978 resultados para electric cellular regulation
Resumo:
The differentiation of the reproductive organs is an essential developmental process required for the proper transmission of the genetic material. Müllerian inhibiting substance (MIS) is produced by testes and is necessary for the regression of the Müllerian ducts: the anlagen of the uterus, fallopian tubes and cervix. In vitro and standard transgenic mouse studies indicate that the nuclear hormone receptor Steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) and the transcription factor SOX9 play an essential role in the regulation of Mis. To test this hypothesis, mutations in the endogenous SF-1 and SOX9 binding sites in the mouse Mis promoter were introduced by gene targeting in embryonic stem (ES) cells. In disagreement with cell culture and transgenic mouse studies, male mice homozygous for the mutant SF-1 binding site correctly initiated Mis transcription in the fetal testes, although at significantly reduced levels. Surprisingly, sufficient Mis was produced for complete elimination of the Müllerian duct system. However, when the SF-1 binding site mutation was combined with an Mis -null allele, the further decrease in Mis levels led to a partial retention of uterine tissue, but only at a distance from the testes. In contrast, males homozygous for the mutant SOX9 binding site did not initiate Mis transcription, resulting in pseudohermaphrodites with a uterus and oviducts. These studies suggest an essential role for SOX9 in the initiation of Mis transcription, whereas SF-1 appears to act as a quantitative regulator of Mis transcript levels perhaps for influencing non-Müllerian duct tissues. ^ The Mis type II receptor, a member of the TGF- b superfamily, is also required for the proper regression of the Müllerian ducts. Mis type II receptor-deficient human males and their murine counterparts develop as pseudohermaphrodites. A lacZ reporter cassette was introduced into the mouse Mis type II receptor gene, by homologous recombination in ES cells. Expression studies, based on b -galactosidase activity, show marked expression of the MIS type II receptor in the postnatal Sertoli cells of the testis as well as in the prenatal and postnatal granulosa cells of the ovary. Expression is also seen in the mesenchymal cells surrounding the Müllerian duct and in the longitudinal muscle layer of the uterus. ^
Resumo:
MacroH2A is a core histone variant that plays an important role in the X-inactivation process during differentiation of embryonic stem cells. It has been shown that macroH2A changes in localization during the cell cycle of somatic cells. This study aims to determine how macroH2A changes during the cell cycle of embryonic stem cells. Male and female mouse embryonic stem cells were transfected with a GFP::macroH2A construct and the relationship between macroH2A and the cell cycle was determined using FACS. This study shows that macroH2A is altered during the cell cycle of embryonic stem cells as it is in somatic cells and that in randomly cycling cells, there is a correlation between macroH2A expression and the phases of the cell cycle. High GFP expressing cells are mostly in the G2/M phase and low GFP expressing cells are mostly in the G1 phase. This correlation indicated that macroH2A is replicated with cellular DNA during the S phase resulting in higher expression in the G2/M phase. Future research, such as RT-PCR and differentiation experiments, is needed to further study this relationship and determine whether this change is at the protein or RNA level and how it changes during differentiation.
