Environmental bulletin : a publication of the Illinois Environmental Council.

Description based on: Dec. 1999; title from caption.

Environmental benefits assessment in economic impact studies : a review /

Project no.80.144.

Environmental register.

Title from caption.

Final report of the Illinois Food Safety Task Force.

"January 1999."

How to select an environmental consultant /

Mode of access: Internet.

The amnesty answer : Illinois Environmental Amnesty Program.

"February 1995."

Economic law enforcement : final report /

"EPA-901/9-76-003A-(b)

National environmental policy act of 1969 : report (to accompany S. 1075).

"July 9, 1969."

Cross-cutting environmental laws : a guide for federal/state project officers.

Mode of access: Internet.

A compilation of Federal laws relating to conservation and development of our nation's fish and wildlife resources, environmental quality, and oceanography [microform].

Reuse of record except for individual research requires license from Congressional Information Service, Inc.

Local Actors in Donor-Funded Rule of Law Assistance in Indonesia: Owners, Partners, Agents?

Thesis (Ph.D.)--University of Washington, 2016-06

Intervention Trial to Assess Arsenic Exposure from Food Crops in Bangladesh

The authors assessed the contribution of food irrigated with arsenic-contaminated water to human exposure to arsenic in Bangladesh. An intervention trial was conducted in a village in the Jessore District of Bangladesh, where irrigation water had been field-tested in March 2000 and was found to contain arsenic with concentrations ranging from 100 to 500 mu g/l. In May 2000, a random sample of 63 households was selected from the village, and I eligible person from each household was recruited to the study and randomized to an intervention or control group. The intervention group received food purchased from a village where irrigation water was found to contain 100 mu g/l arsenic. Pre- and postintervention urine samples were collected for urinary arsenic speciation assays. Preintervention, the mean urinary total arsenic concentrations were 139.25 mu g/l and 129.15 mu g/l for the intervention and control groups, respectively. These concentrations did not change significantly following intervention. Arsenic concentrations in samples of selected raw and cooked foods from the low-contamination area did not contain less arsenic than samples from the high-contamination area. Further studies to investigate the arsenic content of food grown in areas with high and low arsenic contamination of irrigation water are recommended.