déterminé en mesurant leur taille et le nombre de filopodes présents sur ces cônes. Pour évaluer le rôle du succinate et de l’a-cétoglutarate sur la croissance globale des axones de CGRs, la longueur totale des projections axonales d’explants rétiniens a été mesurée. L’effet de ces ligands des récepteurs GPR91 et GPR99 sur le guidage axonal a également été évalué en temps réel à l’aide d’un gradient créé par un micro injecteur placé à 45° et à 100µm du cône de croissance. La distribution in vivo des récepteurs GPR91 et GPR99 sur la rétine a été étudié à l’aide d’expériences d’immunohistochimie. Les résultats obtenus indiquent que l’ajout de 100µM de succinate produit une augmentation de la taille des cônes de croissance et du nombre de filopodes présents à leur surface. Il augmente également la croissance des axones. Ce type de réponse fut également observé lorsque les cellules furent soumises à 200µM d’α-cétoglutarate. Fait à noter, les deux récepteurs n’ont pas d’impact sur le guidage axonal. Ces résultats indiquent donc que les agonistes des récepteurs GPR91 et GPR99 augmentent la croissance des cellules ganglionnaires lorsqu’ils sont présents lors du développement. Par contre, ils n’ont pas d’influence sur la direction prise par les cônes de croissance. Ces nouvelles données sont un pas de plus dans la compréhension des mécanismes qui gèrent et participent au développement et la croissance des CGRs, ce qui pourrait donner de nouvelles cibles thérapeutique pouvant mener à la régénération de nerfs optiques endommagés.

G protein subunits and the stimulation of phospholipase C by Gs-and Gi-coupled receptors: Lack of receptor selectivity of Galpha(16) and evidence for a synergic interaction between Gbeta gamma and the alpha subunit of a receptor activated G protein.

Stimulatory guanine nucleotide binding protein (Gs)-coupled receptors activated by luteinizing hormone, vasopressin, and the catecholamine isoproterenol (luteinizing hormone receptor, type 2 vasopressin receptor, and types 1 and 2 beta-adrenergic receptors) and the Gi-coupled M2 muscarinic receptor (M2R) were expressed transiently in COS cells, alone and in combination with Gbeta gamma dimers, their corresponding Galphas (Galpha(s), or Galpha(i3)) and either Galpha(q) or Galpha(16). Phospholipase C (PLC) activity, assessed by inositol phosphate production from preincorporated myo[3H]inositol, was then determined to gain insight into differential coupling preferences among receptors and G proteins. The following were observed: (i) All receptors tested were able to stimulate PLC activity in response to agonist occupation. The effect of the M2R was pertussis toxin sensitive. (ii) While, as expected, expression of Galpha(q) facilitated an agonist-induced activation of PLC that varied widely from receptor to receptor (400% with type 2 vasopressin receptor and only 30% with M2R), expression of Galpha(16) facilitated about equally well the activation of PLC by any of the tested receptors and thus showed little if any discrimination for one receptor over another. (iii) Gbeta gamma elevated basal (agonist independent) PLC activity between 2- and 4-fold, confirming the proven ability of Gbeta gamma to stimulate PLCbeta. (iv) Activation of expressed receptors by their respective ligands in cells coexpressing excess Gbeta gamma elicited agonist stimulated PLC activities, which, in the case of the M2R, was not blocked by pertussis toxin (PTX), suggesting mediation by a PTX-insensitive PLC-stimulating Galpha subunit, presumably, but not necessarily, of the Gq family. (v) The effects of Gbeta gamma and the PTX-insensitive Galpha elicited by M2R were synergistic, suggesting the possibility that one or more forms of PLC are under conditional or dual regulation of G protein subunits such that stimulation by one sensitizes to the stimulation by the other.