Resumo:
Kinases are part of a complex network of signaling pathways that enable a cell to respond to changes in environmental conditions in a regulated and coordinated way. For example, Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3 beta (GSK3β) modulates conformational changes, protein-protein interaction, protein degradation, and activation of unique domains in proteins that transduce signals from the extracellular milieu to the nucleus. ^ In this project, I investigated the expression and function that GSK3β exhibits in prostate cells. The capacity of GSK3β to regulate two transcription factors (JUN and CREB), which are known to be inversely utilized in prostate tumor cells, was measured. JUN/AP1 is constitutively activated in PC-3 cells; whereas, CREB/CRE activity is ∼20 fold less than the former. GSK3β overexpression obliterates JUN/AP1 activity. With respect to CREB GSK3β increases CREB/CRE activity. Cellular levels of active GSK3β can determine whether JUN or CREB is preferentially active in the PC-3s. Theoretically, in response to a particular cellular context or stimulus, a cell may coordinate JUN and CREB function by regulating GSK3β.^ A comparison of various prostate cell lines showed that active GSK3β is less expressed in normal prostate epithelial cells than in tumor cells. Differentially expressed active (GSK3β) may correlate with progression of prostate carcinoma. If a known marker associated with carcinoma of the prostate could be shown to be regulated by GSK3β then, further study of GSK3β may lead to a better understanding of both possible prevention of the disease and improved therapy for advanced stages. ^ The androgen receptor (AR) is an intriguing phosphoprotein whose regulation is potentially determined by a variety of kinases. One of these is (GSK3β) I found that (GSK3β) is a regulator of the androgen receptor in both the unliganded and liganded states. It can inhibit AR function as measured by reporter assays. Also, GSK3β associates with the AR at the DNA binding domain because deletion constructs expressing either the n-terminus or the c-terminus (both having the DBD in common) immunoprecipitated with GSK3β. Increased understanding of how GSK3β functions in prostate cancer would provide clues into how (1) certain signal pathways are coordinated and (2) the androgen receptor may be regulated. ^
Resumo:
The Ser/Thr protein kinase C (PKC) isozyme family plays an important role in cell growth and differentiation and also contributes to key events in the development and progression of cancer. PKC isozymes are activated by phospholipid-dependent mechanisms, and they are also subject to oxidative activation and inactivation. Oxidative regulatory mechanisms are important in the governance of PKC isozyme action. While oxidative PKC activation involves phospho-tyrosine (P-Y) stabilization, the molecular mechanism(s) for oxidative PKC inactivation have not been defined. We previously reported that Thr → Cys peptide-substrate analogs inactivate several PKC isozymes including PKC-α via S-thiolation, i.e., by forming disulfides with PKC thiols. This inactivation mechanism is chemically analogous to protein S-glutathiolation, a post-translational modification that has been shown to oxidatively regulate several enzymes. To determine if PKC-α could be inactivated by S-glutathiolation, we employed the thiol-specific oxidant diamide (0.01–10mM) and 100μM glutathione (GSH). Diamide alone (0.1–5.0 mM) weakly inactivated PKC-α (<20%), and GSH alone had no effect on the isozyme activity. Marked potentiation of diamide-induced PKC-α inactivation (>90%) was achieved by 100μM GSH, resulting in full inactivation of the isozyme. Inactivation was reversed by DTT, consistent with a mechanism involving PKC-α S-glutathiolation. S-glutathiolation was demonstrated as DTT-reversible incorporation of [35S] GSH into PKC-α isozyme structure. These results indicate that a mild oxidative stimulus can inactivate purified PKC-α via S-glutathiolation. In addition, diamide treatment of metabolically labeled NIH3T3 cells induced potent PKC-α inactivation via isozyme [35S] S-thiolation. These results indicate that cellular PKC-α can be regulated via S-glutathiolation. ^
Resumo:
The MUC1 gene encodes a transmembrane mucin glycoprotein that is overexpressed in several cancers of epithelial origin, including those of breast, pancreas, lung, ovary, and colon. Functions of MUC1 include protection of mucosal epithelium, modulation of cellular adhesion, and signal transduction. Aberrantly increased expression of MUC1 in cancer cells promotes tumor progression through adaptation of these functions. Some regulatory elements participating in MUC1 transcription have been described, but the mechanisms responsible for overexpression are largely unknown. A region of MUC1 5′ flanking sequence containing two conserved potential cytokine response elements, an NFκB site at −589/−580 and a STAT binding element (SBE) at −503/−495, has been implicated in high level expression in breast and pancreatic cancer cell lines. Persistent stimulation by proinflammatory cytokines may contribute to increased MUC1 transcription by tumor cells. ^ T47D breast cancer cells and normal human mammary epithelial cells (HMEC) were used to determine the roles of the κB site and SBE in basal and stimulated expression of MUC1. Treatment of T47D cells and HMEC with interferon-γ (IFNγ) alone enhanced MUC1 expression at the level of transcription, and the effect of IFNγ was further stimulated by tumor necrosis factor-α (TNFα). MUC1 responsiveness to these cytokines was modest in T47D cells but clearly evident in HMEC. Transient transfection of T47D cells with mutant MUC1 promoter constructs revealed that the κB site at −589/−580 and the SBE at −503/−495 and were required for cooperative stimulation by TNFα and IFNγ. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSA) revealed that the synergy was mediated not by cooperative binding of transcription factors but by the independent actions of STAT1α and NFκB p65 on their respective binding sites. Independent mutations in the κB site and SBE abrogated cytokine responsiveness and reduced basal MUC1 promoter activity by 45–50%. However, only the κB site appeared to be constitutively activated in T47D cells, in part by NFκB p65. These findings implicate two cytokine response elements in the 5 ′ flanking region of MUC1, specifically a κB site and a STAT binding element, in overexpression of MUC1 in breast cancer cells. ^
Resumo:
The spontaneously hypertensive rat (SHR) is a model of essential hypertension. During the early development of hypertension, the SHR demonstrates increased proximal tubule (PT) Na+ reabsorption. I hypothesized that the increased PT Na+ reabsorption exhibited by the young SHR was due to altered sub-cellular distribution of Na+, K +-ATPase compared to the normotensive Wistar Kyoto (WKY). The hypothesis is supported, herein, by observations of greater Na+, K +-ATPase α 1 abundance in PT plasma membrane and lower abundance in late endosomes of 4wk SHR despite no difference in total PT α 1 abundance. There is a greater amount of Ser-18 unphosphorylated α 1 in the 4wk SHR PT. Total PT Na+, K+-ATPase γ abundance is greater in SHR at 4wk and 16wk but γ abundance in plasma membrane is greater only at 4wk. The phosphatase, calcineurin, was chosen for study because it is involved in the stimulation of Na+, K +-ATPase. No difference in calcineurin coding sequence, expression, or activity was observed in SHR. Gene expression arrays were next used to find candidate genes involved in the regulation of Na+, K +-ATPase. The first candidate analyzed was soluble epoxide hydrolase (sEH). The gene encoding sEH (EPHX2) showed lower expression in SHR. There was also a reduction in sEH protein abundance but there was no correlation between protein abundance and blood pressure in F2 progeny. Two EPHX2 alleles were identified, an ancestral allele and a variant allele containing four polymorphisms. sEH activity was greater in animals carrying the variant allele but the inheritance of the variant allele did not correlate with blood pressure. Gene expression arrays also led to the examination of genes involved in redox balance/Na+, K+-ATPase regulation. A pattern of lower expression of genes involved in reactive radical detoxification in SHR was discerned. Six transcription factor binding sites were identified that occurred more often in these genes. Three transcription factors that bind to the HNF1 site were expressed at lower levels in SHR. This points to the HNF1 transcriptional complex as an important trans-acting regulator of a wide range of genes involved in altered redox balance in SHR. ^
Resumo:
Lipid rafts are small laterally mobile cell membrane structures that are highly enriched in lymphocyte signaling molecules. Lipid rafts can form from the assembly of specialized lipids and proteins through hydrophobic associations from saturated acyl chains. GM1 gangliosides are a common lipid raft component and have been shown to be essential in many T cell functions. Current lipid raft theory hypothesizes that certain aspects of T cell signaling can be initiated from the coalescence of these signaling-enriched lipid rafts to sites of receptor engagement. We have described how the specific aggregation of GM1 lipid rafts can cause a reorganization of cell surface molecular associations which include dynamic associations of β1 integrins with GM1 lipid rafts. These associations had pronounced effects on T cell adhesive and migratory states. We show that GM1 lipid raft aggregation can dramatically inhibit T cell migration and chemotaxis on the extracellular matrix constituent fibronectin. This inhibition of migration function was shown to be dependent on the src kinase Lck and PKC-regulated F-actin polymerization to extending pseudopods. Furthermore, GM1 lipid raft clustering could activate T cell adhesion-strengthening mechanisms. These include an increase in cellular rigidity, the creation of polymerized cortical F-actin structures, the induction of high affinity integrin states, an increase in surface area and symmetry of the contact plane, and resistance to shear flow detachment while adherent to fibronectin. This indicates that GM1 lipid raft aggregation defines a novel stimulus to regulate lymphocyte motility and cellular adhesion which could have important implications in T cell homing mechanisms. ^
Resumo:
In eukaryotic cells, the ESCRTs (endosomal sorting complexes required for transport) machinery is required for cellular processes such as endosomal sorting, retroviral budding and cytokinesis. The ALG-2 interacting protein Alix is a modular adaptor protein that is critically involved in these ESCRTs-associated cellular processes and consists of an N-terminal Bro1 domain, a middle V domain and C-terminal Pro-rich domain (PRD). In these cellular processes, Alix interacts with the ESCRT-III component CHMP4 at the Bro1 domain, with HIV-1 p6 Gag or EIAV p9Gag at the V domain, and with the ESCRT-I component TSG101 at the Pro-rich domain. Here we demonstrate that the N-terminal Bro1 domain forms an intramolecular interaction with C-terminal PRD within Alix. This Bro1-PRD intramolecular interaction forms a closed conformation of Alix that autoinhibits Alix interaction with all of these partner proteins. Moreover, the binding of Ca2+-activated ALG-2 to the PRD of Alix relieves the autoinhibitory intramolecular interaction, resulting in an open conformation of Alix which is able to interact with all of these partner proteins. The partner proteins bound to Alix in turn maintain Alix in the open conformation after ALG-2 dissociation with Alix. Consistent with the effect of Ca2+-activated ALG-2 on opening/activating Alix in these ESCRTs-associated functions, ALG-2 overexpression accelerates EGF-induced degradation of EGFR in an Alix-dependent manner. These findings discover an intrinsic autoinhibitory mechanism of Alix and a two-step process to activate/open Alix and then keep Alix active/open. This study has solved long-standing issues on the regulations of Alix in ESCRTs-associated functions and the role of ALG-2-Alix interaction, and may serve as the structural basis for further studies about Alix regulations. ^
Resumo:
The Jun activation domain-binding protein (JAB1) is a c-Jun co-activator and a member of the COP9 signalosome. Additionally, it has recently been named a key negative regulator of the cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor, p27. JAB1 overexpression has been observed in breast cancer and correlates with low p27 levels as well as poor prognosis, yet the mechanism of JAB1 deregulation is unknown. Data from our laboratory suggest that constitutive transcriptional activation of the jab1 gene is responsible for JAB1 protein overexpression. Therefore, we hypothesized that overexpression of JAB1 in breast cancer can be attributed to increased transcriptional activity. To identify potential positive regulators of JAB1, we characterized the promoter and found a 128 bp region that was critical for jab1 transcriptional activation. Our studies show that two oncogenic transcription factors, C/EBPβ and STAT3, play an important role in modulating jab1 transcription. Further, we have identified jab1 as a direct target gene of the SRC/STAT3 pathway. These studies provide insight to the mechanism of JAB1 overexpression in breast cancer and open up possibilities for therapies to inhibit its expression. ^ The development of the humanized monoclonal antibody, Herceptin (trastuzumab) targeting the HER2 (ErbB2) receptor has provided promising treatment to patients with aggressive HER2 positive breast cancer. However, many patients are resistant to Herceptin and additional therapies are needed to overcome resistance. Recent findings indicate that one mechanism of resistance involves AKT phosphorylation and subsequent mislocalization of the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor, p27. We examined whether JAB1 facilitated degradation of p27 may be another mechanism of resistance to Herceptin. Our studies show that overexpression of JAB1 inhibited Herceptin induced G1-arrest and p27 accumulation. Interestingly, increased JAB1 levels were observed in two BT-474 Herceptin resistant clones. Targeted silencing of JAB1 increased p27 protein levels, reinstated a G1 checkpoint, and reduced cellular proliferation in the resistant clones. Our studies have demonstrated that inhibition of JAB1 sensitizes Herceptin resistant cells to treatment. Therefore, inhibition of JAB1 could provide a novel method of sensitizing resistant tumors to Herceptin-induced tumor growth arrest. ^