The influence of G protein subtype on agonist action at D-2 dopamine receptors

In previous studies, we have shown that agonists influence the ability of D-2 dopamine receptors to couple to G proteins and here we extend this work. The human D-2Short dopamine receptor and a natural polymorphism of this D-2Short(Ser(311)Cys), have been studied by co-expressing the receptors in insect cells with Gbeta(1)gamma(2) and either Galpha(o), Galpha(i1), Galpha(i2) or Galpha(i3) G protein subunits. These preparations have been used to study the G protein coupling profiles of the two receptors and the influence of agonists. Receptor/G protein coupling was analysed in dopamine/[H-3]spiperone competition binding experiments and through stimulation of [S-35]GTPgammaS binding. Although the Ser(311)Cys polymorphism itself had no appreciable effect on the G protein coupling specificity of the D-2 receptor, agonist stimulation of [S-35]GTPgammaS binding, revealed that both dopamine and (+)-3PPP showed a clear preference for Galpha(o) compared to the Galpha(i) subtypes, but quinpirole did not. These results indicate that agonists are able to stabilise different receptor conformations with different abilities to couple to G proteins. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Heterotrimeric G protein -mediated signal transduction in Neurospora crassa

Heterotrimeric G protein-mediated signal transduction is one of numerous means that cells utilize to respond to external stimuli. G proteins consist of α, β andγ subunits. Extracellular ligands bind to seven-transmembrane helix receptors, triggering conformational changes. This is followed by activation of coupled G proteins through the exchange of GDP for GTP on the Gα subunit. Once activated, Gα-GTP dissociates from the βγ dimer. Both of these two moieties can interact with downstream effectors, such as adenylyl cyclase, phospholipase C, phosphodiesterases, or ion channels, leading to a series of changes in cellular metabolism and physiology. ^ Neurospora crassa is a eukaryotic multicellular filamentous fungus, with asexual/vegetative and sexual phases to its life cycle. Three Gα (GNA-1, GNA-2, GNA-3) and one Gβ (GNB-1) proteins have been identified in this organism. This dissertation investigates GNA-1 and GNB-1 mediated signaling pathways in N. crassa. ^ GNA-1 was the first identified microbial Gα that belongs to a mammalian superfamily (Gαi). Deletion of GNA-1 leads to multiple defects in N. crassa. During the asexual cycle, Δgna-1 strains display a slower growth rate and delayed conidiation on solid medium. In the sexual cycle, the Δgna-1 mutant is male-fertile but female-sterile. Biochemical studies have shown that Δ gna-1 strains have lower adenosine 3′–5 ′ cyclic monophosphate (cAMP) levels than wild type under conditions where phenotypic defects are observed. In this thesis work, strains containing one of two GTPase-deficient gna-1 alleles (gna-1 R178C, gna-1Q204L) leading to constitutive activation of GNA-1 have been constructed and characterized. Activation of GNA-1 causes uncontrolled aerial hyphae proliferation, elevated sensitivity to heat and oxidative stresses, and lower carotenoid synthesis. To further study the function of GNA-1, constructs to enable expression of mammalian Gαi superfamily members were transformed into a Δ gna-1 strain, and complementation of Δgna-1 defects investigated. Gαs, which is not a member of Gα i superfamily was used as a control. These mammalian Gα genes were able to rescue the vegetative growth rate defect of the Δ gna-1 strain in the following order: Gαz > Gα o > Gαs > Gαt > Gαi. In contrast, only Gαo was able to complement the sexual defect of a Δgna-1 strain. With regard to the thermotolerance phenotype, none of the mammalian Gα genes restored the sensitivity to a wild type level. These results suggest that GNA-1 regulates two independent pathways during the vegetative and sexual cycles in N. crassa. ^ GNB-1, a G protein β subunit from N. crassa, was identified and its functions investigated in this thesis work. The sequence of the gnb-1 gene predicts a polypeptide of 358 residues with a molecular mass of 39.7 kDa. GNB-1 exhibits 91% identity to Cryphonectria parasitica CPGB-1, and also displays significant homology with human and Dictyostelium Gβ genes (∼66%). A Δ gnb-1 strain was constructed and shown to exhibit defects in asexual spore germination, vacuole number and size, mass accumulation and female fertility. A novel role for GNB-1 in regulation of GNA-1 and GNA-2 protein levels was also demonstrated. ^