Resumo:
All cells must have the ability to deal with a variety of environmental stresses. Failure to correctly adapt to and/or protect against adverse stress conditions can lead to cell death. In humans, stress response defects have been linked to a number of neurodegenerative diseases and cancer, underscoring the importance of developing a fundamental understanding of the eukaryotic stress response.^ In an effort to characterize cellular response to high temperature stress, I identified and described one member of a novel gene family— RTR1. I show that the RTR1 gene and its protein product genetically and biochemically interact with core subunits of the RNA polymerase II enzyme. Appropriately, loss of RTR1 results in defective transcription from multiple promoters. These data provide evidence that Rtr1, which is essential under stress conditions, acts as a key regulator of transcription.^ In addition to transcriptional regulation, cells deal with many stressors by inducing molecular chaperones. Molecular chaperones are ubiquitous in all living cells and bind unfolded or damaged proteins and catalyze refolding or degradation. Hsp90 is a unique chaperone because it targets specific clients—typically signaling proteins—for maturation. While it has been shown that Sse1, the yeast Hsp110, is a critical regulator of the Hsp90 chaperone cycle, this work describes the molecular basis for that regulation. I show that Sse1 modulates Hsp90 function through regulation of Hsp70 nucleotide exchange. Further, Hsp110-type nucleotide exchange factors (NEFs) appear to have a specific role in modulating Hsp90 function in this manner. Finally, in addition to Hsp110, the eukaryotic cytosol contains two other types of Hsp70 NEF: Snl1 (BAG-domain protein) and Fes1 (HspBP1-like protein). I investigated the cellular roles of these NEFs to better understand the reason that eukaryotic cells contain three distinct protein families that perform the same biochemical function. I show that while cytsolic Hsp70 NEFs have some degree of functional overlap, they also exhibit striking divergence. Taken together, the work presented in this dissertation provides a more detailed understanding of the eukaryotic stress response. ^
Resumo:
CYP4F enzymes metabolize endogenous molecules including arachidonic acid, leukotrienes and prostaglandins. The involvement of these eisosanoids in inflammation has led to the hypothesis that CYP4Fs may modulate inflammatory conditions after traumatic brain injury (TBI). In rat, TBI elicited changes in mRNA expression of CYP4Fs as a function of time in the cerebrum region. These changes in CYP4F mRNA levels inversely correlated with the cerebral leukotriene B4 (LTB4) level following injury at the same time points. TBI also resulted in changes in CYP4F protein expression and localization around the injury site, where CYP4F1 and CYP4F6 immunoreactivity increased in surrounding astrocytes and CYP4F4 immunoreactivity shifted from endothelia of cerebral vessels to astrocytes. The study with rat primary astrocytes indicated that pro-inflammatory cytokines TNFα and IL-1β could affect the transcription of CYP4Fs to a certain degree, whereas the changing pattern in the primary astrocytes appeared to be different from that in the in vivo TBI model.^ In addition, the regulation of CYP4F genes has been an unsolved issue although factors including cytokines and fatty acids appear to affect CYP4Fs expression in multiple models. In this project, HaCaT cells were used as an in vitro cellular model to define signaling pathways involved in the regulation of human CYP4F genes. Retinoic acids inhibited CYP4F11 expression, whereas cytokines TNFα and IL-1β induced transcription of CYP4F11 in HaCaT cells. The induction of CYP4F11 by both cytokines could be blocked by a JNK specific inhibitor, indicating the involvement of the JNK pathway in the up-regulation of CYP4F11. Retinoic acids are known to function in gene regulation through nuclear receptors RARs and RXRs. The RXR agonist LG268 greatly induced transcription of CYP4F11, whereas RAR agonist TTNPB obviously inhibited CYP4F11 transcription, indicating that the down-regulation of CYP4F11 by retinoic acid was mediated by RARs, and that inhibition of CYP4F11 by retinoic acid may also be related to the competition for RXR receptors. Thus, the CYP4F11 gene is regulated by signaling pathways including the RXR pathway and the JNK pathway. In contrast, the regulation mechanism of other CYP4Fs by retinoic acids appears to be different from that of CYP4F11.^
Resumo:
Estrogen receptor (ER) and the tumor suppressor p53 are key prognostic indicators in breast cancer. Estrogen signaling through its receptor (ER) controls proliferation of normal as well as transformed mammary epithelial cells, and the presence of ER is established as a marker of good prognosis and response to therapy. The p53 tumor suppressor gene is often referred to as the "cellular gatekeeper" due to its extensive control of cell proliferation and apoptosis. Loss of functional p53 is a negative prognostic indicator and is correlated with lack of response to antiestrogens, reduced disease-free interval and increased chance of disease recurrence. Clinical studies have demonstrated that tumors with mutated p53 tend to be ER negative, while ER positive tumors tend to have wild type p53. ^ Recent studies from our lab indicate that p53 genotype correlates with estrogen receptor expression in mammary tumors in vivo. We therefore hypothesized that p53 regulates ER expression in mammary cancer cells by recruitment of specific cofactors to the ER promoter. To test this, MCF-7 cells were treated with doxorubicin or ionizing radiation, both of which stimulated significant increases in p53 expression, as expected, but also increased ER expression in a p53-dependent manner. Furthermore, in cells treated with siRNA targeting p53, both p53 and ER protein levels were significantly reduced. P53 was also demonstrated to transcriptionally regulate the ER promoter in luciferase assays and chromatin immunoprecipitation assays showed that p53 was recruited to the ER promoter along with CARM1, CBP, c-Jun and Sp1 and that this multifactor complex was formed in a p53-dependent manner. The regulation of ER by p53 has therapeutic implications, as the treatment of breast cancer cells with doxorubicin sensitized these cells to tamoxifen treatment. Furthermore, response to tamoxifen as well as to estrogen was dependent on p53 expression in ER positive human breast cancer cells. Taken together, these data demonstrate that p53 regulates ER expression through transcriptional control of the ER promoter, accounting for their concordant expression in human breast cancer and identifying potentially beneficial therapeutic strategies for the treatment of ER positive breast cancers. ^
Resumo:
The degradation of proteins by the ubiquitin proteasome system is essential for cellular homeostasis in the heart. An important regulator of metabolic homeostasis is AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). During nutrient deprivation, AMPK is activated and intracellular proteolysis is enhanced through the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS). Whether AMPK plays a role in protein degradation through the UPS in the heart is not known. Here I present data in support of the hypothesis that AMPK transcriptionally regulates key players in the UPS, which, under extreme conditions can be detrimental to the heart. The ubiquitin ligases MAFbx /Atrogin-1 and MuRF1, key regulators of protein degradation, and AMPK activity are increased during nutrient deprivation. Pharmacologic and genetic activation of AMPK is sufficient for the induction of MAFbx/Atrogin-1 and MuRF1 in cardiomyocytes and in the heart in vivo. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that the molecular mechanism by which AMPK regulates MuRF1 expression is through the transcription factor myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2), which is involved in stress response and cardiomyocyte remodeling. MuRF1 is required for AMPK-mediated protein degradation through the UPS in cardiomyocytes. Consequently, the absence of MuRF1 during chronic fasting preserves cardiac function, possibly by limiting degradation of critical metabolic enzymes. Furthermore, during cardiac hypertrophy, chronic activation of AMPK also leads to cardiac dysfunction, possibly through enhanced protein degradation and metabolic dysregulation. Collectively, my findings demonstrate that AMPK regulates expression of ubiquitin ligases which are required for UPS-mediated protein degradation in the heart. Based on these results, I propose that specific metabolic signals may serve as modulators of intracellular protein degradation in the heart.