The role of members of the pertussis toxin-sensitive family of G proteins in coupling receptors to the activation of the G protein-gated inwardly rectifying potassium channel

Inwardly rectifying potassium (K+) channels gated by G proteins (Kir3.x family) are widely distributed in neuronal, atrial, and endocrine tissues and play key roles in generating late inhibitory postsynaptic potentials, slowing the heart rate and modulating hormone release. They are directly activated by Gβγ subunits released from G protein heterotrimers of the Gi/o family upon appropriate receptor stimulation. Here we examine the role of isoforms of pertussis toxin (PTx)-sensitive G protein α subunits (Giα1–3 and GoαA) in mediating coupling between various receptor systems (A1, α2A, D2S, M4, GABAB1a+2, and GABAB1b+2) and the cloned counterpart of the neuronal channel (Kir3.1+3.2A). The expression of mutant PTx-resistant Gi/oα subunits in PTx-treated HEK293 cells stably expressing Kir3.1+3.2A allows us to selectively investigate that coupling. We find that, for those receptors (A1, α2A) known to interact with all isoforms, Giα1–3 and GoαA can all support a significant degree of coupling to Kir3.1+3.2A. The M4 receptor appears to preferentially couple to Giα2 while another group of receptors (D2S, GABAB1a+2, GABAB1b+2) activates the channel predominantly through Gβγ liberated from GoA heterotrimers. Interestingly, we have also found a distinct difference in G protein coupling between the two splice variants of GABAB1. Our data reveal selective pathways of receptor activation through different Gi/oα isoforms for stimulation of the G protein-gated inwardly rectifying K+ channel.

G protein beta gamma subunits stimulate phosphorylation of Shc adapter protein.

The mechanism of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinase activation by pertussis toxin-sensitive Gi-coupled receptors is known to involve the beta gamma subunits of heterotrimeric G proteins (G beta gamma), p21ras activation, and an as-yet-unidentified tyrosine kinase. To investigate the mechanism of G beta gamma-stimulated p21ras activation, G beta gamma-mediated tyrosine phosphorylation was examined by overexpressing G beta gamma or alpha 2-C10 adrenergic receptors (ARs) that couple to Gi in COS-7 cells. Immunoprecipitation of phosphotyrosine-containing proteins revealed a 2- to 3-fold increase in the phosphorylation of two proteins of approximately 50 kDa (designated as p52) in G beta gamma-transfected cells or in alpha 2-C10 AR-transfected cells stimulated with the agonist UK-14304. The latter response was pertussis toxin sensitive. These proteins (p52) were also specifically immunoprecipitated with anti-Shc antibodies and comigrated with two Shc proteins, 46 and 52 kDa. The G beta gamma- or alpha 2-C10 AR-stimulated p52 (Shc) phosphorylation was inhibited by coexpression of the carboxyl terminus of beta-adrenergic receptor kinase (a G beta gamma-binding pleckstrin homology domain peptide) or by the tyrosine kinase inhibitors genistein and herbimycin A, but not by a dominant negative mutant of p21ras. Worthmannin, a specific inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibited phosphorylation of p52 (Shc), implying involvement of PI3K. These results suggest that G beta gamma-stimulated Shc phosphorylation represents an early step in the pathway leading to p21ras activation, similar to the mechanism utilized by growth factor tyrosine kinase receptors.