Resumo:
The degradation of proteins by the ubiquitin proteasome system is essential for cellular homeostasis in the heart. An important regulator of metabolic homeostasis is AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). During nutrient deprivation, AMPK is activated and intracellular proteolysis is enhanced through the ubiquitin proteasome system (UPS). Whether AMPK plays a role in protein degradation through the UPS in the heart is not known. Here I present data in support of the hypothesis that AMPK transcriptionally regulates key players in the UPS, which, under extreme conditions can be detrimental to the heart. The ubiquitin ligases MAFbx /Atrogin-1 and MuRF1, key regulators of protein degradation, and AMPK activity are increased during nutrient deprivation. Pharmacologic and genetic activation of AMPK is sufficient for the induction of MAFbx/Atrogin-1 and MuRF1 in cardiomyocytes and in the heart in vivo. Comprehensive experiments demonstrate that the molecular mechanism by which AMPK regulates MuRF1 expression is through the transcription factor myocyte enhancer factor 2 (MEF2), which is involved in stress response and cardiomyocyte remodeling. MuRF1 is required for AMPK-mediated protein degradation through the UPS in cardiomyocytes. Consequently, the absence of MuRF1 during chronic fasting preserves cardiac function, possibly by limiting degradation of critical metabolic enzymes. Furthermore, during cardiac hypertrophy, chronic activation of AMPK also leads to cardiac dysfunction, possibly through enhanced protein degradation and metabolic dysregulation. Collectively, my findings demonstrate that AMPK regulates expression of ubiquitin ligases which are required for UPS-mediated protein degradation in the heart. Based on these results, I propose that specific metabolic signals may serve as modulators of intracellular protein degradation in the heart.
Resumo:
Growth factor signaling promotes anabolic processes via activation of the PI3K-Akt kinase cascade. Deregulation of the growth factor-dependent PI3K-Akt pathway was implicated in tumorigenesis. Akt is an essential serine/threonine protein kinase that controls multiple physiological functions such as cell growth, proliferation, and survival to maintain cellular homeostasis. Recently, the mammalian Target of Rapamycin Complex 2 (mTORC2) was identified as the main Akt Ser-473 kinase, and Ser-473 phosphorylation is required for Akt hyperactivation. However, the detailed mechanism of mTORC2 regulation in response to growth factor stimulation or cellular stresses is not well understood. In the first project, we studied the regulation of the mTORC2-Akt signaling under ER stress. We identified the inactivation of mTORC2 by glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β). Under ER stress, the essential mTORC2 component, rictor, is phosphorylated by GSK-3β at Ser-1235. This phosphorylation event results in the inhibition of mTORC2 kinase activity by interrupting Akt binding to mTORC2. Blocking rictor Ser-1235 phosphorylation can attenuate the negative impacts of GSK-3β on mTORC2/Akt signaling and tumor growth. Thus, our work demonstrated that GSK-3β-mediated rictor Ser-1235 phosphorylation in response to ER stress interferes with Akt signaling by inhibiting mTORC2 kinase activity. In the second project, I investigated the regulation of the mTORC2 integrity. We found that basal mTOR kinase activity depends on ATP level, which is tightly regulated by cell metabolism. The ATP-sensitive mTOR kinase is required for SIN1 protein phosphorylation and stabilization. SIN1 is an indispensable subunit of mTORC2 and is required for the complex assembly and mTORC2 kinase activity. Our findings reveal that mTOR-mediated phosphorylation of SIN1 is critical for maintaining complex integrity by preventing SIN1 from lysosomal degradation. In sum, our findings verify two distinct mTORC2 regulatory mechanisms via its components rictor and SIN1. First, GSK-3β-mediated rictor Ser-1235 phosphorylation results in mTORC2 inactivation by interfering its substrate binding ability. Second, mTOR-mediated Ser-260 phosphorylation of SIN1 preserves its complex integrity. Thus, these two projects provide novel insights into the regulation of mTORC2.