Investigating G protein signalling bias at the glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor in yeast

Background and Purpose The glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) receptor performs an important role in glycaemic control, stimulating the release of insulin. It is an attractive target for treating type 2 diabetes. Recently, several reports of adverse side effects following prolonged use of GLP-1 receptor therapies have emerged: most likely due to an incomplete understanding of signalling complexities. Experimental Approach We describe the expression of the GLP-1 receptor in a panel of modified yeast strains that couple receptor activation to cell growth via single Gα/yeast chimeras. This assay enables the study of individual ligand-receptor G protein coupling preferences and the quantification of the effect of GLP-1 receptor ligands on G protein selectivity. Key Results The GLP-1 receptor functionally coupled to the chimeras representing the human Gαs, Gαi and Gαq subunits. Calculation of the dissociation constant for a receptor antagonist, exendin-3 revealed no significant difference between the two systems. We obtained previously unobserved differences in G protein signalling bias for clinically relevant therapeutic agents, liraglutide and exenatide; the latter displaying significant bias for the Gαi pathway. We extended the use of the system to investigate small-molecule allosteric compounds and the closely related glucagon receptor. Conclusions and Implications These results provide a better understanding of the molecular events involved in GLP-1 receptor pleiotropic signalling and establish the yeast platform as a robust tool to screen for more selective, efficacious compounds acting at this important class of receptors in the future. © 2014 The Authors. British Journal of Pharmacology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The British Pharmacological Society.

Theoretical study on receptor-G protein recognition: new insights into the mechanisms of the alpha1b-adrenergic recptor activation

This work compares the structural/dynamics features of the wild-type alb-adrenergic receptor (AR) with those of the D142A active mutant and the agonist-bound state. The two active receptor forms were compared in their isolated states as well as in their ability to form homodimers and to recognize the G alpha q beta 1 gamma 2 heterotrimer. The analysis of the isolated structures revealed that, although the mutation- and agonist-induced active states of the alpha 1b-AR are different, they, however, share several structural peculiarities including (a) the release of some constraining interactions found in the wild-type receptor and (b) the opening of a cytosolic crevice formed by the second and third intracellular loops and the cytosolic extensions of helices 5 and 6. Accordingly, also their tendency to form homodimers shows commonalties and differences. In fact, in both the active receptor forms, helix 6 plays a crucial role in mediating homodimerization. However, the homodimeric models result from different interhelical assemblies. On the same line of evidence, in both of the active receptor forms, the cytosolic opened crevice recognizes similar domains on the G protein. However, the docking solutions are differently populated and the receptor-G protein preorientation models suggest that the final complexes should be characterized by different interaction patterns.

Innate receptors for adaptive immunity.

Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) are commonly known as sensor proteins crucial for the early detection of microbial or host-derived stress signals by innate immune cells. Interestingly, some PRRs are also expressed and functional in cells of the adaptive immune system. These receptors provide lymphocytes with innate sensing abilities; for example, B cells express Toll-like receptors, which are important for the humoral response. Strikingly, certain other NOD-like receptors are not only highly expressed in adaptive immune cells, but also exert functions related specifically to adaptive immune system pathways, such as regulating antigen presentation. In this review, we will focus particularly on the current understanding of PRR functions intrinsic to B and T lymphocytes; a developing aspect of PRR biology.

Theoretical study of the electrostatically driven step of receptor-G protein recognition.

This study proposes a theoretical model describing the electrostatically driven step of the alpha 1 b-adrenergic receptor (AR)-G protein recognition. The comparative analysis of the structural-dynamics features of functionally different receptor forms, i.e., the wild type (ground state) and its constitutively active mutants D142A and A293E, was instrumental to gain insight on the receptor-G protein electrostatic and steric complementarity. Rigid body docking simulations between the different forms of the alpha 1 b-AR and the heterotrimeric G alpha q, G alpha s, G alpha i1, and G alpha t suggest that the cytosolic crevice shared by the active receptor and including the second and the third intracellular loops as well as the cytosolic extension of helices 5 and 6, represents the receptor surface with docking complementarity with the G protein. On the other hand, the G protein solvent-exposed portions that recognize the intracellular loops of the activated receptors are the N-terminal portion of alpha 3, alpha G, the alpha G/alpha 4 loop, alpha 4, the alpha 4/beta 6 loop, alpha 5, and the C-terminus. Docking simulations suggest that the two constitutively active mutants D142A and A293E recognize different G proteins with similar selectivity orders, i.e., G alpha q approximately equal to G alpha s > G alpha i > G alpha t. The theoretical models herein proposed might provide useful suggestions for new experiments aiming at exploring the receptor-G protein interface.

Mutational and computational analysis of the alpha(1b)-adrenergic receptor. Involvement of basic and hydrophobic residues in receptor activation and G protein coupling.

To investigate their role in receptor coupling to G(q), we mutated all basic amino acids and some conserved hydrophobic residues of the cytosolic surface of the alpha(1b)-adrenergic receptor (AR). The wild type and mutated receptors were expressed in COS-7 cells and characterized for their ligand binding properties and ability to increase inositol phosphate accumulation. The experimental results have been interpreted in the context of both an ab initio model of the alpha(1b)-AR and of a new homology model built on the recently solved crystal structure of rhodopsin. Among the twenty-three basic amino acids mutated only mutations of three, Arg(254) and Lys(258) in the third intracellular loop and Lys(291) at the cytosolic extension of helix 6, markedly impaired the receptor-mediated inositol phosphate production. Additionally, mutations of two conserved hydrophobic residues, Val(147) and Leu(151) in the second intracellular loop had significant effects on receptor function. The functional analysis of the receptor mutants in conjunction with the predictions of molecular modeling supports the hypothesis that Arg(254), Lys(258), as well as Leu(151) are directly involved in receptor-G protein interaction and/or receptor-mediated activation of the G protein. In contrast, the residues belonging to the cytosolic extensions of helices 3 and 6 play a predominant role in the activation process of the alpha(1b)-AR. These findings contribute to the delineation of the molecular determinants of the alpha(1b)-AR/G(q) interface.

Nouvelles stratégies d’imageries afin de faciliter l’étude des interactions entre les récepteurs couplés aux protéines G

L’étude de l’assemblage et de l’acheminement à la membrane plasmique des complexes de signalisation des RCPGs va jouer un rôle crucial dans le développement de nouveaux médicaments ayant moins d’effets secondaires. Des outils permettant l’étude de ces phénomènes existent déjà, mais un outil polyvalent qui permettrait d’étudier plusieurs aspects pourrait grandement faciliter et accélérer ces études. L’étiquette SNAP est un candidat intéressant puisqu’avec cette étiquette il est possible de marquer une seule construction avec une variété de différents substrats. Une construction encodant pour le récepteur β2AR avec une étiquette SNAP à son extrémité C-terminale a été ingénérée. Cette construction est apte à lier son ligand, à être acheminée à la membrane plasmique et à homodimériser. La protéine exprimée a été marquée avec le fluorophore BG-430. De la fluorescence non spécifique a été détectée dans la cellule (même en absence de l’étiquette SNAP sur le récepteur). Un essai BRET a été développé, utilisant la construction HA-β2AR-SNAP en tant qu’accepteur et est fonctionnel. L’étiquette SNAP, comme utilisée ici, ne présente pas un aussi bon candidat qu’attendu, puisque le substrat n’ayant pas réagi demeure coincé dans la cellule. Le facteur activateur de plaquette (PAF) et son récepteur (PAFR) jouent un rôle critique dans plusieurs réponses inflammatoires et le récepteur FP est impliqué dans l’accouchement prématuré. Une meilleure compréhension des complexes de signalisation associés à ces récepteurs pourrait être la première étape dans la compréhension de leur signalisation dans des situations normales ou de maladies. Des expériences de BRET étudiant des interactions de bases entre les récepteurs et leurs partenaires d’interactions connus ont été réalisées. Elles ont permis de déterminer que : les récepteurs PAF et FP homodimérisent, que les récepteurs PAF et FP hétérodimérisent, que les protéines Gβγ interagissent de manière constitutive avec ces récepteurs et qu’aucun signal de BRET n’a été détecté avec la protéine Gα et ce, en présence ou en absence de stimulation par un agoniste (suggérant qu’il est nécessaire d’optimiser le système présentement utilisé).